Dec 14, 2011 1:09pm

Senate Stalls on House-Passed Payroll Tax Bill

If today’s morning action on the Senate floor is any indication of where things are headed on the payroll tax cut, now tangled with the spending bill,  a deal won’t happen anytime soon.

In a testy exchange, Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., traded  jabs this morning on the Senate floor as they argued over the way forward.

But their 20 minutes of heated conversation boils down to this:  there will not be a Senate vote on the House-passed payroll bill and there is no way forward at this time.

The deadlines are very real: the government runs out of money on Friday. And the payroll tax cut extension expires on December 31.

Calling it a “dead duck,” Sen. Reid this morning asked to move towards a vote on the House-passed Republican payroll tax extenders bill, knowing that it will fail in the Senate.

“We knew Monday that the bill wouldn’t pass the Senate. We also knew yesterday that this bill wouldn’t pass the Senate and we still know that. It won’t pass the Senate,” Reid said. “So let’s get this vote over with. Then we can begin seriously serious negotiations on how to prevent a thousand dollars tax hike on American families.”

Reid’s strategy has been to push a vote on the payroll tax plan first, by tying it to the spending bill that needs to be passed before the federal government runs out of money this Friday. This would prevent the House of Representatives from passing their bills and then leaving town for the holidays without a proper deal on the payroll tax cut issue, forcing the Senate to stomach whatever the House has sent them to pass.

Reid today proposed passing a short continuing resolution (CR) to keep the government open for another week or so until they reach a compromise on the payroll tax issue, basically keeping all legislators in both houses in town until both issues are settled.  Solve the payroll tax issue first then solve the spending bill issue.

“We passed short-term CR’s many times before and we should do it again if that’s what it takes to prevent a tax on the middle class,” Reid said, “Republicans should give Congress a few more days to finish its job rather than rushing home for a vacation.”

But Senate Minority Leader McConnell objected to voting on the House Republicans bill, arguing that Congress should vote on the most pressing issue with the nearest deadline first, the appropriations bill.

“Let’s deal first with the deadline that happens this Friday, two days from now,” McConnell responded on the Senate floor, “fund the government through the rest of the fiscal year, and then turn immediately to the payroll tax extension that expires later in January.”

Republicans have been arguing that there is an agreement on the spending bill, attempting to pull a curtain back to unveil Reid’s strategy to tie the two bills together as a bargaining chip for more leverage in the payroll tax debate.

“Representative Jim Moran, Democrat of Virginia, one of the top members on the House Appropriations Committee, said this yesterday  ‘our bill is done. it should go to the president immediately. We’re not holding it up,’” McConnell said quoting a Democrat to make his case, “We can pass that and do first things first.”  

Reid contends that the appropriations bill is not finished, with at least six issues left to settle and that the holdup has nothing to do with political strategy for the payroll tax issue.

“I don’t care what Jim Moran says or Mitch McConnell says. The bill is not completed.”
Reid then declared that McConnell is living “in a world of nonreality,” and that “everyone can see very clearly that my friends on the other side of the aisle obviously want to have the government shut down.”

So what’s the way forward? At this time it is not clear. Both sides say they are working on the next step.  But negotiators from the House and Senate’s hands are tied until the House-passed plan is killed in the Senate or another plan is proposed.

 

SHOWS:

User Comments

One of the few bills passed by either house of Congress which ACTUALLY CREATES REAL JOBS (along with helping secure America’s energy independence from middle-east muslims) – and dingy harry reid REFUSES to let the Senate consider it and OBOZO-the-Clown commits to vetoing it ! Of course, who could be surprised at that?

Posted by: TeaPartyNation | December 14, 2011, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

Good, let the money go to social security where is supposed to.
Leave the seniors alone!

Posted by: deadwrestler | December 14, 2011, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Good old Harry…when it comes to stonewalling for political purposes, he cannot be beat! THANKS NEVADA….you sent him back…why not send him home?

Posted by: angus | December 14, 2011, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

I thought that the Democrats only want an up or down vote! Give us a vote!! Harry, stop playing politics!

Posted by: Common _ Sense | December 14, 2011, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

“Reid’s strategy has been to push a vote on the payroll tax plan first, by tying it to the spending bill that needs to be passed before the federal government runs out of money this Friday…..” Oh heavens! There they go again……tying bills together to get what they want! I thought only the Republicans pulled this sort of thing?

Posted by: newcountryman | December 14, 2011, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

The really depressing thing is this guy is there for another 5 years!!! Let’s hope to God the Republicans get a majority and get that damned gavel away from him.

Posted by: newcountryman | December 14, 2011, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

The left just moans and groans about the pipe line deal on this bill. However they say not one word about why are student loans, gold coins etc on the Obamacare bill. Is it so they can control who gets the loans and who can own gold? Is this another government take over? Why was it hidden in this useless law then?Hopefully the SC will throw the whole thing out.

Posted by: specialty57 | December 14, 2011, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

What a beautiful campaign gift to the Republican nominee. Democrat-controlled Senate refuses to vote for a bill that would keep tax cuts for the middle class, create at least 20,000 new jobs, and secure future energy resources from an ally. Yeah, the Democrats are all about creating jobs.

Posted by: s | December 14, 2011, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Good for Harry Reid.

If the republicans want to debate the merits of this pipeline let them do it on their own time, introduce a bill of their own or put it in on the jobs bills already introduced, don’t try to attach it to this critical tax reduction bill. If the republicans want to hold this tax reduction bill up because of some pie in the sky pipeline project, let them explain it to the America n people.

The republicans need to read more Machiavelli and less Wealth of Nations, they might learn how to disguise their tactics more.

Posted by: tmferretti | December 14, 2011, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

John Beohner is by far the worse Speaker of the House in modern US history, and we all know that the Minority Leader in the Senate is on record as saying his #1 priority is to ensure that President Obama fails. If you need more proof that Republicans, time and time again, will fight for the Billionaires and Millionaires and insider Traders, and they will continually throw the poor and middle class under the bus or over the cliff!

Posted by: Kenneth the VI of Minneapolis | December 14, 2011, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

I feel bad for Hairy Reid.
Covering Barry’s back is getting harder and harder.
Everyone is getting the feeling that Reid won’t be able to hold up much longer.

Posted by: Noz | December 14, 2011, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Tmferretti; Didn’t you read the story? Harry is doing the same thing you’ve been complaining about!

Posted by: newcountryman | December 14, 2011, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

NEWCOUNTRY

What, by tying it to the budget. This bill is about taxes and revenues so it fits, not a proposed pipeline project that if passed won’t create job one for at least two years if any at all and won’t pay for the tax reduction.

If the republicans think it will create jobs then tack it on or introduce a jobs bill and give each side time to debate. You and I can argue about the pipeline for months, the problem is tax time is approaching rapidly; Americans don’t have the time to wait while the republicans try to derail the tax reduction plan.

Posted by: tmferretti | December 14, 2011, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

One of the few bills passed by either house of Congress which ACTUALLY CREATES REAL JOBS (along with helping secure America’s energy independence from middle-east muslims)…..Posted by: TeaPartyNation | December 14, 2011, 1:15 pm.

LOL! You have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. It may generate a few thousand jobs, less than 5000 per TransCanada itself in their 2008 paperwork filing. And the refined product from the Gulf would go out onto the world market like all the other product that goes through there. It will do NOTHING to help give us energy independence, or even get us off foreign oil. (FYI, Canadian oil is also foreign oil.) And it will not lower the price of gas in America by even one penny a gallon. Just curious, since you mentioned “middle east Muslims”, how you felt about our spending almost a trillion dollars and thousands of American lives to “free” a Muslim nation that had not threatened us……….

Posted by: Searambler | December 14, 2011, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Newcountryman, like I said some people on here would run to Walmart and buy a flashlight if Obam said the sun would not come up tomorrow. They believe every thing a support everything he does. Even after all the sandals, Solyndra, fast and furious, small pocks vaccine, closed door meetings, dirty deals and bribes. Sad.

Posted by: specialty57 | December 14, 2011, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

specialty57 | December 14, 2011, 2:14 pm post ————– LOL! Yeah, gotta watch out for all them sandals…………

Posted by: Searambler | December 14, 2011, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Remove the Pipeline legislation from the bill then vote UP or DOWN. John Boehner should bow his head in SHAME!

Posted by: Kenneth the VI of Minneapolis | December 14, 2011, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

I agree with Mr. Reid. If both parties agree on the payroll tax cut extension, then vote on that issue, only. Both parties need to approve agreed upon issues one at a time. Bills with multiple issues that are adversarial between parties are just not going to fly. The people of this country want to see forward movement, not the continued blame game. As for the oil pipeline that is embedded in the House bill, I have concerns that it would not solve this country’s continuing dependence upon foreign oil. I would rather see a fast tracking of bullet train development than cutting red tape for an oil pipeline construction.

Posted by: rohnertpark1 | December 14, 2011, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

What happened to the republicans filibustering over the pipeline, in exchange for unemployment benefits, and help for the poor. (the other 99 %)

Posted by: john west | December 14, 2011, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

All the Democrats want to do is SPEND & TAX… They don’t want unemployment to go down, so the unemployed will support them because of unemployment benefits given to them. Reid is Reid and he should have retired years and years ago. Can’t the Liberal Democrats see, or understand what is happening in Europe? No common sense!!!!!!! JUST SPEND & TAX, SPEND MORE & TAX MORE!!!! VOTE THEM OUT OF OFFICE IN 2012!

Posted by: Phil White | December 14, 2011, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

GOP is showing their desperation to use these tactics. Not that Dem’s are above it, but it’s so blatantly transparent that all they want to do is feed Obama and the middle class some bad clams. Save those clams for the GOP’s clambake in November. They’ll be needing a better health care bill after they get done eating them.

Posted by: sameagain | December 14, 2011, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Newt Gingrich used the same tactics, he’d tack on a bill that favored his corporate donors then try to ram it thru Congress. Presdient Clinton was constantly calling his bluff.

No more games, the tax reduction bill and the budget bill should be voted UP or DOWN on their own merits. I hOpe harry Reid and the President don’t cave on this issue.

Yes, I support the President, he’s out there fighting for my middle class interests, not the interests of the wealthy or the coropations. It doesn’t matter if his name is Barrack Obama, I’d support any Presdident that was doing the same thing, republican, democrat or independent.

Posted by: tmferretti | December 14, 2011, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Whether it’s fair or not, another government shut down is going to look like it was caused by Republicans, and they will continue to take a hit in their Senate and Congressial districts nationwide, not to mention the void that exists where a decent Republican candidate should be. Good luck with the stall, and start packing.

Posted by: Chuck Beeson | December 14, 2011, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Sea, what would you call them then? Tax payer money being spent on political paybacks. Kaiser for one, what else would you call it, a coincidence ?

Posted by: specialty57 | December 14, 2011, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

“Not that Dem’s are above it, but it’s so blatantly transparent that all they want to do is feed Obama and the middle class some bad clams.”

So all I have to do is hide any negative behavior a bit better and you’ll be cool with it? Deal!

Posted by: John Corzine | December 14, 2011, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Multiple items should NEVER be tied together on a bill. Each bill should represent ONE thing and one thing only. This practice needs to be outlawed…now. Washington came up with the idea so they could ‘sneak’ bills into law by attaching them as ‘riders’ to larger, more important bills. Today, as we see, it’s become a political ploy to gain an advantage over the opposite party. In other words, it helps to keep the two parties in Washington fighting with each other and not getting anything done for the people. That’s why it needs to be outlawed!!

Posted by: RalphF | December 14, 2011, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

“decent Republican candidate” — like the Easter bunny, this doesn’t exist…and before you Dems start laughing, it doesn’t exist for any Democrat either…both parties are filled with corrupt people…

Posted by: RalphF | December 14, 2011, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Obama said, flat out, that he didn’t want to deal with the TransCanada pipeline issue right now, and if it came to him in a bill, he would veto it. There are environmental concerns still unaddressed, and there is some local opposition to the pipeline. So what do the Republicans in the House do? Include it in a bill with OTHER legislation that has nothing to do with a pipeline. Deliberately trying to force Obama to vote against the wishes of some of his Liberal base. It’s a purely political and typically cynical ploy…………

Posted by: Searambler | December 14, 2011, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

All I know is President Obama (and President George Bush) want to give me a $1500 dollar tax break next year that I and millions of other Americans can use. The president wants to extend this cut to 160,000 small businesses that might use it to hire workers.

The republicans oppose this because taxes on millionaires will go up 1.9% on their income over a million dollars to pay for it, poor them.

What is there to discuss?

Posted by: tmferretti | December 14, 2011, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

Just a note of history for all you liberal whiners. The Republicans gave a Democratic President (Bill Clinton) the line item veto so that he could veto individual parts of a bill without vetoing the whole bill…BUT it was Democrats (Byrd of W.Virginia in particular) that had it killed. If it were still in effect, Obama could veto only the pipeline portion of the bill and let the payroll tax cut stand. The Democrats have been the king of “tacking” things on and refused to give it up. So they have no one to blame but themselves.

Posted by: memphispiano | December 14, 2011, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Obama said the “payroll tax cut” would create jobs. Seems like the pipeline would too. But probably not enough for the whiners.

Posted by: newcountryman | December 14, 2011, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

How long can Reid play politics like this while whining about Republicans playing politics?

Posted by: ks1949 | December 14, 2011, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Sea, what would you call them then? Posted by: specialty57 | December 14, 2011, 2:46 pm.

Oh give me a freakin’ break. It’s called POLITICS. Y’all ride Obama, and beat him like a red-headed stepchild, for engaging in POLITICS. The EXACT same politics your Party has perfected over the years. The Republican Party has refused, since the day Obama took office, to admit to themselves that THEY are NOT in charge anymore! They have refused to deal, they have refused to compromise, and they have deliberately grid-locked our Congress, and thus our ability to create policy to deal with issues of national importance. They WANT Obama to fail, and the way they are going about is hurting the nation. And they don’t give a damn…….

Posted by: Searambler | December 14, 2011, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Look at all the people blaming Obama and democrats. But who is it that insists and combining issues in order to try to force crap down America’s throats?? THE REPUBLICAN’TS!!! They fight tooth-and-nail to protect big business and the top 1% – while cutting any and all services that help the middle class. And what is truly amazing – and pitiful – is that most the people bashing Obama are the very ones affected by the actions – and inaction’s – of the very people they support!! WTF???

Posted by: RepubliCAN'TS | December 14, 2011, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

The Senate appears to have been “stalled” for the past year now. Damned Republicans!

Posted by: newcountryman | December 14, 2011, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Obama and the Democrats are the party of NO

Posted by: JC | December 14, 2011, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

How about this one? Just today the Senate defeated each party’s version of a constitutional amendment that would have required a balanced federal budget. The rival proposals would have prohibited Congress from spending more each year than it receives in revenue. Both fell well short of the two-thirds majority needed to send them to the states for ratification. I’m beginning to wonder what they even do.

Posted by: newcountryman | December 14, 2011, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Obama says I do not want the pipeline no matter how many jobs it creates. Just like he promised Shovel Ready Jobs. Obama is a partisan, despicable politician that insights hate and violence<!!

Posted by: JC | December 14, 2011, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

“hide any negative behavior a bit better”? No, but it would be in your best interest if you’re going to do bad behavior to hide it successfully since if you don’t you will need to suffer the consequences. Not you, of course, just following your premise. Whoever does bad behavior pays if caught. It happens on both sides in Congress and around the rest of the world.

GOP is attempting to hide their attack on Obama and the middle class by saying their pipeline will create jobs. The gulf oil spill created jobs too. Was that their idea of a jobs plan?

Posted by: sameagain | December 14, 2011, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

The Republicans gave a Democratic President (Bill Clinton) the line item veto so that he could veto individual parts of a bill without vetoing the whole bill…BUT it was Democrats (Byrd of W.Virginia in particular) that had it killed. Posted by: memphispiano | December 14, 2011, 3:22 pm.

LOL! Typical Republican spin. It was ruled unconstitutional by the SUPREME COURT. Because it IS against the rules of the Constitution. A Constitutional amendment would have to be passed to get the line-item veto in effect. Stop whining and do a little research, and DON’T lie about it!!!

Posted by: Searambler | December 14, 2011, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Just today the Senate defeated each party’s version of a constitutional amendment that would have required a balanced federal budget.
Posted by: newcountryman | December 14, 2011, 3:39 pm.

Good for them, that’s the first smart thing they’ve done in a while. A balanced budget amendment would be a huge, terrible mistake. And it could easily be used to RAISE taxes by a LOT. Because there is no way it would ever get passed with wording that required the balancing be done purely by cutting spending………..

Posted by: Searambler | December 14, 2011, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

GOP the party of ‘Massive Failure’ to itself & the citizens of the United States. Oh well they are making their own bed for Nov 2012. GOP the party of oops.

Posted by: gypsyEyes | December 14, 2011, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

I think a constitutional amendment to balance the budget except in an emergency voted on by a 2/3 majority is critically important to our future. And Sea, since when are you a tax limit proponent?

Posted by: newcountryman | December 14, 2011, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

@newcountryman , i’ve been wondering what you do, hanging out all day on ABC news echoing nothing but Faux News idiot points. FYI Faux will say anything as long as it is antiObama anti Democrat , & here you are doing the same new country man….hmmmm. maybe u should start thinking for yourself & don’t watch faux news & I bet, I just bet you get in less fights with your ‘friends’.

Posted by: gypsyEyes | December 14, 2011, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

NEWCOUNTRY

The middle class will spend the $1500 on goods and services made here in the USA (if ABC has its way). It will put billions into the economy that sorely needs it and will create thousands of jobs.

The pipeline is a jobs bill and should be introduced as such. If it can be proven that it will create a significant number of jobs and is just not a benefit to the oil companies, I’m all for it.

The real answer is a pipeline from Siberia to Alaska. The Russians have the largest oil reserves in the world. They will sell it to us for approximately half of what we pay for mid east oil. The problem is the Russians want to develop their fields themselves and not let Exxon, Shell, BP in on it, so we do nothing. This pipeline will create hundreds of thousands of jobs and lower the price of gasoline which will really help our economy.

Posted by: tmferretti | December 14, 2011, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

newcountryman – the GOP kool aid has made you absolutely goofy, that way to faux news where the goofballs hang out & cheer each other on when they make up crap.

Posted by: gypsyEyes | December 14, 2011, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

I think a constitutional amendment to balance the budget except in an emergency voted on by a 2/3 majority is critically important to our future. And Sea, since when are you a tax limit proponent? Posted by: newcountryman | December 14, 2011, 3:48 pm.

LOL! I hate paying taxes as much as everyone else hates paying taxes. But I recognize why we need to pay taxes. Republicans often seem to feel we shouldn’t pay any taxes, period. Like Michelle Bachmann said a couple months ago. That’s stupid and short-sighted. Think about it. There are THREE ways to balance a budget. Cut spending until it matches current revenue. Increase revenues to match current spending amounts. Or, cut SOME spending and increase SOME revenue until they balance out. Requiring the federal budget to be balanced every year would HAVE to include a combination of cuts and tax increases. People a lot smarter than you and me agree on this. Do you see any Republicans supporting this, knowing they might have to violate their Grover Norquist pledge? Remember, a balanced budget amendment doesn’t necessarily affect spending levels, or even stop federal government expansion. All it does is require that the amount spent is the same as the amount received…..

Posted by: Searambler | December 14, 2011, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

The problem lies with the Republicans because there was NO REASON to tack on ANYTHING to this bill. I hope the Cons go up in FLAMES in 2012 for what they’ve done for the past 3 years. One more thing, IF the Republicans win the Presidency in 2012, much more will get done because the Dems care MORE about the USA than those on the right so they WILL cooperate more as we saw under GW. I just pray that the right person on the Republican side is the nominee and Newt is NOT the person to hope for.

Posted by: demNme5 | December 14, 2011, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

DId I read this right: “But Senate Minority Leader McConnell objected to voting on the House Republicans bill, arguing that Congress should vote on the most pressing issue with the nearest deadline first, the appropriations bill.

“Let’s deal first with the deadline that happens this Friday, two days from now,” McConnell responded on the Senate floor, “fund the government through the rest of the fiscal year, and then turn immediately to the payroll tax extension that expires later in January” So Reid wants to hold a vote but MCCONNELL doesn’t becasue Reid knows it will not pass …. and so does McConnell.

Posted by: pksk531 | December 14, 2011, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

DId I read this right: “But Senate Minority Leader McConnell objected to voting on the House Republicans bill, arguing that Congress should vote on the most pressing issue with the nearest deadline first, the appropriations bill.

“Let’s deal first with the deadline that happens this Friday, two days from now,” McConnell responded on the Senate floor, “fund the government through the rest of the fiscal year, and then turn immediately to the payroll tax extension that expires later in January”

So Reid wants to hold a vote but MCCONNELL doesn’t because Reid knows it will not pass …. and so does McConnell. Seems like Boehners little ruse failed miserably and he is being thrown under the bus by one of his own.

Posted by: pksk531 | December 14, 2011, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

Being a Republican myself, who tired of the way the party was heading in 2008 and did not want McCain in office I sought for “The Change”. The only change I have seen is a President who is not in touch with the “True American” ways. Congress and Senate have lost touch with the general American public and only hear the voices of the Lobbyist and Special Interest Groups who line their pockets. More than 3/4 of our Congress and Senate are millionaires, so why would those of us who work for a living ever expect that they actually care about the public anymore? It is sad to see that the United States of America is so divided now and the laughing stock to the world around us.

Posted by: Desi Garrigan | December 14, 2011, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Fire them all. Start with Reid and McConnell, and KEEP going. These clowns don’t care about right and wrong, they just care about Right and Left. The non-polarized Americans, which make up the largest majority, have to put an end to this! Nevermind the extreme winger comments, we need to clean house. Lets get started!

Posted by: TroyS | December 14, 2011, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

The republicans are desperate and don’t care if America see them for who they truly are, panders to the rich and foe to the working classes!

Posted by: bobbob7779311 | December 14, 2011, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.