Dec 2, 2011 11:26am

Student Challenges Bachmann on Gay Rights

A 16-year-old high school student confronted GOP contender Michele Bachmann on same-sex marriage and gay rights  at a campaign event in Iowa, leading the  congresswoman to suggest that if gay people want to get married they should marry people of opposite gender.

In a  video posted to YouTube and making its way through the blogosphere,  Jane Schmidt, who identifies herself as the head of the Gay-Straight Alliance (GSA) at her high school in Waverly, Iowa, asked the candidate on Wednesday: “What would you do to help protect GSAs in high schools and support the LGBT community?”

LGBT is shorthand for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community.

Bachmann told Schmidt it was the government’s role to treat all people equally, and not give preference to any group based on sexuality.

“As Americans we all have the same civil rights,” she said. “That’s really what government’s roll is, to protect our civil rights. There shouldn’t be any special rights or special set of criteria based on people preferences. We all have the same civil rights.”

“Then why can’t same sex couples get married,” asked Schmidt.

“They can get married, [if] they abide by the same laws as everyone else. They can marry a man, if they’re a woman, and can marry a woman if they’re man,” Bachmann said.

Same sex marriage has been legal in Iowa since 2009, the result of a court ruling.

The video of Schmidt and Bachmann comes on the heels of another viral video in which a young Iowan confronts politicians about gay marriage.

 A video of Zach Wahls, a 20-year-old University of Iowa engineering student who was raised by lesbians also went viral this week. The former Eagle Scout gave a three-minute speech before Iowa legislators in February, urging them not to pass a constitutional amendment that would ban gay marriage and civil unions.

Wahls told them, ” … the sexual orientation of my parents has had zero affect on the content of my character…If I was your son, Mr. chairman, I believe I would make you very proud.”

SHOWS:

User Comments

Telling a gay person they have to marry someone of the OPPOSITE sex is like telling a heterosexual they have to marry someone of the SAME sex. There would be no love to ensure the longevity of the union.

Posted by: John in Bachmann's district | December 2, 2011, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Bachmann is just a total idiot. She says things while ignorant of the entire issue being addressed. Gays cannot simply marry someone of the opposite and be cured. Both spouses would be miserable. It happens a lot with closeted gays, many of them Christians or Republicans, LOL, but it is never successful, happy, loving, or fulfilling.

Posted by: Dr. Bubba | December 2, 2011, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

If you actually believe Bachmann’s insane logic, then she’s promoting the idea of loveless, non-intimate marriages. Is that what marriage is all about in her mind? Aside from her own sham-of-a-marriage, why would anyone approve of such a thing? Doesn’t common sense tell you that gay people marrying each other is better than gays and straights marrying each other?

Posted by: David in Houston | December 2, 2011, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Yes! that is the answer!1 Instead of allowing two people to be happy, let’s make four people miserable in loveless marriages! [KIDDING!} The only people who would benefit are the divorce lawyers! This woman is a TWIT!!

Posted by: pksk531 | December 2, 2011, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

There’s Michelle showing her STUPIDITY again. Is there a Republican out there that will even ADMIT they’re truly embarrassed by the “Field” of clowns running for the Presidency??? The ONLY trully GOOD one out there is Jon Huntsman and NONE of you like him. Why??? He’s not DUMB enough, he’s not MEAN enough, he’s not ILL-Informed, he’s not GREEDY enough, AND he leads an exempelary personal life. Just can’t cut the mustard for the right if you’re THAT good!!!

Posted by: demNme5 | December 2, 2011, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

I see you have you agenda based filter on for this thread.
I am unable to make a conservative salient point here.
Something very civil which exposes the illogic of the 16 year olds attempt at making her case.

Posted by: Noz | December 2, 2011, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

I just viewed the youtube video and Bachman is more of an idiot than described in the news story. How can any voting American support her? I am sincerely worried about the future of our country with idiots for candidates and idiot voters!!!!!

She makes an argument for eliminating the Dept. of Education so that any school that wants to have prayers, can do so!!!!! She states that the Fed Gov’t takes away Freedom of Speech by NOT allowing prayer in schools, but the idiot forgot the part in the the CONSTITUTION that guarentees separation of church and state!

She was clearly out manuvered by a few high school students on the discussion of GLBT rights. Way to go girls!!!!! Continue to fight for YOUR rights!!!!!!!!

Posted by: tunetown152 | December 2, 2011, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Actually, her response perfectly explains why her husband married her. Because he is so obviously a deeply repressed gay man…………….

Posted by: Searambler | December 2, 2011, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

TuneTown, seperation of Church and State is not in the Constitution.
Get a copy and read it.
Marriage is the Union of a Man and a Woman.
The Giblet community has got it wrong.
The Union of two people of the Same Sex is called something else.
The agenda filter here doesn’t allow me to give you that word.

Posted by: Noz | December 2, 2011, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

NOZ,

Your right that the term Separation of Church and State is not in the Constitution. That term was actually coined by Thomas Jefferson.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Prayers in School is against the Constitution. The Government both Federal and State(With the passing of the 14th and 15th amendments) cannot actively use its position to further any religion. Prayers in School is a violation of that and will not be tolerated.

Posted by: Christopher | December 2, 2011, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Christopher

Did you know where Thomas Jefferson went after he wrote that in the letter? To church.
Guess where. Service was held in Congress.

Posted by: Mike | December 2, 2011, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

That’s right Christopher but if student’s on their own want to say prayers before class for example then the constitution protects their right to do so.

“the MAJORITY of people in this nation are getting SICK of these FANATICAL RELIGIOUS FOOLS trying to run our Government by means of religion.” – Demnme5

Are you railing against the Minority Media which wishes to impose it’s will on us based on their Fanatical Pop Culture Religion of Liberalism?

Posted by: Noz | December 2, 2011, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Mike,

Your right as well.

President Jefferson was a Deist and didn’t believe the same why as most Christians do now. In fact he created his own bible by removing all the Supernatural Crap

Posted by: Christopher | December 2, 2011, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

MIKE: So do you NOT see WHY a man as smart as Thomas Jefferson DID see a strong reason for separation of church and state? HE is the type of person we NEED now. Someone that BELIEVES in God and DOES NOT try to USE that in his Governance of this Nation!!!! Very FEW people want a person like Michelle Bachmann that would CITE religion in too many things that OUGHT NOT to be in our Government!!!

Posted by: demNme5 | December 2, 2011, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Mike,

Your right, he attended church regularly and so did many presidents through to Abraham Lincoln. I find it odd you didn’t mention the lack of church services in the city at that time. Did you also know Jefferson was a Deist? Have you ever heard of the Jefferson Bible, basically it was a bible with only the moral stories in it. All the supernatural books, chapters were removed as he didn’t really believe in that. You could say his beliefs were more aligned with the Unitarian faith.

NOZ,

The students have a right to pray, but no Government Official should lead or or require it. I think you confuse the 1963 court ruling and what it actually applied to.

Posted by: Christopher | December 2, 2011, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

NOZ: “TuneTown, seperation of Church and State is not in the Constitution. Get a copy and read it.” – - – NOZ, the fact that the actual words “Seperation of Church and State” are not in the Constitution is totally irrelevant. The meaning and intent is there for anyone capable of engaging in independent rational thought while applying proper logic, grammar, and semantics to a contextual interpretation. A fundamental reality of language is that the meaning of language goes far beyond the literal meaning of the words. – - – NOZ: ” Marriage is the Union of a Man and a Woman.” – - – NOT in every culture. Another fundamental reality of language is that ALL meaning & ALL definitions are arbitrary at one point and fluid after another point. People can choose to ascribe whatever meaning thay want to any symbol, even words. This is why the government needs to get out of the marriage business and replace it with the civil union business that ONLY the government does to grant certain legal rights, benefits, and privileges. That would make the definition of marriage totally irrelevant.

Posted by: B-K KnightRider | December 2, 2011, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

Rep. Bachmann is a cold hearted human being and does not want anyone that does not believe or look like her to have rights. She already said she wouldn’t give it a 2nd thought to ripping a family apart. I have to laugh because then she is so offended and this Jimmy Kimmel was sexist…give me a break. If you would give a 2nd thought to ripping a family apart then you can’t be that offended over a song.

Posted by: MTATL67 | December 2, 2011, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

NOZ: “Are you railing against the Minority Media which wishes to impose it’s will on us based on their Fanatical Pop Culture Religion of Liberalism?” – - – “Minority Media”? What does that even mean? Talk about someone who has no respect for the meaning of words. And “”Religion of Liberalism”? There you are perverting/distorting the meaning of two words. Do you simply define liberalism as whatever you disagree with? That is not what liberal or liberalism mean. Can you even rationally define either? Railing against the media over constitutional matters is pointless because the Constitution ONLY protects us from government action, not media action. The media can do whatever it wants within the limits of the law and we can then choose to ignore the media or not. But the media cannot violate the Constitution in the process. The government on the other hand is a different matter. One of the things the Constitution is supposed to do is prevent the government from legislating religious beliefs and practices. When one group of people (i.e. Christians) manages to use the government as its proxy to impose their religious beliefs upon everyone else through the force of law then we have a de facto establishment of religion. We would then effectively have an implicit, or covert, or stealth state religion. The only thing missing would be an official designation of Christianity as the state religion. As any clear thinking person capable of engaging in independent rational thought can see, that would violate the intent of the Establishment Clause. Essentially, part of the meaning and intent of the Establishment Clause is to ensure that we have a seperation of church and state. In part that means no legislating religious beliefs or practices.

Posted by: B-K KnightRider | December 2, 2011, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Why would Bachmann want prayer in public schools? I thought she was a “Christian.”

“And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.” – Matthew 6:5-6

Posted by: Eric | December 2, 2011, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Look, Folks. This strategy worked for Michelle’s husband, so Michelle is assuming it will work for the rest of us.

All tragedy aside — or maybe not — lesbians and gays marring people of the opposite sex would surely lead to heartbreak.

I did it before I realized I was gay and the heartbreak was enormous for both my ex-wife AND me. We deeply loved each other but couldn’t make things work.

Michelle is clueless, too, when she says: “There shouldn’t be any special rights or special set of criteria based on people preferences. ”

EXACTLY!!! In the present situation, heterosexuals have special rights based on their preferences. We want those rights extended to the rest of us!

Posted by: Billbb | December 2, 2011, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

I “liked” this only because this just shows the one-sided double talk of politics. I hate that it is at the oppression of others. That hurts. But maybe taking control of the government at smaller levels is what we need. The revolution we need to shake things up and make sure that everyone’s voice is heard, but not by the vipers of Eden. No matter how they use their power, I would venture that most politicians bottom line is their paycheck. No matter what comes in the following years in the U.S. I vow to operate in my realm of influence in the direction of a better place. We need to evolve and be positive and proactive, live to better standards and principles, we need a new paradigm for society. A friend once told me of this saying, “The definition of insanity is making the same mistakes over and over again expecting a different outcome,” and I rather like that.

Posted by: Jay | December 2, 2011, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

I am in no way a supporter of Bachman, she’s an airhead. BUT, on the issue of legal marriage, where would the anti man/woman marriage people draw the line? Seriously, if we allow any human adult to marry any human adult of his/her choice, we allow brothers to marry sisters, cousins to marry uncles, mothers to marry sons. There is no law that says that marriage has to include a sexual relationship, so, especially in tough economic times, it might be economically beneficial to arrange some strange “marriages”. Is this really the can of worms you want to open?

Posted by: mike | December 5, 2011, 1:33 am 1:33 am

She should have said they can’t get married because marriage is a priviledge and society does not give this priviledge to siblings, an adult and a child, an uncle and a niece, a human and an animal, or 3 people. She should have said that Thomas Jefferson wrote a bill that made the penalty for this
deviant behavior – castration. The founders were moral and enlightened men!!

Posted by: Traveler7 | December 6, 2011, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

She should have said for one it’s not biologically possible for two men or two women to have kids nor are the sexual organs useful for face to face sexual encounters.

Posted by: Can't tell my name get arrested or defamed by liberal communist Nazis | December 6, 2011, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

It is each persons choice to pick the road they want but please dont tell me what is right or wrong. Not just me but the majority want to be left alone, its takes a court order to rule in favor of this. No state has ever voted for it. Pleas do what you want but dont tell us what to do.

Posted by: joe deluca | December 6, 2011, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

It is absolutely idiotic to argue about these things. Love is love, whether between a man and a woman or between two women or between two men. You don’t need marriage to have love, but it IS wrong to deny it to someone who wishes to marry, just because they want to marry a person of the same sex. Homosexuality is found in ALL species. HomoPHOBIA is found in ONE. Which do you think the universe will see as strange?

Posted by: Ravyn | December 6, 2011, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

to answer the 16 year old who asked bachmann the question: what should be done for high school kids int he “lgbt” community? first of all, no one that age is really gay. they are just being told they are by a bunch of idiots who don’t know what’s really going on. so make the people stop pushing those “identified as gay” etc kids into corners with labels. They aren’t even grown up yet, their identitiy is not fully established. They need protection as people, but they also need help establishing a healthy gender identity and accepting their real identity, not some deviated version of it that comes from adverse life experiences and poor unhealthy conditioning. They need protection, but they also need to know that they are not in any way shape or form, destined for or stuck in the mold of being “gay” just because some people say they are. Because it’s a lie they are told too many times, that they are gay so they should just accept it. Reject that lie, for starters. It comes from others, not from the truth within. Then look for more truth for yourself, kids.

Posted by: mrs mystery | December 6, 2011, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY
1. Leviticus 18:22
“Do not practice homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman. It is a detestable sin.
Leviticus 18:21-23 (in Context) Leviticus 18 (Whole Chapter)
2. Leviticus 20:13
“If a man practices homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman, both men have committed a detestable act. They must both be put to death, for they are guilty of a capital offense.
Leviticus 20:12-14 (in Context) Leviticus 20 (Whole Chapter)
3. 1 Corinthians 6:9
Don’t you realize that those who do wrong will not inherit the Kingdom of God? Don’t fool yourselves. Those who indulge in sexual sin, or who worship idols, or commit adultery, or are male prostitutes, or practice homosexuality,
1 Corinthians 6:8-10 (in Context) 1 Corinthians 6 (Whole Chapter)
4. Timothy 1:10
The law is for people who are sexually immoral, or who practice homosexuality, or are slave traders, liars, promise breakers, or who do anything else that contradicts the wholesome teaching
1 Timothy 1:9-11 (in Context) 1 Timothy 1 (Whole Chapter)

Posted by: POPEYE | December 6, 2011, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

@Popeye 1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can’t I own Canadians?

Posted by: Karen | December 6, 2011, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Bachman nor any other candidate who does not uphold the Constitution of the United States,Human and Civil rights or triest to make their personal religious beliefs civil law does not deserve to be elected to hold an office of the United States, State or local Government. Such folks need to be taught a lesson—DON’T ELECT THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DON’T ELECT THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DON’T ELECT THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DON’T ELECT THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DON’T ELECT THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DON’T ELECT THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DON’T ELECT THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DON’T ELECT THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DON’T ELECT THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: ludwig | December 6, 2011, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

@Popeye
When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord – Leviticus1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

Posted by: Karen | December 6, 2011, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Just as gays believe they should be allowed to marry, Bachmann believes otherwise. Gays are not wrong, neither is Bachmann. There is no grand arbiter. But I guarantee ABC will slant this as Bachmann being wrong. I could call all my straight friends and have them blitz this site so there are many more anti-gays responding. Would that convince ABC to report differently?

Posted by: Tony Denslow | December 6, 2011, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

That last post was perfect. Gotta love it when foolishness is brought to the light and can not be denied>

Posted by: Kymm | December 6, 2011, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

M. Bachman knows that government does not have the right to change the definition of marriage. She is taking a principled stand here and I very much approve of that.

Posted by: William Bruce | December 6, 2011, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

YES, THIS GIRL HAS THAT BIG OR STRONG POSITION,SHE IS HUMAN LIKE ALL GAYS OR NOT GAYS I’M HETEROSEXUAL BUT I BELIEVE AS HUMAN BEING THE RESPECT TO THE GAY COMMUNITY BECAUSE THE TEACH US TO DON’T BE HYPOCRITES,OR DISCRIMINATE TO OTHERS JUST FOR ADIFFERENT SEXUAL ORIENTATION.JUST GOD HAS THIS POWER THE GOVERMENT IS HUMAN AND SHOULD ACT ON CIVIL RIGHTS NOT ON GOD’S CONCERNINGS.

Posted by: melquiades ruiz | December 6, 2011, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Bachman is an idiot, and people who support her are idiots. Now I will fight to protect these idiots rights, but will they fight to protect mine. We used to outlaw a black man marrying a white woman, but that somehow was made okay. maybe after enough lynchings and what not, enough blood was spilled then it was okay. have we become more civilized since then, or do we need to spill more blood . gay marriage will be legal very soon. it won’t ruin your neighborhood.

and to the person who thinks that a person in high school can’t possibly know that they’re gay, uh there is a host of medical evidence to prove the contrary. you enter puberty, you’re chemistry attracts you to someone, that should be enough to let you know.

Posted by: Mark | December 6, 2011, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

When the blacks were first allowed to be citizens, they were not allowed to use the same things as whites. Later, segregation was ended, stating that the “equality” was unequal.

Isn’t that similar to what this woman is presenting? You are equal, you can marry anyone… except the one you love. Equal in the sense that they can be married, but unequal in the sense that they cannot marry whom ever they want.

As a straight girl from a homophobic family, I support gay rights. And not Bachmann. I will be 18 for the next presidential election. You do not have my vote.

Posted by: Anon | December 6, 2011, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

@Karen,
Your comments come across as insulting and hurtful and do nothing to further your argument that homosexuality should be considered normal behavior. I’m sure you’ve heard the saying, “Imitation is the best form of flattery.” Marriage was established for those of opposite sex, that some desire to copy it is admirable however misplaced. People who choose to like people of their own sex is a behavior simply not considered normal by some, especially those who believe in Jesus Christ. If you do not understand why someone would put their trust and faith in Jesus then you wouldn’t understand their explanation for disagreeing with you in this matter. It is not your place, or anyone else’s, to insult them when they try to explain why they feel this way. You are welcome to not agree, anything beyond that doesn’t reflect on the person you are insulting, it reflects on you. I hope you take this to heart, I mean you no offense.

Posted by: Darrell | December 6, 2011, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

I agree with Mrs. Bachmann in all she has said. All these gays want is special rights. As a Christian man I feel strongly same sex marriage is wrong and always will be. I know there may be some very nice gay people but wrong is wrong. Just because they believe what the feel it is still against the laws God gave us and always will be.

Posted by: Max | December 6, 2011, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

And then ignoramuses claim and talk about our poor innocent children who know absolutely nothing about sex, and are abused if they have some. But 8 year olds talk about gay marriage in school, to I take it they know which end to put what. Besides, what is this kind of issue doing in 3rd grade? Have the left, libs, and progressive taken over the entire educational system?

Posted by: TooHotFru | December 6, 2011, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

we all have a right to live a good, happy and peaceful life.
Not seeking to hurt others, want what isnt our own,
We come in many sizes and shapes and likewise in orientation.
I am a hetrosexual person but I respect the right of a man or woman to be
attracted to someone of the same sex.
If both people are happy with their relationship and content to live in harmony
with one another in the same good and quiet way that couples generally do, then it is their own
affair.
We cannot force people into molds.
Live side by side and in peace with your neighbours. Try and understand their point of view and respect it.

Posted by: audrey | December 6, 2011, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

I am a Christian and I believe what the Bible says. Its very easy to take one verse of scripture and take it out of context. You must read more than just a verse. One of the things I love about scripture is that it renews your mind and gives you correct perception. If we don’t renew our mind, we are prone to be deceived. I don’t hate people who think they are Gay or Lesbian. I know God requires us to love no matter what. I also know that homosexual relationships are not what God intended nor is that how he made His people. I don’t believe it is my place to judge them, however, I could not in good conscience support Gay and/or Lesbian Marriage because it is against God’s Law. Someone in my family just informed me that they are living a homosexual lifestyle and it broke my heart but I will love them just the same. I am in agreement that we don’t have much to choose from with regard to Presidential Candidates. One thing I do know for sure, as society removes our Lord from classrooms, government, etc, our nation moves closer to destruction. I will stand for my Lord and make my life count for Him and walk in the love He requires of his people. May God grant us His mercy.

Posted by: Linda Durrence | December 6, 2011, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

Once upon a time, African-Americans needed ‘special’ protection from the law. Like the amendment giving them the right to vote. For that matter, women too needed ‘special’ protection- special laws written to protect their rights. In fact without those ‘special’ laws, Bachman would not be allowed to run for president. This fact is what makes her argument completely ignorant.

Posted by: acceptingone | December 6, 2011, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

This article points out the fact that people under 21 should not be allowed to vote. Their brains have not matured enough to determine who a leader should be.

Posted by: jabo | December 6, 2011, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

@TOOHOTFRU – Wow! Calling kids “scum”….that really reflects on you when you call kids that. You may disagree with how some are raised, but it’s not your business nor is it your right. That is their parents’ business and rights to how they choose to raise their children.

Posted by: Tanya | December 6, 2011, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

What Michele Bachmann doesn’t know is that there are already male gays marrying a straight woman and lesbians marrying a straight man and that’s where dysfunctional families come from. Majority of divorces of marriages with adult children are the result of the gay parent finally realizing that he/she can no longer live a lie. Sometimes tragedy happens.

Posted by: Darius | December 6, 2011, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Here’s the solution to the whole freaking mess: Take away government’s authority to license “marriage.” Let everyone enter into a civil union for purposes of allowing the state to protect contract rights in such relationships, and then let the couple go find some church to confer the status of marriage upon them. It’s an easy solution, but gays won’t buy it. They’re into forcing their agenda on the rest of society.

Posted by: GregA | December 6, 2011, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

First of gay marriage should be handled by each state who decides to pass a law allowing it, not the Federal government. They can’t even run a lemonade stand. We need less federal government. I personally wont vote for Bachmann but I agree with eliminating the Department of Education. Every sector the government has taking over has made that program worse.

Also, doesn’t the 1st Amendment say: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof? So stop hating on people who practice their beliefs. Students should be allowed to pray if they choose to do so. And you people yelling out separation of church and state, not a SINGLE state in this country has organized religion, look it up. Why don’t you check out countries like Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan.

Posted by: leavemeALONE | December 6, 2011, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

B.K.Knightrider- in your Dec.2 post regarding “separation of church and state” you said “The meaning and intent is there for anyone capable of engaging in independent rational thought while applying proper logic, grammar, and semantics to a contextual interpretation. A fundamental reality of language is that the meaning of language goes far beyond the literal meaning of the words.”
Then you came right back when talking about marriage and said “Another fundamental reality of language is that ALL meaning & ALL definitions are arbitrary at one point and fluid after another point. People can choose to ascribe whatever meaning thay want to any symbol, even words.” Can you say CONTRADICTION?

Eric- Dec. 2 The bible also says:
Luke 18:1  ”And he spake a parable unto them to this end, that men ought always to pray, and not to faint;2  Saying, There was in a city a judge, which feared not God, neither regarded man:
3  And there was a widow in that city; and she came unto him, saying, Avenge me of mine adversary.4  And he would not for a while: but afterward he said within himself, Though I fear not God, nor regard man;5  Yet because this widow troubleth me, I will avenge her, lest by her continual coming she weary me.6  And the Lord said, Hear what the unjust judge saith.
7  And shall not God avenge his own elect, which cry day and night unto him, though he bear long with them?8  I tell you that he will avenge them speedily.

You can’t take one text of scripture (out of context) and make it doctrine!

Posted by: Zgoob | December 6, 2011, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

OMG! Now we adults are definitely using our children too to promote our sinful nature. Stop using children as your scapegoats! Sin is sin no matter how you try to disguise it. Stop trying to make it look acceptable by making others feel sorry for you! One day you WILL regret your sinful beliefs, but then it will be too late! Gay is gay wrong is wrong! Who gives a crap about your human rights when you don’t even have a clue what love is….your emotionally tied and co-dependent if your gay, but not in love! Your also headed for destruction and deceived by the enemy.

Posted by: Junie b jones | December 6, 2011, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

All you ignorant people, stop hating on Michelle Bachmann! She addresses that every human being have the same rights, regardless of thier sexual orientation or personal preferences. Homosexuality is shunned in the Bible, and being a Christian, I stand by those beliefs that every Christian should recognize completely also. Homosexuals should still be respected as any other person would be however homosexuality does not have to be accepted. And for young kids speaking out about these issues, please close your mouths. You have no idea what you are talking about and words are just getting fed to you. There are already enough older ridiculously-minded role models that are making fools of themselves for you.

Posted by: RCRECE | December 6, 2011, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

Love os love. Bachmann doesn’t have the right to tell homosexuals that they can’t marry. They should be able to marry the one they love regardless.

Posted by: Daisy | December 6, 2011, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

The bible also says people should divorce… but we allow that.
the bible also says if your son is being troublesome and wont obey you… you can kill him…
the bible also says if a man rapes a virgin woman.. the woman must marry him
the bible also supports slavery
murder
treats women as second class citizens and property
this is not taken out of context it is simply written in plain english… how else should i read this book of evil and contradicting texts.
It is normally the people that do not actually read their bible and only read the nice parts their preacher points out that are still christian… I was a christian until I actually though id learn more about what i “believed” in… you cant believe in something you do not know anything about. and once I read and read and read the less i believed. marriage is between a man and a woman<— now… but not for long. Homos will have equal rights you just need to get over it and stop hating so much…

Posted by: beaux | December 6, 2011, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Love is not what sustains a marriage. Commitment does. The claim that homosexual couples wouldn’t WANT to marry a person of the opposite gender is irrelevant. The point is that they CAN, which makes it equal.

And there is no discrimination based on “sexual orientation” because the “sexual orientation” of those applying for a marriage license is never ASKED. The can’t discriminate against you based on information they do NOT HAVE.

And there are plenty of same sex heterosexual friends who would love to marry in order to take advantage of each other’s work benefits. But they can’t. Are they discriminted against based on THEIR “sexual orientation” too????

The fact is there is no law that says a person cannot marry because they are homosexual. They simply have to do so under the same laws as the rest of us.

Posted by: Shannon | December 6, 2011, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Human Aliens, of course you have rights, you already doing what you think you are righ now, did the government stop you? but its too much if you will change the entire human laws, and Gods laws just because you want to marry, legally? for what? for conjugal properties? as I said, you can be a couple of same sex, and still be respected, live peacefully and be happy, we all people respect that, and why you get that respect? because religion thought us to be kind, but don’t ask for too much. Don’t you see you all are dragging our world into suddomism, dragging our world into quos. Teach your children the straight way, not your way, hoping he or she end up getting married of the right sex. but if not? well….after all, we all have the right.

Posted by: rdc | December 6, 2011, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

Bravo for the Youth-Equalitarians who challenge people seeking public office although they know what the answer is going to be before they ask the question or what the retort will be to a statement. I was surprised that her answers and retorts did not need any histroical background, therefore there it was pretty somber without comic or humor at her expense of course.

Posted by: Basil511 | December 6, 2011, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

I seriously don’t understand what the problem is with homosexuality. The fact of the matter is that people are ignorant about it. It’s not their fault, they simply don’t know. The LGBT community is not really very different from the rest of us. As my friend David says, “Alternative lifestyle? I wish I had an alternative lifestyle!” And yet people are convinced it is something to be ashamed of. Why do you care? It isn’t your private parts. Homosexuality has been around ever since there were separate sexes, there are over 500 species who act way better than humans around their LGBT compadres.
I am a Catholic, and have been all my life, but I don’t take the Bible word for word. It was inspired by God, yes, but there’s a difference between things being inspired by God and literally WRITTEN with his hands. To me, God (or whatever higher powers you happen to believe in/not believe in) is love. If two people love each other, that comes from God. How can anything that comes from God Himself be a sin?
Shannon, I say any two consenting adults who aren’t related should be allowed to get married (at least civilly). If people are marrying for economic reasons, so be it. It’s happened before: look at all the arranged marriages that have happened throughout history. Civil marriage should really only be for the benefits that the government gives to people who are married. If those two consenting adults want to be further joined through their belief system, then they can go get married in a church under the presence of God. But the point is that marriage should really not be so narrowly defined. I agree that marriage equals commitment. However, the majority of marriages today also have a component of romantic love that cannot be ignored.
What Bachmann is saying is that people don’t have the right to choose who they want to marry. That is the thing that seems wrong to me. Why should the government even have a say in that? And I think it could be pretty easily fixed- if people had common sense. Unfortunately, many don’t. So here I sit. Sue me, devout believers.

Posted by: Marisa | December 6, 2011, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Bachman knows the meaning of the word “marriage” and, like the majority of us, is not willing to rewrite it. Call homosexual relationships what you want, but it can’t be “marriage” – that’s already in use.
The word “gay” already has a meaning and so does “queer”. Tell me, which better describes human love relationships outside of marriage? Call homosexuality what you want, but don’t try force it on me as something that nature intended. – It’s an oddity.

Posted by: Dalight | December 6, 2011, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

You fake Christians are a curse on the world. Your hypocrisy is boundless, your ignorance of your own religion shameful, and your hatred for those different from you absolutelyin defiance of what Jesus taught. If you were capable of shame or self awareness, I’d say look at your behavior and contrast it with the love Christ taught. But you are willfully blind, smugly condemning those who don’t live their lives exactly like you. You will all burn in Hell.

Posted by: DDM Taylor | December 6, 2011, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

The same people that call Mrs Bachman an idiot for not being “open minded” want to force (legislate) everyone else to be tolerant and understanding of homosexuality. You cant have it both ways, if you want open mindedness and understanding on the gay issue, then take the time and effort to understand and respect other points of view.

Posted by: jake | December 6, 2011, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

I dont understand why anyone would want to get married

Posted by: lonesome Johnson | December 6, 2011, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Next people will want to marry their animals, Parent’s marrying their kids, or multiple people marrying, and having it all recognized by law. Will you say its ok because its their choice?

Posted by: kat | December 6, 2011, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

To Tunetown152,

You say separation of church and state is guaranteed by the Constitution? Obviously,you have not read the Constitution or the Bill of Rights–go back and read them and tell me where it says anything about separation of church and state! You won’t find it!
You people make me sick–you don’t mention anything about what the Bible says about homosexuals! It is an abomination to God,you can try and justify it all you want–but,in the ultimate outcome God will do the judging!

You are eager to misquote the Constitution re: the aforementioned subject,but no mention about what the Bible says or teaches!

Another thing, some people like Dear Abby and others try to say “they are born that way” that is a lot of hog wash!

There is a day acoming that will to most be a fright,

There is a day acoming that will to some be all right,

There is a day acoming that some say is not far away,

There is a day acoming that some will kneel and pray,

There is a day acoming that the haters will love to hate,

There is a day acoming that GOD will set things straight!

Amen

Posted by: Mike | December 6, 2011, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

If a man or woman comes to you and says that he/she is the devil and waves a trident in front of you… What would you say? Probably that he/she is crazy and you would commit him/her to a mental hospital.

If a man/woman comes to you and says that he/she is the Napoleon/josephine and dresses accordingly… What would you say? Probably that he/she is crazy and you would commit him/her to a mental hospital.
If I put on a blue tight and red cape… am I superman?
If a man comes to you and says he is a woman… What would you say? I would say that that man is crazy and should be committed to a mental institution for correction. That person needs help in finding his identity… He is confused. You are giving rights to somebody who is unbalanced (now the gay community has more rights than the straight people) and They want to run the show.
About gay marriage…If you don’t stop this nonsense, soon enough we will look a a picture of a woman and a dog and an innocent kid will say: LOOK MY MOTHER AND MY FATHER!!!
THINK ABOUT IT… you have gone far enough…

I don’t hate gay people, I just want to help them help themselves…

Posted by: Pedro Martinez | December 6, 2011, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

This whole gay marriage topic is ridiculous! Marriage is between one male and one female. If you want to categorize the relationship between gays and lesbians, fine, just pick a different descriptor. In 50 years when this is “normal” (God forbid), we’ll have the rainbow coalition talking about human/pet marriages or human/object marriages. Completely ludicrous! I will NEVER support gay marriage–bank on that!

Posted by: Pat | December 6, 2011, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

i don’t think gay marriages is right neither do i think that gays should openly remain in that state not to say that its a condition or a disease. But lets think about it this way if everyone was gay how would our species continue to prosper every human being would eventually die off, therefore I don’t believe that a person should willingly remain gay, and yea i am implying that a person who is gay can become heterosexual and be in complete content with it because I have seen it happen with my own two 20/20 eyes.

Posted by: AnTo | December 6, 2011, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

Out of 5000 years of history none of the 86 cultures that embraced homosexuality survived to this day. As a x-gay person I ask what is normal about the act?

Posted by: curtis | December 6, 2011, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

Wow we still have some ignorant people in this country. Its because of you there are so many closeted married men who are out having sex with men and your at home thinking they are at work… what idiots we have in this country including Michelle

Posted by: Doug | December 6, 2011, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

GOD HAVE MERCY!!!!!

Posted by: ng | December 7, 2011, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Thank you to the people who post and point out the hypocrisy of Michele Bachmann’s statement about not extending “special” rights to people based on their preferences (when special rights are exactly what straight people already enjoy). Since hypocrisy is the foundation for many of the Republican Party’s stances on issues (i.e., Repub voters are supporting Gingrich, another adulterer, after Cain’s recent adultery-driven flameout; huh?), I guess it’s not surprising that we have to put up with Bible thumpers. Why is it that they keep reciting the same Leviticus passages “about” homosexuality but they conveniently leave out the other passages which strongly prohibit eating shellfish or wearing a garment with mixed fabrics, something that millions of Americans do everyday? Why is it that they rabidly recite the Sodom and Gomorrah story, saying the cities were doomed because of homosexuality (when the sin they were destroyed for was never named; why not inhospitableness?) but then fail to tell the rest of the story (how a teenage daughter is offered up to the wicked men outside the door wanting in)? Why aren’t these same people standing outside Long John Silver’s with signs or boycotting Macy’s, since as God/the Bible clearly indicates, these transgressions are apparently very sinful? Oh, that’s right: they’re hypocrites.

Posted by: coguy5280 | December 7, 2011, 12:16 am 12:16 am

In a nutshell, the media twists the words of others for personal gain and to advance an agenda that includes gay marriage. Personally, i don’t hate gay people, but when did it become natural for a man to lust after another man? why complicate things? Why sacrifice the good of the many for the good of few? For most of man’s existence, it has always been a man and woman. It’s always been like that. Why change something that works? Face it, the world’s gone to $#!%. Everything is quickly moving from simple black and white, to shades of gray. The lines are blurred people. Morality is being thrown out, and nobody cares. Nobody has to agree with me, but this is the opinion i will stick by.

Posted by: Figueroza | December 7, 2011, 12:22 am 12:22 am

I understand everyone has a right to their beliefs, and, with the Bible thumpers, they believe that gay people are sinful and wrong and shouldn’t be in society. I think they’re wrong, but that’s they’re belief. My question is the following: if they’re so quick to recite the Bible passages supposedly condemning gay people, why are they mute on the other laws that the Bible speaks “definitively” to? The Bible specifically says that it is sinful to eat shellfish as well as to wear a garment made of mixed fabrics; yet, I have never heard of one Christian standing outside Long John Silver’s with a sign or a pastor telling his congregation to boycott Macy’s. The Bible also says, indirectly, that it’s ok to have slaves; yet, I don’t know of any person in this country that would be accepted in any way for having a slave. Just as Michele Bachmann’s statement about extending “special” rights to those based on their preferences is completely hypocritical, so is the stance of so many Republicans and Bible thumpers on a myriad of issues (now that Herman Cain’s adultery-driven flameout has tanked his bid for the White House, who are Republicans sending to the top of the polls? Newt Gingrich, another adulterer.) And lastly, can we please put a moratorium on the “Well, if gay people are allowed to marry, then what’s to stop a man and an animal from getting married,” bs? To get married, you have to be able to say, “I do,” and a frog can’t do that. If you Bible thumpers are so worried about two family members getting married, then why aren’t you demonstrating to have the state of Alabama excommunicated? H-y-p-o-c-r-i-t-e-s.

Posted by: Mark West | December 7, 2011, 12:35 am 12:35 am

to me this isn’t about being a christian but everyone should search through their heart and they will see that the reasons they hate being true Christians is the urge for pleasure of money, sex and power mostly in a rather improper way i.e of the true human nature and mind you, those who are homos, lesbian have lost their identity and way and its a pity that the world today sees what should be detested according to our supreme nature over other creatures as what is best for us. take for example, you son said he wants to marry his own sister will you approve saying its his opinion. not all humans have the right to any opinion especially if it is against human true nature if you disagree then let the US let IRAN be with his opinion of alienating ISREAL and making his NUCLEAR WEAPONS

Posted by: GBLESS | December 7, 2011, 1:47 am 1:47 am

not a christian, not religious, but Just poison a girlfriend who is gay last month because they are not fit to exist, call be a person without respect for life and human right but the only right here is following our natural laws, I can’t wake up one morning saying I want to build house anywhere there must be regulations I will abide to, so if we view our human government laws as acceptable, then what happens to the law of mother-nature, to all you gays keep doing what you are doing but I assure you, know one can fight with nature cus you will end up ruining your life.

Posted by: aninimous | December 7, 2011, 2:03 am 2:03 am

i really get discouraged when i hear comments like “there is nothing wrong with gay marraige”.it really pisses me off.somebody finally takes a bold stand against homosexuality and is being called an idiot.where is the freedom of opinions and views that pro-gay people are agitating for?does it mean it works in only one direction?so anybody who is anti-gay is an idiot or wrong.what an abnormality! whether we like it or not,the truth is the truth and cannot be hidden. in the end the truth will prevail.the triumph of evil over good is only temporary.and i really wonder why gay people should be allowed to raise children.since they don’t want to contribute to pro-creation,they have no buisness with raising children.raising a child is a privilege that belongs to people who are normal enough to have one.if america wants to normalize gay marraiges,why should it be legalized? what is the government’s business with that?is almost like legalizing lying simply because a lot of people lie.our sense of right and wrong is largely gotten from the fact that every human being is God conscious and this has nothing to do with being a christian.America might as well remove “right” from its constituition and forever once and for all tell the world that it is really a godless society.you can be a homosexual all you want but don’t force it on me.it would forever be wrong to everyone who has a common sense,who beleives in the word of God,who understands the bible,who are right thinking,who are normal and knows truth.

Posted by: stephanie | December 7, 2011, 2:07 am 2:07 am

Why is this even an issue? focus on important things. Health care. Social security. Christianity is wrong. Humanity is right. Love who you love.

Posted by: Adam | December 7, 2011, 2:15 am 2:15 am

@Darrell, stop getting personal and explain why you guys are so oppossing to homosexuality yet do not fight for the right to own slave? Both of them are clearly stated in the bible. When you talk the talk the walk the walk

Posted by: tav | December 7, 2011, 2:42 am 2:42 am

Just because discrimination is legal doesn’t make it right. Slavery was once legal, and the bible was misused to justify it. Many of the laws in the Middle East discriminating against women are absolutely atrocious, yet perfectly legal according to their law. And, you can be gay AND christian. Jesus said WHOSOEVER believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life. Whosoever includes us, folks. I’m gay and I believe. Jesus is my Savior, and he made me just as I am, and loves and accepts me exactly as I am. It’s not as rare as you think.

Posted by: Katherine | December 7, 2011, 2:45 am 2:45 am

I am confused.

Gay marriage helps the economy. So republicans should support it, it bein Capitalist and free market.
Gay marriage reduces the spread of disease. Which Republicans should support because it lowers government spending.
Gay marriage reduces the number of tax returns to mail out. Which reduces government further. So it is a Republican cause.
Gay marriage reduces the amount you would ever hear the word GAY, and that is something ALL republicans want right? So again it should be their mantra.

God said Thou Shalt Not Kill. Now repbulicans, being all god fearing literalists…of course have ALL started to write letters, hold rallies, and march on Washington for the Absolute BANISHENT of all SOLDIERS past and present. Killers all right? Killers for MONEY too, so twice the evil. I see just report after report of all the repbulicans marching and writing to end the army navy and airforce RIGHT NOW. God said not to kill, so OBVIOUSLY, none of them could EVER support the army. The army Raises taxes, Makes Big government (the biggest ever actually), and is against God.

I guess there are NO republican Christians, because a christian could never support ANYONE who kills for money. You know, like soldiers. Yep. Gotta go stop those gay people you have don’t know, will never meet, and cannot ever be hurt by. Yep. Whorship the killers for money, but invisible gay peole you never saw…yep spend BILLIONS holding them down and their invisible relationships. THAT is the priority.

Posted by: craig musselman | December 7, 2011, 2:55 am 2:55 am

Why is there so much talk about the bible, not all Americans are Christian or even believe in God. While I do not fully understand homosexuality, I think that same-sex marriage should be made legal. It is just a matter of equality of rights, and religion should have nothing to do with this discussion. The concept of ‘marriage’ (along with other rules in every religious text) seems to have been defined by humans in each religion in recent years, what do you think humans that lived on the earth 10,000 years ago did? (long before Jesus Christ or any other organized religions even existed)…Humans have been known to walk the earth since at least 30,000 years ago. So it may help to just focus on the rationality of the question at hand (reg. legalizing gay marriage), and leave any religion out of this decision..

Posted by: SANJAY | December 7, 2011, 3:42 am 3:42 am

Another set up by the left …. . If the MSM spent even 10% as much time trying to ruin Obama as they do on the rest of POTUS candidates .. no one would dare vote for the corrupt phony!

Posted by: kagiso edwards | December 7, 2011, 4:21 am 4:21 am

This post just made my day! I sat down and leisurely read through all you idiots bickering over nothing, with a biiig smile plastered on my face. Man! am I In a good mood now!

Thank you idiot voters and bible trumpeters for making my day. Please continue bickering so people like me can stay happy. I love you all for it.

Posted by: Krogan | December 7, 2011, 5:42 am 5:42 am

To you people who want prayer in the schools – a couple of questions: In my class, I have protestants, Catholics, a Jehovah’s Witness, a Mormon, an atheist, two Buddhists, and a Muslim. I myself am a Unitarian Universalist. Whose prayer would you recommend being said out loud? Also, I would really like to know why is it that all of these supposed supporters of the teachings of Jesus ignore his teaching about prayer? I seem to recall him saying that when you pray, you should not do as the pharisees do – praying aloud for people to see how holy you are – but you should do so quietly in the privacy of your own room (closet is the exact word used I believe).

Posted by: Doni | December 7, 2011, 6:39 am 6:39 am

Wow! For that eight year old to independantly cognate the translucency of a political issue portends a premonition of using children soldiers. That act alone sends the signal that homosexuals will do anything to promote their agendas. And this is the result of someone who is stable? Seems like a tactic used by christians to promote their agenda like… “world youth day…”

Posted by: Art | December 7, 2011, 6:57 am 6:57 am

If you are a gay man, according to Michele, you can marry a woman. Just the way that Marcus Bachmann did?

Posted by: Dan Elkin | December 7, 2011, 8:42 am 8:42 am

First off to those saying that the young people of america shouldn’t be allowed to vote because we don’t have enough expierence to know what to look for in a leader: Are you saying then that the military should increase the sign-up age to 21 or even 30 then. My history class taught me that the right to vote was given to 18 year olds because someone or a group of someones felt it wasn’t right that young ADULTS were able to DIE for their country but not allowed to have a say in who runs it. you say we are too caught up in our own personal issues to pay attention to the important ones when sometimes we know more about what’s going on in the world than most middle-aged adults. I myself turned 21 recently and during the 2008 election knew better than to vote for the man sitting in office today. it is true that most of my generation did vote for him but there are a select few that were able to see past the bull that even most ADULTS didn’t see. we are so quick to support someone who agrees with our views but on the same note they have no right to solely promise us something and to keep it. It is up to congress and the senate as well as the president to determine if a law should be passed allowing or denying something and its based on personal views. if i was in office i have just as much right to vote against an issue as the congressman or senator sitting next to me does to vote for it reguardles of the prefrence of the people i represent. if i am against say same-sex marriage but the majority of the public in my district are for it the opinion of the public really doesn’t matter i can vote however i want and no one will be the wiser. honeslty thanks to the senate, congress, and the electoral college we as the american public have no true say in what goes on in our country if an issue was brought to the public for a vote and we did away with the electoral college (which by the way was put in place because the founding fathers didn’t believe that the general public was SMART enough to make an informed decision on who should run the country mostly due to the fact that few unless you were a shop owner could read) then maybe americans would have more say and the country might have fewer issues. On the issue of same-sex marriage the public is so closely divided at least from what we see publicly that if we were to vote on the issue it would be a close call and either side could win a law might be passed that would allow it but at the same time a law might be passed that would ban it. as it stands right now due to public pressure we could very well see same sex marriages being the norm in the near future.

For those that say Prayer in school is wrong: I agree with not having a set prayer or even making it mandatory to pray aloud but as a christian i have just as much of a right to pray when ever i choose as the agnostic or the athiest does to choose not to. The High school i went to had a minute of silence every morning after saying the Pledge of alliegance to give us the opportunity to PRAY, meditate, or even just reflect on our day. we prayed silently if we chose to do so but our freedom of religion and expression was not violated i was even allowed to carry my bible with me throught the school day and even say grace before i ate breakfast or lunch. We even had a family of muslims that were allowed to pray throughout the school day as their beliefs taught. I was allowed to bring my best GIRLFRIEND to prom and no one thought i was a lesbian it wasn’t even an issue but some schools will not allow same-sex couple to attend dances or other school functions together unless it is as a group of people.

Now onto the issue at hand: Personally I think same-sex marriages are wrong. but everyone has a right to be happy and everyone no matter race, sex, religion, or sexual orientation should have the same rights as everyone else. As a christian i am taught to love everyone reguardless of thier sins or even thier rightousness. If we were to deny the rights of one guroup of people in a sense segretage them then we are going right back to the days of the civil rights movement. it was the actions of the American people more specifically the African-American community that changed the laws. If you are so against something or even if you fully support something no matter what it is. SPEAK UP don’t just sit here arguing over weither your opinion is right or wrong. get a group together and DO SOMETHING about it. The people in office don’t sit and read everysingle post someone makes. and by arguing back and forth it truly shows the ignornace of the american people as a whole and yes i’m including myself in this. however i’m not going to sit here all day and argure my OPINION with someone or try to cram my opinion down your throat. i’ve said what i wanted to say and if i do come back to look at the comments and someone challenges me if i have a sensible rebuttle and can support my argument with FACTS and not just quotes from the bible or statistcs taken out of thin air i might reply.

One final note: to those that are here quoting scripture and saying same-sex marriage is wrong remember the bible also says “Judge not lest ye be judged” we are so quick to condemn myself included that we forget it also says “let those who are without sin cast the first stone” (not sure if those are the exact words and can’t remember where it’s located) I am nothing but a sinner saved by grace and my sins are no better than yours all sins are equal at the foot of the cross.

Posted by: Tasha | December 7, 2011, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Her answers about perversion were absolutely correct. Perverts do not like them, they want perversion to be considered as an equal life style and want special laws for the perverts. Americans, tolerance is that you do not kill them and do not discriminate them in their civil rights but it does not mean you have to allow them to steal our institution of marriage which is the basis of the moral society. Homosexuality is wrong, it is corrosion which eats up the moral of our children, the moral foundation of our society.

Posted by: crawbar | December 7, 2011, 9:59 am 9:59 am

I am not why people are so interested in who people love either gay or straight. Is it because of thier own life is a loveless shallow existence? Are they hiding something? Were they brianwashed by thier parents and the fictional bible they were forced to read? Personally I don’t need a piece of paper to love someone. We all know the percentage of divorce in this country. The institution is a joke and the people who support it are even more so. Religion as in the past continues to create hatred. That is the sin here, not two poeple who just want to be happy together. Now take your blinders off and enjoy life and all the fantastic differences that make life so wonderful! We as a nation have far more pressing matters to tend to.

Posted by: Skyeboy10 | December 7, 2011, 10:06 am 10:06 am

The Bible contains 6 Admonishments to Homosexuals & 362 Admonishments to Heterosexuals. That doesn’t mean that God doesn’t love Heterosexuals. It just means they need more supervision.

Poor, Poor Michele Bachmann, she must have not yet returned from Planet Uranus and missed a few classes if not all of them. Does anyone know where this sad example of a human being was educated? Here is a perfect example as to why the Institution that failed to properly educate her, should be closed down.

Posted by: Steve Chandler | December 7, 2011, 10:38 am 10:38 am

The Bible contains 6 Admonishments to Homosexuals & 362 Admonishments to Heterosexuals. That doesn’t mean that God doesn’t love Heterosexuals. It just means they need more supervision.

Poor, Poor Michele Bachmann, she must have not yet returned from Planet Uranus and missed a few classes if not all of them. Does anyone know where this sad example of a human being was educated? Here is a perfect example as to why the Institution that failed to properly educate her, should be closed down.

Posted by: Jim Chandler | December 7, 2011, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Like Sodom and Gomorrah, just go to cities that allow this. That way you can meet and greet and whatever else you want without causing any discomfort to anyone, including yourself. Not right? maybe, but if peace is what you want, then go for it. Make your own community and LIVE as you want. God is the judge not Bachman. Government shouldnt take any part in this. Aids didnt come from man and woman but lifestyles that cause problems, just like hereosexual diseases. Promiscuity causes hererosexual issues. If we all just follow what is in the Bible then would we have so many problems. And dont go and say, “is stoning still right”? Consider the deadly sins and ten commandments. Follow that and you wont go wrong.

Posted by: Cesca | December 7, 2011, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Whether you believe in the Bible or not, you have to believe that there is a bigger authority than our government. There is a heaven and there is a hell. Dont believe? THEN wait till you reach the last minute of your life and see what awaits. Cant escape it. Anonthdh one of the commentors in this blog will someday bow down to the truth as all will who LIVE AND LET LIVE, when its time.

Posted by: Cesca | December 7, 2011, 10:53 am 10:53 am

the vast majority of my marriage to my wife is not about the fact she is (and should be) the opposite sex. Michelle Bachmann spoke it well I think… It IS, and always has been the very definition of marriage.

Posted by: matt | December 7, 2011, 11:08 am 11:08 am

ITS A BLOG…..IS THIS SLOW ENOUGH? GET OVER YOUR ELITIST SELF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Cesca | December 7, 2011, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Come on, people. Let’s not get nasty. Why would you want a congresswoman supporting something she doesn’t believe in? If she believes that Gay marriages are wrong, then I wouldn’t want her supportiing them…..because if she did, that would show how weak she is in defending her beliefs. And this whole, “Can’t use religion as a reason” thing…..Give me a break. The reason people join specific religions is because of what they believe in…Religion is a guiding factor in people’s life choices and decisions. Beliefs dictate everything we do as human beings…so please stop with this, and let’s have a purely adult conversation….

Posted by: Breanna | December 7, 2011, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Marriage ” IS” not “WAS” instituted by God the Father. Not by man. What God the Father has established cannot be undone unless granted through the Son.

Posted by: cando | December 7, 2011, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

I am a reformed Catholic. I was raised (brainwashed) Catholic. When I was old enough to think for myself. I decided to free myself from all the lies, hatred, and fables from the great comic book! There is no person living that can prove either way so religious fanatics, do us all a favor and keep your nose out of other people’s personal lives. I can’t imagine how boring your own existence is to worry about this. What in this green planet are you frightned of? Side note: My best buddy growing up was Christian Reformed, boy was his family happy to hear he was gay. He is now a doctor! helping other people..Go figure!

Posted by: Skyeboy10 | December 7, 2011, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

Its a pity, reading almost 90% of the responses here, it is becoming obvious that we are drifting on very dangerous grounds and slippery waters . The fact that we want something our way, does not make it always acceptable or right . Don’t we realize, that after we gratify our so called lusts, passions, cravings, which we often define as love or affections, it then blossoms to hurts, pains and in most cases irreversible repercussions. If only we come to terms within ourselves,our individual and collective moral consciousness ,if any left (having not been seared by hot iron, or intelligently yet ill advised persuasive oratory, selfish convictions and a host of other negativity) we would find that we are simply asking for liberty and licence (marriage) to cloak our godless and mindless behavior, in favor of selfish gratifications. ofcourse which comes with a high price for those directly and indirectly involved.Changing the natural order of things, to disorder and chaos. Yes i understand feelings, genetic malfunctions, mistakes, accidents, etc etc. But seeking a way to correct it should be the course, not continuing in the curse. It is not only erroneous, but disastrous.
Even if Thomas Jefferson or anyone else, took out what displeased them in the Bible, and rewrote it, as someone indicated it doesn’t change the fallibility of it. Its a code of moral conducts to say the least, and it has a lot we all can learn from.That is why many of us will continue to quote it for its stability of truth and morality in a world thats losing its senses of right and wrong and becoming more opinionated than defined.
For instance, it defines the origin of marriage, and i belief that is what Poor, ill educated,Ms. Michele Bachmann (as some people defined her) is trying to get across. Even if the whole world is going one way, it still doesn’t make wrong ever become right, and that is a fundamental truth.
It doesn’t no matter whichever way, color, one,two,senate,courts, government, or country want to paint or call it. The truth remains the truth. History and archaeology, as clear evidences of the demise of Sodom and Gomorrah. You may chose not to believe and call me an names,and that’s OK. But there is a way out… ask Jesus, call on him,cry to him if necessary. And if you do so sincerely, you will soon find out soon enough, He his real.
I used to be in that destruction headed group,i was not gay but the group classifies us all as no part in Gods Kingdom :(sexually immoral, idolater,adulterer,male prostitute, homosexual offenders, thieves, greedy, drunkards, liars,slanderer,swindlers) and that is what some of you (and i)were but you too can now be washed, sanctified and justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the spirit of our God (1Cor.6:7-11) So i judge no man, but will warn every man/woman/both, not to embrace whats wrong, but ask for help from the one who can truly help. Yes it may seem right to some, the pleasure of the moment, the security of companionship or seeming stability, but wrong remains wrong, and right remains right,even as truth is not relative, truth is truth. No shades of grey. There is a way that seemeth right to man,but the end, are ways of death.(Prv.14:12) The point is the repercussions does not all end here, even after death, there are repercussions. I have shared the way out with you. Make wise choices, the ball is in your court. You have read this.I love you all ,straight, gay, lesbian, transgender. But God loves you more and Christ died for you and me. Make wise choices. Call on him today. Jhn.3,36;Jhn14 6

Posted by: Bcoming a Godless Society | December 7, 2011, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

In the bible (im talkin to all the people that say its wrong and it says it in the bible and bill of rights and stuff like that)…doesnt it also say not to judge…and to be free…and that god loves you for who you are and made you to fit somewhere in this world….like a puzzle…god made people like that and i think its normal…if its what there heart says and wants…its alright…but if your doing it for popularity or for attention…thats stupid….so thats why i think its not wrong and not right….god says its wrong but he also says not to judge so he must have known this was gonna happen sooo….he made us the way we are and thats who we are going to be…. you dont have to be gay but you dont have to hate them either….there just normal people with different people they love…not much of a difference…and to me…more gay and lesbian people are nice to me than straight because they actually care about things im my life and if you get to meet one you will probably think the same thing…

Posted by: Kelsey | December 7, 2011, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

I’m Catholic and I love gay people. Please stop comming at my religion. Not all Christians are the same, I hope you know.

Posted by: Minzy | December 8, 2011, 12:19 am 12:19 am

It’s very telling how much of an idiot she is when even teens and children know better than she does and they keep calling her out on it. There’s NO way that her way of thinking will ever become acceptable in the United States. Maybe if this were 1811 instead of 2011.

Posted by: David J. Alsberge | December 8, 2011, 1:20 am 1:20 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.