Rick Santorum’s Wife Breaks Down As Her Husband Addresses ’96 Death Of Their Newborn Son
NEWTON, Iowa — During the question and answer portion of Rick Santorum’s second to last campaign event of the day, a voter brought up a painful memory from the former Pennsylvania senator’s past.
At a Pizza Ranch restaurant in Newton, Iowa, a member of the audience asked Santorum to react to a controversial attack leveled by liberal Fox News contributor Alan Colmes, who called the Santorum family’s approach to grieving for their dead baby boy, who lived for only two hours after his birth in 1996, “crazy.”
In a Fox News interview on Monday, Colmes characterized Santorum’s decision to bring the deceased child home an example of “some of the crazy things he’s said and done.”
But in Iowa this afternoon, Santorum explained that it was important for his other children to “know they had a brother.”
Santorum’s wife, Karen, who was at the event and listened to her husband talk about the experience, began to weep.
“It’s just so inappropriate,” she said as tears streamed from her eyes.
Earlier on Monday, Colmes criticized Santorum’s handling of the death of the child, Gabriel Michael Santorum.
“Get a load of some of the crazy things he’s said and done, like taking his two-hour-old baby when it died right after child birth home and played with it so that his other children would know that the child was real,” the liberal pundit said in a Fox News interview.
In a 2005 New York Times Magazine profile by writer Mike Sokolove described how the Santorum family reacted to the tragedy: “Rick and Karen Santorum would not let the morgue take the corpse of their newborn; they slept that night in the hospital with their lifeless baby between them.”
Karen Santorum also writes on the event in her book: “‘Letters to Gabriel: The True Story of Gabriel Michael Santorum.”
Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
It is my understanding that the Santorum’s took a drug that sped up the delivery of the 19 week infant.
I know that Ms. Santorum was seriously ill and went into labor – so it’s completely understandable (in my view).
However, Santorum’s own position is that abortion is wrong under any circumstances – even to save the life of the mother.
So if he really believes that then they shouldn’t have taken the drug.
Posted by: Conscience | January 2, 2012, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
Santorum has never once said abortion is wrong when a mother’s life is at risk, nitwit. As far as Alan Colmes goes, he’s evidently as attractive on the inside as the outside.
Posted by: Trevor | January 2, 2012, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
Dear Mr. Colmes,
“It’s” name was Gabriel. His name was Gabriel.
Do you think you could have said what you said while calling a human being by his name?
Well, it looks like baby Gabriel’s purpose in life is known, now. To make us sick enough of liberals and realize that we need to find our hearts and souls.
Posted by: Jane | January 2, 2012, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
In all my 65 years, I have never heard of such inhumanity as these two taking a deceased baby home to confirm to their other children that the lifeless dead baby was, indeed, their brother…this is absolutely beyond sick…and the people who will vote in caucus tomorrow evening in Iowa either do not know of this derranged man or, more incredible, do not care. Since santorum came out today saying states have the right to deny contraceptions to anyone in their state if the people in that state do not want them, and has said abortion in any form, even to save the mother’s life (one of those great Catholic beliefs!), should never even be considered, it would seem that ms. santorum did, in fact, take something to hasten the birth of a fetus that died shortly after delivery…then was paraded around the house, lifeless. These are sick ultra-conservative evangelical religious right folks who are dangerous to the very life of this country should they assume any office beyond garbage collector!
Posted by: snydergal | January 2, 2012, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
It was the bit about taking a cadaver home from the hospital with them so that their kids could see a dead body and hurt even more than just the knowledge that it died that made him unacceptable presidential material. That’s just not normal. Its not what I would consider sane.
Posted by: whatever | January 2, 2012, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
While it does seem kind of odd I believe people tend to grieve in different ways and I am not going to pass further judgment (aside from my initial comment) on the Santorums behavior after the loss of Gabriel.
Still would never vote for him in a million years on ideological disagreements.
Posted by: sebby23 | January 2, 2012, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
I am going to try one last time, because my posts are not getting through.
Rick Santorum stated that abortion is wrong without ANY exceptions. Any exceptions are “phony excuses”.
I have nothing against this guy – and I don’t like to bring up personal issues.
But the policy position seems to be inconsistent with his own life.
Posted by: Conscience | January 2, 2012, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
OK idiots, how is taking a drug the same thing as willingly killing the child? The only person who equates the two is person who is moronic or just trolling others. Preventing the situation is different than letting it go through. Modern medicine is making the issue less relevant every day. Deciding you dont want the child is different, which is what people are really fighting for. After all its a womans choice, right? To do with the fetus what they want? Just listen to how liberals talk about babies. Alan could only say “it” over and over again. Some of these liberals are on camera saying it should be OK up to the age of even 3.
Posted by: Steve | January 2, 2012, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
How anybody deals with grief should not be a subject of a political discussion. I find it odd only because I believe the physical body has no value after death, and should be disposed of without cleaning, embalming, dressing it up, putting it in a satin lined walnut casket. having the public parade past it to stare at it, then having it buried somewhere for all eternity. See – I bet some of you think I’m nuts, too.
Posted by: Sheila | January 2, 2012, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
To those who think this was “sick”, have you ever lost a newborn child? No? Then you have no right to judge. Also, what is normal? It wasn’t that long ago that the “normal” thing to do when a loved one died was to dress them up in their best clothes, prop them up in a chair, and take family photos.
Everyone has a right to grieve in their own way. The only thing that is “sick” is that there are people in this world that would condemn others because of how they choose to grieve.
Posted by: jeff | January 2, 2012, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
The lack of any compassion, the complete and total disdain for two parents to grieve in a way that is cathartic to them is absolutely stunning around here. I can’t say that I would have done the same but I can’t say I wouldn’t have either. The Santorums are more sane than many that have posted their judgemental vitriol. Yeah, you folks are really a tolerant bunch, aren’t you? Meanwhile, a million and a half unborn are killed every year in this nation alone and that’s just dandy and logical for you all, isn’t it? Unbelievable.
Posted by: princetrumpet | January 2, 2012, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
I don’t like Rick Santorum … don’t think he has any business running for office … we booted him out in Pennsylvania because he has some extreme ideas that he proposes to inflict on other people. That being said … how he and his wife chose to handle the loss of their child, and whatever bizarre method they might have had to handle their grief, it is not right to attack him on this issue. We should accord him the respect to follow his own instincts in this matter. He is not the type to allow other folks this luxury … which is why he is not fit to hold public office!
Posted by: Carol S. | January 2, 2012, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a non-profit legal watchdog group dedicated to holding public officials accountable for their actions, named Senator Rick Santorum as one of the most corrupt members of congress in their 2006 report.
This second annual report on the most corrupt members of Congress entitled Beyond DeLay: The 20 Most Corrupt Members of Congress (and five to watch) was an encyclopedic report on corruption in the 109th Congress which documented the egregious, unethical and possibly illegal activities of the most tainted members of Congress.
CREW compiled the members’ transgressions and analyzed them in light of federal laws and congressional rules.
Posted by: Charles | January 2, 2012, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Rick Santorum, as hinted at by the many references to his incident of bringing home a dead baby to show his children, is not merely wrong for America, he is dangerously superstitious.
Any sort of person who has this view of human life (and I’m very strongly pro-life and also Catholic, though not Roman Catholic) can not be trusted to make rational decisions, especially when it comes to war and peace. Lunatics like this sent young teenagers to fight against the Ottoman Empire in the Children’s Crusade several centuries ago.
Posted by: Jonathan | January 2, 2012, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
Parents have the right to grieve however they wish, as long as no one is harmed by it. So, the Santorums’ grief may seem odd and inappropriate to some. I’m more concerned about Rick’s total belief system, religious incongruities and inconsistencies, extremist right-wing views, and his disdain for anyone who doesn’t look, think, and act the way he does and thinks everyone should. He lacks basic humanity, decency, and respect for the rest of us. Dangerous and unfit for POTUS.
Posted by: Dr. Bubba | January 2, 2012, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
We lost a child at 20 weeks due to cervical incompetence inducing pre-term labor. I had to go through the entire birthing process, KNOWING that there was no way that our child would live. I chose an epidural to save myself the physical agony and I chose Pitocin to speed up the delivery to get through the horror as quickly as possible. (In no way did I consider taking those drugs an act of aborting my child or assisting in his death.) While we did not take our dead child home with us, we did arrange to have a funeral home pick him up. 36 hours later, we chose to see him one last time at the funeral home (tearfully) before he was taken away to be cremated. We kept his ashes. A year later, we gathered up the emotional strength to plant a plumb tree with his ashes. It is the most pampered and sacred tree in our garden.
Losing this child was an amazing shock and terrible wound. “I did not know that living life could hurt this bad!” Is all that I could think or express for several weeks. I slept with my son’s baby blanket draped over my belly for 2 months following his birth/death and my husband and I both rode the tides of every single stage of grief. I patiently endured well meaning friends “comfort” me by saying things like “at least you he didn’t die when he was a baby that you had a relationship with.” And that was the easiest part of it all.
Therefore, I, a pro-choice liberal, find myself in no position to judge the actions/reactions of this family to the loss of their child. I DO think that Alan Colmes is a Fox News contributor for the SPECIFIC purpose of making “liberals” look bad on their station. Regardless of political opinions, spinners and commentators in all camps aught to know what subjects are simply taboo. Otherwise, they accomplish nothing but making themselves look like total jack@sses while simultaneously making the targets of their abuse all the more sympathetic to the general public.
Posted by: Taheerah | January 2, 2012, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a non-profit legal watchdog group dedicated to holding public officials accountable for their actions, named Senator Rick Santorum as one of the most corrupt members of congress in their 2006 report. This second annual report on the most corrupt members of Congress entitled Beyond DeLay: The 20 Most Corrupt Members of Congress (and five to watch) was an encyclopedic report on corruption in the 109th Congress which documented the egregious, unethical and possibly illegal activities of the most tainted members of Congress. CREW compiled the members’ transgressions and analyzed them in light of federal laws and congressional rules.
Posted by: Charles | January 2, 2012, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
you know, when I think of this I see a family that just lost a child and held a family funeral.
I see sadness, tragedy, pain.
When I read some of these heartless posts, it makes me wonder if it truly is not time to divide America into two countries, one Pro-Life and Creator and Constitution and
one Progressive, Pro-Choice and Athestic.
I don’t know how to divide the terriitories but would be willing to move my family to the Territory that sides with Pro-Life.
Posted by: irishalaman | January 2, 2012, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
Having lost a daughter in childbirth, I can tell you that the hospitals encourage you to spend time with the baby. To take pictures. To have friends and family come and say ‘goodbye’. And do whatever else you feel will help you bond with the baby and then say goodbye.
I do not think I would vote for Santorum, but not because of this. And Alan Colmes, AGAIN proves what an ass he is. In my opinion that is.
Posted by: Denise B | January 3, 2012, 1:12 am 1:12 am
Hey, if it’s legal to take home a dead fetus to bond with it and he and his wife choose to do that then fine, knock yourself out. I won’t vote for you for President (because you’re crazy and/or emotionally fragile).
It’s entirely a different story when you inflict this horror show on your kids. They will have that horrible memory the rest of their lives.
Posted by: Chris | January 3, 2012, 1:30 am 1:30 am
Is this the SICK twisted PERVERSION we are going to see from the left the campaign season? I guess when your president is a lying wannabe dictator thug.
The Santorums did not bring a dead baby home for their kids to play with. They took their son, who had died home, to reconcile the death of their child. They wanted time, to say goodbye, and to give the rest of the family the same opportunity. They took this opportunity to take a few pictures of the child that they would not see again on this earth. Until you loose a child, you really need to shut up. You cannot know what they were going through. Colmes is a God-hating dirt-bag. BEYOND LOW!!
Posted by: TexasBirdGirl | January 3, 2012, 2:34 am 2:34 am
Colmes needs to be fired.
Posted by: mbs | January 3, 2012, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Alan Colmes is Jewish. In the Jewish culture there is a watcher for the body who will stay by the body from the moment of death through the burial. Washing and watching the body is common in many cultures, and the process of burying one’s dead is sacred.
The Democrat Party claims it’s the party which “cares”. Bull-oney. Any party who thinks mocking bereaved parents is the pinacle of cleverness, is the same kind of party we’ve watched dominate countries which thought nothing of murdering 10′s of millions of people for the sake of “workers” or “fairness” or “justice”. No wonder Democrats can support the killing of a fully viable baby in the womb and make the Dr who made millions in infanticide a cult hero.
Posted by: FireAlan | January 3, 2012, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
I wonder what he would say if he saw family members of service men and women he intends on killing in the middle east sitting up their dead soldier and talking to it on the sofa for a couple of days before burial. That would be cute, they could pour food down the neck where the head used to be. He is a whacko, and anybody that ignores this probably needs to crawl back under the rock from wherest they came. Iowa is anybodies game right now, but the two with the strongest most ardent ground game will nab it. However, Romney will have to fight for all the other neo-con voters that support Gingrich, Santorum, Perry, etc. He will never convert a single Paul vote. Whereas, Paul may just get a few of Romney’s everyone else is a non-threat. And if Americans are such wimps to think that Iran poses any significant threat they are idiots. Shouldn’t we consider that Iran feels threatens by America and is acting in a reasonable manner? Wouldn’t we be doing the same thing if China were bullying us? Dems and Reps are hypocrites.
Posted by: Joe Chabot | January 3, 2012, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
Everyone deals with grief in a different way and should be allowed to do so. I have a friend who gave birth to a stillborn, she chose to not even look at the baby. I couldn’t do that but that’s the way she wanted to handle and she has that right. Others “need” to spend time with the body to deal with their grief. I think the Santorums felt their other children needed to feel apart of this event in their lives. I’m sure they were involved all along in the pregnancy and needed to not feel left out and also need to grieve.I use to think that “viewing” a dead body and the whole funeral thing was kind of crazy until my Dad passed away, then I realized I had to spend some time with his body and going through the funeral process was a healing experince for me.Being with the body of someone you love does not seen “gross” or “weird” Death is a part of living and you should deal with it however you want and so should everyone else without any judgements for anyone. Unless you’ve lose a newborn, you do not know how you would deal with it. I think allowing the other children to spend some time with the baby’s body in the privacy of their own home was something they will never regret.
Posted by: FAY HIGINBOTHAM | January 3, 2012, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
I’m sorry, but who here actually believes that the hospital let them take a dead baby home to sleep with, then TOOK IT BACK the next day?
Posted by: ibwilliamsi | January 3, 2012, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
When I listened to the clip of Santorum on Hannity explaining what they did and why it brought tears to my eyes. You need to hear his explanation because its quite beautiful and touching. Also his wife was a neo natal nurse and they didn’t “play” with the child. They just wanted the children to know they had a brother and for the baby to forever be a member of thei family. To have been known even if for a very short time. Alan Colms is a jerk for bringing it up but as we have learned liberals and their media minions don’t know shame.
Posted by: magicbeans | January 4, 2012, 10:47 am 10:47 am
My family lost a baby a few years back, my mother held my sister in her arms for the two hour car ride back to her hometown where the funeral would take place and my sister, Alexi, not “it” was shown to our family before preceding to the wake and funeral. Experiencing this myself, it is not weird. It is not “inhumane” It is not “crazy”, “gross”. I saw my sister dead and that respected the dignity of her life.
My family’s friend lost a newborn baby who died immediately after birth. This couple knew their baby would die early in the pregnancy but proceeded to have the child. Pictures were taken, the baby was held, and it was healing.
When my father saw what Alan Colmes said about Santorum and his family, he cried. Why do political debates have to be so cold and heartless? It truly makes me sick to my stomach that his family’s tragedy was even mentioned.
Posted by: A | January 4, 2012, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
A 20 weeks premature baby is probably not viable, although they are getting closer. If 16 weeks premature, the boy could have been saved. I imagine the mother was given Pitocin to bring on labor, because it might be that the baby was already dead in the womb.
Santorum is Italian American, and those I know include children in funerals. I am not, but I went to my baby brother’s funeral when he died at birth and all the children in neighborhood came too. We looked at him in the casket, which looked like a cradle, though none of us actually touched him that I could see. He was however full term. But this little guy Gabriel was the victim of one of Nature’s cruelties. I’m glad they named him. I am sure he was wanted. I make no judgment of them. They aren’t weird for this. But I would donate to any organization which upheld a woman’s right to choose. Too many women in my family tree which I have studied recently died in childbirth due to complications of diabetes and other problems. The children they left behind got a very rough time out of life. I want women to cherish their children, but also to look out from themselves.
Posted by: Dianne Foster | January 4, 2012, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
The risk of a child suffering and dying or being born damaged increases both with the age of the mother and with the number of pregnancies she has had. Her risk of damage or death increases also.
Caring for Gabriel’s dead body does nothing to atone for what the Santorum’s put him through because they wanted more children nor for the chance they took of losing their children’s mother.
Posted by: Jane | January 4, 2012, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
I’ve always thought Colmes to be a suspicious character – felt like the only reason he was on Fox news is to show liberals as wimpy and pathetic. Now with this statement, I almost feel like he might be hired by the right to underhandedly show liberals in a bad light. Santorum taking his dead baby home shows some craziness, but it also is a very touching thing to do, and I believe more people would applaud and respect the Santorums for it vs think them crazy.
Posted by: shiney singh | January 4, 2012, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
I see nothing wrong with taking that little baby’s body home to spend a short time with all family members. I am old enough to remember when wakes were held in the family home, where people came and sat up all night and stayed all day with the family, bringing food and as much comfort as possible. My very young aunt and ten year old uncle were two examples of this practice in our family. It’s a personal choice and really none of our business how the Santorums, or anyone else, handles the death of a child. I have a daughter who does volunteer work with mothers of stillborn and SID’s babies and can say with certainty that the varied ways the women handle those tragedies would be a lesson to all those critical of the Santorums. Colmes is a pathetic example of an man and I actually feel pity for him.
Posted by: Mary | January 8, 2012, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Absolutely nothing to do with politics. Why is the media bringing this up and why are people talking about it? Ridiculous.
Posted by: Heaher | January 13, 2012, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Lose a baby first, then judge.
Posted by: Steve | January 20, 2012, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
This man is the epitome of hypocrite and I don’t care if you are liberal, conservative, republican, or democrat you know what he did was not right. Bringing it home to his kids is outrageous and morally wrong. This is disgusting and if you think this is alright you are disgusting. I swear to God you people are like a damn cult. Concerning the whole abortion thing….no matter how you look at it, it was an abortion. And yes he does call for abortion being illegal in ALL forms and situations, so yes this man is a fringe hypocrite who will never become president.
Posted by: sansham | January 23, 2012, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
It is really sad to read these posts and to see how ignorant and how removed people are from reality of life and death. What do people think occurred in families before babies were born in hospitals and before people died in hospitals? Remarks that Rick Santorum’s children were some how traumatized by seeing and no doubt holding there little baby brother are ridiculous. Rick Santorum and his wife (who was a neonatal ICU nurse) clearly are highly present parent’s and I am sure they talked to their children, held them, prayed with them and together they bonded and grieved their baby as a family- like human beings have done since the beginning of time. Families used to wash the bodies of their loved ones and prepare them for burial. Just because our modern day society no longer does these rituals doesn’t mean they are “sick”, or “disgusting”. Sansham’s post saying “..no matter how you look at it, it was an abortion” , doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Karen Santorum developed an infection in her womb and went into premature labor, the baby was born too early to be viable and died within two hours.That is not an abortion. Rick and Karen Santorum bonded and grieved with their child at home for what I understood was less than 12 hours – instead of the hour or two at the most , that they would probably had in the hospital due to time constrains, staff availability etc. In our society how the Santorums chose to grieve their baby is considered” outrageous and morally wrong”, but over a million abortions a year in the US is morally fine and simply a women’s choice. Can someone explain that to me?
Posted by: Jana | January 27, 2012, 1:51 am 1:51 am
My first reaction to this was that it was gruesome.
On reflection, perhaps, not so much but also rather wrongheaded with the potential for damage to the existing children.
Perhaps they (the Santorums) didn’t have enough time to process this.
One does not take a dead body home. Grandma, Grandpa, brother or sister.
True the family had not yet seen the dead brother. It would have been better to bring the children to the hospital rather than bring the child home. Or better yet, at a proper funeral.
This is a nightmare that keeps on giving. But I guess Santorum has Santorum for brains.
Posted by: Richard | February 10, 2012, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm