Analysis: Rick Santorum Struggles to Transition to Major Candidate, Flubs National Motto
MANCHESTER, N.H. — Rick Santorum’s transition from scrappy Iowa underdog to national contender hit some bumps in his first full day campaigning in New Hampshire since his near-upset in the Hawkeye State.
At the first stop we covered today, at the Merrimack train station in Northfield, N.H., the former senator from Pennsylvania charmed the crowd, telling his life story, making his pitch and winning them over. Diving into the traditional engagement that New Hampshire voters demand, Santorum excelled in the back-and-forth.
But at the New Hampshire College Convention, at the Grappone Conference Center in Concord, N.H., he seemed lecturing and occasionally prickly. And while perhaps an instructive tone is not entirely inappropriate in front of students, he did some of the same Wednesday night at a senior center in Brentwood, N.H.
His debate with college students about same-sex marriage grew contentious.
“Why shouldn’t marriage [be] between three men?” he asked at one point.
His position on the issue is one that certainly will have appeal for the social conservatives in this state, where same sex marriage is legal, and even more so for his next audience in South Carolina. But the extensive back-and-forth – he clearly relishes debate – distracted from his task at hand: introducing himself to voters, explaining his rationale for his candidacy, and becoming a contender. While his bona fides as a social conservative are part of that, his task is to now expand beyond those base Republican voters. Even before that debate over marriage, Santorum’s stump speech was long on history lessons, short on rallying supporters.
Santorum, at one point, asked for a show of hands as to who knew the national motto. He expressed a shocked disgust that “only 5 percent of you are raising your hands.”
Moreover, he was wrong. He said the motto was “E Pluribus Unum.” It isn’t. It’s “In God We Trust” – as Republicans pointed out two months ago in a House resolution after President Obama made the same mistake.
Presidential campaigns provide opportunities for candidates to grow and mature, to step into the role of a national leader. Not every candidate is able to meet the moment – witness Howard Dean, for example, or Mike Huckabee. Sometimes the thinking is: Well, this worked for me up until now, so I might as well continue doing it. But that is a fallacy. Campaigns are opportunities to grow into something else. No nominee starts the same as he ends.
Santorum will need his campaign to grow in infrastructure, fundraising, endorsements and national reach. After New Hampshire, as the candidates move to states that depend less on retail politics and more on money, TV ads and major rallies, this will become a resource war. But that won’t be enough. He will need to grow, as well.
Conservatives are looking for a candidate around whom they can rally. Santorum will need to rise to the occasion, or like others before him, he could fall.
Email
White House Loves Aggressive Journalism ... Abroad
Virginia Ultrasound Bill Hits Nerve
ABC, isn’t that a picture of Jason Lee you used for the Santorum article?
Posted by: Jiji Moran | January 5, 2012, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
E pluribus unum (pronounced /ˈiː ˈplʊərɨbəs ˈuːnəm/; Latin [ˈeː ˈpluːrɪbʊs ˈuːnũː]) — Latin for “Out of many, one” — is a phrase on the Seal of the United States, along with Annuit cœptis and Novus ordo seclorum, and adopted by an Act of Congress in 1782.[1] Never codified by law, E pluribus unum was considered a de facto motto of the United States until 1956 when the United States Congress passed an act (H.J. Resolution 396), adopting “In God We Trust” as the official motto.
Posted by: Sally | January 5, 2012, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Dear Rick, Do you think that it is fair that the Federal Government sues states, that interpret inconsistently enforced Federal law, but overlooks states like California, that reward illegals with the ‘Dream Act’ while punishing U.S. Citizens with ‘Proposition 8′.
What happened to all men are created equal?
What happened to the 14th Amendment?
Why is divorce legal if marriage is not legal for everyone?
Why are you such a hypocrite?
You should not be fighting aginst marriage that does not concern you, instead, you should be fighting for making divorce illegal for your kind, so children know their parents, even if his name is ‘roll in the hay’ and her name is ‘I love you so much I want to have yo baaaaayyyybeeee!’
Posted by: Tom Smith | January 5, 2012, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
Dear Rick, Do you think that it is fair that the Federal Government sues states, that interpret inconsistently enforced FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS FOR OVER 25 YEARS, but overlooks states like California, that REWARD illegals with the ‘Dream Act’ while PUNISHING U.S. Citizens with ‘Proposition 8′.
What happened to all men are created equal?
What happened to the 14th Amendment?
Why is divorce legal if marriage is not legal for everyone?
Why are you such a hypocrite?
You should not be fighting aginst marriage that does not concern you, instead, you should be fighting for making divorce illegal for your kind, so children know their parents, even if his name is ‘roll in the hay’ and her name is ‘I love you so much I want to have yo baaaaayyyybeeee!’
Posted by: Tom Smith | January 5, 2012, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
So is ABC taking up the gay rites cause now? Nothing positive to say about Santorum’s ideals? Don’t believe children should be raised by their mother and father? Don’t believe increasing divorce rates have hurt society over the last 30 years? Don’t believe the standards that God set applies to the United States? I don’t understand how anyone thinks accepting gay marriage will benefit society. I don’t buy it. And I support Santorum!
Posted by: SimpleLiving | January 5, 2012, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Simpleliving: I’m sorry, but what are “gay rites”? Is that some new religious ceremony? And, aren’t the high divorce rates from HETEROsexual marriages??? Please study up on spelling and logic……
Posted by: Bobby Jo | January 5, 2012, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
I feel tired of media clamoring for a battle between “conservatives” and others in the Republican Party. They crave dissension and want to eradicate Mitt Romney, because they perceive that he would be the strongest adversary against their hero, Barack Obama.
Posted by: Todd | January 6, 2012, 1:12 am 1:12 am
The non-Mormon in the race makes the Mormon case of the “The Family: A Proclamation to the World” by espousing marriage between man and woman and children entitled be raised in a home where a father and mother love and nurture the child.
Posted by: Doug | January 6, 2012, 1:40 am 1:40 am
I mean, it’s easier for a gang of rich men to form a corporation and screw the whole country than it is for two gay people to buy a house together…. what’s up with that. We call corporations persons and let them run roughshod over everything…. but we call it “special rights” when a gay man wants to visit his partner in the hospital.
Posted by: blip | January 6, 2012, 4:36 am 4:36 am
He’s apparently as clueless as Obama. Who in the hell doesn’t know what the national motto is? These politicians are getting to me.
Posted by: newcountryman | January 6, 2012, 4:57 am 4:57 am
Did ABC ever report Barack Obama’s inability to correctly state the motto? Did ABC ever report Barack Obama”s statement about an “English” embassy?
Posted by: Nephron | January 6, 2012, 8:07 am 8:07 am
Why is my other comment not showing up? Is it being filtered for some reason, or is there an hour-long delay?
Posted by: Martha.S | January 6, 2012, 8:25 am 8:25 am
martha.s wrote:”Why is my other comment not showing up? Is it being filtered for some reason, or is there an hour-long delay?”
.
Depends on whether you said anything bad about oBama or the DEMOCRATS…. makes a difference in the free exchange of opinions and ideas on this progressive web site. You must not have said anything bad about Bush, Gingrich, Perry, Santorum, etc. That’s a post that is guaranteed to survive the censor scrutiny.
Posted by: Michelle Shu Jas | January 6, 2012, 9:18 am 9:18 am
Ok, 2 hours since my last post.Did ABC ever cover Obama’s mistake about the motto?
Posted by: Nephron | January 6, 2012, 10:17 am 10:17 am