Comments on: For RuPaul, Ron Paul Confusion Is a Real Drag

By: ted

ted — Sun, 15 Jan 2012 03:18:21 +0000

Holy crap, RuPaul is 51?!

By: Chris

Chris — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:25:47 +0000

Dear Above:

Please find a sense of humor. It’s good for your health and people might actually like you.

Love,
Concerned Citizen

By: Jenna

Jenna — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:17:03 +0000

Grow Up. No one is confusing the two.

By: Mahmoud A

Mahmoud A — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 22:55:12 +0000

My 13 year old would be so embarrassed if he authored such a shallow piece!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 22:50:29 +0000

Well we know whose *not* going to win a New York Press Club Award or Pulitzer this year.

By: Jaret

Jaret — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:34:47 +0000

This is just another pathetic attempt to smear Ron Paul. Way to go, ABC! Once again you’ve proven that you have no journalistic integrity. The story on Ron Paul should be his rise in the NH polls as Romney falls, but you can’t report that. No, your orders came from above that you can’t report anything good or even anything truthful about Dr. Paul. After trying to ruin him over the newsletters, you don’t even have the decency to report that Ben Swann, a local news reporter for a Fox affiliate, found the REAL author of the “racist newsletters”.

By: jack

jack — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:09:23 +0000

I think RuPaul’s is the writer in disguise.

By: roman

roman — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:21:05 +0000

.necrophilia journalism

By: A Cynic

A Cynic — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:59:26 +0000

Why is this called news?
Posted by: Lary | January 9, 2012, 12:34 pm.

For the exact same reason “Todd Palin Supports Gingrich” is news.

By: Kel Roberts

Kel Roberts — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:42:21 +0000

Really, really, really stupid article. This is just another attempt to turn our brain’s into jello. Stop reporting this b.s. or you are going to continue to lose readers and viewers. The author should be fired.