Comments on: The Supreme Court Takes on Cher’s Use of the F Word

By: Mark

Mark — Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:20:57 +0000

Tina, I don’t see your point. Kids can see any spluf (make that a dirty word if you want to, words are only as dirty as you make them) they want online. There is no room for freedom and censorship to coexist, because censorship exists solely to destroy freedom.

By: Rono

Rono — Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:30:57 +0000

9 and 10 years later this topic is still being worked on?
It is no wonder the USA is in the confused and screwed up condition she is in especially when our own VP has dropped the same F-BOMB over open mics several times.
Will he also be a subject for bad language discussion for decades to come?
Worry about the big problems 1st Washington and then take care of the small ones.

By: Wilson Nurre

Wilson Nurre — Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:58:37 +0000

This article will help the internet users for creating new blog or even a blog from start to end.

By: Awesome

Awesome — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:48:29 +0000

If the citizens do not have ethics, lack personal accountability, eschew personal good moral standards, continue to cultivate the attitude of entitlement and have no regard for anyone but themselves, there is no law that the Supreme Court of the land can pass that would change the march into self-destruction.

By: G-

G- — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:06:43 +0000

Do we really need F bombs every third word….bla bla bla. We do not NEED anything on TV. It is entertainment. If I am entertained I will watch, if I am not I won’t. Why can’t we let the viewer decide what he/she wants to watch, and let them decide if their child is OK to watch it with them?
It is possible for some lady to spill her drink at a restaurant and drop and F bomb. It is just a word. If someone wants to place a high value on it, less power to them.

By: Miami Hybrid

Miami Hybrid — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:59:35 +0000

I think this is a really important issue.The past rule of 10 pm was created for the purpose of being able limit what a minor watches on public television. I think that editing for the prime time is great. If you would like to see the uncut version, get cable with parental controls.There are many who do not have fancy ways of blocking what’s on TV at 8 pm. Have censorship is a relief to many, not a violations of the actors freedom of expression. I love Cher. I have looked up to her all my life, and main stream grandmothers have made her the icon she is today. She needs to see our point also.

By: Tina

Tina — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:41:12 +0000

Well I find it quite interesting she is being called in for saying the F bomb,,but all day long in cartoons, programs, whatever you hear GD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and what is so sad is that where that Judge sits behind him, on our money it states IN GOD WE TRUST,,,, my question is REALLY????? The courts and goverment need to get a handle on all the nudity online, TV , and language. I at times get to a point I am ready to discontinue Satellite, and internet so so so sick of it.

By: Give Me a Break

Give Me a Break — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:11:49 +0000

So glad this is being elevated to the Supreme Court. Now they don’t have to spend time on worthless cases like health care reform.

By: Robert C. Holt

Robert C. Holt — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:59:13 +0000

“Do not let any unwholesome talk come out of your mouths, but only what is helpful for building others up according to their needs, that it may benefit those who listen.” (Ephesians 4:29)

By: Rick

Rick — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:57:03 +0000

I think this is simple to solve. Control the level of decency by fining both the network and the celebrity heavily that used the bad language. Hit them in the wallet.