Comments on: Romney Defends Conservative Values, Says Obama Has ‘Secular Agenda’

By: RQ

RQ — Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:06:57 +0000

What is wrong with a “secular agenda”? Our constitution is secular. What would Romney’s agenda be? A Mormon agenda? A sectarian christian theocratic agenda. Isn’t fiscal policy secular by nature? Does he base his fiscal policy on his religious beliefs? No thank you. These candidates do not even know what secular means.

By: Noz

Noz — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:45:09 +0000

“Which brand do we want our President to hawk? The “right” one. Go figure that one out.” – plantain_11

Exactly, which is why lots of folks are trying to figure out what brand of religion Obama is hawking.

By: Rich

Rich — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:41:45 +0000

Maybe Romney should be a little more secular..his Mormons are baptizing dead people and he is silent about it.

By: Willpen

Willpen — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:31:25 +0000

EXCUSE ME…. but the country that I LIVE IN is a country where church and state are separated so the a politician’s agenda SHOULD BE SECULAR… This just makes me so damn angry…

By: Pax Tayer

Pax Tayer — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:49:44 +0000

In other words, Romney is complaining that Obama hasn’t yet established the “correct” brand of Christianity as the Official Religion of the U.S.

By: plantain_11

plantain_11 — Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:44:00 +0000

Question: Who wants a President that advocates for their religious beliefs? Answer: The people that adhere to his brand of religion. If we’re talking Christianity, there are many “brands” of Christianity. Hundreds of them. Which brand do we want our President to hawk? The “right” one. Go figure that one out.

By: Noz

Noz — Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:32:11 +0000

Romney Defends Conservative Values, Says Obama Has ‘Secular Agenda’

Sounds right.
What’s the big deal?

By: Rick McDaniel

Rick McDaniel — Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:14:34 +0000

Obama’s AGENDA, is that of a dictator, not a secularist.

By: carole

carole — Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:07:55 +0000

I think people are confused; this is a race for a presidential nominee, not a religious leader. The more I hear from these GOP candidates, the more it sounds as if they are running for the head of a religious organization. I fear a theocratic takeover. Whatever happened to American Democracy; whatever happened to separation of church and state? Why is a person’s religious beliefs more important than his fiscal, foreign and domestic policies? When are the candidates going to talk about jobs and the economy instead of defending their religious beliefs. It’s ridiculous.

By: Pa

Pa — Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:02:34 +0000

Veterans for Ron Paul 2012. Thanks for not posting a picture of the Veterans for Ron Paul March ABC