<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama on Solyndra: &#8216;This Was Not Our Program Per Se&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/obama-on-solyndra-this-was-not-our-program-per-se/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/obama-on-solyndra-this-was-not-our-program-per-se/</link>
	<description>The latest Politics news and blog posts from ABC News contributors and bloggers including Jake Tapper, George Stephanopoulos and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 22:30:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuck</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/obama-on-solyndra-this-was-not-our-program-per-se/#comment-21422732</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=534092#comment-21422732</guid>
		<description>What made the loan even more suspicios was the goverment put themselves in a secondary position on the loan,which is unusal.It diffinently looks to be set up for his buddies.When he toured the plant and bragged about it there had to be people that new it was going under.Befoe the loan was given there werw already financial forcasters that had projected the date it would go under dead on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What made the loan even more suspicios was the goverment put themselves in a secondary position on the loan,which is unusal.It diffinently looks to be set up for his buddies.When he toured the plant and bragged about it there had to be people that new it was going under.Befoe the loan was given there werw already financial forcasters that had projected the date it would go under dead on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taphonomic</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/obama-on-solyndra-this-was-not-our-program-per-se/#comment-21353822</link>
		<dc:creator>Taphonomic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=534092#comment-21353822</guid>
		<description>Obama visited the Solyndra plant on May 26, 2010, boasting about the loan saying, “the true engine of economic growth will always be companies like Solyndra.” He praised Solyndra as a Recovery Act (stimulus) success story.

But it wasn&#039;t his program, per se.  

Liar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama visited the Solyndra plant on May 26, 2010, boasting about the loan saying, “the true engine of economic growth will always be companies like Solyndra.” He praised Solyndra as a Recovery Act (stimulus) success story.</p>
<p>But it wasn&#8217;t his program, per se.  </p>
<p>Liar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lizzie</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/obama-on-solyndra-this-was-not-our-program-per-se/#comment-21258402</link>
		<dc:creator>Lizzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=534092#comment-21258402</guid>
		<description>Dan, so you&#039;re telling us that ALL the debt  was created by Pres.Bush,  before that we started with ZERO, Pres. Clinton and before none before increased the Natl. debt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, so you&#8217;re telling us that ALL the debt  was created by Pres.Bush,  before that we started with ZERO, Pres. Clinton and before none before increased the Natl. debt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/obama-on-solyndra-this-was-not-our-program-per-se/#comment-21248152</link>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=534092#comment-21248152</guid>
		<description>Obama is an idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randi</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/obama-on-solyndra-this-was-not-our-program-per-se/#comment-21220132</link>
		<dc:creator>Randi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 05:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=534092#comment-21220132</guid>
		<description>Posted by: carlos &#124; March 23, 2012, 12:08 am 12:08 am 

Wasn&#039;t it the government that gathered together the resources and the future technology to get us to the moon and back? The internet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted by: carlos | March 23, 2012, 12:08 am 12:08 am </p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t it the government that gathered together the resources and the future technology to get us to the moon and back? The internet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlos</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/obama-on-solyndra-this-was-not-our-program-per-se/#comment-21213642</link>
		<dc:creator>carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 04:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=534092#comment-21213642</guid>
		<description>Yes, &quot;we know&quot; what the technologies of the future are. That&#039;s what the federal government is known for, plotting the way of the future. This conceit would be risible if it weren&#039;t so expensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, &#8220;we know&#8221; what the technologies of the future are. That&#8217;s what the federal government is known for, plotting the way of the future. This conceit would be risible if it weren&#8217;t so expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/obama-on-solyndra-this-was-not-our-program-per-se/#comment-21211922</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 03:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=534092#comment-21211922</guid>
		<description>When will the MSM use the term “lie” when referring to things Obama says? Remember the Bush Lied People Died meem.

Posted by: tim &#124; March 22, 2012, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

What lie?

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Pub.L. 109-58) is a bill passed by the United States Congress on July 29, 2005, and signed into law by President George W. Bush on August 8, 2005, at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The act, described by proponents as an attempt to combat growing energy problems, changed US energy policy by providing tax incentives and loan guarantees for energy production of various types.

This act was then absorbed into the Recovery Act, so the President was right. It was created by Congress just as he stated. By the way, this is a passing reference in the interview and is not delivered as any kind of scathing criticism, nor deflection.

Posted by: Barney &#124; March 22, 2012, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

*****</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will the MSM use the term “lie” when referring to things Obama says? Remember the Bush Lied People Died meem.</p>
<p>Posted by: tim | March 22, 2012, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm</p>
<p>What lie?</p>
<p>The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Pub.L. 109-58) is a bill passed by the United States Congress on July 29, 2005, and signed into law by President George W. Bush on August 8, 2005, at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The act, described by proponents as an attempt to combat growing energy problems, changed US energy policy by providing tax incentives and loan guarantees for energy production of various types.</p>
<p>This act was then absorbed into the Recovery Act, so the President was right. It was created by Congress just as he stated. By the way, this is a passing reference in the interview and is not delivered as any kind of scathing criticism, nor deflection.</p>
<p>Posted by: Barney | March 22, 2012, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm</p>
<p>*****</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Right Loses Again</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/obama-on-solyndra-this-was-not-our-program-per-se/#comment-21211822</link>
		<dc:creator>The Right Loses Again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 03:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=534092#comment-21211822</guid>
		<description>Posted by: Dan &#124; March 22, 2012, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm 

You have no counter arguments, so you attack the &#039;person&#039;? That&#039;s lame, but totally expected from the Republican right wing. When you come up with some facts or counterarguments, let us know. Until then, have a decent day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted by: Dan | March 22, 2012, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm </p>
<p>You have no counter arguments, so you attack the &#8216;person&#8217;? That&#8217;s lame, but totally expected from the Republican right wing. When you come up with some facts or counterarguments, let us know. Until then, have a decent day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/obama-on-solyndra-this-was-not-our-program-per-se/#comment-21208972</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 02:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=534092#comment-21208972</guid>
		<description>I think that posting the same Media Matters propaganda again and again under different names actually makes it true. I defend President Obama even if he contradicts himself within the same minute. Notice I NEVER say anything negative about him under any circumstances. That proves I’m credible and sensible and very definitely not a sycophant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that posting the same Media Matters propaganda again and again under different names actually makes it true. I defend President Obama even if he contradicts himself within the same minute. Notice I NEVER say anything negative about him under any circumstances. That proves I’m credible and sensible and very definitely not a sycophant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barney</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/obama-on-solyndra-this-was-not-our-program-per-se/#comment-21207172</link>
		<dc:creator>Barney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 02:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=534092#comment-21207172</guid>
		<description>When will the MSM use the term “lie” when referring to things Obama says? Remember the Bush Lied People Died meem.

Posted by: tim &#124; March 22, 2012, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

What lie?

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Pub.L. 109-58) is a bill passed by the United States Congress on July 29, 2005, and signed into law by President George W. Bush on August 8, 2005, at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The act, described by proponents as an attempt to combat growing energy problems, changed US energy policy by providing tax incentives and loan guarantees for energy production of various types.

This act was then absorbed into the Recovery Act, so the President was right. It was created by Congress just as he stated. By the way, this is a passing reference in the interview and is not delivered as any kind of scathing criticism, nor deflection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will the MSM use the term “lie” when referring to things Obama says? Remember the Bush Lied People Died meem.</p>
<p>Posted by: tim | March 22, 2012, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm</p>
<p>What lie?</p>
<p>The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Pub.L. 109-58) is a bill passed by the United States Congress on July 29, 2005, and signed into law by President George W. Bush on August 8, 2005, at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The act, described by proponents as an attempt to combat growing energy problems, changed US energy policy by providing tax incentives and loan guarantees for energy production of various types.</p>
<p>This act was then absorbed into the Recovery Act, so the President was right. It was created by Congress just as he stated. By the way, this is a passing reference in the interview and is not delivered as any kind of scathing criticism, nor deflection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>