Comments on: Boehner and Pelosi Clash Over Obama’s Gay Marriage Stance

By: Martin Mann

Martin Mann — Thu, 17 May 2012 00:16:57 +0000

Really, would you expect anything different from these two? Once again the liberal media is diverting the real issues at hand. The economy, housing, and jobs are what we should be discussing. We know that Boehner wouldn’t support gay marriage. We know that Pelosi would, THIS ISN’T NEWS. If this is the information you needed to sway your vote from Obama then overall it has paid off. Otherwise you’re still just a blind puppet not knowing what is good for you or this country. OR, you’re not working and you don’t want to work because you know that Obama bucks with provide you with everything you want. The problem with that is, those bucks are every working American’s, not Obama’s and certainly not yours.

By: sonny

sonny — Wed, 16 May 2012 23:18:57 +0000

About the only thing that could normally be considered goof about Pelosi is her loyalty but its only going to be there as long as it gets her something.

By: Michael

Michael — Tue, 15 May 2012 16:27:53 +0000

I love how everyone gets up in arms over a Catholic who actually supports gay marraige. How terrible. lol.

Wake up, Grow up, and learn to LIVE your faith, not just parrot back choice phrases at the world when it does something you disaprove of.

@ Olwzone = I like your choice of verses, which you obviously didnt read too closely. Do you realize the number of people lumped in under those verses? “(v.29) Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, (v.30) Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, (v.31) Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful”
~So… you lump in disobediant children, people wishing to marry a partner of the same gender, boasters, murderers, debaters, all in the same group? Hope you aren’t a judge… though you couldnt be, for you would fall into the category of “debater” yourself.

And no one mentions that in the 10-15th centuries, christian churches had multiple services for the marraige of man and man, or woman and woman, which was considered undesirable, but not anathema.

Maybe instead of just reading a bible, you should research the history, learn what your religion truly entails.

Here’s a wild thought, instead of bashing anyone who doesnt immediately agree with your narrow mindset, EDUCATE YOURSELF.

By: semby

semby — Tue, 15 May 2012 15:47:48 +0000

For the good of this country and the Catholic Church; she needs to be ex-communicates. She’s a disgrace!

By: John

John — Tue, 15 May 2012 15:15:35 +0000

What a joke this is disgusting! Tired of people spewing things about religions like Christianity and Catholics supporting gay marriage these people have never even picked up a bible and read it. Both New and old testaments forbid it outright and it use to be punishable by death. Romans ch1-27-32 and thats new testament. Says God will abandon people like that so idk maybe she isn’t reading the same bible I am but I am Christian and know what the bible says she needs to be educated.

By: olwzone

olwzone — Tue, 15 May 2012 14:44:02 +0000

There must be a recording in side that empty head that just pucks out this garbage!!

By: Mark Finn

Mark Finn — Tue, 15 May 2012 14:19:52 +0000

The woman is obviously a CINO (Catholic In Name Only)…

By: Joseph Paul

Joseph Paul — Tue, 15 May 2012 13:53:44 +0000

And her ‘Catholicism’ doesn’t teach her that marriage is between a MAN and a WOMAN? Nothing but political posturing. Hypocrisy at its best. As long as votes are to be had, this woman is capable of sacrificing not only her principles, her convictions, her education even maybe her family. What a sewer rat.

By: newcountryman

newcountryman — Thu, 10 May 2012 18:19:59 +0000

I would expect nothing less from “Jack-in-the-Box” Nanny Pelosi on anything Obama does.