Comments on: Bill Clinton: Mitt Romney Would Be ‘Calamitous for Our Country’

By: Noz

Noz — Wed, 06 Jun 2012 13:16:05 +0000

Posted by: DBRight | June 6, 2012, 1:48 AM 1:48 AM

Wow, a sane voice.
Thank you for posting.

By: dbright

dbright — Wed, 06 Jun 2012 05:48:36 +0000

Looks like Clinton’s as desperate as Obama. Stumps against Walker, as Obama peeks over his shoulder. Remember this man was cited for civil contempt during his Monica distraction.

Obama hides and sends out people with thick enough skin to try to do his desperate bidding. Sad, truly.

Now, DAVEM: You may not like Romney (and I’m not a big fan, yet). But show a little class and don’t stoop to comments about his beliefs, or magic underwear type comments. You stray away from the point: you don’t like him. Imagine how people feel about Obama.

If only the media fails to hide the significance of Wisconsin, and the conservative uprising, we may just have a chance to bring the country back to the old-days of self-reliance, responsibility, and Liberty. Like that’s a bad thing.

By: James Jameson

James Jameson — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 20:45:29 +0000

Really, I would say we already have a trainwreck as president, so Calamitious must mean , anti-Communist.

By: rev1981

rev1981 — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 20:26:48 +0000

Clinton compliments Romney on his successful business career which neither he or O’Bama ever experienced. That is Ok. But then, O’Bama must have reminded Bill that he is apart of “The Presidents Club” (a must read) and what Bill’s responsibilities are (or not are). That is why Bill changed his tune and said the “calamitious” remark about Romney. Now who is the ‘flip-flopper?’

By: Noz

Noz — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 19:31:41 +0000

“btw, I have enjoyed working with Tom Hanks. Really nice guy and he also endorsed Obama in 2008.” – Wilson

Hopefully Hanks is better informed this go around and votes for Mittens.

btw, I think the makeup artist short changed you on that movie.

By: seriously

seriously — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 18:41:21 +0000

Bill Clinton is a no class moron. Go find another intern and have some cigars Bill. Geez hasn’t he done enough to embarass the Democratic party.

By: Wilson

Wilson — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:35:46 +0000

Sorry NOZ, over $1.25 trillion of your $5 trillion was interest on the debt left after Bush. Not Obama’s “spending”. Another $1.2 trillion is the deficit on the books for 2009 before Obama took office. So suddenly your “common knowledge” $5 trillion isn’t “Bama’s”

What I’d like to hear from you is why “spending” with Trickle Down economics under previous administrations was OK. And why you have no problem with “spending” under the Ryan Budget, estimated by the CBO to actually INCREASE our debt.

btw, I have enjoyed working with Tom Hanks. Really nice guy and he also endorsed Obama in 2008.

By: Cloony 2012

Cloony 2012 — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:16:21 +0000

the election, the parties, the ‘issues’, terrorism,osama, wars-all just smoke and mirrors. the country is run by corporations. the corporates greed ran the country into the ground, calamatous. ha! what’s an election without meladramatics!the whole election is hollywooded, whoever puts on the best show wins. WTF? there are better people in Hollywood! let’s elect them!

By: Noz

Noz — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:12:33 +0000

“Yes, under President Barack Obama, the debt increased from $12,311,3349,677,512 in 2009 to $15,125,898,976,397 in 2011.” – Wilson

Hey Wilson, time to get updated.
Bama increased the debt by 5 Trillion, it’s common knowledge.

btw, I loved your acting in that movie Cast Away with Tom Hankerchief.

By: Wilson

Wilson — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:02:11 +0000

Deb shouted: “OBAMA HAD DONE NOTHING FOR THIS COUNTRY EXCEPT PUT US DEEPER IN DEBT.”

Are you implying that the Ryan Budget – supported by Mr. Romney – is a better option than President Obama’s spending? The CBO states that the Ryan Budget will put us deeper into debt. If “debt” is a key reason for voting against Obama, why is a future under Mitt any better?

Ronald Reagan nearly tripled our national debt from $930,210,000,000 in 1980 to $2,684,392,000,000 in 1988. George W. Bush doubled our national debt from $5,662,216,013,697 In 2000 to $10,699,804,864,612 because of more GOP supply side economics: military spending + tax cuts for the wealthy.

Yes, under President Barack Obama, the debt increased from $12,311,3349,677,512 in 2009 to $15,125,898,976,397 in 2011.

For the sake of argument, let’s set aside the fact that Obama’s debt included spending to offset the worst economic down turn in most American’s memory + accumulated interest on massive accumulated debt. Let’s just look at the basic numbers.

As you can see, the Reagan and Bush “trickle down” economic eras gave the nation VASTLY more debt than President Obama. Why would voters believe returning to those Republican policies – more tax cuts, more military spending, and fewer regulations – will magically turn our economy around with less debt?