Comments on: Romney Promises to ‘Bury The Hatchet,’ Work with Democrats

By: Tracy

Tracy — Mon, 29 Oct 2012 05:22:02 +0000

Romney bragged during the debate about working with democrats. What people fail to realize is it’s because they were democrats. The democrats worked with him. Unlike the party of NO is towards OBama. I give the credit for what was accomplished in his state to the dems. Not to him.

By: Michael

Michael — Wed, 15 Aug 2012 04:15:00 +0000

“odumbo set a new low for his complete lack of working with the other side. What a dope.”

Here speaks the intellectual heart of the right.

Republicans really are the idiocracy.

PS – Where are the Tax Returns Willard?

By: Michelle Shu Jas

Michelle Shu Jas — Fri, 03 Aug 2012 02:17:21 +0000

@dave 6:19 PM
.
1) raise taxes on 95% of Americans by $500 per year (oBlamer’s plan was to increase the deficit which is essentially a delayed tax increase for everyone…. who do you think is going to pay it off).
2) cut taxes for millionaires by $87,000 per year (oBlamer’s plan was to hand millions of taxpayer dollars to his millionaire cronies all in the name of GREEN energy).
3) grow the deficit (oBlamer’s plan was to absolutely EXPLODE the deficit and saddle everyone with the monumental task of how to pay it off…. he has succeeded beyond his wildest collectivist dreams).
.
Major collectivist success….

By: Dave

Dave — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 22:19:21 +0000

Posted by: Freedom | August 2, 2012, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

“The study, by researchers at the nonpartisan Brookings Institution and the Tax Policy Center, found Romney’s economic plan would raise taxes on 95 percent of Americans by an average of $500 per year and grow the deficit, while millionaires would receive an average tax cut of $87,000 a year.”

So this is Romney’s plan . . .

1) raise taxes on 95% of Americans by $500 per year
2) cut taxes for millionaires by $87,000 per year
3) grow the deficit

Major fail . . .

By: Janet

Janet — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 22:17:28 +0000

It would be better if we buried the Republican House.

By: Mr McGoo

Mr McGoo — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 21:58:50 +0000

I am non-partisan and vote however I want. I am not totally on board the Obama train, but Romney is the best the Republican Party has to offer. If they want my vote they will need to find a candidate that can relate to the regular people. Like Ron did Like George II did. (I not totally sure how GW did it but he did) Where is the republican that came from nothing and went into public service at an early age. Maybe a former Cop that turned DA that went into Politics. Someone that has the ability to talk and get people to feel what they are saying (because they believe it). This is the only way to get people to “buy in”

By: Freedom

Freedom — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 21:50:18 +0000

Why do Democrats hate religion, the 2nd Amendment, the military, success and a balance budget?

By: real_hope_and_change

real_hope_and_change — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 20:18:17 +0000

odumbo set a new low for his complete lack of working with the other side. What a dope.

By: heirloomfurniture

heirloomfurniture — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 20:17:05 +0000

President Obama has found it difficult to find support for any of his proposals among Republicans on Capitol Hill. He passed his landmark achievements – health reform legislation and wall street reform – without any help from Democrats. Is this what holds for journalism today. No fact checking. No proofreading. No bias?. If the MSM were doing well they could afford to keep their editors so blatant oversight as this would never happen.

By: Perplexed

Perplexed — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 20:03:57 +0000

Normally I would attribute obama’s terrible record of negotiation to his obvious lack of experience. While I think that explains things to some extent, I think another severe liability that he has is his hard core subservience to leftist ideology. Alinsky was NO compromiser. It leaves no room for give and take. He is a strictly ‘his way or the highway’ kind of guy. When combined with his gross lack of experience it is a fundamental flaw in a chief executive.