Yes George showed his bias today.
Of course he got no specifics and none will be forth coming.
This will have to be worked out with Demos once the Romney Presidency starts.
It’s the third rail of politics Vampy and it’s amazing that these guys are willing to deal with it once elected. You must belong to the Cookie Roberts school of politics which believes we can never revamp the tax code so we are doomed to build the deficit until it blows up.

And btw…

“The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Saturday shows President Obama attracting support from 46% of voters nationwide, while Mitt Romney earns 44% of the vote. Four percent (4%) prefer some other candidate, and five percent (5%) are undecided.” So, ahem, Gallup: Obama+4, Ipsos: Obama+4 and Rasmussen: Obama +2 meaning Gallup has moved 3 points toward Obama, Ipsos and Rasmussen have both moved 5 points in Obama’s direction.

Advantage, Obama.

ALL the SPECIFICS you want are at Romney’s website. You are beyond a tool if you think I am going to cut and paste 50 pages of specifics for you, when you and I know YOU have made up YOUR mind. The above post are for those who are considering a change for the better, or who are sitting on the fence, and want to know WHAT Obama’s REAL record is to date, since no one involved with the Obama campaign dare share with the public what Obama’s record has actually been these last 3 3/4 years.

12,544,000: The Number Of Unemployed Workers. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

8,031,000: The Number Of Workers Working Part-Time For Economic Reasons. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

5,033,000: The Number Of Workers Who Have Been Unemployed For 27 Weeks Or Longer. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

1,043,000: Construction Jobs Lost Since President Obama Took Office. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

582,000 Manufacturing Jobs Lost Since President Obama Took Office. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

368,000: Workers That Dropped Out Of The Labor Force In August. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

261,000: Jobs Lost Since President Obama Took Office. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

41,000: Downward Revision Of Jobs Created Over The Last Two Months. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

15,000: Manufacturing Jobs Lost In August. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

1981: The Last Time The Labor Force Participation Rate Was At Its Current Level Of 63.5 Percent. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

43: Consecutive Months The Unemployment Rate Has Remained Above Eight Percent. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

39.2 Weeks: The Average Duration Of Unemployment – Nearly Double The 19.8 Weeks When President Obama Took Office. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

14.7 Percent: The Real Unemployment Rate, Including Those That Are Working Part-Time Due To Economic Reasons. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

11.2 Percent: The Unemployment Rate Had Labor Force Participation Remained Steady Since President Obama Took Office. (American Enterprise Institute, 9/7/12)

8.4 Percent: The Unemployment Rate Had Labor Force Participation Remained Steady From July. (American Enterprise Institute, 9/7/12)

8.1 Percent: The Unemployment Rate In August. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

7.8 Percent: The Unemployment Rate When President Obama Took Office. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 9/7/12)

5.4 Percent: The Unemployment Rate President Obama’s Advisers Predicted If We Passed His $787 Billion Stimulus. (Christina Romer and Jared Bernstein, “The Job Impact Of The American Recovery And Reinvestment Plan,”1/9/09)

Two questions: 1) Has there ever been a more comprehensive failure than Barack Obama? 2) Why would the Romney campaign ever run an ad that doesn’t include at least a couple of these figures?

Comparing employment in the USA to Africa is silly and irrelevant.

“Paul Krugman calls that “he looked at me funny” economic theory.” – The Liberal Vamp

If Paul Krugman knew how the economy works instead of blabbering on about unproven theories all the time then your statement might have weight.