Comments on: Paul Krugman: Paul Ryan ‘Was Never a Man of Substance’

By: A.Yeshuratnam

A.Yeshuratnam — Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:53:50 +0000

Is Krugman a liberal or a pseudo-Communist? His nonfunctional, quixotic economic policies followed by Obama are primary responsible for deep recession and mammoth unemployment. Nobel prize need not be an additional qualification. Nobel Committee often makes wrong choices. Even Arafat, a terrorist and murderer, was their choice. Obama was chosen when he had not completed even six months as president. Bombings by drones have killed hundreds of innocent civilians, children and entire families. And yet, Peace Prize.. Krugman has become a sleazy political columnist, instead of producing economic theories. Krugman, not Ryan, is not at all a man of substance.
Margaret Thatcher dispensed with economists patronized by Labor Party. She introduced tax cuts and there was a miraculous revival of economy. Romney, if elected, can follow Thatcher’s methods.

By: P322

P322 — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 00:40:18 +0000

This from a newspaper that employed Jason Blair who made up stories they published? The New York Times and their writers lost all credibility with me back then.

By: real_hope_and_change

real_hope_and_change — Sat, 22 Sep 2012 12:26:47 +0000

“There seems to be so many repeated comments in this section, usually from a conservative voice, and there are really only about 3 ‘templates’ to these types of comments. Very strange to see. I especially like the ones who say they are independents but only voice conservative concerns.”———–Actually we see only one template from the liberals—blame Bush. Apparently your template detection needs some work.

By: spud940u

spud940u — Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:07:10 +0000

This is coming from a man who most likely thinks Joe Biden is not a bumbling fool.

By: Little Ann

Little Ann — Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:03:50 +0000

Have you ever heard? It takes one to know one!!!!!

By: Roger

Roger — Fri, 14 Sep 2012 02:45:20 +0000

Paul Krugman is supporting an immature man who can not talk intelligently without a TelePrompTer

Posted by: firedup49 | September 13, 2012, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Wow, have you ever got that wrong. I presume you’re talking about President Obama and he is extremely well-spoken without a telepromter, and shows both great insight and intelligence.

By: Freedom

Freedom — Fri, 14 Sep 2012 02:42:31 +0000

Krugman can’t talk about substance, he has none. Why does anyone care what this mean egotistical man thinks or says? A Nobel Prize, did he do nothing too?

By: firedup49

firedup49 — Fri, 14 Sep 2012 02:13:40 +0000

Paul Krugman is supporting an immature man who can not talk intelligently without a TelePrompTer

By: Lizzie

Lizzie — Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:40:44 +0000

Got to love Stephanopoulis on the view, stating Fox covered the RNC more than the DNC, apparently he mistook ABC, NBC, CBS which covered the DNC and their speeches about abortions and birthcontrol more than FOX, who covered BOTH conventions equally.

By: reggie

reggie — Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:28:54 +0000

Wow! You made me sit through a full viewing of last Sunday’s Stephanopoulus routine so I could get myself updated on Krugman’s comment about Ryan not being a person of substance ( to paraphrase Mr. K.), and what did I get? The line above…that was it….the whole bit! Did it warrant ABC pointing it out in their opening bit to advertise it or what? ..seemed like another campaign gaffe by ABC…….Krugman said absolutely nothing to support his claim……..and, if you notice, when he is a visitor on the show, that’s what he is….a visitor, who just happened to find an empty seat, Il guess. What a dud!