What most voters don’t know is the way Mitt Romney actually made his fortune: by borrowing vast sums of money that other people were forced to pay back.

Romney makes a $250 million fortune loading up companies with debt and then extracting million-dollar fees from those same companies, in exchange for the generous service of telling them who needs to be fired in order to finance the debt payments he saddled them with in the first place.

Just search “hostile takeovers Bain Capital” to get a better idea of Romney’s “parasitic capitalism”.

Romney won the debate by out Blabbing Obama and the moderator and
In hindsight Obama had the correct strategy of let Romney talk and take over the conversation with him and he also took over the moderator, it could not follow It has been said give a man enough rope and he let will hang himself, and other terms are putting him on the stand and let him sing in this case by self identifying who he is and confirm his thinking. by Obama allowing him to stay out in the open unprotected, in football terms this is called out running your blockers

By letting Mitt Romney talk he confirmed that his plan was in complete by fact check and therefore it is true what Obama has been saying he proved he does not have a plan

By fact check blabbing Mitt has contradicted himself in every direction or his plans were termed to be incomplete and were not telling the truth again Obama was correct Mitt Romney does not have a plan

We are much better off than we were four years ago jobs or up, housing market is up, the stock market is up, proves things are getting better every day proves Obama has a plan

The media has over analyzed Obama’s strategy of letting Mitt talk and over of evaluated this by thinking negative instead of positive and determining as Obama being flat, non-responsive, non-interested and not into the debate but yet proven by fact check that Mitts statements are contradictory, incorrect and his statements are flip flopping.
The media is now repeating what the opposition party is saying that the job rate has been fixed by the Democrats, now how many times are they going to get it wrong.

Republican political theory is pretty straight forward and it simply states that if you are a have not, you deserve you fate and should stop trying to better yourself and the conditions of your family. That is the definition of the 47%. As far as Mitt Romney is concerned, you are a LOSER, and you do not count. If he is elected, you will get no consideration from him on any matters of your concern.

The Democrats offer a different perspective, but it is rather stark too. If you want to do better and you are willing to pay the price. The key here is that the opportunity will be made available, but at a rather higher threshold. The mechanisms for affirmative action have been for the most part removed and you must compete with people and persons who have some latent social-economic advantages. Not recognizing those facts can be detrimental to your financial and economic well being, so you must do that first. Next, you may want to get an education to make yourself a more competitive and productive person; but you must consider the cost of that education relative to the ROI on yourself. It isn’t the just a matter of income that you may command in a few years; it is the factors surrounding the requirements of the employment generating that income that you must understand.

Voting the straight D ticket addresses the above considerations in terms of the recent history of the United States of America. Republicans have put wars and tax cuts for the wealthy at the top of their agenda for the past twelve years. Although they can pass a significant part of the blame for the failure of the government to Democrats, they cannot deny that Obama was the guy who just told them NO in 2010. For this, they have determined to punish him by denying the whole nation any progress as long as he is in office. Now it’s your turn to do some denying. Vote the Straight D ticket in 2012 and sort it out in 2014.