Comments on: PM Note: 65 Million Watched Debate, Romney’s Lady Binder, Courting Women, Jeb’s Advice

By: Librarian53

Librarian53 — Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:14:24 +0000

Freedom, did you know that there were attacks on our embassies during the years under President Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, and Bush Jr. ?
It is really terrible that the Republican Party is politicizing this tragedy. How low can they go.

By: Librarian53

Librarian53 — Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:12:09 +0000

Herewego, stop lying. Oil and gasoline prices are set on the world market. You know or should know, that oil drilled here is sold to the highest bidder on the world market.
And of course the Ledbetter law helps women and men. Now they can sue if they find out they are being paid less than someone else doing the same job. It isn’t like people go around showing their paystubs, so it can take years to find out you are being ripped off.
And you are lying about women staffers being paid less. Everyone who has the same job title gets paid the same.
Did you read all the articles that Romney made up his story about how he thought of getting the ‘binders of women’? Romney lies again.

By: Freedom

Freedom — Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:34:53 +0000

Why do you keep harping on the “binder of women”? Do you think we are all stupid. Everyone knew exactly what he was talking about but the news media it seems. You keep ignoring the the Benghazi cover up and the killings of our people. Why??????

By: herewego

herewego — Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:20:04 +0000

And oh my god, how Obama lied about the whole oil and energy question………………Yes, sorry America, its true Obama is the main reason why you are paying so much for gas and electric now……..and yes America, he hwas cut drilling and such by over 50% on federal lands…………and yes America, all of Obama’s energy policies have been making George Soros richer who as you may know is Obama’s puppet master along with the Saud Royals (who have made billions off Obama’s screwing of America and been pulling Obama’s strings since atleast his Harvard days.

By: herewego

herewego — Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:16:41 +0000

Let’s see Obama lied lied and lied well in both debates but in the second, he lied about the economy doing good (like we voters don’t know this lie), he lied about LIBYA again and the murder of the ambassador and 3 others that he caused, he lied about the Lehbetter law being to help women–it doesn’t, it helps attorneys, not to mention Obama pays his female staffers less than his male staffers so it made his record on this an issue, and Crowley the moderator thought Obama was doing so bad that she had to jump in a public way to proteck poor little lying Obama—and the bots think Obama won and that by spinning the second debate (which historically has never affected an election) is going to somehow help Obama win the election? Really? Bot-logic something that just doesn’t make sense.

By: herewego

herewego — Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:11:18 +0000

Robert, because Romney did win the presidency after the first debate. Historically speaking, and this has ALWAYS been the case, the person ahead in the polls following the 1st debate (especially when gallup gives them over 50% like they do Romney) wins the election. THIS has ALWAYS been the case. The second and third debate have never counted for anything and changed anything.

By: Robertmiii

Robertmiii — Thu, 18 Oct 2012 04:57:19 +0000

Hey teapots, the day after the first debate Romney had parties as if he had just won the Presidency…why not now?

By: Robertmiii

Robertmiii — Thu, 18 Oct 2012 04:14:15 +0000

The reason the nation watched the second debate with such vigor is because they wanted to see our President kick Romney’s butt… which he did. Mitt and Ann Romney are rich aristocrats who have had MONEY their entire life… They are used car salesman hoping to ruse YOU!!!!

By: Mike1776

Mike1776 — Wed, 17 Oct 2012 23:21:03 +0000

Thank God Romney and Lyin’ Ryan are losing. What a staggering disaster they would be if elected. More, endless, disastrous wars abroad, George W. Bush style (from the same old Bush foreign policy team Romney is now reassembling. Plus, in the ultimate irony, Taliban-style laws on social issues in the United States, giving the government, not individual women, control over these women’s bodies.

The new wars, plus even more huge tax cuts for the very rich, would blow up the deficit (steadily coming under control with Obama) to unheard of magnitude. Which would be the trigger for Romney and Ryan to do what they’ve wanted to do all along, but dare not admit:

1. Doing away with the tax breaks (like the mortgage tax deduction) that ordinary Americans rely on while of course, obviously, leaving untouched the loopholes that save Romney personally millions in tax — notably the capital gains tax treatment of “carried interest”. Result: billionaires pay less tax than ever, ordinary Americans pay more. That’s why Romney and Ryan DARE NOT answer the obvious question: “you talk about abolishing tax loopholes. Which ones would you abolish?

2. Trashing the social safety net: Medicare, Medicaid, the Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”), Social Security, Veterans benefits and services, and food stamps.