Dec 6, 2012 3:25pm

Tom Coburn: ‘We’re Over the Cliff Already’

Regardless of whether or not the president and Republicans strike a deficit deal, taxes are going to increase and the U.S. government has already gone over the so-called fiscal cliff, Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., told ABC News.

“We’re over the cliff already. We went over the cliff when we started spending money we didn’t have on things we didn’t need,” he said. “What the debate now is: What does the parachute look like for a softer landing?”

Because the so-called Bush tax cuts are set to expire on Dec. 31, Coburn said, Republicans have no choice to but to accept higher taxes.

“We have no leverage on that, so whether we want taxes to go up or not they’re going to,” Coburn said. “We can’t stop that from happening. But the real elephant in the room is entitlements.”

Democrats have seized on comments Coburn made Wednesday on MSNBC suggesting that “we have to raise revenue,” and that, “I would rather see rates go up than the other way” of closing loopholes, as most Republicans advocate. Coburn clarified his comments, but did not back away from them.

“They’re jumping on it, saying Coburn wants to raise rates. You know, all I am is pragmatic, saying, ‘Hey they’re going up,’” Coburn said. “So all I am is realistic. It’s going to happen.”

The question, Coburn said, is whether or not government spending is going to be controlled. He said the president has offered no significant plan to control the skyrocketing costs of Medicare and Social Security.

“The fact is [that] we need people working on the real problem right now,” Coburn said. “We’re going to have increased revenue, but if you have just increased revenue, you have all the taxes in the world — you can take everybody’s income over $50,000 — and you won’t solve our problems. So until you decide how you’re going to save Medicare, how you’re going to secure Social Security, you’re not going to solve the problems.”

Coburn said the president deserves blame for refusing to seriously negotiate with Republicans on controlling entitlement spending. Without concessions from the president on entitlements, he predicted there will be no deal on the fiscal cliff.

“The point is, what we’re doing is we’re putting the country at risk for political purposes rather than getting in a room and saying: How do we deal a compromise that solves the biggest problem, which is how do we save Medicare? How do we save Social Security disability?” Coburn said. “It runs out of money in two years. Two years! Social Security disability runs out of money. How do we save that for the very people who are totally dependent on a disability check? Nobody is talking about those issues. Everybody is playing politics and it doesn’t matter who’s running this country when we’re broke.”

He added: “This government is twice the size it was 11 years ago. Most Americans don’t realize that. They feel it innately. We can’t afford it and it’s time for all of us, all of us, the very wealthy and the not-so-wealthy, to participate in the price it’s going to take to put us back on a good course.”

SHOWS:

User Comments

Someone with a brain had finally spelled it out in big letters for all of the idiots in this country. The elephant in the room is entitlements. Until you control that you have done nothing.

Posted by: Billy Bob | December 6, 2012, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

This logjam could be solved today. All one has to do is embrace tax increases that will eliminate the deficit which in turn increases the debt. I am a conservative but I could agree to that. Since democrats embrace taxes why can’t they? Republicans would be happy that the deficit is being eliminated. So what is there to disagree about. Problem solved!!!!

Posted by: Perplexed | December 6, 2012, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

First sign of common sense I have heard all year! It’s time to get to work and really work on the budget!

Posted by: Terry58 | December 6, 2012, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Billy Bob: exactly right! We were over the cliff $14 trilliion ago. All I could think of during the election that there are a minimum of 34 million people out there (and more) who cannot and do not balance a checkbook. Very disheartening, disgusting, and frustrating. How dare they complain about the wealthy and the banks when they can’t even handle their own finances and want to manage the finances for the entire country, Whoa!

Posted by: Denise | December 6, 2012, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

You can’t fall off a cliff if you never left the ground.

Wby don’t we cut the tax rates to 0%. Then complain that our deficit problem is caused by spending too much on entitlements.

Posted by: proacman | December 6, 2012, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

THE REPUBLICANS HAVE OFFERED THE EXACT SAME PLAN OBAMA HIMSELF WAS PROMOTING ON 7/22/2011—SAYING RAISING TAX RATES IN A BAD ECONOMY IS FOOLISH, BUT CLOSING LOOPHOLES IS THE WAY TO GO!!! NOW OBAMA IS REJECTING WHAT WAS ORIGINALLY HIS IDEA!!—OBAMA IS A PETTY LITTLE MAN—HE IS WILLING TO SACRIFICE AMERICAN CITIZENS FOR HIS PETTY LITTLE AGENDA——-THE REPUBLICANS HAVE OFFERED A DEAL —IT IS UP TO THE DEMOCRATS TO COME BACK WITH A COUNTER OFFER—AT LEAST THAT IS HOW ADULTS MAKE DEALS!!!! WHY ISN’T OBAMA IN WASHINGTON WORKING ON THIS DEAL???

Posted by: obamas-media-lies202 | December 6, 2012, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Stupidly, the majority of Americans believe George W. Bush is responsible almost singularly for this country’s economiic problems. The majority forgets(or is ignorant of) the fact that unemployment was at 4.7% in 2006 and that the Bush Tax Cuts were not just for the wealthy but for the middle class and poor as well. The majority forgets(or is ignorant of) the fact that we had a Democratic Congress the last two years of the Bush Administration and that the Democratic Party pushed banks to give out bad loans repeatedly. The majority forgets(or is ignorant of) the fact that TARP(which is credited by Obama with rescuing the US from ‘the “brink”) was a Bush program and that the GM bailout(which Obama gets sole credit for) began under Bush. The majority forgets(or is ignorant of) the fact that the deficits under Bush were tiny compared to Obama’s. The truth is therefore, that, unfortunately, to a majority of Americans, the facts don’t matter. Until the majority of Americans stop being stupid and educate themselves as to the above facts, Obama and the media will succeed in fooling them again and again.

Posted by: ConstantineXI | December 6, 2012, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

republicans have ruined this country & they’re doubling down on ignorance. who cares about math, truth & science? or education for that matter. they say they care. their actions say they don’t.

Posted by: apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Bush – fool me once , uh …..yeah it was bush, it happened during his 8 year run on sentence that we had to witness.

Posted by: apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

It’s so basic: don’t spend more than what you take in. Unfortunately, raising taxes won’t solve the government’s spending problem. It will break eventually and we will fall hard.

Posted by: Lex | December 6, 2012, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

I’m just a little surprised that the democrats in the crowd haven’t responded to my proposal to raise whatever taxes are necessary to end the deficit. Is there some problem with this? Please let me know what your objections are. Don’t we all agree that the deficit which leads to greater debt is bad?

Posted by: Perplexed | December 6, 2012, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

The tax increases won’t do anything to pay down our debt. We will be no better off financially.

Posted by: Judy | December 6, 2012, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 4:04 pm —- Take any 4 years of Bush even 2001 (9/11) and 2008 (recession) and compare them to Obama’s. Compare all the numbers from their 1st day in office. Obama promised many things and delivered almost none.

Posted by: Commonsenseparty | December 6, 2012, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

it’s so basic someone said…..if it was basic we’d be off to the next problem genius

Posted by: apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

If we had 100% taxes paid by everyone, do you really think the government would just stop spending MORE money?

Posted by: Frank J. | December 6, 2012, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

I’m confused! I am proposing that democrats spend whatever they want. All we have to do is raise the appropriate taxes to pay for it so that we have no deficit. What is the objection. Everyone gets what they want.

Posted by: Perplexed | December 6, 2012, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

@ commonsense party – who was at the helm the last days of bush years? what was happening? do you ebven care to acknowledge the depth of partisan hate that one side hands off to another a ticking time bomb & then waits for it to go off then blame the recipient of the time bomb…that’s how the gop plays….cheats I mean, cheaters never prosper…THEY LOSE ELECTIONS knumnuts.

Posted by: apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

If the U.S. collapses, this will be the perfect opportunity for the UN to take the reins.

Posted by: Ivan | December 6, 2012, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

everyone pay your taxes…problem solved….what’s wrong now gop? it’s always something….the party of no….whines again.

Posted by: apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

When the government has an unlimited source of revenue, i.e. taxes, they will never control spending. This will be a debate over and over again, just like the movie groundhogs day. The answer will simply always be, raise taxes, raise the debt ceiling not cut spending or entitlements.

Posted by: NoSpin1600 | December 6, 2012, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

It solves no problem! Don’t be dumb.

Posted by: Guri | December 6, 2012, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

@ commonsense party….no one was at the helm…bush gave up….he didn’t try to help anything on the transfer. The world suffered the consequence…it was all us politics baby. sucks don’t it?

Posted by: apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

billy bob , at least i don’t do inbreeding like yourself

Posted by: apostleJohn
Are you sure about that??? Ok I get it, you really are not this stupid, this is just an act you put on???

Posted by: Billy Bob | December 6, 2012, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

They are favoring closing loopholes on the middle class…

Posted by: Emerald_Sparks | December 6, 2012, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Will the drug addict be happy with less drugs or more?

Posted by: P. Pragham | December 6, 2012, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 4:14 pm —- I worry about country and you worry about partisan BS. Do you realize we were already improving before Obama came in. Yep, the GDP growth was already turning around BEFORE Obama got into office. It topped out at 3.9% in 2010 and hasn’t recovered since. We now sit at 2% (unadjusted) and who knows where it will go with this problem. As I blamed Bush for the problems under him, I blame Obama for these.

Posted by: Commonsenseparty | December 6, 2012, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

@apostleJohn — Everyone does pay their taxes, even the rich. What Dems are whining about is they feel they don’t pay enough. I say overhaul or tax code, close loopholes, limit deductions, this includes people who have more kids than they can afford) then everyone will pay their fair share. Don’t confuse income tax and the tax people like Romney and Buffett pay on capital gains.

Posted by: NoSpin1600 | December 6, 2012, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Taxes will hit everyone. It’s coming.

Posted by: Unger | December 6, 2012, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 4:17 pm — So TARP helped nobody? The rise of the GDP started in the 1st quarter of 2009.

Posted by: Commonsenseparty | December 6, 2012, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

not sue commeon sense, just saying during the bush years, the rich made the rules…now we’re all suffering for their tax breaks over 2 wars math.

Posted by: apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

wars are pretty expensive, who paid ? when ? how ? where?

Posted by: apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

perplexed isnt it obvious that its ok to raise taxes anyone else but ones self? i would pay 10% higher rates if i thought it would help fix things. we all need to pay more and obama should lower his bar to anyone making more than 50,000 a year. then we will see who really is patriotic and how many people become republicans overnight. its aways ok to spend other peoples money. once again raise them on evryone over 50,000 and we can get healthier as a nation.

Posted by: catman | December 6, 2012, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

@ catman – I concur , we’re never gonna get anywhere with a boehner in the house! LOL!

Posted by: apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

We can solve our problems. We simply raise taxes to pay for whatever we want to spend on. If we want something then the government gives it to us. Then we raise taxes to pay for it. What could be simplier. Those who live off of the government get what they want and the people who pay taxes fund it. What could be more equitable. The democrats are happy and the republicans are happy. The Party just goes on and on and on and on……

Posted by: Perplexed | December 6, 2012, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

Yeah, what Washington needs is a good Zombie Apocolypse. But only if congress is in session.

Posted by: David | December 6, 2012, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

APOSTLEJOHN….Is it really necessary for you to call names just because you don’t agree with what someone else’s opinion? Constantinexi and Commonsense made some very good points! Obama made promises and hasn’t kept any of them. How can we continue to spend money we don’t have? The MSM has done a poor job in reporting anything that would cast Obama and the Democrats in a negative way. your hatred of the GOP is very devisive and maybe clouding your ability to relate to how others may feel about this topic. Please grow up and stop attacking others who may not agree with your opinion. Last time I checked everyone here in this forum has the right to free speech–just as you do–but any point you are trying to make only turns off others when you behave like a two-year-old. just my opinion!!

Posted by: rightsideofmymind | December 6, 2012, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

the best thing obama could do is use his executive power and legalize and regulate marijauna for a whole host of reasons. number one prohibition never works, it will save billions in law enforcement ( police and prison unions would fight that), we could tax it and pay for obama care, hostess twinkees would be profitable and last we could get stoned and foget about the fiscal cliff because we wouldnt care.

Posted by: catman | December 6, 2012, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Catman: I really don’t care who pays the taxes or how much they pay. I just want agreement that we pay for what we spend. You can spend as much as you want. It just can not be funded by deficits and borrowing or printing money. Isn’t that reasonable? The democrats will never agree to curb spending so why waste your time. They get what they want and we get a more fiscally sound economic system. Then everyone is happy and that is really what it is all about, isn’t it?

Posted by: Perplexed | December 6, 2012, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

@David — Isn’t Congress full of zombies? Each being controlled and doing the will of their respective party?

Posted by: NoSpin1600 | December 6, 2012, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Jump the cliff. Raise rates on everyone. Cut bloated Defense spending. Dump the TEA Party. And then begin work on Medicare.

Posted by: Debbie | December 6, 2012, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Cut spending including on all you right wing senior loons on SS and Medicare. No more free scooters. You want a scooter, buy itself.

Posted by: jim bob jr | December 6, 2012, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

everyone pay your taxes…problem solved….what’s wrong now gop? it’s always something….the party of no….whines again.POSTED BY: APOSTLEJOHN | DECEMBER 6, 2012, 4:15 PM 4:15 PM
You forgot conveniently like all libs and democrats, that or the last 2 years of the Bush Presidency the DEMOCRATS been in charge, but still you blame Pres.Bush for everything, now Pres.Obama has had 4 years on the job training and what has he done, except talk big, campaign for reelection, play golf, go on vacation and a lot of BS, but you still blame Pres,Bush for everything thats wrong, to you Pres.Obama is the messiah and he can walk on water. He is the ONE who refuses to sit down and find a compromise, but that’s beyond his comprehension. To him it’s his way or no way.

Posted by: Lizzie | December 6, 2012, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

Let’s cut some of that military spending. Wars are pretty expensive.

Posted by: Debbie | December 6, 2012, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

perplexed…i am of like mind. pay for what we spend and the tax base gets broadened.once we all pay you will see everyone screaming about how we spend money we dont have and this charade will cease.

Posted by: catman | December 6, 2012, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

lizzie – just saying – lots of corruption & rich getting richer during bush years, obama comes in …what does he do? FIXES THINGS! you seem to forget to listen to other things besides faux news where you evidently get your ‘facts’ & dash over here thinking your doing some kind of holy work. well you’re not, your just one of the gops sheep & I doubt u even are the upper 2% which really makes you a sheep.

Posted by: apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

i believe more and more people think the best solution is to go cliff diving with obama. he would never let that happen as he would lose control.

Posted by: catman | December 6, 2012, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Debbie | December 6, 2012, 4:43 pm ——- Eliminate 75% of bases overseas and bring those folks home to guard our borders and spend their money here. Consolidate commands and reduce the upper 2 tiers by 10% by offering early retirements. Eliminate all training deployments and conduct the training at the home bases. Utilize telecon meetings verses travel. There are many ways to cut the miltary and still keep our current levels of capabilities.

Posted by: Commonsenseparty | December 6, 2012, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

who is truly working hard to get America back on track but gop does everything to let the big corporations have their way again & screw us all?

Posted by: apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 4:47 pm —- It’s not saved yet. Have you seen GM stock? We the people are on the hook for Billions and need the stock to triple to break even. If that is your idea of saved, then it’s different than most.

Posted by: Commonsenseparty | December 6, 2012, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Debbie | December 6, 2012, 4:43 pm ——- Eliminate 75% of bases overseas and bring those folks home to guard our borders and spend their money here. Consolidate commands and reduce the upper 2 tiers by 10% by offering early retirements. Eliminate all training deployments and conduct the training at the home bases. Utilize telecon meetings verses travel. There are many ways to cut the miltary and still keep our current levels of capabilities.

Posted by: Commonsenseparty | December 6, 2012, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
I think you are being a little ridiculous now don’t you think.

Posted by: BILLY BOB | December 6, 2012, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

@ commonsense – i have confidence they will be ok, & we are better off this way then not doing anything. & cash for clunkers was good too, although no one admits it. I enjoy cleaner air.

Posted by: apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

It was two unnecessary wars, a bailout of the criminal bankers that put us over the cliff and both parties can share the blame. But it is not nor was it the fault of SS or Medicare. Spending on two wars and no bid contractors and bailing out avarice criminal thugs on Wall Street and 12 years of tax cuts are the reasons for the “over the cliff” Stop picking on SS and medicare – they had nothing to do with it.

Posted by: StopPickingonSS | December 6, 2012, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

If people want more entitlements, free child care, trips to Europe or whatever their little pea pickin heart desires they can have—-except someone has to pay for it. If they think the rick have the income then put the entire tax burden on them. If they don’t then I guess we all will have to pay for it. Let’s see how committed to big government you are. It doesn’t come cheap. I have made a fair offer and all should be agreeable.

Posted by: Perplexed | December 6, 2012, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

just remember who truly is working hard for us to get things back on track? the man who is going to take a 4 million dollar vacation to hawaii for christmas……paid for by you and me. do as i say…..not as i do.

Posted by: catman | December 6, 2012, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Bottom line. STOP SPENDING, OBAMA!!!! DO SOMETHING ABOUT YOUR SICK, SICK ADDICTION!!! Obama shells out food stamps to millions, welfare to millions, healthcare to millions, and many other handouts to millions. This includes the many, many millions wo are milking and defrauding the system and sucking up the resources like leeches at taxpayer expense. WHEN is it going to stop, Obama??? Taxing the very rich will have adverse effects on the economy, and the amunt of money will keep the government running for just a few days, that’s all. And higher taxes for others will mean that millions of people will have less money, so consequently they will tighten up and not spend as much, and obviously businesses will suffer, and more jobs will be lost. Back in 2011, Obama, you stated that well over a trillion dollars could be raised WITHOUT raising taxes on anyone. Now in a very odd turn of events, you are saying something entirely different. With your track record of lying, Obama, it is impossible to trust anything that you say.

Posted by: Francis | December 6, 2012, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

It should of been, cut spending first, then cut taxes, but it has ALWAYS been the other way around.

Posted by: REAL_HOPE_AND_CHANGE | December 6, 2012, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Entitlements did not put us here – two wars with no bid contracts, bailing out the criminal Wall streeet bankers, and 12 years of tax cuts during that time is why we are here. Leave entitlement spendiing off the table as it is NOT the CAUSE.

Posted by: StopPickingonSS | December 6, 2012, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Lets cut the entire DOD and all the Industrial War Complex freeloaders and then we can save some bucks!

Posted by: StopPickingonSS | December 6, 2012, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

try not going to war to save money…it’s a win / win

Posted by: apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Make Congress take pay cuts and get rid of the entire military first – they cause all the spending!

Posted by: StopPickingonSS | December 6, 2012, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

war & greed & lies….bush’s america
marijuana smokers smoke legally in Washington! …. obama’s america

I’ll take Obama’s America over war & greed any day. war & greed are works of the devil. pot is not.

Posted by: apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

warmongers are unhappy with Obama – boo hoo

Posted by: apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

Too late! They have already spent that money and have placed IOU’s in the place of cash.

Posted by: dont worry be happy | December 6, 2012, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

My mama always said, “Stupid is as stupid does”. I believe she was talking about me at the time. In either case, I with Obama on this particular issue. Time to tax the rich like they did back in the 70′s. Gotta go, someone’s come a callin for some moonshine.

Posted by: BILLY BOB | December 6, 2012, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

I fell out of a tree and landed on my head when I was young so I do have an excuse for being an idiot.

Posted by: apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Hey, that’s what happened to me too!

Posted by: BILLY BOB
You are not as big of an idiot as i am Billy, I promise you that.

Posted by: apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

I never left, fooled you didn’t I. Naw, I’m a way bigger idiot than you. My momma told me so. She never lies. She tells me it’s not my fault though. I picked it up from my father, she can’t remember if it was Raymond or Bobby, but they were both massive idiots.

Posted by: BILLY BOB | December 6, 2012, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

I have to admit, you are pretty sharp Billy. I too got my idiot genes from my father, Uncle John.

Posted by: apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

“I’ll take Obama’s America over war & greed any day. war & greed are works of the devil. pot is not.————–Yeah right on. I see we think alike. I want them to spend their money on me! I want to make sure I get lots of free stuff from all those selfish rich people. Its not my fault I can’t find a job I like. I’d prefer to just live off those sleazy rich people. Work is for morons anyway!

Posted by: dem_without_a_clue | December 6, 2012, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

We got here because of two wars, a prescription drug benefit, a bailout of Wall Street’s greedy collapse and multiple tax cuts. Remember Cheney after the 2002 election: “We won the election, we deserve another tax cut.” Everyone has to sacrifice to put the American budget on sound footing. We are here because Bush and Cheney and their Greedy Old Party plundered our national treasury through a variety of scams. But we all have to do our part. It’s absolutely outrageous that the super rich and mega corporations who drove the car off the cliff insist on taking a limo away from the accident scene. They pour a fortune into buying candidates but they can’t ante up for the good of the country!! It should make anyone who cares about this country absolutely sick. We’ve got to stick a fork once-and-for-all in the Bush/Cheney era of runaway greed and selfishness!

Posted by: hopesprings52 | December 6, 2012, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Once again, the problem is Obama’s sick, sick SPENDING.

Posted by: Francis | December 6, 2012, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

Wrong again. Bush’s submitted budget for 2009 had a built-in deficit of over $400 billion, but revenue under his budget fell short by over $600 billion due to the millions of lost jobs and lost tax revenues on his shift.

So the deficit for 2009 (Bush’s deficit) was already over a trillion dollars. Before Obama.

Posted by: Dan | December 6, 2012, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

the people complain about the politicians, but as I see on this page, the people are just as bad if not worse than the politicians. we are morphing into the future….everything is changing, while the political parties blame it on each other, the change (climate & all is changing) we will react, we will fight, & when catastrophe hits…& it will, we will band together for a day or 2…people in America need to change…without complaint

Posted by: apostleJohn | December 6, 2012, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Once again, the problem is Obama’s sick, sick SPENDING.

Posted by: Francis | December 6, 2012, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

Wrong again. Bush’s submitted budget for 2009 had a built-in deficit of over $400 billion, but revenue under his budget fell short by over $600 billion due to the millions of lost jobs and lost tax revenues on his shift.

So the deficit for 2009 (Bush’s deficit) was already over a trillion dollars. Before Obama.

Posted by: Dan | December 6, 2012, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
I agree with Dan.

Posted by: Dolly | December 6, 2012, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

No need to save SS Disability fund as it have been allowed to be raided by false claimants who are not really disabled !

Posted by: wyl5326 | December 6, 2012, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

“We went over the cliff when we started spending money we didn’t have on things we didn’t need.”

Right on Senator Coburn. We did not NEED a decade of spending Trillions on two pre-emptive wars. We did not NEED an unfunded prescription drug benefit. Did you vote for that spending?

Posted by: Little Liza Jane | December 6, 2012, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

The Republicans will never get it! The Gov creates money not as the whiners would have you believe. The U.S.’s infrastruchter is desperately in need of repair THAT’S the gov. job not the states. The states are notoriusly wasteful and they can’t be trusted to spend wisely it usuallt goes to Graft and Corrupt Officals.

Posted by: Jdsa | December 6, 2012, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

I think it is the republicons fault for pushing us to the brink of fiscal cliff. They orobably think that ctting taxes again will take care of the problem.

Posted by: BILLY BOB | December 6, 2012, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

With my son now serving in Afghanistan, away from his family for Christmas, and his promotion and pay raise put on hold for 9 months because of past cuts to defense….I’m all for leaving Afghanistan to the Afghans. Now. Not when Obama told the Taliban we were moving out. Casualties in Afghanistan have tripled since Obama was elected. Obama ordered 30,000 more troops deployed there to bolster the NATO forces that were losing the fight we had already won against the Taliban. Obama escalated our involvement in Afghanistan. Obama cut defense spending. Makes as much sense as everything else he does.

Posted by: Newsjunkie | December 6, 2012, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

With my son now serving in Afghanistan, away from his family for Christmas, and his promotion and pay raise put on hold for 9 months because of past cuts to defense….I’m all for leaving Afghanistan to the Afghans. Now. Not when Obama told the Taliban we were moving out. Casualties in Afghanistan have tripled since Obama was elected. Obama ordered 30,000 more troops deployed there to bolster the NATO forces that were losing the fight we had already won against the Taliban. Obama escalated our involvement in Afghanistan. Obama cut defense spending. Makes as much sense as everything else he does.

Posted by: Newsjunkie | December 6, 2012, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
That wasn’t Obama’s fault, that is Bush’s fault for losing focus in Afgan and going after imaginary WMD’s

Posted by: BILLY BOB | December 6, 2012, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

Casualties in Afghanistan have tripled since Obama was elected.

Posted by: Newsjunkie | December 6, 2012, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

George Bush diverted his attention from Afghanistan and sent way over 100,000 troops to Iraq. U.S. deaths in Afghanistan went up every year under Bush. This trend continued until Obama’s policy came into effect in 2010. American deaths have gone down each year since then.

Posted by: Dan | December 6, 2012, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

billy bob sounds like we are going after imaginary wmd s in syria as we speak. also unemployment just rose from 7.9% at election time to 8.3% in one short month…perhaps jack welch was right about someone cooking the books to make obama look better in addition democrats are looking to extend unemployment bennies again…..didnt we watch this movie 4 years ago?

Posted by: catman | December 6, 2012, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

dan…murdres in chicago have risen last year to an amount higher than the war in afghanisatn….why are we not invading chicago?

Posted by: catman | December 6, 2012, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

Oh my gosh….I am so sick of each side blaming the other. Both sides are to blame for the situation we are in today. I have seen kindergartner’s play better than our congress does. Dem’s and Repubs beat their chest and inflated egos while those of use i the middle pay the price for a two party system….UGH

Posted by: yes I said that | December 6, 2012, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

See, it wasn’t so bad…..

Posted by: nomayo2 | December 6, 2012, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

billy bob sounds like we are going after imaginary wmd s in syria as we speak

Posted by: catman | December 6, 2012, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

How would you know they’re ‘imaginary”?

Posted by: Dan | December 6, 2012, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

dan…how did we know they were imaginary in iraq before we invaded? we didnt nor do we know now….so lets not make the same mistake again but never forget that war is good business and great for the economy in the short run. unemployment suspiciously soared upward over the past 4 weeks and politicians will do anything to get re elected. the drumbeat has started…for that matter how does any journalist know? yet cnn is all over the story.

time to let the middle east take care of itself.

Posted by: catman | December 6, 2012, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

You think this country is ruined and POOR now, wait’ll crazy obamacare goes through, it will be he*l on earth.

Posted by: Bonnie | December 6, 2012, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

billy bob sounds like we are going after imaginary wmd s in syria as we speak

Posted by: catman | December 6, 2012, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

So you really don’t have clue whether Syria’s WMD are ‘imaginary’ or not, you’re just blathering. Fair enough.

Posted by: Dan | December 6, 2012, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

unemployment suspiciously soared upward over the past 4 weeks

Posted by: catman | December 6, 2012, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Again, the fact you’re poorly informed affects your insight. Sandy affected hundreds of thousands of people and employment.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The number of people seeking U.S. unemployment aid fell sharply last week as a temporary spike caused by Superstorm Sandy has faded.

Economists expect employers added 110,000 jobs in November. And they think the unemployment rate will remain 7.9 percent.

P.S. – Also, Gallup is NOT the official unemployment source. It’s numbers are not official.

Posted by: Dan | December 6, 2012, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

just let Bush tax cut expire for everyone, which is only way now to raise enough revenue. people forget that taxing more on the ‘rich’ would only produce enough revenue to run government for a few days, and unless tax is raised for everyone especially middle class, there will be not enough money to reduce even half of deficit.

so, just let’s all go over the cliff, which is the best option now to at least cut some spending and raise some significant amount of revenue.

Posted by: Celisti | December 6, 2012, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Even letting the Bush tax cuts expire would nor raise enough taxes for the government at current spending. You would need a tax rate of 77% on everyone to begin to match taxes to spending. Not just the rich, but the middle class and the poor. Oh and that’s just Federal. Don’t forget state and local taxes.You want to pay that? I don’t. The idiots in Blue states like California and NY are already going to pay near 50% in taxes for the privilege of being treated like serfs by the public sector union overlords, what happens to them?

We have to get spending under control. Cut spending right now by 1.5 trillion then talk to me about tax increases. You raise taxes now, you’re guaranteeing a depression and possibly a default.

Posted by: Ogregunner | December 6, 2012, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Ogregunner – Well said. Unfortunately, far too few people realize that govt needs to STOP SPENDING!!!

Posted by: Logicsgood | December 6, 2012, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Cut spending right now by 1.5 trillion then talk to me about tax increases. You raise taxes now, you’re guaranteeing a depression and possibly a default.

Posted by: Ogregunner | December 6, 2012, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Same result with spending cuts of that magnitude.

Posted by: Dan | December 6, 2012, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

I long for the days when we had a President who was a real leader, but one the Democrats have turned their back on in their endless pursuit of giving people “goodies” from the Government and having other people pay for them.

The leader I have in mind is a President that said in his inaugural address:

Ask NOT what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country.

–President John F. Kennedy

Posted by: Altair-IV | December 6, 2012, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

On July 22, 2011—Obama wanted to cut loopholes instead of raising tax rates during a weak economy because that would weaken the economy!! THIS IS THE EXACT SAME PLAN THE REPUBLICANS JUST OFFERED TO OBAMA —BUT OBAMA SAID NO!!!—-DOESN’T THE POTUS WANT TO DO WHAT IS BEST FOR THE ECONOMY???? IS OBAMA A PETTY LITTLE ARROGANT MAN WHO IS WILLING TO HURT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BECAUSE HE HAS SOME SORT OF GRUDGE AGAINST THE REPUBLICANS!!!!—SHOULDN’T OBAMA BE CONCERNED WITH DOING WHAT IS BEST FOR AMERICAN CITIZENS NOT HIS DEMOCRATIC PARTY??? ISN’T THAT WHAT A REAL LEADER WOULD DO—

Posted by: obamas-media-lies202 | December 6, 2012, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Dan, I’m not saying there won’t be pain. But for the overall economy its better to not run deficits. Immediately confidence would rise as we got our financial house in order and with that the economy would improve. Jobs would increase and fewer people would have to depend on the government for their sustenance. Then government could shrink even more, allowing people to keep more of the money they’ve earned.
See the problem is not that we’re paying too little in taxes. The problem is the government is spending too much money. Money it doesn’t have. Politicians have been promising too much to too many for votes, and its gotten to the point that we can’t afford it. The Federal government has doubled in size since 2001. Why? Do we really need a TSA that’s more interested in your daughter’s boobs, than in profiling Al Qeada members? Do we really need FEMA, when people are still without power and heat nearly a month after Sandy? What did we do before them? Do we really need departments of energy and education when we’re running trillion dollar deficits? And do we need them in light of the fact that if we don’t get rid of them Grammy’s not getting her social security check? You know the check she keeps getting even though the taxes she put in for it she got back twenty years ago? This is going to be hard. 60 years of politicians lying is going to be tough to overcome. But we have to stop spending before we allow the government to take even more of our money. Why would we let them, given the bang-up job they’ve done so far?

Posted by: Ogregunner | December 6, 2012, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

i would like to know why when one politician gives a speech why they need a half dozen of their cronies standing either beside them or behind them.. who is paying their wages for just standing on a stage and looking stupid

Posted by: guy | December 6, 2012, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

The leader I have in mind is a President that said in his inaugural address:

Ask NOT what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country.

–President John F. Kennedy

Posted by: Altair-IV | December 6, 2012, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

In Kennedy’s time the super wealthy didn’t whine and complain like they do now – they paid taxes FAR above the current rates and were still happy to live and contribute to the best country in the world.

Posted by: Dan | December 6, 2012, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

i think that we should reduce taxex and also do away will all deductions,thius includes interest,taxescompany cars,planes,entertainment,travel,salaries,donations to churches foreign investment and i guarantee in two or three years we will have a balanced budget

Posted by: guy | December 6, 2012, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

I just wonder why the republicans didn’t care about any of this stuff when bush was in office spending trillions on Wars that turned out to be false ?

Posted by: jim S | December 6, 2012, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Now its us democrat’s motto. “Ask what your country can do for you – ask NOT what you can do for your country. Yeah right on and keep those free cell phones a comin!

Posted by: dem_without_a_clue | December 6, 2012, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Well, in my lifetime, I won’t be making over $50,000, so I’m good.

Posted by: Sherri | December 6, 2012, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Posted by: dem_without_a_clue | December 6, 2012, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

In Kennedy’s time the super wealthy didn’t whine and complain like they do now – they paid taxes FAR above the current rates and were still happy to live in and contribute to the best country in the world.

Posted by: Dan | December 6, 2012, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Posted by: Dan | December 6, 2012, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
In Kennedy’s time there were waaaay more loopholes. So the rich didn’t have to whine. Besides Kennedy LOWERED tax rates, and had an economic boom.

Let’s not forget the government takes 2 TRILLION dollars from us in taxes. Stop and think about that. 2 TRILLION dollars. Every Year. You can do a lot with that money. But our government spends 3.5 Trillion. I mean really? 2 Trillion isn’t enough? Gimme a break.

Posted by: Thionite | December 6, 2012, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

In Kennedy’s time there were waaaay more loopholes.

Posted by: Thionite | December 6, 2012, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Still, in Kennedy’s time the super wealthy paid FAR more taxes than they do now and were still happy to live in and contribute to the best country in the world. They didn’t whine and complain like they do now.

Posted by: Dan | December 7, 2012, 12:09 am 12:09 am

The rich need to give up more; those living off the government need to take some responsibility. And let’s bring the troops home. Problem solved.

Posted by: LagunaTriMom | December 7, 2012, 12:23 am 12:23 am

“In Kennedy’s time the super wealthy didn’t whine and complain like they do now – they paid taxes FAR above the current rates and were still happy to live in and contribute to the best country in the world.”————-Hey I’m with you. Tax those evil rich people. I need my free stuff!!!!

Posted by: dem_without_a_clue | December 7, 2012, 6:53 am 6:53 am

In your nostalgia you forgot one other aspect of the high tax era on the rich. Government spending was a lot less as a percentage of GDP. If you want to go back to that era, then fine with me. Just realize that we are talking about a lot smaller government and NO Medicare and Medicaid.

Posted by: Perplexed | December 7, 2012, 7:59 am 7:59 am

In President Kennedy’s era we were the best country on the face of the earth. We no longer are but a hollow shell of what we once were.

Posted by: Perplexed | December 7, 2012, 8:07 am 8:07 am

Democrats are such a needy bunch.

Posted by: newcountryman | December 7, 2012, 8:32 am 8:32 am

Today the rich are those who’s income is above $250K/year. Tomorrow it’ll be those above $100K/year.

Posted by: newcountryman | December 7, 2012, 8:34 am 8:34 am

Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., “But the real elephant in the room is entitlements.” Would someone like to explain to me how the money I have put into both Social Security and Medicare are now “entitlements”? Both of the programs were designed by Congress and my payroll deductions are mandated by the same Congress. So what exactly am I entitled to? Getting my money back? I have an idea, just refund the money I have put n over the last 50 years of working, stop taking money out of my paycheck, and let me invest the money my way. I may not make as much but at least Congress won’t have a “slush fund” anymore at my expense!

Posted by: Don | December 7, 2012, 11:30 am 11:30 am

NO NEED TO INCREASE TAXES OR CUT VITAL PROGRAMS. ELIMINATE UNNESSARY DEPARTMENTS (ENERGY, EDUCATION, ETC) AND YOU COULD BALANCE THE BUDGET OVERNIGHT

Posted by: TOOMUCHALREADY | December 8, 2012, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

When I listened to Coburn on Social Security and Medicare, he is lying. Both can be fixed by increasing the Top from $110,000 just like we have done for the last 50 years I contributed. When it comes to Medicaid, Coburn needs to fix the Price Fixing of Medical Monopoly that has been locked in with a Network of Computers that tick up prices nationwide. There is no Competition, Medical Services is a Monopoly for 7% Profit and we need to wake up and make our Congress address the Medical Services Monopoly.
Coburn and his Republican Rich 2% want to kill Medicare and Social Security, The Corporatists the Republicans stole my Defined Benefit Pension just like the 44 million households who were tossed over to the Pension Guarantee Corp with schemes of Bain Capital, Merger and Aquisitions and Leveraged Buyouts that raided pension funds.
The Republicans who represent the 2% just want no Safety Net for the 98% that Medicare and Social Security provides. They want to eradiate the program so they will not be pressured to be taxes. They are fighting tooth and nail to stop a 4% tax rate increase of the 2% (Report $300,000 in taxable income, the tax raise would be $2000 which is “:Chump Change”. If Coburn wants to reduce taxes, how about cutting back on the $800 Billion (before 9/11 $400 Billion) poured into the Military Industrial Complex. That is where we need to reduce spending, we are not at war with China ($143 Bilion) or Russia ($100 Billion) and there is a lot of reduction that is available.
So raise the taxes 4% on the Rich. Don’t worry, Corporate Executives of this country are paid 90% in stock, taxed at 15% Capital gains rates. We need to raise those taxes to the Top Marginal Tax rates.
How about invoking a “Stock Trade” tax, on the Computer Hyper trading that is skimming $Billions every second from our 401K’s and Retirement funds?
How the Republicans who represent 2% of this country, had 45% vote for them is beyond me. I guess the Corporate Republican Media of Fox and Limbaugh have been effective but thank goodness for the Internet.
Coburn is a shill for the 2% just like all his Republican Party that have been Highjacked by the likes of the Billionaire Koch Brothers who “Want it All”.

Posted by: Mike | December 9, 2012, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

The problem with Obama and the Democrats is that they keep talking about ‘fairness’. That is a concept for grade school children. The Democrats treat their followers as children. Democrats never let their flock grow up. WHY? Because it is easier to control the dummies. Republican attempt to act like adults. The children will always win. They complain, they whine, they yell, they scream….it’s all emotional garbage.

Posted by: Elliot | December 9, 2012, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.