<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary Clinton Photo Shows Her Back at Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/01/hillary-clinton-photo-shows-her-back-at-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/01/hillary-clinton-photo-shows-her-back-at-work/</link>
	<description>The latest Politics news and blog posts from ABC News contributors and bloggers including Jake Tapper, George Stephanopoulos and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:02:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commonsenseparty</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/01/hillary-clinton-photo-shows-her-back-at-work/#comment-30384824</link>
		<dc:creator>Commonsenseparty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 13:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=830941#comment-30384824</guid>
		<description>I guess the continued comparisons between Obama and Bush are accurate.  Both are among our worst Presidents in history.  I do find it comical that anytime Obama messes up (and there are many), Obamabots immediately try and excuse it because they think Bush did something similar.  That is exactly the problem in DC and these dingbats don&#039;t seem to pick up on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the continued comparisons between Obama and Bush are accurate.  Both are among our worst Presidents in history.  I do find it comical that anytime Obama messes up (and there are many), Obamabots immediately try and excuse it because they think Bush did something similar.  That is exactly the problem in DC and these dingbats don&#8217;t seem to pick up on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commonsenseparty</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/01/hillary-clinton-photo-shows-her-back-at-work/#comment-30384782</link>
		<dc:creator>Commonsenseparty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 13:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=830941#comment-30384782</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see, it took almost a week for the media to tell us our Sec of State Hillary fell down, hit her head and had a concussion, conveniently right before her testimony on Benghazi was to be given AND she never went to the hospital.  But, within one day of the blood clot, it was all over the news.  I liked Hillary more than Obama although I thought she was woefully inexperienced to hold the POTUS position as Obama was/is.  Now I ust think she is full of krap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see, it took almost a week for the media to tell us our Sec of State Hillary fell down, hit her head and had a concussion, conveniently right before her testimony on Benghazi was to be given AND she never went to the hospital.  But, within one day of the blood clot, it was all over the news.  I liked Hillary more than Obama although I thought she was woefully inexperienced to hold the POTUS position as Obama was/is.  Now I ust think she is full of krap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/01/hillary-clinton-photo-shows-her-back-at-work/#comment-30379737</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=830941#comment-30379737</guid>
		<description>Just gotta love the Hillary haters. She did not cause the deaths of the 4 American personnel Benghazi. She did have a blood clot, she isn’t Satan and yes she has done a marvelous job as Secretary of State.

Posted by: Kris &#124; January 7, 2013, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

*****</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just gotta love the Hillary haters. She did not cause the deaths of the 4 American personnel Benghazi. She did have a blood clot, she isn’t Satan and yes she has done a marvelous job as Secretary of State.</p>
<p>Posted by: Kris | January 7, 2013, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm</p>
<p>*****</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usakindatheart</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/01/hillary-clinton-photo-shows-her-back-at-work/#comment-30379556</link>
		<dc:creator>usakindatheart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=830941#comment-30379556</guid>
		<description>any person who wants to tax cow farts loses my vote

wasn&#039;t she the one that had a problem with stay at home mothers and baking cookies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>any person who wants to tax cow farts loses my vote</p>
<p>wasn&#8217;t she the one that had a problem with stay at home mothers and baking cookies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usakindatheart</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/01/hillary-clinton-photo-shows-her-back-at-work/#comment-30379534</link>
		<dc:creator>usakindatheart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=830941#comment-30379534</guid>
		<description>Well she now has had enough time to get her story straight

AMNESIA helmet, wonder if her husband&#039;s cigar can lift it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well she now has had enough time to get her story straight</p>
<p>AMNESIA helmet, wonder if her husband&#8217;s cigar can lift it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLS1950</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/01/hillary-clinton-photo-shows-her-back-at-work/#comment-30379296</link>
		<dc:creator>JLS1950</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=830941#comment-30379296</guid>
		<description>Should have given her a batter&#039;s helmet, so she could really play some hardball!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should have given her a batter&#8217;s helmet, so she could really play some hardball!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dart</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/01/hillary-clinton-photo-shows-her-back-at-work/#comment-30378913</link>
		<dc:creator>Dart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 05:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=830941#comment-30378913</guid>
		<description>Sandy, Your comments are absolutely meaningless.

Posted by: Frankie &#124; January 8, 2013, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Your inability to comprehend clear comments, does not make them meaningless. I understand what Sandy is saying easily. She&#039;s comparing two parallel situations in two administrations - the Bush administration and the Obama administration - and clearly pointing out what a farce the Bush situation was, and identifying the hypocritical whining of the Republican supporters now. Wish your reading comprehension was a little higher. Perhaps if you read it more slowly.

&quot;It’s not that complicated (except for people like you). Two security failures, one under each administration, and the methods of accountability in testimony. We’ve yet to see Clinton exactly, but we know, 1) Bush testified behind closed doors, 2) Bush did NOT testify under oath, 3) Bush had Cheney at his side so they get their stories straight, and 4) Bush testified only as long as he chose to.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy, Your comments are absolutely meaningless.</p>
<p>Posted by: Frankie | January 8, 2013, 12:18 am 12:18 am</p>
<p>Your inability to comprehend clear comments, does not make them meaningless. I understand what Sandy is saying easily. She&#8217;s comparing two parallel situations in two administrations &#8211; the Bush administration and the Obama administration &#8211; and clearly pointing out what a farce the Bush situation was, and identifying the hypocritical whining of the Republican supporters now. Wish your reading comprehension was a little higher. Perhaps if you read it more slowly.</p>
<p>&#8220;It’s not that complicated (except for people like you). Two security failures, one under each administration, and the methods of accountability in testimony. We’ve yet to see Clinton exactly, but we know, 1) Bush testified behind closed doors, 2) Bush did NOT testify under oath, 3) Bush had Cheney at his side so they get their stories straight, and 4) Bush testified only as long as he chose to.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frankie</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/01/hillary-clinton-photo-shows-her-back-at-work/#comment-30378558</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 05:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=830941#comment-30378558</guid>
		<description>Sandy, Your comments are absolutely meaningless. The fact that Bush didn&#039;t testify under oath doesn&#039;t mean that it must be the same for Hillary. She needs to be under oath.  I notice that yourresponse was being used by Josh repeatedly. So you&#039;ve taken over the night shift for him, huh? Shilling for Barry 24/7, huh? Gotta protect little Barry, otherwise you might lose those handouts. You&#039;ll be losing them anyway because the money will be running out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy, Your comments are absolutely meaningless. The fact that Bush didn&#8217;t testify under oath doesn&#8217;t mean that it must be the same for Hillary. She needs to be under oath.  I notice that yourresponse was being used by Josh repeatedly. So you&#8217;ve taken over the night shift for him, huh? Shilling for Barry 24/7, huh? Gotta protect little Barry, otherwise you might lose those handouts. You&#8217;ll be losing them anyway because the money will be running out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/01/hillary-clinton-photo-shows-her-back-at-work/#comment-30378048</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 04:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=830941#comment-30378048</guid>
		<description>Posted by: Frankie &#124; January 7, 2013, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm 

It’s not that complicated (except for people like you). Two security failures, one under each administration, and the methods of accountability in testimony. We’ve yet to see Clinton exactly, but we know, 1) Bush testified behind closed doors, 2) Bush did NOT testify under oath, 3) Bush had Cheney at his side so they get their stories straight, and 4) Bush testified only as long as he chose to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted by: Frankie | January 7, 2013, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm </p>
<p>It’s not that complicated (except for people like you). Two security failures, one under each administration, and the methods of accountability in testimony. We’ve yet to see Clinton exactly, but we know, 1) Bush testified behind closed doors, 2) Bush did NOT testify under oath, 3) Bush had Cheney at his side so they get their stories straight, and 4) Bush testified only as long as he chose to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frankie</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/01/hillary-clinton-photo-shows-her-back-at-work/#comment-30378011</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 04:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=830941#comment-30378011</guid>
		<description>NewCountryMan and TheEightiesRuled, I read what you said, and I thoroughy agree. You are exactly correct! Liberals will blame Bush forever because their messiah is untouchable and can do no wrong. It&#039;s all worn out. Bush is out of office. This is about Benghazi and Clinton and Obama. Obama gives the orders to all Cabinet members, and they act accordingly. Sandy, you appear to be programmed like a robot repeating the same sentences over and over again. Just cut and paste and cut paste repeatedly, right? Blaming Bush does not work. Bush has nothing to do with Benghazi. The robotic responses from the other Obamabots are equally ridiculous and only meant to antagonize and annoy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NewCountryMan and TheEightiesRuled, I read what you said, and I thoroughy agree. You are exactly correct! Liberals will blame Bush forever because their messiah is untouchable and can do no wrong. It&#8217;s all worn out. Bush is out of office. This is about Benghazi and Clinton and Obama. Obama gives the orders to all Cabinet members, and they act accordingly. Sandy, you appear to be programmed like a robot repeating the same sentences over and over again. Just cut and paste and cut paste repeatedly, right? Blaming Bush does not work. Bush has nothing to do with Benghazi. The robotic responses from the other Obamabots are equally ridiculous and only meant to antagonize and annoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>