Jan 6, 2013 10:19am

Sen. Mitch McConnell: ‘The Tax Issue Is Finished’

abc mitch mcconnell this week jt 130106 wblog Sen. Mitch McConnell: The Tax Issue Is Finished

ABC News

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell. R-Ky., Sunday said he will not accept any new revenue in future deals with congressional Democrats and President Obama.

“The tax issue is finished.  Over. Completed,” McConnell told me on “This Week.” “That’s behind us. Now the question is what are we going to do about the biggest problem confronting our country and that’s our spending addiction.

“We didn’t have this problem because we weren’t taxing enough,” McConnell added.

He blamed Obama and Democrats for waiting to resolve budget issues until the last minute.

Read a transcript of the full interview with Sen. Mitch McConnell HERE.

“Why we end up in these last-minute discussions is beyond me. We need to function,” McConnell said. “I mean, the House of Representatives, for example, passed a budget every year.  They’ve passed appropriation bills.

“The Senate Democratic majority and the president seem to like these last-minute deals.”

McConnell said that the biggest issue facing the country in the next year is the deficit and spending. And he predicted that the issue would occupy the congressional agenda in the first three months of the year, overtaking Obama’s other priorities, including gun control.

“But the biggest problem we have at the moment is spending and debt,” McConnell said. “That’s going to dominate the Congress between now and the end of March.  None of these issues, I think, will have the kind of priority that spending and debt are going to have over the next two or three months.”

On the expected nomination of former Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., as the secretary of Defense by Obama, McConnell said he would evaluate Hagel’s past statements before determining whether he could support his nomination in the Senate.

“I’m going to take a look at all the things that Chuck has said over the years and review that, and in terms of his qualifications to lead our nation’s military,” McConnell said. “The question we will be answering if he’s the nominee, is do his views make sense for that particular job?  I think he ought to be given a fair hearing, like any other nominee, and he will be.”

McConnell, who in 2008 praised Hagel for his clear voice and stature on foreign policy and national security, now says he will reserve judgment on his possible nomination until after a Senate confirmation hearing.

“I’m going to wait and see how the hearings go and see whether Chuck’s views square with the job he would be nominated to do,” he added.

Like “This Week” on Facebook here. You can also follow the show on Twitter here.

SHOWS:

User Comments

Where was Mitch McConnell when George Bush was doing all the spending?

Posted by: brenda roberts | January 6, 2013, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Who cares what Standard & Poor’s says? They told us the economy was solid just before it crashed.

Posted by: brenda roberts | January 6, 2013, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Congress should stop all spending on South Korea. Harry Truman insisted on billions of dollars for South Korea since 1950. Harry promised that money as war reparation to Japan over atom bomb drops on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Posted by: brianxjones73sc | January 6, 2013, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Neither side got the message. Do what’s best for the COUNTRY, not yourselves, Tears down the house and build a new one.

Posted by: Fizz | January 6, 2013, 10:59 am 10:59 am

McConnell is wrong! When it comes to the Democrats, the tax issue is never finished.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 6, 2013, 11:13 am 11:13 am

What do you expect from the man who led the fight that resulted in unlimited corporate funding for political campaigns. no billionaire left behind is Sen McConnell’s campaign slogan.

Posted by: Fred | January 6, 2013, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Mitch McConnell…one of the biggest problems with our government.

Posted by: Wendy | January 6, 2013, 11:18 am 11:18 am

If Mitch McConnell wants spending levels to go back to what they were when the budget was balanced, let’s start with Congressional Salaries, Benefits, and Perks. That includes all the monies spent on Congressional offices, travel, staff, health clubs, barbers, etc. Let Congressional raises be the same as other Federal employees’ raises. Let Congressional retirement plans be the same as those who retire under the Office of Personnel Management Plans. Let Congressional health insurance plans be the same as other Federal employees’ health insurance plans. Only then will the GOP stop looking like a bunch of hypocrites with their calls for cutting spending.

Posted by: Marianne Manley Granoff | January 6, 2013, 11:24 am 11:24 am

What a moron, of course there will be more taxes.

Posted by: sameagain | January 6, 2013, 11:24 am 11:24 am

The land shark is really really good at pointing blame. It’s just directed at the wrong party!

Posted by: Jeepers | January 6, 2013, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Why did you let “Turtle Man” dodge the question about the debt ceiling? He says the problem is we spend too much, that was the time to ask him if we spend too much on the military and all the unneeded republican military pork that they justify with threats on Israel and the danger of Iran. George, you and the Disney News company do not have the stones to ask any tough questions about our nations screwed up priorities. Shame!

Posted by: Chris Thomas | January 6, 2013, 11:26 am 11:26 am

McConnell is worse than Boehner. At least the Speaker will negotiate and bend a bit, as the President did. Wait! Mitch is the tenth richest senator in the USA. No wonder he hates taxing the rich.

Posted by: Doc62 | January 6, 2013, 11:26 am 11:26 am

He should focus on spending sure, but the taxes must go up to deal with the debt. It’s just plain stupid to think about it any other way. He thinks not raising the dept ceiling will solve anything? More stupidity.l

Posted by: sameagain | January 6, 2013, 11:27 am 11:27 am

It is refreshing to know that someone has a grip on our over spending and will act to bring it under control.

Posted by: Gene Dodge | January 6, 2013, 11:27 am 11:27 am

McConnell thinks Obama and the dems are the ones waiting until the last minute? Let’s not forget who waited until the night before the deadline for the fiscal cliff to get back to Washington – Boehner and his ilk.

Posted by: cynda p. | January 6, 2013, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Oh – and no one in Congress should get paid (including health insurance benefits, retirement benefits, office space, staff salaries, etc.) for days they are in recess unless they have accumulated enough vacation days (at the same rate of accumulation as other Federal employees) to cover the time off.

Posted by: Marianne Manley Granoff | January 6, 2013, 11:42 am 11:42 am

Sen. Mitch McConnell remarks this Sunday Jan 5, 2013 Was What us Southerns call A “Good old boy” Fit! A fit is when you do not get you Way! Not getting YOUR way causes all “Good old Boys” to STOP thinking. Remember Sen. Mitch McConnell will be retiring to receive his “entitlement”
If Sen. Mitch McConnell is so upset over spending, He should ask all Retired Senators to stop taking A Goverment Pension. Which is a true “Entitlement”
Our Governent will not change until all The “WHITE” Good old boys retire or die.
If this President was White everyone would be trying to work together…I am a southern FEMALE and I have watched and been effected by the “Good OLD Boy” Effect.
Sen. Mitch McConnell said to us “America” this Sunday, “Listen America I am an “OLD Man with a Closed Brain. And it will not open any more; His job should be taken away from him. Sen. Mitch McConnell works for the people NOT HIMSELF…What a silly idea to think, that Senators or Congressmen are working for the people and NOT their own pocketbook.
AS AN AMERICAN I FIRE SEN. MITCH MCCONNELL FOR NOT DOING HIS JOB.
AND HE TOLD US ALL “HE WILL NOT” IN THE FUTURE..

Posted by: Susan K | January 6, 2013, 11:42 am 11:42 am

Sen. Mitch McConnell is a perfect example of avoiding the main issues., I am so sick in observing the immaturity of adults. Pointing fingers at who is not doing what, instead of working together. There is so much time and money being wasted in arguing like little children. I do not appreciate my tax money being paid to those who are in a position of representing the people, sitting in their offices, not really having a clue of how people are truly living in areas that they will never visit in their life time. There are families that are so out of touch of what is happening around the world, their main focus is what happens under the roofs of their homes. Work together for the people, please.

Posted by: Irene | January 6, 2013, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Please get out of the Democrats way and let them completely bankrupt this great country ! Bush ran billion dollar deficits, Obama runs trillion dollar deficits ! One last thing, everyone shouldn’t have to get up and leave for work !

Posted by: JUST SAYING..... | January 6, 2013, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

“… Do what’s best for the COUNTRY, not yourselves, Tears down the house and build a new one…” the only way that would work is if (1) campaign contributions were outlawed in all forms and (2) term limits were imposed. Those two things are the POISON in Washington and you can change anyone and everyone you want, they will all succumb to greed and if allowed to stay in Washington for 10 years, 20 years, they will become what we have there today…

Posted by: RalphF3200 | January 6, 2013, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Negotiation Obama style. I love it! If Obama can declare from his throne that there will be no negotiating over the debt ceiling, why not declare the GOP is done with tax hikes?

Posted by: GodsWaysAreBest | January 6, 2013, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

trying to compare Bush’s spending with Oblunder’s is just silly

Posted by: Brian | January 6, 2013, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

The only party I hear saying “never” and “we won’t” and “it’s over” are the Republicans. That’s not the attitude anyone needs that is running any business, let alone a country.

Posted by: Sheila | January 6, 2013, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Mitch McConnell, you’re a hypocrite ! All the spending that Bush did starting two wars and now he’s blaming Obama for bringing better healthcare to the country??? What a jerk!

Time to fire Mitch McConnell! He’s useless part of our government. Complete waste of tax payer dollars. Let’s start with his job.

Posted by: Cary | January 6, 2013, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Mitch McConnell, you’re a hypocrite ! All the spending that Bush did starting two wars and now he’s blaming Obama for bringing better healthcare to the country??? What a jerk!

Time to fire Mitch McConnell! He’s useless part of our government. Complete waste of tax payer dollars. Let’s start with his job.

Posted by: Cary | January 6, 2013, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
——————————————————————————————–
Why is it we compare Obama to the idiot Bush? We should not of spent so much under Bush.. we should not spend so much, now.

Posted by: dbase1986 | January 6, 2013, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

So, who died and let him or any of them become the boss of OUR people, OUR world? ” Will NOT accept “??? Who the heck does he think he is? ( and his party). Any and all of this affects ALL the people in the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Another showing of the Old Days. Please stop hiding and come out from under the pews. THIS is OUR country.. not one persons or party. Get over yourself. Maybe he needs a vacation.. right, he already did that, over and over and over again. Like the rest of them. and WE PAY THEM to represent us? Horrible

Posted by: Sandra | January 6, 2013, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Mitch your on the outside looking in.

Posted by: romney2012 | January 6, 2013, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Yeah news flash and thank you so much. Both parties are literally crazy. I work and work hard don’t even make that much. My paycheck without the 2% extra tax taken up just nose dived about 80.00 so I am anticipating at least 100.00 after tax cut. This is ridiculous and as a middle class voter am sick of being abused and used by both parties who lie.and the people believe. I have the proof my paycheck.

Posted by: Steve | January 6, 2013, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

How about paying Congress members for the job they do? We would be saving a lot of money by sending home the do nothing members of Congress with a minimum payment. Second question: Where was McConnel when Chenney said that deficits didn’t matter and proceded to spend without restraint? No Republican said a word about the absurd spending that created this deficit. All of the sudden, they can’t live with it but keep making irresponsible decisions. There hatred and anger for the president will be their undoing. They won’t be missed because maybe sane, reasonable Republicans will replace them.

Posted by: Maria Rivera Carvalho | January 6, 2013, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

So Mitch thinks the President and Democrats are the problem. But, it was ole Mitch who said the Republicans’ top priority was to limit Obama to one term. It’s hard to work together when you want the President to fail.

Posted by: midfield91 | January 6, 2013, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

This is the worst Congress & Senate in my lifetime …. Obama caved in settling for $400,000 …. No wonder Republicans were afraid of $250,000 since the average Congressperson makes $175,000 …. In 2007-2008 the people voted for a change of representatives in Washington, and all we got was Teaparty bullies!

Posted by: nevermind | January 6, 2013, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

This guy must think we’re all idots. From day one his only pea brain thought was to get Obama out of office. The American people thought differently though. If we get the same level of cooperation during the next congressional session I’d like to see all these uncooperative Republicals voted out of office. Let’s make’um extinct.

Posted by: Mark | January 6, 2013, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

I joined the Republican party because I honestly thought they were more clever and creative than Democrats. I actually think this is still true in many cases, but the people in control of the party today are utter morons who do more damage to the citizens of this country than good.

Posted by: sameagain | January 6, 2013, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

33 Years of Republicans Growing Government, Growing Debt, and Slashing Revenue. Now, this lemon faced Traitor wants to cut Social Security and Medicare. We didn’t have this issue until the Republicans created it. Without Bush and the preceding Republican anti-Americanism we would have been very well off.

Posted by: Robert Simpson | January 6, 2013, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Yeah news flash and thank you so much. Both parties are literally crazy. I work and work hard don’t even make that much. My paycheck without the 2% extra tax taken up just nose dived about 80.00 so I am anticipating at least 100.00 after tax cut. This is ridiculous and as a middle class voter am sick of being abused and used by both parties who lie.and the people believe. I have the proof my paycheck.

Posted by: Steve | January 6, 2013, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
———————————————————————————————–

I am with you Steve.. BOTH parties LIE, CHEAT and STEAL from the American Tax Payer. Then, their idiot supporters defend it and keep sending the same ones back to DC. IMO.. you been in DC 10 years or More… you need to go the hell home and stay there. YOU ARE THE PROBLEM, and OUR ECONOMY is the PROOF.

Posted by: dbase1986 | January 6, 2013, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

The head of Obama propaganda, a gay of Chinese origin, must be from lowest ghetto or China town somewhere. Obama is a poor man who suddenly got a huge sum from grandma, spending on all poor relatives, illegal immigrants, diamonds on trucks. Hilary Clinton was raised from a background with no sense of culture, never being rich before in the history.

Posted by: BK90 | January 6, 2013, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Good. Enough of the crisis after crisis to take advantage of the system.

Posted by: x | January 6, 2013, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

33 Years of Republicans Growing Government, Growing Debt, and Slashing Revenue. Now, this lemon faced Traitor wants to cut Social Security and Medicare. We didn’t have this issue until the Republicans created it. Without Bush and the preceding Republican anti-Americanism we would have been very well off.

Posted by: Robert Simpson | January 6, 2013, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
—————————————————————————————————

Since 1945… The Democrats have controlled the house for 51 years Republicans 16 years
…………………… The Democrats have controlled the Senate for 47 years Republicans 20 years
…………………… The Democrats have controlled the Pres. for 31 Years Republicans 36 years
…………… The Democrats have controlled ALL THREE at 1 time for 21 years.. Repubs 4 years
…………… The Democrats have controlled 2 of them at 1 time for 43 years….. Repubs 12 years.

Posted by: dbase1986 | January 6, 2013, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

Corrupt politicians are always complaining about the wasteful spending of federal revenues, but they are stealing trillions by their bogus hyperbole about the emergency need for massive funding of law enforcement agencies and national defense contractors. They want the public to tighten their belts when the politician’s bellies are touching the floor.

Posted by: melvin polatnick | January 6, 2013, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

This is the first time the government and CIA directly force American citizens to hand out guns. After the lesson of 1929, no small investors store gold in bank safety deposit boxes anymore. This time, the CIA will use video records in numistmatic stores. Leave the rest for your own imagination.

Posted by: TV | January 6, 2013, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Posted by: Dan McGuire | January 6, 2013, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Wrong. There are more trailer-trash, dumb Republicans on food stamps. Like you.

Posted by: Dave | January 6, 2013, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

While I like the message that Senator McConnell is making, I think that in reality, more revenue enhancements will be necessary in addition to significant spending cuts. Statements like these tend to paint politicians into corners by taking away their ability to negotiate. I wish they would just say that they are willing to work together to solve our fiscal mess and quite making hard line negotiating statements. We should be paying for the benefits we are receiving and not expect future generations to foot the bill in the form of excessive interest payments on our baloonng debt.

Posted by: NMPete | January 6, 2013, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Are there really people that want taxes raised further? I guess if you don’t pay any INCOME tax in the first place, then why would you care? Isn’t that about a third to half the population if you figure in all of the exemptions. When they talk about need to raise more taxed, who do you think its going to impact? While everyone plays party politics, the middle class is going to get screwed in the process because we are stupid enough to think that Washington is working for us.

Posted by: lets be clear | January 6, 2013, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Attention progressives… take off your blinders

If we could get back to George Bush’s level of spending $2.9 TRILLION budget for 2008 instead of the $3.8 in spending Obama is proposing for 2013 we have a small surplus.

Obama has spent over 1 trillion more than the government has gotten every year of his presidency. Bush topped out at less than 1/2 that.

Posted by: R Sweeney | January 6, 2013, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Democrats don’t care if you raise taxes, in fact, they LOVE IT!! Since they don’t work (above the table, anyway), they don’t pay Federal income taxes. So raising taxes means more revenues for them to share amongst themselves!

Posted by: End_ofan_Error | January 6, 2013, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

we are screwed. the natives that voted obozo in have no clue or concern about the major spending issues our government has.

Posted by: redhotrash | January 6, 2013, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

This moron’s mere statements that the debt ceiling even could be a factor in negotiations hurts the economy right now and therefore the citizens of the country today. He doesn’t care because he’s rich and his money is safe in bonds or whatever. He just plays with other people’s lives like they are nothing. Yes spending needs to be negotiated, but not by people of McConnell’s low caliber and character. Yes Obama does need to get back out and lead on it, just like he did in 2011. But this time Republicans need to be active players, not their usual stupid political selves.

Posted by: sameagain | January 6, 2013, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

The republicans in the Senate and the House should make it perfectly clear that NOTHING is going to pass until the budget is dealt with. They will filibuster in the senate anything that comes up and the house will refuse to bring up anything other than getting our spending on track.

The facts remain. revenue is about even to what it was pre-recession and we just took another $60+B/year from the private sector with the tax increase. Spending is up over $1T from pre-recession levels. We went from “obscene” (according to the current president) $400B yearly deficits to now what appears to be acceptable $1.4T yearly deficits under his watch.

So game on Republicans.

Posted by: Bill | January 6, 2013, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

While I like the message that Senator McConnell is making, I think that in reality, more revenue enhancements will be necessary in addition to significant spending cuts. Statements like these tend to paint politicians into corners by taking away their ability to negotiate. I wish they would just say that they are willing to work together to solve our fiscal mess and quite making hard line negotiating statements. We should be paying for the benefits we are receiving and not expect future generations to foot the bill in the form of excessive interest payments on our baloonng debt.

Posted by: NMPete | January 6, 2013, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
———————————————————————————————
I don’t see where the Dems are doing any better. Pretty much there way or the highway. The idiot Repubs gave into the Revenue raising taxes on 400k a year and above. I think it is time the Dems start giving up some spending.

I see a lot of Dems talking about Obama raising the Debt Limit WITHOUT more revenue OR any spending cuts. Without any vote or negotiating.

Posted by: dbase1986 | January 6, 2013, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Ha! That’s rich! Spending addiction.. the only one with a ‘spending addiction’ here are those on the left!

Posted by: anon | January 6, 2013, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Oh, and before you all think about more taxes. Remember this. The US government has historically since before WW2 been able to extract about 18-20% of GDP from the private economy REGARDLESS of tax rates. So raising taxes isn’t going to do a whole lot because people will change their behaviors. But what the lower tax rates does is create GDP growth. 20% of a bigger number is a bigger number, that is the way to get revenue.

Unfortunately right now we are spending at about 25% of GDP. The country has NEVER been able to extract that much, even short term, from the private economy. So to the “tax more” crowd, what makes you think that this time will be any different? History is not on your side.

Posted by: Bill | January 6, 2013, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Forget taxes. On to the bankruptcy hearing.

Posted by: PEIKOVYAN | January 6, 2013, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

HEY ABC IF YOU DON’T LIKE MY COMMENTS TOUGH MUST BE NICE FOR OBAMA TO HAVE HIS OWN TV NEWS NETWORK (MSNBC) BUT I DIDN’T KNOW HE ALSO OWNED ABC NEWS. …. ALL HAIL CHAIRMAN OBAMA… … ALL KOOL-AID DRINKS UNITE 2014 IS COMING AND THE DEMISE OF AMERICA WILL BE COMPLETE… OBAMA’S AMERICA 2016 …. THE GREAT ONE CHAIRMAN OBAMA WILL HAVE IS KINGDOM WHERE THE DO NOTHINGS WILL HAVE EVERYTHING HANDED TO THEM AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH WILL BE COMPLETE….WHAT WILL THE GREAT ONE DO WHEN THE PRODUCTIVE AMONG US DECIDE IT JUST ISN’T WORTH IT AND BECOME TAKERS TOO? …. I DIDN’T VOTE FOR THAT … OH YES YOU DID. ALL HAIL THE GREAT ONE CHAIRMAN OBAMA.

Posted by: platojunior | January 6, 2013, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

Why don’t these republicans say what they will cut in stead of just cut. Everyone is for cutting as long as it doesn’t effect them. Start cutting corporate welfare fist no more oil subsidies

Posted by: George | January 6, 2013, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Is ABC a gateway drug to al-Jazeera?

Posted by: PEIKOVYAN | January 6, 2013, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

cut spending…. focus on defense!…. and the countless agencies for ‘security’… no one even knows how many defense contractors there are any more.

don’t cut money for education (pell) or assistance for the poor or disabled or veterans…. don’t cut areas that make a net profit (IRS), or agencies that enforce rules regarding fraud.

Posted by: jrumor | January 6, 2013, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Why don’t these republicans say what they will cut in stead of just cut. Everyone is for cutting as long as it doesn’t effect them. Start cutting corporate welfare fist no more oil subsidies
Posted by: George | January 6, 2013, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

FIRST PERSON TO MAKE AN KIND OF SENSE CORPORATE WELFARE IS A SIN …. JUST LIKE THE GREAT ONE CHAIRMAN OBAMA’S CATERING TO THE DO NOTHINGS AMONG US. I DIDN’T VOTE FOR THAT .. .OH YES YOU DID. GRAB YOUR ANKLES 2014 IS A COMING, AND THE MONEY GRAB WILL BE COMPLETE.

Posted by: platojunior | January 6, 2013, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

the only one with a ‘spending addiction’ here are those on the left!

Posted by: anon | January 6, 2013, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Don’t kid yourself, Bush left a doubled national debt and a deficit for 2009 of over a trillion dollars – plus an economy in the midst of the largest economic collapse since the Great Depression.

Posted by: bill | January 6, 2013, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Our problem is priorities. We want to attack healthcare, but this is far from our spending problem. How many people can have their medical bills paid with the amount of money we spend to deploy and launch missles by the millions of $$ into some 3rd world country? We aren’t the world police and our country has way too many problems to worry about solving everyone else’s problems!

Posted by: Itsdone | January 6, 2013, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Bush overspent = demon. Obama overspends = angel. Okay, that makes sense. LOL.

Posted by: PEIKOVYAN | January 6, 2013, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

That’s what you think Senator McConnell. We have only just begun on getting thinks back on track. When only 1% of Americans will see a tax increase this is just plain foolish. Now what is needed, is to eliminate tax loopholes that our politicians put in the tax code on purpose to benefit the rich and themselves. Then all deductions need to be capped at $25,000 in which only the rich will be affected. Then we need to end tax free havens with off shore accounts and place a tax on all corporations that outsource jobs by making it more expensive to make their products overseas than right here at home due to labor costs.

Posted by: bob | January 6, 2013, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Sorry Mitch but those loopholes that allow people like Mitt Romney to pay a 10% tax are next to go.

Posted by: dave | January 6, 2013, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

We could have energy independence by using student revolutionaries as fuel.

Posted by: PEIKOVYAN | January 6, 2013, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

This is Mitch’ political posturing and a signal to potential 2014 voters for him. He clearly knows that he ALONE cannot determine if this the last tax issue. We still need to reform our tax code remember. We still have to bring in more revenue and find savings where we currently spend. You need MONEY to pay down debt. As a former republican, now turned democrat…. I hope these two stop playing the political games and STAND TOGETHER to tell the American the full spectrum of what must be done to stabilize our credit and economy.

Posted by: TV | January 6, 2013, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

There are times I agree with republicans and there are times I agree with democrats. Truth is that both parties have the necessary ideas to save and grow America. Problem is in them blending the ideas. It is possible, very possible to be Progressive while being Conservative where necessary. That requires people kicking that ideological purity to the curb.

Posted by: TV | January 6, 2013, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

A friend at church who is a WELDER told me this morning that they taxed his paycheck $50.00 this week, to me that sounds like around ……20% ………with holding tax, plus his Social Security with holdings. THAT SOUNDS LIKE A HUGE INVESTMENT INTO THE LOCAL ECONOMY TO SPUR PRODUCTIVITY AND SALES UP.
FOLKS this is a DESPERATE SITUATION THAT WE ARE IN. The gasoline and the tax markets are going to bring this nation into ruination. PAYING for what Corporate is not paying in CHINESE labor.

2 Chronicles 7:14…….If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.

Posted by: Newunion | January 6, 2013, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

I am not a rich person, nor do I have a stock portfolio, but I think your statements are ridiculous. Everyone wants to persecute anything rich people do as evil, and they should give all of their money to people who are too lazy to work or do anything. I caution you….

Having incentives on stock returns is a vital part of our free market economy. By offering lower taxes on returns, it encourages people with money to invest it in our economy and businesses rather than hoarding it all and watching our country fall to pieces. This is what has happened with our current economic plan. When people lose faith in the market and pull their money, it crumbles. People always think they have all the answers, but be careful what you wish for!

Remember, once you bite the hand that feeds, there will be no more money to give the people who are too good to work for it! (Obamites as I call them). I have worked hard my whole life (80-100 hours/week) to get to where I am. I accrued over $200k in student loan debt. I have no sympathy for people who are too lazy to work for their money. They are the #1 problem with this country.

Why did the Roman empire fall? LAZINESS! Look it up.

Posted by: Itsdone | January 6, 2013, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

He can repeat this on every talk show until he’s blue in the face, but it ain’t over until it’s over, and it ain’t over!!!

Posted by: Marol Kisan | January 6, 2013, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

the people who are too good to work for it! (Obamites as I call them).

Posted by: Itsdone | January 6, 2013, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

There are just as many trailer-trash and southern hick Republicans on food stamps.

Posted by: Dishwasher Chuck | January 6, 2013, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Drilling NOW would give us energy independence, plenty of jobs, and would stop sending money to terrorists.
Why can’t we?? Why not, BHO????
Hello?!?

Posted by: burt | January 6, 2013, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

Newunion, Thank you for sharing your college knowledge but your arguments are hardly persuasive when you end your screed by noting you accrued over $200K in student loans You took the loans so you wouldn’t have to work at a “real job” as I’m sure you castigate what you call Obamites for all the time while you went to school…for HOW long exactly? And why is it that you types always thinks NOBODY works as hard as you do, winge winge winge wah wah wah… Assuming you mean the wealthy, we can’t “bite the hand that feeds us” because it’s clenched tightly into a fist with nothing forthcoming and it’s been that way for years now. Tell the truth, you secretly aspired to be a fist-clencher with them don’tcha. But guess what, they don’t give 2 hoots about you and they never will.

Posted by: Marol Kisan | January 6, 2013, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

OK Mitch, let’s start with the over bloated multi-national corporation’s private security force; the US MILITARY!

Posted by: dan | January 6, 2013, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Well, $200k is the typical cost for an Ivy League degree in medicine. My college was paid for because rather than smoke pot and drink, I worked hard in high school and earned a scholarship (earned is the key word, not entitled to) And “how long?” 8 years of school, to be exact. People in medical school typically don’t have a side job after their 90 hour work week. This to be followed by 7 years of ADDITIONAL training making less than minimum wage once the math is done. Sorry, we don’t all work as hard as you.

You people want to take our money away? That is fine, but I guarantee that you will regret that decision once you see the quality of healthcare you receive. I am good at my job, but that is because I work my butt off and have significant experience. I already see the problem with cutting hours of trainees and the difference in their medical skills. I assure you that once you cut healthcare workers’ salaries, they are certainly not going to work that much for so little. Remember this once you get your Obamacare. Pray you don’t get sick!

Posted by: Itsdone | January 6, 2013, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

I don’t understand all this talk that the President has to get specific about spending cuts. IMO, it is the Republicans that need to get specific. The Republicans like Boehner, McConnell, McCain, etc are all preaching it is now time for spending cuts. Well, where are their specifics? I see no one hammering the GOP for their specifics, not on This Week or any other news show. Everyone talks about Obama needing to get specific. The President campaigned on higher tax revenues and a balanced approach. He is doing his part. Now it is time for the GOP to put up or shut up, IMO. When are the media going to start getting tough on the GOP leaders for their specifics? Their cuts will be unpopular. Let’s see how far they really are willing to go.

Posted by: Melissa | January 6, 2013, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Talking trash to the opposing political party really is juvenile. Once again I say that both parties need to blend their ideas to best serve the nation.

Posted by: TV | January 6, 2013, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Great, and McConnell’s carreer is finished too for not doing his job to DEMOCRATICALLY help rule this country. As has been said about former middle east leaders, his leadership is “illegitimate” and “he must go”. Otherwise the American people will impose sanctions on him, freeze his bank accounts, and set up a drone strike on him and other domestic terrorists.

Posted by: Brian Smith | January 6, 2013, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

He does look like a turtle.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 6, 2013, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

This guy just doesn’t live in our reality, does he. ” Mitch McConnell. R-Ky., Sunday said he will not accept any new revenue in future deals with congressional Democrats and President Obama.
“The tax issue is finished. Over. Completed,” McConnell told me on “This Week.” “That’s behind us. Now the question is what are we going to do about the biggest problem confronting our country and that’s our spending addiction.”—-So his idea is just to slash as many social programs as he possibly can to try and ballance the budget? You can’t get rid of the deficit without taxing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Lord almighty people, has our educational system failed us so badly that we can’t even do simple economics?

Posted by: Jax | January 6, 2013, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Print money, the debt will decrease so spending can continue. Anyone ever heard of the Wiemar Republic? Probably not, government schools don’t teach such things.

Posted by: John McElroy | January 6, 2013, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

did anyone who works in washington notice the extra deductions from their checks? Probably not, they make enough that it does not phase them. BUT us average ppl it hits hard, even if it is $400 a month give or take depending……..

Posted by: Really??!! | January 6, 2013, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

The GOP needs to stand firm for once. There is nothing that the Dems or Pres. Obama can do to increase the debt ceiling without the GOP. It’s time to stop the hemorrhaging and start spending under our means so we can pay down the debt.

Posted by: Pat | January 6, 2013, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

I guess the 1% need the extra money to purchase a $2.8 million baseball card or some gum chewed by Elvis. The 1% want the to 47% to do without healtcare and other life saving services so they can have thier expensive toys. Am I my brothers keeper, guess not. Maybe the 47% should insist on higher pay for military service, like maybe $2.8 million for a four year enlistment.

Posted by: concerned81 | January 6, 2013, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

Now the biggest problems facing our nation is whether Standard and Poors including Moody’s will downgrade our credit worthiness a third time. If that happens our treasury bonds being bought by China will be reduced to junk bonds forcing China to sell them for what she can get. This will prompt Japan, and many European nations who also hold US bonds to sell. If that happens hyperinflation will occur as the dollar is devalued. the second and immediate problem is Obama care which will go into full effect come later on this month. In it’s 2 thousand pages of regulations and taxes not dealt by the Congress is a provision that states all business big and small must cover their uninsured employees both part time and full time, including their families and pre existing conditions. This will kill small business the back bone of our economy and force big business to lay off large segments of their employees. Many businesses will simply fold. This in the face of the EU economic meltdown.

Posted by: Mr. Bernard Wijeyasingha | January 6, 2013, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Bob 4:44pm – Capping deductions at $25K will impact middle class in some parts of the country. Our property taxes alone have increased to $17K for a raised ranch / mother daughter house in NY. This is more than triple what it was when we moved here and is largely due to out of control school taxes.

Posted by: Pat | January 6, 2013, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

McConnell needs to realize that he is NOT in charge. He is a SERVANT; not a dictator. The people voted against his party in the last election and will continue to do so as long as his party continues its arrogance. Keep it up McConnell and even you can be voted out. Come the next election the Democrats will take back the House. Hopefully we will finally get to reversing the last 20 years of upward wealth distribution.

Posted by: ScroogeYou | January 6, 2013, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

Scroogeyou – so what is your answer? Do you think we can continue to tax the country out of its debt problem? If a family had money problems, most people would think they should cut back on expenses, eliminate cable, etc. and not go out and buy a new car just because it gets a little better MPG and will “save” them money.

Posted by: Pat | January 6, 2013, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

““We didn’t have this problem because we weren’t taxing enough,” McConnell added.” Yeah, we did actually, partly because you clowns started two wars and cut income at the same time,. Not to mention sending the world economy into a death spin from which it is still touch and go it will recover. We need BOTH revenues and cuts.

Posted by: Thera Pewt | January 6, 2013, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

McConnell says the tax issue is finished … only until the Republicans want to cut their rich masters another bigger slice of the cake. Hey, if you guys can revisit it, so can the Democrats.

Posted by: Laugh Out Loud | January 6, 2013, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

“There is nothing that the Dems or Pres. Obama can do to increase the debt ceiling without the GOP” There IS actually. Under the 14th Amendment the President can increase it unilaterally if the alternative is to destroy the US’s fiscal credibility and creditworthiness. And he should.

The point is that your Congress has already approved the spending and Obama has increased debt by a smaller percentage than any of the past six Presidents. The best Congress can do now is stomp its tiny feet, have a hissy fit, and say “We won’t pay for what we’ve already approved.” You tried to destroy our economy and credibility twice in the past five years. You won’t do it again.

Posted by: Wall Streeter | January 6, 2013, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

@ Bob Great! May actually work..if we could get them to actually enforce it!!!!!!!! .. That’s what you think Senator McConnell. We have only just begun on getting thinks back on track. When only 1% of Americans will see a tax increase this is just plain foolish. Now what is needed, is to eliminate tax loopholes that our politicians put in the tax code on purpose to benefit the rich and themselves. Then all deductions need to be capped at $25,000 in which only the rich will be affected. Then we need to end tax free havens with off shore accounts and place a tax on all corporations that outsource jobs by making it more expensive to make their products overseas than right here at home due to labor costs.

POSTED BY: BOB | JANUARY 6, 2013, 4:44 PM 4:44 PM

Posted by: Sandra | January 6, 2013, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

Agree on some spending cuts, pass them, and then try to close some loopholes. Forget about a “grand bargain” which will be next to impossible.

Posted by: CapitolGains | January 6, 2013, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Nothing worse than a blind person who doesn’t want to see!! What a bunch of trivial idiots! And both sides are equally bad! WOW!!!
Obama, Reid, Pelosi, Boehner, McConnell, etc, etc. It’s like a parade of incompetents! The Keystone Cops would be a welcome sight in Washington.

Posted by: Gonz | January 6, 2013, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Thank goodness the Republicans are adults!! This new breed of Obama Democrat are like children running up the balance on their parents credit cards–only the working adults in this country are paying the bill. The people that elected Obama are the ones that take government handouts like food stamps,welfare, rent assistance, heat assistance, Obama phones, free internet,free so of course they want to take more of your money y raising taxes to pay for more of their benefits!!! Stand strong Republicans because the Obama Democrats are about to pitch a hissy fit—oh and my paycheck was smaller this week because you let our payroll taxes go up!! But I thought I heard you say repeatedly that taxes would not go up on us –the middle class–BUT THEY DID!!! JUST ONE MORE LIE FROM THE OBAMA DEMOCRATS

Posted by: WERALLSLAVES300 | January 6, 2013, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

You people defending your party, or the president, look like absolute idiots! Like anyone in Washington is NOT to blame!

Posted by: Gonz | January 6, 2013, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

“This new breed of Obama Democrat are like children running up the balance on their parents credit cards” Rubbish. The fact is that both tax and spending HAVE TO be addressed, but silly manufactured crises on the debt ceiling is NOT the time to address them, particularly by a party that rubberstamped one debt ceiling increase after another by their own leader. The last bit of brinksmanship by the Republicans over this convinced the world there was a political voice in Washington that thought we should default on our already-incurred debts. We’re going to have health reforms so stop having your little tantrums about that. Yes, you don’t go blind into increased debt, but only a total moron thinks convincing the world your credit and your word is WORTHLESS is any kind of solution.

Posted by: Wall Streeter | January 6, 2013, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

You know you can trust the Obama Democrats to tell us the truth–I mean remember when OBAMA kept telling us the mandate on OBAMACARE was not a tax–but then his attorneys go before the Supreme Court and say it is a TAX!!!! SURPRISE—No but really you can trust the OBAMA Democrats to tell you the truth THIS TIME!!! Really this time you can trust Obama and the Democrats to be honest!! No really this time they are telling the truth…

Posted by: WERALLSLAVES300 | January 6, 2013, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Reading these posts I’m too often reminded of the old adage: “What a pity all the people who really know how to run the country are too busy driving cabs.”

Posted by: Day Javue | January 6, 2013, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

“Really this time you can trust Obama and the Democrats to be honest” “Read my lips. NO NEW TAXES. ” Remember that one?

Posted by: Day Javue | January 6, 2013, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Romney’s September 11 ‘shoot first and aim later instinct’ would have saved the lives of Stevens, Woods, and others.

Obama’s ‘apologize for American values instinct’ left Stevens and Woods out to dry, all while he watched on real time TV.

Woods covered the mile to the embassy in minutes , helped evacuate and save 30 lives back to the safe house before his own death, all against direct orders of the President. To hell with those orders.

If the other CIA had gone with Woods to the embassy, or even backed Woods up after returning to the CIA safe house, against the President’s orders, Stevens would have been found on the floor of the Embassy safe room in 10 minutes, instead of 5 hours, and his death by smoke inhalation would very likely have been prevented.

6 or 7 CIA rallying to the Embassy could have crushed the terrorists.

The Benghazi embassy was forsaken by Obama, and Clinton, to preserve their poll numbers.

CIA security operatives at the Benghazi CIA security annex (safe house), paid with American tax dollars for months to be there and to provide security, were forbidden to help the American ambassador under fire and pleeding for help, by executive order.

Posted by: Scott | January 6, 2013, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

Cuts alone can’t do it. Taxes alone can’t do it. Anyone who says otherwise is lying to you for political ends.

Posted by: On the wall | January 6, 2013, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

“Romney’s September 11 ‘shoot first and aim later instinct’ would have saved the lives of Stevens, Woods, and others.” Because Republicans did SUCH a good job on 9-11.

Posted by: Clark | January 6, 2013, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

“I see a lot of Dems talking about Obama raising the Debt Limit WITHOUT more revenue OR any spending cuts. Without any vote or negotiating.” The debt ceiling covers spending Congress has ALREADY agreed to spend. The only thing to negotiate is whether our word is worth a da*n thing. Why is it so hard for Republicans to get that into their thick heads?

Posted by: Liz J | January 6, 2013, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

McConnell is an idiot, plain and simple.

Posted by: calvin | January 6, 2013, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

We need to raise the Capital Gains tax to at least 35% with no deductions then reduce the income tax on wages to no more than 12% less deductions. That ought to help undo some of that damage from the last 20 years of gushing wealth upward. And, I’m one of the people that would pay more… GLADLY!

Posted by: ScroogeYou | January 6, 2013, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Let’s double the debt right now. I’m tired of waiting for the country to fail in stages. Let’s implode. When the commune tries to move out of the warzone cities, the simple rural folk will shoot them.

Posted by: PEIKOVYAN | January 6, 2013, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Always thought that increased sales tax on luxury goods is one of the fairest ways to go. If you can afford it, you can afford to pay for it.

Posted by: Getting fiscal | January 6, 2013, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

“When the commune tries to move out of the warzone cities, the simple rural folk will shoot them.” Exactly why you fools should be banned from buying guns.

Posted by: Marcus8 | January 6, 2013, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

“Let’s double the debt right now.” Hey Sherlock, doubling the debt CEILING is not the same as doubling the debt. Ask your mother or a responsible adult to explain why. The debts we have now are debts we have already incurred on policies already enacted …. yes, by Congress.

Posted by: Hard Vark | January 6, 2013, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

“Let’s double the debt right now.” Hey Sherlock, doubling the debt CEILING is not the same as doubling the debt. Ask your mother or a responsible adult to explain why. The debts we have now are debts we have already incurred on policies already enacted …. yes, by Congress.

Posted by: Hard Vark | January 6, 2013, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
————————————————————————————————

Very true… lol, but every time we raise it.. guess what? We have to go back and raise it again because……… Ah… wait for it? Because we did not do anything to stop it from Continuing to go up. Just because we Raise the Debt Ceiling does not mean we won’t keep creating MORE DEBT…. It just lets us do it. When do we stop? 20 trillion? 30? Hell, let’s just go for 100… why not… from what I am hearing it don’t really matter.. does it?

Hell… fire up the presses… print more money… hey.. make it easy… let us print our own.

Posted by: dbase1986 | January 6, 2013, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Two years ago the federal payroll tax was decreased from 6.2% to 4.2%, however, thanks to the state of Illinois and our oh so wonderful govenor, the state income tax rate went from 3% to 5%, so I did not really get to enjoy more income at that time. Now the federal payroll tax has gone back up to 6.2% and I am now actually clearing less money after taxes per paycheck than I did when the Illinois state income tax rose. Thank you very much to my state goverment and thank you very much to my federal government. It is my humble opinion that you both suck. I hope that when everyone sees their bottom line,they remember each and every single member of both state and national members of congress that were seated at the time it was decided that their ineptness with our state and national budgets should be paid for by increasing the amount that they take out of what their citizens work hard to earn. The next time you are standing in the voting booth makiing the decision on who needs to go, Democrat and Republican alike remember those names. I am done with politicians who continue to treat their office like a right and not the privilege that it is.

Posted by: Tim | January 7, 2013, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Well the 14th I see might be needed for this time around.

Posted by: Emerald_Sparks | January 7, 2013, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Progressives like to self-identify as “progressive”. They are brain-dead zombies, smug useless emo-boy Hegelian mystics, cyber-bullies, frauds, traitors, wimps. Their cult leaders spend more than Bush used to spend. If Bush was in error then, Progressives are in error now. The only difference is they have rationales piled higher and deeper.

Posted by: PEIKOVYAN | January 7, 2013, 6:55 am 6:55 am

The 14th Amendment to the Constitution concerning payment public of debt; Section 5. “The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.” What part of Congress don’t you Obama peasants not understand?

Posted by: newcountryman | January 7, 2013, 7:38 am 7:38 am

“The peasants are revolting”.

Posted by: PEIKOVYAN | January 7, 2013, 8:12 am 8:12 am

It is utterly amazing how many Liberals here JUST DO NOT GET IT.

Posted by: dr_bugsy | January 7, 2013, 8:12 am 8:12 am

What’s amazing to me is how all of these Obama supporters have come up with the concept that the 14th amendment gives congressional override authority to the Executive. That’s NO WHERE in the Constitution.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 7, 2013, 8:15 am 8:15 am

The primary thing the founding fathers wanted to prevent and the last thing they wanted to provide was a document that provided for an (another) omnipotent king.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 7, 2013, 8:19 am 8:19 am

We ALL know that we are spending too much and irresponsibly but are not willing to sacrifice. People know that their children and grandchildren will end up paying the bills but they just don’t care. It will impoverish their kids but that is secondary to their own immediate gratification. We are a really disgusting society that will deserve exactly what we are going to get.

Posted by: Perplexed | January 7, 2013, 8:36 am 8:36 am

Bad enough to pay your family bills with a cash advance from a credit card. The credit card debt is unmanageable, the interest payments are rising. Worse when govt does this,govt prints the cash, adds the cash to existing cash in circulation, the ever-growing quantities of cash chase the same amount of goods, double the quantity of cash means prices rise on all goods, goods cost twice as much. The working poor see the results at their groceries and their gas station. Obama is trying to spend his way out of Bush’s overspending. Democrats are delusional about how it works.

Posted by: PEIKOVYAN | January 7, 2013, 8:45 am 8:45 am

The President should just stay out of this debt ceiling and spending cuts fight. It’s the Congress’s responsibility to make laws and appropriate money, not his. He can try to sway some democrats his way but that’s it. No more closed meetings in the White House,

All proceedings should be televised on C-Span. If these Congressmen want cover they can meet in the cloak room.

Boehner and McConnell are just looking for a scapegoat. They know these spending cuts are going to decimate this economy and put millions out of work. When it happens they need the President to blame.

The republicans will be against anything the President proposes anyway and it will just lead to more grid lock. Let Congress do their job and quit ducking their responsibility. They’ve already broken the process.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 7, 2013, 8:46 am 8:46 am

NEWCOUNTRYMAN

The Constitution expressely and solely says that Congress and the Congress only can make laws and appropriate money, not the Executive branch.

The President should stay out of the process. The republicans will be against anything the President proposes anyway and it will just lead to more grid lock. Let Congress do their job and quit ducking their responsibility. They’ve already broken the Constitutional process

Posted by: tmferretti | January 7, 2013, 8:49 am 8:49 am

Obama is lucky to keep his job. Millions of people weren’t as lucky.

Posted by: PEIKOVYAN | January 7, 2013, 8:54 am 8:54 am

Boehner and McConnell are just looking for a scapegoat. They know these spending cuts are going to decimate this economy and put millions out of work. When it happens they need the President to blame.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 7, 2013, 8:59 am 8:59 am

“The Constitution expressely and solely says that Congress and the Congress only can make laws and appropriate money, not the Executive branch.

The President should stay out of the process.” So we agree then.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 7, 2013, 9:01 am 9:01 am

Tmferretti; I think it’s the president who is continually trying to get around the Constitution.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 7, 2013, 9:02 am 9:02 am

Boehnor and McConnell are just looking for a scapegoat. They know that their speding cuts are going to decimate this economy and put millions of Americans out of work.

No more White House closed door meetings. These proceedings should be televised on C-Span so the public can see who these idiots are. If deals are to be cut, they can do it in a closet somewhere.

We have a dysfuntional Congress, they refuse to do their job. The President can either sign the bill or not. If these knuckleheads think they did such a great job, they can override his veto

Posted by: tmferretti | January 7, 2013, 9:04 am 9:04 am

Typical feminized Democrat.

Posted by: PEIKOVYAN | January 7, 2013, 9:07 am 9:07 am

NEWCOUNTRYMAN

As I said, the President might be able to infuence liberal democrats to move more to the center, but he should in no way be part of these Congressional proceedings

Boehner and McConnell are just looking for a scapegoat. They know these spending cuts are going to decimate this economy and put millions out of work. When it happens they need the President to blame.

The republicans will be against anything the President proposes anyway and it will just lead to more grid lock. Let Congress do their job and quit ducking their responsibility. They’ve already broken the process.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 7, 2013, 9:08 am 9:08 am

@tmferretti wrote: “The republicans will be against anything the President proposes anyway …” Funny you mention that because when the Republicans are handed a Republican nominee on a silver platter they can’t accept it because the nomination came from President Obama. And the Republicans like to tout their bipartisanship. They can’t even accept their own kind. Their hate runs deep but their brain pans are shallow.

Posted by: psychovyan | January 7, 2013, 9:08 am 9:08 am

The Village People represent a broad spectrum of Democrat opinion-makers. Inclusivity.

Posted by: PEIKOVYAN | January 7, 2013, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Obama only kept his job because this new breed of Obama Democrat bought votes by easing the requirements which made more people eligible to get government checks even though they are capable of working!!. Government checks like–Food stamps, welfare, disability, rent assistance, heat assistance, Obama phones, Obama minutes, free internet, free college tuition etc etc. This new Obama Democrat is not willing to do what is necessary to take care of their families—if you don’t earn enough money then get a part time job– stop spending money you do not have——BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY–HAVE SOME SELF RESPECT PEOPLE– GROW U– TAKE CARE OF YOURSELF –BE A MAN OR BE A WOMAN!!

Posted by: WERALLSLAVES300 | January 7, 2013, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Psycho; If you are refering to the “men that have been long dead” who wrote the Constitution? Are you proposing we throw it out altogether and start over, or make changes? Or do you simply have no other honest comment to make?

Posted by: newcountryman | January 7, 2013, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Obama doesn’t even necessarily want Hagel. He really wants Kerry though.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 7, 2013, 9:11 am 9:11 am

NEWCOUNTRYMAN

The President might be able to sway some liberal democrats to the center but thats all he should do. He can either sign the bill or not. If these knuckleheads think they did such a great job they can override his veto.

Boehner and McConnell are just looking for a scapegoat. They know these spending cuts are going to decimate this economy and put millions out of work. When it happens they are looking for the President to blame.

The republicans will be against anything the President proposes anyway and it will just lead to more grid lock. Let Congress do their job and quit ducking their responsibility. They’ve already broken the process.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 7, 2013, 9:12 am 9:12 am

He refers to the individual rights that are long-dead when collectivized rights are created by force. The reasons why he demands this are met with denials and ad hominem attacks.

Posted by: PEIKOVYAN | January 7, 2013, 9:12 am 9:12 am

“They can’t even accept their own kind. Their hate runs deep but their brain pans are shallow.” Look who’s talking.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 7, 2013, 9:13 am 9:13 am

psychovan said–”And newcountryman, are you STILL quoting men that have been long dead and lived in a time when they could not even begin to conceive what this nation would face in its future?”————–YOU MEAN LIKE THIS NEW BREED OF DEMOCRATS THAT BELIEVE OTHERS SHOULD WORK–PAY TAXES TO SUPPORT THE OBAMA DEMOCRAT THEIR ENTIRE LIFE??? You are probably right!!

Posted by: WERALLSLAVES300 | January 7, 2013, 9:14 am 9:14 am

NEWCOUNTRYMAN

It’s so obvious that the republicans in Congress won’t do their job. They need to debate and compromise with the democrats in Congress, not the President.

Once they have a bill the President will either sign it or not.. If they are so convinced they did a good job , they can override his veto. Let the process work.

Boehner and McConnell are just looking for a scapegoat. They know these spending cuts are going to decimate this economy and put millions out of work. When it happens they need the President to blame.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 7, 2013, 9:16 am 9:16 am

NEWCOUNTRYMAN

Sorry, I can’t respond. ABC is exercising it’s exclusion policy for a while.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 7, 2013, 9:17 am 9:17 am

Jefferson is a target for Democrats who believe America was at a higher state socially and ethically when ruled by neolithic wanderers. Given enough time, the Democrats will return us to that era.

Posted by: PEIKOVYAN | January 7, 2013, 9:18 am 9:18 am

NEWCOUNTRYMAN

Boehner and McConnell are just looking for a scapegoat. They know these idiotic spending cuts are going to decimate this economy and put millions out of work. When it happens they need the President to blame.

The republicans will be against anything the President proposes anyway and it will just lead to more grid lock. Let Congress do their job and quit ducking their responsibility. They’ve already broken the process.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 7, 2013, 9:19 am 9:19 am

MY Tax money is Obama’s new ‘drug’ habit.

Posted by: BobinNC | January 7, 2013, 9:19 am 9:19 am

Unfortunately, the problem is the electorate and not the politicans. The politicans are simply a reflection in the mirror of the electorate. obama was crystal clear about raising taxes instead of spending cuts. There will be NO substantive spending cuts as long as he is President and the democrats maintain their power in the Senate. We will see a unilateral approach of feeding the government spending frenzy with more and more taxes on the MIDDLE CLASS. The reason is very simple. There is not enough wealth among the rich and the corporations to feed this monster of spending and entitlements. If you want to stop this you MUST stop re-electing these incumbents, republican or democrat, who keep voting for spending and taxes. Washington is addicted to spending irresponsibly and ONLY you can cure them but kicking them out of office.

Posted by: Perplexed | January 7, 2013, 9:21 am 9:21 am

When you think you can think, but you can only feel, it’s comforting to be a Democrat and a “genius”.

Posted by: PEIKOVYAN | January 7, 2013, 9:23 am 9:23 am

Spending and taxes are out of control. I would rather see the economy go broke now than to see them borrow another dime. I hope to see EVERY politician unemployed.

Posted by: Paul | January 7, 2013, 9:31 am 9:31 am

newcountryman, no one said throw out the constitution. They did have the foresight to make it a LIVING document with the INTENT that it would be changed for the betterment of the ENTIRE country. I’m just saying you quote these men like they are great leaders and liberators when they were slave owners who succeeded in committing the most effective genocide of an aboriginal population that the world has EVER seen. Your heros stained this country with the Trail of Tears. The charity your heros gave wasn’t really charity but was biological warfare against an innocent populace. And I don’t care WHAT the Native Americans did to the Europeans in defense of their home the natives were defending their homes. Your idols are as hollow as your words!

Posted by: psychovyan | January 7, 2013, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Boehner and McConnell know these idiotic spending cuts are going to decimate this economy and put millions out of work. They are looking for a scapegoat when the American people see their foolishness. They President should veto this debt ceiling and any spending bill.

If the republicans insist on it, they can try to override his veto as specified in the Constitution.

Britain did the same thing these republicans are proposing. Now, their economy is the worst since the great depression, unemployment is soaring, and their debt is rising again.

If anyone is foolish enough to cut spending in the middle of a recession they deserve the wrath of the American people.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 7, 2013, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Anyone can see that this country has a spending problem. Denying that immediately makes you an imbecile.

Posted by: Matt | January 7, 2013, 9:40 am 9:40 am

The Constitution is a legal agreement understood within the context of its first generation of readers. The President wins election by a plurality (even a 60% “landslide” out of a record 80% turnout yields a 48% less-than-majority vote) and is expected to lead, and be led, by the Congress. The Court determines if any laws are constitutionally valid. Amendments change the Constitution. Discovering the “intent” of the Founding Fathers through seance, revelation or street riot is dangerous nonsense.

Posted by: PEIKOVYAN | January 7, 2013, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Psycho; I don’t quote them (the founders). I’m stating what the document actually says. Some people on here obviously don’t know what it actually reads. I’m actually not going to waste my time with you since you’re obviously more into insulting everyone including the ones that provided the very basis for the very words you are free to use (1st Amendment). Have a nice day.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 7, 2013, 9:47 am 9:47 am

What’s disturbing about the constitutional system is that where it should allow for amendments that clarify when the constitution is silent, instead it permits amendments that conflict with existing law. The 16th Amendment is an excellent example, and the government is going broke even with the extra revenue this created.

Posted by: PEIKOVYAN | January 7, 2013, 9:55 am 9:55 am

How can Demoncrats be so oblivious? Are you so obsessed with “being right” that you forget that end results are all that really matters? We don’t care who solved the problem. JUST SOLVE IT. The right are being obstructionists because the left wants us to be socialists. This should be no surprise to anyone. You get what you pay for and you can pat yourselves on the back for bringing more misery to all of us. Stop wasting our money. We wouldn’t care to give more if we knew it would be used wisely. IDIOTS IDIOTS IDIOTS

Posted by: BillRakes | January 7, 2013, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Dems are looking at 1 trillion in new revenue including taxes.

Posted by: jschmidt | January 7, 2013, 10:01 am 10:01 am

That ought to pay the “vig” on the debt that will crush us all.

Posted by: PEIKOVYAN | January 7, 2013, 10:02 am 10:02 am

“Anyone can see that this country has a spending problem. Denying that immediately makes you an imbecile.”

Where’s my free phone?

Posted by: Gimme | January 7, 2013, 10:06 am 10:06 am

OB backed himself into this corner. The only avenue he had against Romney was the class warfare bit..and he was successful. Then it was time to pay the piper. The only way to pay back his promise made during the class warfare propaganda was to ensure only taxes were raised on the successful. Okay, that happened. His other promise was to have a “balanced approach.” Well, OB, the fulcrum is pretty well weighted to one side….revenue heavy. What do you bring to the table this time? Looks like 72% of the folks believe there has to be spending cuts to go along with tax increases. I think most of them actually run a household and understand debt. But, your base is not going to be happy with you if you even mention cuts…..good luck. You should have seen this one coming. I know, I know…you had to get elected first..worry about the details later.

Posted by: choppyseas | January 7, 2013, 10:06 am 10:06 am

DOC62, so SIX out of TEN are democrats,
Rank Name Minimum Net Worth Maximum Net Worth
1Herb Kohl (D-Wis)$219,098,029. $234,549,004
2 John Kerry (D-Mass)$165,741,511. $235,262,100
3 Jay Rockefeller (D-WVa)$78,150,023. $101,579,003
4Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif)$43,341,462. $98,630,021
5 Lincoln D. Chafee (R-RI)$41,153,105. $64,096,019
6 Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ)$38,198,170$90,733,019
7John McCain (R-Ariz)$20,571,136. $32,043,011
8 Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass)$19,189,049 $93,043,004
9 Elizabeth Dole (R-NC $13,508,152. $49,829,007
10 Gordon H. Smith (R-Ore)$12,994,660. $62,261,641

Posted by: Lizzie | January 7, 2013, 10:14 am 10:14 am

Boehner and McConnell are just looking for a scapegoat. They know these spending cuts are going to decimate this economy and put millions out of work. When it happens they need the President to blame.

Britain has already tried the republican plan with their austerity programs. They now have the worst economy since the great depression, unemployment is soaring and their debt is on the rise again.

All this foolishness of cutting spending in the middle of a recession will do the same here.

The republicans will be against anything the President proposes anyway and it will just lead to more grid lock. Let Congress do their job and quit ducking their responsibility. They’ve already broken the process.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 7, 2013, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Our government calls the paper it prints “currency”. On that basis the total amount of currency circulating is valued in the total amount of goods it can buy. The production of goods is now stagnant. When government doubles or triples the currency in circulation by printing more, the total is still valued in the total amount of goods it can buy. These goods will cost double or triple what they used to cost. Hyperinflation is around the corner.

Posted by: PEIKOVYAN | January 7, 2013, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Boehner and McConnell are just looking for a scapegoat. They know these spending cuts are going to decimate this economy and put millions out of work. When it happens they need the President to blame.

Britain has already tried the republican plan with their austerity programs. They now have the worst economy since the great depression, unemployment is soaring and their debt is on the rise again.

All this foolishness of cutting spending in the middle of a recession will do the same here. If the republicans would use some common sense instead of worrying about their primary elections, which they will loose anyway we might make some progress.

The republicans will be against anything the President proposes anyway and it will just lead to more grid lock. Let Congress do their job and quit ducking their responsibility. They’ve already broken the process.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 7, 2013, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Sorry, the socialists are poised to confiscate another trillion dollars from nation. H says he wants unlimited personal control over the debt and demands for more devaluing of the dollar. We just went through the Obamacare scam trillions in new taxes, the new cliff taxes, and now another trillion in demand coming. So, more inflation, more debt, more taxes. That’s Valdimir Lenin’s policies. He’s the one that said, “The way to crush the bourgeoisie is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation.” and “The best way to destroy the capitalist system is to debauch the currency.” But he knew he would need help, just as the left today do and to that he states, “The press should be not only a collective propagandist and a collective agitator, but also a collective organizer of the masses.” And that they are for sure. Lenin’s policies are being closely adhered to and implemented. The left have defeated a once great nation! What’s that other thing Lenin said? Oh, yeah… “The government is tottering. We must deal it the death blow an any cost. To delay action is the same as death.” Read up on Vladimir Lenin Quotes. H and Party are all over it like stink.

Posted by: TexBork_2013 | January 7, 2013, 10:26 am 10:26 am

here comes the Democrat defense line: “Boooooooschhhhh!!!!!”

Posted by: Ivan | January 7, 2013, 10:32 am 10:32 am

The Constitution expressely and solely says that Congress and the Congress only can make laws and appropriate money, not the Executive branch.
The President should stay out of the process
———-
Each year, the President of the United States submits his budget request to Congress for the following fiscal year as required by the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921. Current law (31 U.S.C. § 1105(a)) requires the president to submit a budget no earlier than the first Monday in January, and no later than the first Monday in February.

Obama’d rather be golfing

Posted by: Ivan | January 7, 2013, 10:39 am 10:39 am

First, let the sequester kick in. Next, cut 600′billion to match the tax increase that went through as part of the fiscal cliff, and then cut all this:

* Corporation for Public Broadcasting Subsidy — $445 million annual savings.
* Save America’s Treasures Program — $25 million annual savings.
* International Fund for Ireland — $17 million annual savings.
* Legal Services Corporation — $420 million annual savings.
* National Endowment for the Arts — $167.5 million annual savings.
* National Endowment for the Humanities — $167.5 million annual savings.
* Hope VI Program — $250 million annual savings.
* Amtrak Subsidies — $1.565 billion annual savings.
* Eliminate duplicative education programs — H.R. 2274 (in last Congress), authored by Rep. McKeon, eliminates 68 at a savings of $1.3 billion annually.
* U.S. Trade Development Agency — $55 million annual savings.
* Woodrow Wilson Center Subsidy — $20 million annual savings.
* Cut in half funding for congressional printing and binding — $47 million annual savings.
* John C. Stennis Center Subsidy — $430,000 annual savings.
* Community Development Fund — $4.5 billion annual savings.
* Heritage Area Grants and Statutory Aid — $24 million annual savings.
* Cut Federal Travel Budget in Half — $7.5 billion annual savings
* Trim Federal Vehicle Budget by 20% — $600 million annual savings.
* Essential Air Service — $150 million annual savings.
* Technology Innovation Program — $70 million annual savings.
* Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) Program — $125 million annual savings.
* Department of Energy Grants to States for Weatherization — $530 million annual savings.
* Beach Replenishment — $95 million annual savings.
* New Starts Transit — $2 billion annual savings.
* Exchange Programs for Alaska Natives, Native Hawaiians, and Their Historical Trading Partners in Massachusetts — $9 million annual savings
* Intercity and High Speed Rail Grants — $2.5 billion annual savings.
* Title X Family Planning — $318 million annual savings.
* Appalachian Regional Commission — $76 million annual savings.
* Economic Development Administration — $293 million annual savings.
* Programs under the National and Community Services Act — $1.15 billion annual savings.
* Applied Research at Department of Energy — $1.27 billion annual savings.
* Freedom CAR and Fuel Partnership — $200 million annual savings.
* Energy Star Program — $52 million annual savings.
* Economic Assistance to Egypt — $250 million annually.
* U.S. Agency for International Development — $1.39 billion annual savings.
* General Assistance to District of Columbia — $210 million annual savings.
* Subsidy for Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority — $150 million annual savings.
* Presidential Campaign Fund — $775 million savings over ten years.
* No funding for federal office space acquisition — $864 million annual savings.
* End prohibitions on competitive sourcing of government services.
* Repeal the Davis-Bacon Act — More than $1 billion annually.
* IRS Direct Deposit: Require the IRS to deposit fees for some services it offers (such as processing payment plans for taxpayers) to the Treasury, instead of allowing it to remain as part of its budget — $1.8 billion savings over ten years.
* Require collection of unpaid taxes by federal employees — $1 billion total savings.
* Prohibit taxpayer funded union activities by federal employees — $1.2 billion savings over ten years.
* Sell excess federal properties the government does not make use of — $15 billion total savings.
* Eliminate death gratuity for Members of Congress. Untold savings could result from this.
* Eliminate Mohair Subsidies — $1 million annual savings.
* Eliminate taxpayer subsidies to the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — $12.5 million annual savings
* Eliminate Market Access Program — $200 million annual savings.
* USDA Sugar Program — $14 million annual savings.
* Subsidy to Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) — $93 million annual savings.
* Eliminate the National Organic Certification Cost-Share Program — $56.2 million annual savings.
* Eliminate fund for Obamacare administrative costs — $900 million savings.
* Ready to Learn TV Program — $27 million savings.
* HUD Ph.D. Program.
* Deficit Reduction Check-Off Act.

* TOTAL SAVINGS: $2.5 Trillion over Ten Years

The Spending Reduction Act of 2011 was introduced to the House of Representatives in January 2011 and referred to committee, where it has remained ever since; it has not been passed or ever put to a vote.

Posted by: SAMADAMS | January 7, 2013, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Here’s a novel idea.
How about all Congressional pay, expenses and benefits be paid from the surplus.
No surplus, no pay and bennies.

Posted by: Kelvin | January 7, 2013, 10:55 am 10:55 am

An ineffectual Weimar Republic argues as violent thugs wait for hyperinflation to make their case.

Posted by: PEIKOVYAN | January 7, 2013, 11:03 am 11:03 am

What is everyone surprised at this? Is it a revelation that Washington wants more of your money? Has everyone forgotten that we just had an election and the primary promoter of taxes, obama, received a majority of votes? What did you expect? Until you fire these people who promote spending at more taxes this is ALL you are going to get.

Posted by: Perplexed | January 7, 2013, 11:04 am 11:04 am

I can’t wait until you folks discover that there isn’t enough revenue to be squeezed from the rich and he is going to have to tap the middle class for bucks. I wonder how many of you will be so understanding of taxes when it comes from your paycheck instead of some rich guy? Let me take a wild guess.

Posted by: Perplexed | January 7, 2013, 11:17 am 11:17 am

tmferretti | January 7, 2013, 10:21 am —- The recession ended 3.5 years ago, remember? If you believe we are still in a recession, then Obama should not have gone back on his lie of not raising taxes during a recession. Which one is it?

Posted by: Commonsenseparty | January 7, 2013, 11:20 am 11:20 am

@choppyseas wrote: “The only avenue he had against Romney was the class warfare bit..and he was successful.” Yes… it was Obama using Romney like a puppet and FORCING Romney to write off 47% of the VOTING public, INCLUDING seniors, veterans and other such moochers to whom the GOP believes our government owns no debts. Yes, it was Obama who forced Romney and the GOP to REFUSE to listen to the voting public. I have no doubt that you will say that the voting public didn’t know what they were doing. Keep it up and the Democrats will take the House in the next round of elections. Thanks… it’s much appreciated!

Posted by: ScroogeYou | January 7, 2013, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

@peikovyan, For someone that whines about the government’s money being worthless, why do you whine so much to try to keep what little you have? If it’s worthless… it’s worthless. Quit your 8itchin’!

Posted by: ScroogeYou | January 7, 2013, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

I doubt if you are going to appreciate things when we go bankrupt and austerity is forced on us. If you think that taxes are high now and spending is not enough you are in for a big surprise. There will be NO entitlements or safety nets anymore. The government will spend the high taxes that it will be forced to impose on us, our children and our grandchildren to pay off debts that they will never be able to pay off. You will be on your own, sweetheart.

Posted by: Perplexed | January 7, 2013, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

I’m sure throwing even more and more tax money at the government without demanding fiscal responsibility will work very well. It always has before.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 7, 2013, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Why is it that EVEN when one of their own argues in favor of raising taxes on the wealthy, the critics ALWAYS twist that into illusory opposition to cutting waste and spending? Why is it that when you ask the people who scream the loudest about waste and spending to take a look at waste and spending at the Pentagon they get all LIBERAL? I’m all for defending this country but let’s get real, if we’re going to address spending, waste and fraud then we CANNOT give a free pass to ANY area of our government. I can see why you are “perplexed”. Honestly I would rather my descendants bear the burden of high taxes than be subjects (property) of “the company store”. And I make my primary income on the stock market buying from the chicken little’s of the world. They ALWAYS come back and I ALWAYS demand a premium of AT LEAST 10% and more often upwards of 20%. Keep up the panic… it’s great for my bottom line..

Posted by: ScroogeYou | January 7, 2013, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

@newcountryman, Where were you screaming about “fiscal responsibility” when Bush led us into a bogus war with Iraq and the continuing boondoggle in Afghanistan? How many trillions of dollars have those wars cost us to date? And who even cares about the money when you think about the cost to our brothers, sisters, sons and daughters who fight and die in these wars. How much will the ongoing care for the wounded veterans cost this country for the NEXT 50 years? And, in true Republican fashion you’ll be sure to hang the tab on the current administration.

Posted by: ScroogeYou | January 7, 2013, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Wow!! According to Mitch McConnell Washington’s self inflicted Fiscal Cliff (He helped create) is a bigger problem than 20 dead 1st graders gunned down like small animals. Not quite his words, but he said it…Unbelievable!

Posted by: EricJM | January 7, 2013, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

POSTED BY: BRENDA ROBERTS | JANUARY 6, 2013, 10:33 AM 10:33 AM where have all those democrats been, when DEMOCRATS voted to spend, spend, spend and then blamed the President. Now no one says this President spends, it’s the congress fault. Guess you have be a democrat to to spin it your way and get away with it.

Posted by: Lizzie | January 7, 2013, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

You can add revenue without taxing JAX. You complain that our education system has failed us based on mcconnels statement on revenue/taxes/deficit? well you confirmed your own claim for me!! heres one way of getting more revenue without raising taxes- simple, its called getting more tax payers! more jobs=more tax payers. higher paying jobs=more revenue. easy.. your a joke JAX.

Posted by: jgan | January 7, 2013, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

POSTED BY: PERPLEXED | JANUARY 7, 2013, 11:04 AM 11:04 AM people believed that only the OTHER guy will be paying taxes and that their pay checks will increase, as the President said, if the guy next door has two cars and you have none, the government will take one of his and give it to you. And that’s called redistribution.

Posted by: Lizzie | January 7, 2013, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

I am going to risk that I have not used up my quota for conservatives but here is a go at it. What does it profit us to continue spending with no restraint when most of us recognize that there is a limit to how much you can tax? Can we tax the rich at 100%? Can we tax the middle class at 75%? What is the limit of taxes? If there is a limit then how much revenue will that raise? Will that pay off some of our debt, half of our debt, all of our debt? Do you care if we ever pay off any of the debt?

Posted by: Perplexed | January 7, 2013, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

New idea: Elected officials are all given a flat pay of $100,000 a year. They don’t have to pay for security, but everything else they do. This includes the president and all of congress. Then let’s see who really wants to run for office.

Posted by: GAJRANT | January 7, 2013, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.