<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Military Sexual Assault Victims Testify Before Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/03/military-sexual-assault-victims-testify-before-congress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/03/military-sexual-assault-victims-testify-before-congress/</link>
	<description>The latest Politics news and blog posts from ABC News contributors and bloggers including Jake Tapper, George Stephanopoulos and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:31:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmcginnis</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/03/military-sexual-assault-victims-testify-before-congress/#comment-31587536</link>
		<dc:creator>tmcginnis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=839633#comment-31587536</guid>
		<description>Good point from WildAndBlue, until the paranoid &quot;agenda&quot; part. What agenda? Please, the &quot;agenda&quot; is to get justice for victims of sexual assault, and I think most of us would sign onto that. Such a smart and informative comment gets polluted easily by language that invokes the conspiracy-theory mindset of the delusional factions of the right wing. 

This article should be corrected, as I am with WildAndBlue. The writer/editors don&#039;t seem to understand how the system works, and have misrepresented it in this piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point from WildAndBlue, until the paranoid &#8220;agenda&#8221; part. What agenda? Please, the &#8220;agenda&#8221; is to get justice for victims of sexual assault, and I think most of us would sign onto that. Such a smart and informative comment gets polluted easily by language that invokes the conspiracy-theory mindset of the delusional factions of the right wing. </p>
<p>This article should be corrected, as I am with WildAndBlue. The writer/editors don&#8217;t seem to understand how the system works, and have misrepresented it in this piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wildandblue</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/03/military-sexual-assault-victims-testify-before-congress/#comment-31575484</link>
		<dc:creator>wildandblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 01:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/?p=839633#comment-31575484</guid>
		<description>The language at the end is wrong.  An inspector general CANNOT &quot;throw out&quot; a federal conviction.  A general officer, in the position of what&#039;s called General Court-Martial Convening Authority, signs off on the action, promulgating the sentence of a servicemember after court-martial.  Either the author of this news piece doesn&#039;t know the truth, or skewed it in order to prop up abc&#039;s agenda.  The only means to alter a federal conviction is through appellate review, via  the Court of Military Appeals.  However, the topic is definitely an issue with a bullseye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The language at the end is wrong.  An inspector general CANNOT &#8220;throw out&#8221; a federal conviction.  A general officer, in the position of what&#8217;s called General Court-Martial Convening Authority, signs off on the action, promulgating the sentence of a servicemember after court-martial.  Either the author of this news piece doesn&#8217;t know the truth, or skewed it in order to prop up abc&#8217;s agenda.  The only means to alter a federal conviction is through appellate review, via  the Court of Military Appeals.  However, the topic is definitely an issue with a bullseye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>