<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Warmer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2005/11/warmer-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2005/11/warmer-2/</link>
	<description>The latest Technology news and blog posts from ABC News contributors and bloggers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:30:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: redtech5</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2005/11/warmer-2/#comment-14289</link>
		<dc:creator>redtech5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2005/11/warmer-2/#comment-14289</guid>
		<description>Hi Ned,
I&#039;ll add my two cents to this whole global warming/Kyoto treaty thang....
Personally, I&#039;m a bit mixed about it. I know that as one of the leading &quot;great industrialized nations&quot; on the planet, America could do a lot more to shore up the environment, reduce pollution, and hopefully reverse global warming. And I know that a lot of Bush-bashers blame him for all the environmental ills we now have -- just because he didn&#039;t sign on to the Kyoto protocol.
BUT, I think Bush has some valid points -- namely, what good is this protocol when it exempts &quot;less industrialized&quot; nations such as China and India? If they&#039;re so &quot;less industrializes,&quot; how come they also have some of the most POLLUTED areas of the earth?
I had a conversation with a relative of mine this holiday weekend and we discussed how much our &quot;homeland&quot; (Yes, I&#039;m Chinese.) has changed -- that so MANY Chinese are leaving the native countryside and agricultural lifestyle for urban living and manufacturing industries... the growing &quot;middle class&quot;... etc.
My relative and I came to the conclusion that China, for better or worse, is more or less where America was in the early 1900s. Big business (i.e. &quot;big money&quot;) is growing like gangbusters, creating massive amounts of new jobs and new, cheaper products (and the consumer demand for them) -- BUT, unlike the U.S., there apparently is NO governmental check to HOW the country goes about developing itself into an industrial powerhouse. No one there apparently CARES that the factories there are spewing out pollutants by the tons. And being a communist state, it wouldn&#039;t surprise me if there WERE any Ralph Naders among China&#039;s BILLION+ population that they were (permanently and quietly) silenced long ago in some Asian gulag (or unmarked cemetary) in some desolate corner of China.
Case point, another Asian friend of mine came back from China last year and was absolutely STUNNED with the wide selection of consumer electronic goods -- and all at unheard of remarkably LOW prices -- now available in China. He said that the TVs and DVD players that the country was cranking out back then FAR SURPASSED what he saw in Tokyo. And although the quality of the goods weren&#039;t as refined as something you would expect from Sony or other Japanese company, my friend says there is a reason for it...
According to my friend, he says a local sales rep in China told him &quot;We make these things cheaper (i.e. with reduced quality) so that when they break, it&#039;s easier to just throw out and buy the new model rather than try to fix it. If we don&#039;t do it that way, who will buy our NEW stuff?&quot; (at least that&#039;s the ROUGH translation from what he told me in Chinese!)
And it&#039;s that kind of &quot;throw-away&quot; attitude that I think will be the death of us all. But unfortunately, to me, it seems the prevailing attitude everywhere.
How long ago was it that Apple came out with the iPod? Then all sorts of problems come popping up with the built-in, non-removable, non-replaceable rechargeable batteries? And then what? Oh wait, Apple comes out with the &quot;gotta have&quot; mini... so we&#039;re good with that for a year, year and a half? Then comes the even SEXIER &quot;nano&quot;... and if we were on the verge of buying that then there&#039;s the &quot;video ipod&quot; and ipod cell phones -- just a MONTH later.
And let&#039;s not even get started on cell phones.
Just where do all these &quot;dead&quot; products go? Reused? Recycled? Fat chance.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ned,<br />
I&#8217;ll add my two cents to this whole global warming/Kyoto treaty thang&#8230;.<br />
Personally, I&#8217;m a bit mixed about it. I know that as one of the leading &#8220;great industrialized nations&#8221; on the planet, America could do a lot more to shore up the environment, reduce pollution, and hopefully reverse global warming. And I know that a lot of Bush-bashers blame him for all the environmental ills we now have &#8212; just because he didn&#8217;t sign on to the Kyoto protocol.<br />
BUT, I think Bush has some valid points &#8212; namely, what good is this protocol when it exempts &#8220;less industrialized&#8221; nations such as China and India? If they&#8217;re so &#8220;less industrializes,&#8221; how come they also have some of the most POLLUTED areas of the earth?<br />
I had a conversation with a relative of mine this holiday weekend and we discussed how much our &#8220;homeland&#8221; (Yes, I&#8217;m Chinese.) has changed &#8212; that so MANY Chinese are leaving the native countryside and agricultural lifestyle for urban living and manufacturing industries&#8230; the growing &#8220;middle class&#8221;&#8230; etc.<br />
My relative and I came to the conclusion that China, for better or worse, is more or less where America was in the early 1900s. Big business (i.e. &#8220;big money&#8221;) is growing like gangbusters, creating massive amounts of new jobs and new, cheaper products (and the consumer demand for them) &#8212; BUT, unlike the U.S., there apparently is NO governmental check to HOW the country goes about developing itself into an industrial powerhouse. No one there apparently CARES that the factories there are spewing out pollutants by the tons. And being a communist state, it wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if there WERE any Ralph Naders among China&#8217;s BILLION+ population that they were (permanently and quietly) silenced long ago in some Asian gulag (or unmarked cemetary) in some desolate corner of China.<br />
Case point, another Asian friend of mine came back from China last year and was absolutely STUNNED with the wide selection of consumer electronic goods &#8212; and all at unheard of remarkably LOW prices &#8212; now available in China. He said that the TVs and DVD players that the country was cranking out back then FAR SURPASSED what he saw in Tokyo. And although the quality of the goods weren&#8217;t as refined as something you would expect from Sony or other Japanese company, my friend says there is a reason for it&#8230;<br />
According to my friend, he says a local sales rep in China told him &#8220;We make these things cheaper (i.e. with reduced quality) so that when they break, it&#8217;s easier to just throw out and buy the new model rather than try to fix it. If we don&#8217;t do it that way, who will buy our NEW stuff?&#8221; (at least that&#8217;s the ROUGH translation from what he told me in Chinese!)<br />
And it&#8217;s that kind of &#8220;throw-away&#8221; attitude that I think will be the death of us all. But unfortunately, to me, it seems the prevailing attitude everywhere.<br />
How long ago was it that Apple came out with the iPod? Then all sorts of problems come popping up with the built-in, non-removable, non-replaceable rechargeable batteries? And then what? Oh wait, Apple comes out with the &#8220;gotta have&#8221; mini&#8230; so we&#8217;re good with that for a year, year and a half? Then comes the even SEXIER &#8220;nano&#8221;&#8230; and if we were on the verge of buying that then there&#8217;s the &#8220;video ipod&#8221; and ipod cell phones &#8212; just a MONTH later.<br />
And let&#8217;s not even get started on cell phones.<br />
Just where do all these &#8220;dead&#8221; products go? Reused? Recycled? Fat chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>