Another Day, Another Delay
1:45pm
This message from Gina Sunseri, our Houston-based producer:
Two good sources are telling me NASA will be forced to admit today the May launch window for the next Shuttle mission is impossible.
They will have to swap out the ECO sensors (fuel cutoff switches) on the external tank they just shipped to the Kennedy Space Center last month.
Engineers and managers are having an all-hands-on-deck meeting now in Houston.
This swap will take 22 days, which kills any chance of making a May launch.
There are four ECO (short for Engine Cut-Off) sensors inside the Shuttle’s orange external tank, near its base. They signal that the tank is running dry, preventing the Shuttle’s engines from continuing to fire when there is no fuel to power them.
To get to them, engineers have to cut through the foam insulation on the base of the tank, then open an access hatch. It’s not a job to be done when the tank is standing upright on its launch platform. If you remember, ECO sensors did them in twice before they launched Discovery last year. The first time, they were less than 2-1/2 hours to launch, with the astronauts settling into their seats in the crew compartment, when one of the sensors sent a faulty signal–and the launch was put off for two weeks.
The next window is July 1st-20th.
—————
UPDATE, 4:30PM Gina’s sources were good. NASA held a 4pm (EST) news conference and has just put out the following statement:
RELEASE: 06-092
NASA ANNOUNCES NEW WINDOW FOR NEXT SPACE SHUTTLE MISSION
NASA announced today July 1 to 19, 2006, is the new launch planning window for Space Shuttle Discovery’s mission (STS-121). The window gives the agency time to do additional engineering work and analysis to ensure a safe flight for Discovery and its crew.
Space Shuttle Program Manager Wayne Hale made the announcement during a news conference from NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston. The decision to target July followed a two-day meeting on the external fuel tank’s engine cutoff (ECO) sensors. The sensors indicate whether the tank still has fuel during liftoff. During testing, one of the four ECO sensors had a slightly different reading than is expected. Shuttle officials have decided they will remove and replace all four liquid hydrogen sensors.
"We’ve been saying for months that our engineering work would determine when we fly our next mission. Targeting July is the right choice in order to make smart decisions," said Bill Gerstenmaier, NASA associate administrator for Space Operations.
Gina adds that NASA believes it can still launch three shuttles in 2006…partly because it has to. The plan is to be finished with them in 2010, and time’s a’ wastin’.
Of course, an irony in all this is that to build the Shuttles’ replacement, NASA is cannibalizing all the science programs that led to the findings we’ve been talking about since last week. The mission to Jupiter’s moon Europa, believed, like Saturn’s moon Enceladus, to be a home to liquid water, is canceled, at least for now. Anyone want to send a new probe to Saturn? It won’t happen any time soon.
Email
Space Station Flies Over Eastern U.S. at Night 




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Just goes to show how the domino theory works: when one project fails or is delayed, it causes delays and cancellations for others. I only hope the delays won’t cause problems for our researchers.
Posted by: chuck | March 15, 2006, 7:57 am 7:57 am
You know, the more I read about how messed-up the shuttles are, the more I wonder how NASA manages to survive for so long….
Billions of dollars in funding and we’re still stuck with 1970s-era space technology and set-backs in space exploration.
Sometimes I wonder if we (as in the U.S.) should just say to hell with it and close down NASA and either start anew or let private companies take over the role of pioneering space. But then I look at private efforts like Sir Richard Branson’s “Galactic Air Service” and the newly formed “rocket racing league” and realize they haven’t a clue either. I can’t imagine how such ventures help advance the SCIENCE of space exploration and discovery?
Maybe we should just throw in the towel and really try and reach out to the other countries. To form a REAL international alliance of scientists and under the guise of true international peace and good will, tackle the huge challenge of exploring space IN PEACE and BROTHERHOOD, for the GOOD of ALL mankind.
(Ok, all you Saturians and Jovians out there reading this communique can now quit laughing and muttering, “Foolish, pathetic humans!”)
Posted by: redtech5 | March 15, 2006, 9:44 am 9:44 am
Once again, I have to heartily second Redtech5′s comments, especially the ones in the next-to-the-last paragraph. What I’d like to see happen, and just maybe before I take my final breath, was foreshadowed in the movie “Star Trek: First Contact.” (I know it’s only a movie, and I’m not a Trekker, but the part I’m talking about was transcendent for me.) One of the main characters is explaining that after Earth’s first contact with an alien species, mankind realized that it was no longer alone in the universe. All inhabitants of Earth moved from petulant ethnic squabbles, mass poverty, and the amassing of material riches by a few to the betterment of all with a motivating force of the exploration of outer space. That would be the true start of a new era for all!
Posted by: chuck | March 15, 2006, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm