Apr 11, 2006 5:17pm

What’s a Planet?

Tuesday afternoon The Space Telescope Science Institute, which operates the Hubble Telescope, reports that it has taken its first image of the putative tenth planet, the one identified last summer, far beyond the orbit of Pluto, by Caltech astronomer Mike Brown.  He nicknamed the object "Xena," after the warrior princess of syndicated-TV fame, but for now, the International Astronomical Union is sticking to the official designation 2003 UB313. Brown used to argue that Pluto didn’t qualify as a planet–too small, too unlike the other planets–but last year he said he’d changed his mind because, well, every preschooler thinks of Pluto as a planet.  Later, when followup observations suggested that 2003 UB313 was considerably larger than Pluto, Brown said the case was clear: it deserved to be a planet, for which he’d submitted a serious (as yet unannounced) name. The Hubble image muddies the water.  In it, 2003 UB313 is only 1.5 pixels across (the rest is glare).  It’s probably only slightly larger than Pluto–1,490 miles in diameter, vs. 1,422 miles for Pluto.  Maybe both of them ought only to be regarded as "Kuiper Belt Objects," part of the vast band of icy, rocky planetoids, asteroids and comets that orbit far beyond Neptune. (More information from NASA is HERE.  The Space Telescope Science Institute has more HERE.) What does this matter?  Well, science looks for order, and if not for these distant interlopers, the Solar System would be very orderly.  The inner planets–Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars–are small and rocky; the outer planets–Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune–are gas giants.  A noisy little movement in the 1990s said Pluto, at best, qualified as "other." So what makes a planet?  Anything spherical that orbits the Sun?  In that case there are a bunch of asteroids that qualify (the astrophysicist Neil Tyson smiles about the discovery of "the planet Ceres" between Mars and Jupiter in 1801).  Anything larger than Pluto?  In that case you could make an argument for several moons of Jupiter, Saturn and–oh, forgive me–Earth, since their size puts Pluto to shame, and, strictly speaking, they do circle the Sun.  Anyone got a better idea?  Science is waiting for one. —– (A quick note of thanks to those of you who caught our editing error from Monday.  Yes, I know the Moon isn’t a planet, and I’m pretty sure our editors do too–but one of them, in a rush, apparently changed the first line of the piece I wrote from "…an early step to send the first astronauts there…." to "…an early step to delivering the first astronauts to the planet…."  Correction made.)

User Comments

Ned, I have to admit that I didn’t understand the corrections made to your previous posting, since I must have seen your article after the correction was made. In any case, I have absolutely no idea for a defining test as to what a planet is. (Maybe we could apply the old common-sense test that if it “walks like a duck, quacks like a duck,” and so on.) Many thanks for the additional links!

Posted by: chuck | April 12, 2006, 7:57 am 7:57 am

I think the shuttle program should continue but it needs to be geared towered
colonizing the moon and starting to move off planet this I think will generate
a new generation of original thinkers in science and technology as Von Braun
was to early space flight. When I was in high school I stood upon the bridge
of the mock up that was at Rockwell in Downey Ca. I have been in awe
since that time of the marvels man can create with but a dream.

Posted by: Traci Sarah Dunn | April 13, 2006, 3:22 am 3:22 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.