Reboot
To those of you who are new to this page, welcome. Pull up a computer and get comfortable. I hope you’ll like what you find here. To those of you who have been here before, welcome back. I’m grateful you’re here again. A quick reminder of what I hope this page will be–and what it is not. One of the great joys of science/technology reporting is that I get to talk to really interesting people who are doing really interesting things. I also run across odd bits of information that I’d miss if I were in another line of work. I’ll do my best to pass these on to you. To me, that’s usually the most daunting part of my work. I labor and fret over scripts for television or radio, trying to get every word just right, because there’s no second chance. But this blog is a somewhat different proposition. Fear not–I’ll still fret over accuracy and context. But instead of filing a report, I hope we’ll be having a conversation. Please, please weigh in, even if only with a casual line or two. Tell me what interests you, or doesn’t, or gets you mad, or gives you a laugh, and I’ll try to oblige. I really do read comments, and I learn a lot from them. As for what this is not–well, I don’t think of this as a place for me to spout my own opinons. There are plenty of other places to go for punditry, some of which I truly respect, but I think my job is to provide you with useful information–raw data, as it were, to which I welcome your response. So let’s get back to business. —————– The Ghost of Hurricane Katrina NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, is out this morning with its outlook for the 2006 hurricane season, and sounding dark about it. They predict: 13-16 named storms–tropical storms or worse. 8-10 of them are likely to become hurricanes, with winds of 75 mph or more. 4-6 could reach Category 3 or higher. An "average" year to them is 11 named storms, six hurricanes, two big ones. (For more, and for definitions, try http://www.nhc.noaa.gov.) But we haven’t had an "average" year in a decade, and last year, of course, was off the charts. This year can’t possibly be as bad (can it?), simply because the odds and the atmosphere rarely align the way they did in 2005, but today’s outlook is for a slightly more active atmosphere than what they predicted a year ago this week. Ask around at the National Hurricane Center, and they’ll mostly blame the Atlantic Multi-Decadal Signal–a shift in prevailing winds and currents that comes along irregularly. But it so happens that the tropical Atlantic has been unusually warm of late, and warm, steamy water is the fuel of hurricanes. Bill Blakemore, my friend down the hall who also reports on such matters, has posted a piece on whether there ought to be Category 6 hurricanes; find it HERE. Bill has spent the last couple of years concentrating on global climate change, and he’s talked to a lot of atmospheric scientists who are worried. As we’ve reported in the last year, there’s evidence to suggest that as the climate warms–and it is warming; the questions are how much and why–the intensity of hurricanes rises accordingly. It does not seem to affect the number of storms, but in the last several decades they’ve tended to be stronger. The NOAA people, some of whom quietly grumble that they can’t say what they’d like to about climate warming, do repeat that we need to be ready. Evacuation plans have not greatly improved since last year, and America’s coastal population keeps rising–despite the mass exodus from the New Orleans area since last August. (Hurricane Katrina on August 28, 2005, before it made landfall. NOAA satellite image.) This from Max Mayfield, director of the National Hurricane Center: "Whether we face an active hurricane season, like this year, or a below normal season, the crucial message for every person is the same: prepare, prepare, prepare." Mayfield says he has no problem sounding like a broken record if it gets people to stock up on emergency supplies now, and know where they would go if they find themselves in a storm’s path. He also says he hopes he’s wasting people’s time. But he knows he’s not.
Email
Space Station Flies Over Eastern U.S. at Night 




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Glad to have you back, Ned.
Posted by: Rob M | May 22, 2006, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Welcome back, Ned! SO happy to see you blogging again!
I’m not quite sure how to phrase this, but . . . do you think NOAA’s predicting a slightly more active atmosphere than they did last year is in part a correction for last year’s experience? That is, do you think this year’s forecast would have been the same even if the data had been analyzed without any knowledge of how the atmosphere *actually* behaved during the last hurricane season? Or are the key ingredients slightly more ominous than last year at this time by any measure? And might that mean the number and intensity of storms could be even worse than in 2005?
Do models still suggest that any storms steering toward the Northeast could be unusually strong because of the warm winter we had? It’s hard to imagine anything like a Category 5 in New England — warmer though it may be compared to other years, the North Atlantic’s surface temperatures just don’t approach those of the Gulf of Mexico — but it’s a frightening thought. I’m old enough to have a toddler’s faint memory of Hurricanes Carol and Diane crossing Long Island in the mid-50s, and I have very clear memories of Hurricane Donna and its eye passing directly over our house (by then, we were in New England). Scary to think of a repeat, or worse. The town we live in is very prone to flooding. I have a bad feeling last week might have been a pale preview of what could happen from a strong hurricane’s rain alone.
Of course, if this turns out to be a more typical summer and storms don’t come up the east coast, I’ll bet my next paycheck that despite last week’s rain, a drought will be officially declared by late July. We had an extraordinarily dry winter.
My worst fear remains for Florida and the Gulf Coast in general. And they’ve yet to rebuild. . . .
“He also says he hopes he’s wasting people’s time. But he knows he’s not.”
Chilling words.
Posted by: Jill Nikolaides | May 22, 2006, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
It’s GREAT to have you back, Ned! I can’t begin to tell you how much I’ve missed your blog in general and your always-intersting and intriguing links to other resources I’m certain I would’ve missed otherwise! Please don’t go away again!
I’d heard on the news this morning that the city of New Orleans is preparing to hold its first emergency evacuation drill today, so the background on the NOAA hurricane season forecast is indeed timely. Living in Chicago, I know firsthand that weather forecasting is more of an art than a science (although I’m sure many meterologists would disagree), even with the assistance of computer modeling and precise instrumentation. It behooves the NOAA to issue a pessimistic hurricane forecast, since they most assuredly want people to be prepared for the worst. Nevertheless, the NOAA also needs to stress that this forecast is their “best guess” as to what they expect to happen this season, since even “best guesses” can be incorrect. But it seems a shame that some scientists of the NOAA don’t feel free to speak out about global warming, which just might be contributing to the strange weather we’ve recently experienced.
Posted by: chuck | May 23, 2006, 8:18 am 8:18 am
Ah, see, Chuck? You have insights. I only have . . . er, windy questions.
It’s good to see *you* back here, too!
I second everything you wrote in your first paragraph. Thanks, Ned!
Posted by: Jill Nikolaides | May 23, 2006, 9:30 am 9:30 am
I see that H Clinton has echoed the need to be more independent of foreign oil. She also touts getting the alternate fuel from corn. I have seen no one mention how to get the nitrogen to make corn grow. Nitrogen fertilizers now come from petroleum projects. Prices for this fertilizer have jumped.
Are there other good sources for nitrogen fertilizers?
Posted by: Hipocketraveler | May 24, 2006, 7:51 am 7:51 am
But, Jill, you have GOOD questions! (I’m never sure my insights are that good.) It’s good to see you back here, too!
Posted by: chuck | May 24, 2006, 7:58 am 7:58 am
Welcome back Ned,
I wondered why I couldn’t find your blog. I thought maybe they had hid it on a back page somewhere.
A while back you were talking about the lack of public awareness on the global warming issue (which is fortunately changing). A good example of the reason for this can be seen in the Competitive Enterprise Institute’s new ad in response to Al Gore’s new movie. I think there is a fascinating news story in the ongoing industry/conservative propaganda campaign to deny global warming and confuse the public. It has been going on for many years of course, but it is becoming more and more laughable in light of current science, although many still believe it. The following article talks about how one of the scientists cited in the CEI ad says they are misrepresenting his work.
http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article571678.ece
Posted by: Jock Young | May 25, 2006, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Hey, Chuck -
I don’t think anyone’ll be able to tell if my questions are good unless I can make them succinct! :-) And I ALWAYS enjoy reading your insights!
Posted by: Jill | May 26, 2006, 10:50 am 10:50 am
Ned, I meant to add my thanks for following up on my question about whether last year’s horrific hurricane season figured into this year’s forecast!
Posted by: Jill | May 26, 2006, 10:53 am 10:53 am