Water World
When Geoff Marcy and Paul Butler, the two American scientists who found the first planets orbiting other stars, began to report their discoveries in the 1990s, the headline was mostly discouraging to people who hoped for signs of life out there.
Most of the planets they discovered were nothing like the Earth. (Here’s a list, courtesy of Alex Willman at Princeton.) They were far larger (probably because existing technology wasn’t sensitive enough to spot earth-like exoplanets). Most of them were in wildly eccentric, elliptical orbits–"eccentricity," in this case, being a measure of how far an orbit is from being circular. Most important, if your interest was in finding a moist, lush planet like ours, none of the 200 exoplanets yet found had any promise of liquid water. Either they were too close to their suns, so water would boil away; or they were distant, frozen worlds.
Until now. Gliese 581 C, the newly-found planet reported by the European Southern Observatory, may be as small as 1.5 times the diameter–and their work suggests it may be in a relatively circular orbit…one which makes it possible that temperatures on the surface could be between zero and 40 degrees C, allowing for liquid water. More HERE.
Remember that water is probably all over our solar system, and most likely others–just not in liquid form. There’s plenty of water ice (think comets, the polar caps of Mars, perhaps the lunar soil), and there’s plenty of water in gaseous form (think comets’ tails). But liquid water is that all-important ingredient for life–the one that makes astrobiologists salivate.
Having said all that, I hate to throw, er, cold water on the whole thing, but….
The ESO scientists readily concede that all they know about Gliese 581 C are its position, mass and orbital period–all of that inferred from tiny doppler shifts made by its host star, Gliese 581. This is a planet 20 light years away (roughly 120 trillion miles), much too small to be seen from here or explored with existing technology. NASA is working on a large space telescope called the Terrestrial Planet Finder, and the European Space Agency has a roughly competing project called Darwin; both are behind schedule and over budget.
So we’re left with educated guesses. But they certainly are a lot of fun.
Email
TechBytes (02.10.12)
Steve Jobs' FBI File: Bomb Threat? 




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
To paraphrase Shakespeare, Now is the winter of our discontent made summer by the tantalizing discoveries of the planet hunters. I, for one, am absolutely enchanted by the latest findings. I do believe that there is other life out there, in one form or another. We’re too new at this to be too bold in our speculations, but it sure is fun, anyway.
Posted by: Andy | April 25, 2007, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
From this discovery, I’m reminded of a short animated film which Walt Disney made in the mid- to late-1950′s (before, if memory serves, Sputnik was even launched) where he speculated about life on Mars. I found that film fascinating, and the speculation about the various lifeforms even more so. I’d hope that whatever speculations are made now about Gliese 581 C could be verified by some exploration in the future. (And the scientists will have to do something about that name if the planet becomes a focus of study–it sounds too much like a made-up name from “Star Trek.”)
Posted by: chuck | April 26, 2007, 8:43 am 8:43 am
I always wonder, when reading stories like this, why we assume that a planet must be like ours to support life. Whether you believe evolution “molds” life to fit the environment or God (or some other entity) creates it specifically for an environment, surely there could be life that draws its energy from hydrogen or some other element or compound, or that is suited for life at temperatures beyond what life on earth could stand. Are we limiting our imagination too much?
Posted by: Wes | April 26, 2007, 9:06 am 9:06 am
Good point, Wes. I have even read about speculation on silicon-based life, as opposed to carbon-based life. Just about anything is possible in this wacky universe. I hope science has finally taken notice that they could be wrong about a lot of their suppositions. They’re already rewriting a lot of textbooks on various subjects.
Posted by: Andy | April 26, 2007, 10:11 am 10:11 am
I have a three yr old. ANd I think she would love baby alive but at three would it be good to get her that. or she would hold off for another yr? Christmas is so hard now!!! All she has asked for is a castle (which we got her) and a baby (we don’t amind getting it but baby alive eats and poos and everyhting). Any suggestions or adive would help. Also if you or anyone you know has a baby alive and can shed anylight on if it is a good product or not?.
Posted by: Cecila Linea | August 31, 2011, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm