NASA’s Administrator on ‘Drunken Astronauts’
One final note on last week’s story of astronauts and alcohol…and a reflection of the position in which NASA says it finds itself. You’ll recall that when an outside panel, led by Col. Richard Bachmann of the U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine, brought up the subject of two cases in which astronauts allegedly had been drinking before flights, it provided no specifics. The report itself did not even say whether the astronauts involved had been on shuttle flights. You can find the text HERE. Today there’s a statement from Michael Griffin, the head of NASA. "I am sure you realize that the report was assembled from anecdotal information, unverified by the committee and, indeed, not documented in a way that would allow us to pursue the cited incidents to closure," he writes. "This does not mean that the claims made in the report are untrue, but it does necessitate a ‘go slow’ approach on our part regarding any public statements we might make." He continues, "Given the seriousness of the report’s allegations, the only responsible action we can take, and the action we will take, is to investigate the cited behaviors in an attempt to establish the firmest possible basis of fact upon which to base future decisions. In no way do I want to minimize the importance of the concerns raised by the committee’s report. However, and precisely because they are so serious, I feel compelled to insure that I will act on the basis of fact rather than assertion. Only in this way can we preserve and enhance the trust that must exist between and among our flight crews, their physicians, and NASA management. "Finally, I cannot end this note without stating to all of you my personal belief in the professional excellence and dedication to the mission, and indeed the essential goodness, of our astronaut corps. I personally began working with our flight crews more than twenty-five years ago, and I know many, many former and current members of the corps as valued professional colleagues and personal friends."
Email
Space Station Flies Over Eastern U.S. at Night 




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
This is just a dumb op-ed piece. Of course there isn’t anything definitive yet. They told you there wouldn’t be and stated that there would be an ongoing investigation and a more proactive approach in corrective action right away. Did Ned have to put his 2 cents worth in just tio get his name out there? Give me Jules Bergman!
Posted by: patrick | July 30, 2007, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Actually, this is not an “op-ed” piece at all. Ned is quoting Michael Griffin’s (the head of Nasa) own words: notice the use of QUOTATION MARKS surrounding ALL of the comments.
Ned is making NO comments of his own. Lastly, I have had the honor to follow Ned’s reporting over a period of 20+ years — both on the air and more recently, on the web. He is one of the most ethical and professional journalists in the industry.
Posted by: Nora | July 30, 2007, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
First, this is not the entire article that was here previously. Second, I never said that he made unethical statements.
The entire initial article, which seems to have disappeared and shortened into what you see now, contained a rather terse and unprofessional cheap shot at NASA. It is possible he thought better of it and removed it.
Posted by: Patrick | July 30, 2007, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
NASA PROJECT MAYBE HAVE SOME SECRET FOR PUBLIC! SO I THINK THAT WILL BE MANY DISCUSSING QUESTIONS.
HOW DO YOU THINK?
JUST FOR MY REALIIZATION.
Posted by: anderson | July 31, 2007, 5:35 am 5:35 am
I think NASA’s been in a downward spiral since the Colombia incident a few years back, and hasn’t been able to recover from it. As a result, we’re seeing more and more private industry starting to explore the possibilities of venturing into space. Which in itself, is not a bad thing. I’d actually like to see more of it. NASA seems very slow at getting there, while private industry, seems to be getting the job done quickly and efficiently. But they’re no government agency like NASA are they?
Posted by: Lawrence | July 31, 2007, 11:46 am 11:46 am
There is no agency like NASA and the only reason the private sector is moving as quickly as they are is because of the knowlege that is out there that has been collected since 1958 by NASA and the USAF.
Colombia is a country in South America, “Columbia” was a Space Shuttle.
NASA is not in a “downward spiral” but has flown several times since the loss of Columbia. They will finish the ISS and then in a few years after move back to the Moon having developed a series of new spacecraft. Downward spiral??? Baseless!
Posted by: Patrick | July 31, 2007, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
After the most recent scandals at and involving NASA (the Lisa Nowak travesty, the continued equipment problems, and now, the allegations of astronauts under the influence of alcohol), I cna’t help but think of how the now-historical figures who were first selected as astronauts in the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo projects must feel about all of this. I’m sure they can’t be proud that their hard work led to this state of affairs.
Posted by: chuck | August 1, 2007, 8:55 am 8:55 am
You know, I’m sure the historical figures of NASA had their own problems. They may have just been kept under wraps then. We didn’t have the communication technology that we have today, ie., the internet and a tv in every home. And it may just be that people really weren’t interested in those sorts of things back then as they are now, I wouldn’t know because I’m only 24.
Posted by: Lawrence | August 1, 2007, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm