From the Fertile Mind of Arthur C. Clarke
Stanley Kubrick’s science-fiction epic "2001: A Space Odyssey" may seem a touch quaint in 2007, but when it came out in 1968 it was hailed as visionary. It depicted astronauts going on a mission to Jupiter, in search of the first signs of intelligent life beyond the earth. In the book version, though, Kubrick’s co-author, Arthur C. Clarke, had the astronauts going to Saturn–specifically to its moon Japetus, which, as Clarke wrote, is six times brighter on one side than the other. He imagined a large, white, eye-shaped oval on the bright side, with one of those mysterious black monoliths in the center. Well, Japetus is usually given the Greek-derived spelling Iapetus (pronounced "Eye-APP-ah-tuss"), and a few years behind schedule, NASA’s Cassini probe should come within about a thousand miles of its surface on Monday morning, U.S. time. It is only a mite less mysterious than when Clarke wrote about it. Scientists now think the more intriguing side is the dark one, which may, over the eons, have swept up debris from among Saturn’s 46 other known moons. The bright side may be ice. NASA has posted more HERE, mostly based on Cassini’s one previous flyby of Iapetus, on New Year’s Eve 2004, when it only came within 76,000 miles. There’s also more HERE from the Cassini imaging team. Iapetus is a tiny world, less than 900 miles in diameter, but it may have some of the tallest mountains in the solar system–three times as high as Mt. Everest. A cold, dark, hostile place. Is there a monolith on its bright side? I’ll leave that to the imagination.
(Image credit: NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute)
Email
TechBytes (02.10.12)
Steve Jobs' FBI File: Bomb Threat? 




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Thats a neat bit of cinematic history I never knew. Probably since I’ve never even seen the movie. The wife isn’t a big fan of sci-fi movies. Had to force her to come with me to see the new Star Wars movies. Never saw the first ones in the theaters, as I wasn’t even alive yet.
Posted by: Lawrence | September 7, 2007, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
Clarke’s story is kinda allegorical for me, but the film was ground-breaking for its special effects. Sci-Fi films came of age at that moment. No more hokey rockets and V-2 launches. That film began the New Age of science fiction films. It’s still impressive today.
Posted by: Andy | September 8, 2007, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
As for the legacy of “2001: a Space Odyssey,” I’m still trying to figure out whether art imitates life, or life imitates art. Now that the Cassini probe is photographing Iapetus, I think I’ll call it a draw.
Posted by: chuck | September 10, 2007, 10:08 am 10:08 am
“2001: A Space Odyssey” is indeed, quaint…
“Pan Am” delivering visitors to a half-finished orbiting space station/hotel (Hilton?) that is equipped with video-phones for (really) long-distance calling service — provided by “the Bell telephone” system.
“Ha, ha” funny or just outright sad at how far we’ve really gone (and not gone) by the year 2007?
Posted by: redtech5 | September 10, 2007, 11:12 am 11:12 am
It’s well worth reading the whole chapter in 2001(the book) where Bowman reaches Saturn and goes into orbit. Arthur C Clarke was a physicist and so he was actually able to calculate the details of a possible orbit around Saturn and its moons which is why the description is strikingly similar to Cassini’s orbit. His creative use of language brings the scene to life!
Posted by: Dan | September 19, 2007, 9:06 am 9:06 am