Jun 4, 2008 5:19pm

Risky Business

What are you smoking?  Or if you’re a parent, what have your kids been smoking? The CDC’s newest Youth Risk Behavior Survey is just out, and it shows a gradual drop in cigarette use by American high-schoolers.  Taken every two years, it shows that tobacco use in grades 9-12 peaked in 1997.  Back then, 36.4 percent of those surveyed said they had smoked cigarettes on at least one day during the 30 days before the survey.  The 2007 figure, just out, is down to 20.0 percent.  More complete figures are HERE. Marijuana use has followed a similar but less pronounced trend, according to the survey.  It peaked at 26.7 percent in 1999, and slowly dropped to 19.7 percent in the 2007 survey. Cocaine — though the question was asked differently — has slowly dropped as well.  In 1999, 9.5 percent said they had ever used it in their lives.  The latest figure: 7.2 percent.  And crystal meth?  They didn’t even think to ask the question until 1999, when 9.1 percent said they’d used methamphetamines of some sort in their lives.  The latest number is down to 4.4 percent.  Full table HERE. These figures have been picked up by a group called the Marijuana Policy Project, which says it would like marijuana decriminalized and regulated much the way alcohol and tobacco are.   It gives some of the credit for the drop in smoking to tough laws against sales to minors. Aaron Houston, their director of government relations: "Efforts to curb cigarette sales to teens have been wildly successful, and it’s past time we applied those lessons to marijuana."

User Comments

Its about time some good news came along about this horrible stain on the human race. The fewer reeking, nicotine-addicted people the better. The adult rate is down as well as more people get sick of all the icky little “inconveniences” associated with smoking: little round burn holes in all the upholstery, inability to sit in a meeting or event longer than 2 hours, stale smoke stench infusing everything, higher insurance premiums, judgemental looks, litter, health problems and on and on…

Posted by: colinalcarz | June 4, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

There is a very large difference between using drugs and smoking. The wierdos that want to legalize pot but ban smoking are the perfect example of the results of drug use – no touch with reality.

Posted by: Quietman | June 4, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

colinalcarz
I don’t know where you live but there are not many places where your attitude is common, I can think only of NYC and LA offhand. Most of the US does not have an attitude or restrictions except in restaraunts and some states don’t have those either. But 49 states are against the use of pot or any other illegal drug and rightfully so.

Posted by: Quietman | June 4, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Re: Aaron Houston, their director of government relations: “Efforts to curb cigarette sales to teens have been wildly successful, and it’s past time we applied those lessons to marijuana.”
What planet is this guy from? Marijuana is illegal, a halucinigenic drug! It should have been first on the list along with all the other illegal drugs – oh, I forgot, its legal in california.

Posted by: Quietman | June 4, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Quietman -
Marijuana is not hallucinegenic. It can still mess you up, but then so can alcohol. In that sense alcohol is worse then cigarettes, although it is not as addictive (depending) and doesn’t kill you as fast.
There are bad things about all of them. Sometimes it is hard to decide what “freedom” should be allowed to people. But “public service” campaigns discouraging all of them seem appropriate as well.

Posted by: jock59801 | June 4, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

this article and the responses are the silliest bunch of balogney Iv ever read… tobacco use is dropping because kids dont want to get cancer like their grandparents, booze use is going way up, pot use is way up (mabey not admitted to but way up) and the article doesnt even bother to mention pharmacudicals which are the biggest killers of kids out there……. anouther article brought to you by your beloved makers of toxins for tots.

Posted by: Jenn | June 4, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Jock
Some things are genetic in nature, as in prone to cancer or prone to heart disease. That is why some people can drink and smoke and live past 100. Its not a popular notion but the insurance companies are well aware of it. So blanket protection is used for everyone, need it or not. I have no complaints there except for the taxation without representation issue (smokers are taxed by nonsmokers).
It is not the same as drugs.
In Viet Nam I was a medic. Technically pot is a euphoric but can cause hallucinations, I treated people for it over there. One thought I had his mother hidden in a bunker and tended to get violent, so don’t believe those people that say its harmless.

Posted by: Quietman | June 4, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Jenn
Missused pharmacudicals generally. Any drug, pharmacudical, natural or illegal can harm. Its all in the use. Alcohol in the right dose is good for you, exceed that dose and its bad because like most stimulants, increased amounts become depressents. Even the old time stimulant, coffee, if drank in sufficient quantity can make you sleepy.

Posted by: Quietman | June 4, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

depressents s/b depressants – sorry.

Posted by: Quietman | June 4, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

How is this a “Science & Technology” article?

Posted by: Ernie Mercer | June 4, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Quietman: I disagree with you regarding marijuana versus cigs. Perhaps the delusional people you dealt with in Vietnam had more to do with being in a war zone than being high on pot.

Posted by: rick | June 5, 2008, 6:39 am 6:39 am

For the people who have been brain washed by DARE programs and other ridiculous fabricated evidence of marijuana use—no one has ever died using this drug.thats a fact. cigarettes kill hundreds of people a day

Posted by: brandon | June 5, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Well said Jock, good point.. Im a smoker, and hate the jacked up tax’s.. but these ‘sin’ tax’s are starting to move twords fats in foods now, so Im hopeful someday soon americans will argue against the legality of them.
Agreed Quietman,, any substance at all if abused will bring harm, including water. (remeber the Wii contestant?) Moderation and moralities can not be legalized however and the claim that the ‘laws’ and ‘dare’ are somehow effecting these numbers is just crap that I dont think many in touch people believe for a moment. The article irritates me because it totally ignores the damage being done by legal pharmacudical drugs that are sweeping through towns (oxy) and killing younger children everyday.
Well said brandon… amazingly I know a gal who was ‘president’ of her dare club in school… and even though she has a psychology degree, she is so wrapped up in ‘weed’ that she has no inclination to get a job in her field because she knows it will require a drug test…… thats a waste of life and true ‘drug abuse’…. but its her life and like I said you cant legislate morality,, no matter how heavy the fine some will choose to throw their lives away. Furthermore,, its HER body,, not the states…

Posted by: Jenn | June 5, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

rick
Euphorics affect judgement by changing your mood. Under the influence you can do things that you would not normally do. Continued heavy use can cause permanent brain damage.
brandon – Spoken like an Angeleno.

Posted by: Quietman | June 5, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Jenn -
True, it might be her body, but it’s my tax dollars that are going to pay for her body when it’s homeless…

Posted by: Haando | June 5, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

Marijuana is the most demonized drug out there. The reason it is that it is the least dangerous of all drugs mentioned in this article. It is a bold faced lie for the FDA to say marijuana has no medical value. Is public protection a war cry only when it suits the political persuasion of the government? I ask because the FDA is protecting the names of the factories responsible for the Hepren contamination that killed 200 people. The FDA has refused to release the names of the Chinese manufactures that caused these deaths of our tax paying citizens. This is undeniable look it up. In fact the FDA is not even aloud to inspect Chinese facilities. This is the government organization that every marijuana reform critic cite. The FDA will not even allow fair and balanced study of marijuana. How can we make a judgment with no scientific evidence of serious side affect, and in fact evidence points to positive results when used for treatment of many conditions including cancer, breast and lung and Alzheimer’s. Do I trust them(FDA), do you trust them? Are we putting Americans in jail or at risk by making people get their intoxicant from the same dealers that push coke instead of a regulated outlet? Why are we doing this? I need a better answer than “because its against the law” because its against the law to poison thousands of Americans prescribed medications. I also don’t want to hear it causes brain damage because it requires a sophisticated MRI to find “brain damage” caused by marijuana where as the affects of alcohol are apparent when comparing size and geometry of an alcoholics brain to a non drinkers brain. Its smaller and weighs up to 15% less than a non drinkers brain. All you people that scan the headlines or don’t mute your tv during commercials are brain dead. Your government is taking advantage of your inherent will to make moral judgment against others that you don’t agree with. And let’s not forget that drug laws were never voted into being by the people. Its no coincidence that the same people that pushed for drug law were the nylon textile manufactures, the political police groups, big pharmaceutical and alcohol industry lobbyist. They all have substantial investment in keeping marijuana illegal.

Posted by: Mike | June 6, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Mike
A study was done by the Army a long time ago. I don’t know if the results were released to the public or not but I am sure that the Surgeon General has access to them so probably the FDA has as well.

Posted by: Quietman | June 7, 2008, 3:42 am 3:42 am

They should legalize all drugs and tax the hell out of them… Then we wouldn’t need so many prisons..Also I think if they were legal drug use would go down further because they would lose the “outlaw” feel.. This is a choice and we as a free country should be able to use whatever we want as long as it doesn’t affect our neighbors. Maybe I’m just to libral but that is the way I see it.

Posted by: Joe | June 11, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Joe
Think about it. Alcohol when missused can kill the drunk or the drunk can drive, in that drunk driving affects our neighbors. What would freely available mind altering drugs do?

Posted by: Quietman | June 17, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.