Don’t Touch That Dial
It’s been called the biggest shift in television service since color, but it’s really more than that. When color TV began, people, at least, could still watch their old black-and-white sets. When broadcast television switches to digital transmission on February 17, analog TV sets that still use rooftop antennae or rabbit ears will no longer be able to get a signal. If you have cable or satellite service, or you get a converter box, you’re fine, no matter how old your set. If you have a set purchased since March 1, 2007, you’re also fine — but the industry estimates that something like 70 million TV sets won’t be fine. The FCC has more information HERE. To help those folks along, the FCC is offering vouchers to help pay for converter boxes — but the transition can hardly be without hiccups. If you go HERE, you can get a $40 voucher to pay for the set-top box (they typically run about $40-70) — but in response to a query from Rep. Ed. Markey (D-Mass.), the FCC says it expects to get about 60 million requests for coupons. In the period from Dec. 10 to 16, it got 227,714 requests, up from a weekly average of 110,000 this year. Even though people may get them and not redeem them, the FCC says the $1.5 billion allocated for the voucher program could run short by about $250 million. See their summary HERE. For more info, you can go to www.dtvanswers.com, run by the National Association of Broadcasters. Or you can call 1-888-DTV-2009. (ABC has its own info HERE.) Feb. 18 may be a dicey day for a lot of TV-tech folks. But, hey, we survived the Y2K bug, and we’ll get through this too.
Email
TechBytes (02.10.12)
Steve Jobs' FBI File: Bomb Threat? 




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
We have hd tv’s pay the extra to the cable co…and it is the most ridiculous thing I have ever seen. If the signal is not perfect at all times, you end up with squares, words not matching mouth movement, etc. A lot of times I have ended up so disgusted, I change to the regular channel, forget the hd version. As for those people who don’t have or can’t get cable/satellite, it sucks, but in the world we live in, it’s all about the money, and they can’t make money if the signal is going out for free….
Posted by: samhiguchi | December 29, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
I find this whole thing absurd. What happened to free TV? I couldn’t care less if I get HD, digital or not and I’m not buying a new flatscreen HD TV for $1000. And the folks in the stores don’t seem to know what’s going on, either. My elderly mother was told she’d need a new HD roof antennae or something along with the converter box. You know, not everyone can afford this big switch. She’s never had cable and will be forced to get it. Yet another monthly expense she doesn’t need. I wish the government would stay out of my house and my private life and not fix what isn’t broken.
Posted by: Niki | December 29, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
What government idiot decided that these coupons should have expiration dates before Feb 2009 ? Plenty of people have acquired coupons only to have them expire.
Posted by: davej | December 29, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
Hey davej – you are on the money with your comment. We got our coupon’s last February/March – but they expired two weeks after we got them and there were no converter boxes available in our stores yet. Yes, we have satellite, but our local channels don’t come in and in the case of storms it doesn’t work…so need these. Help! If you didn’t get to use yours, can you reapply?
Posted by: newtonianlass | December 29, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
After the last blackout, I brought small battery operated TVs so that if the power went out again, I could still get keep up with what is happening. Now since everything has to be PLUGGED IN, I have just lost all contact with the outside world in case of an emergency. Did ANYONE think of emergency situations like that before demanding that we have to uses electricty in order to keep informed about the world around us? Oh I get it. Cable, Converter boxes and the Utility companies thought of this new method to pull in more money.
Posted by: Gloria Jones | December 29, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
Some of the local channels in my area have already converted. SOoo… I got a convertor and guess what, it still doesnt work. When this was all started I read that the military needed the bandwidth. Now I hear google and others are lobbying to use the freed bandwidth for cell phones. There is no justifiable reason for this stupidity and it will get worse before it gets better. I really feel for the elderly who won’t understand any of this.
Posted by: Bob | December 29, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
If you have cable or satelite TV…..it doesn’t have to be a HDTV…you don’t need a converter box. This is the biggest brohaha over “almost” nothing!!!! I’m sure there are some in more rural/remote areas that don’t have(or can’t get)cable/satelite….but most people don’t rely on local/antenna service anymore.
Posted by: casey | December 29, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
The Digital Coupon program sounds good but I live in Wilmington, NC and we went digital Sept. 8th 2008 and I still can’t get a $40 converter coupon. I have tried three times since early 2008 but no response. There is no real person to help, no complaint dept., no contact info, no nothing. I’m frustrated.
Posted by: D. Mercer | December 29, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Sorry newtonianlass, i had the same situation i went to buy the box and they told me “It expired 2 weeks ago.” Heck i work for the government and i am just as disgusted with this.
You cannot re-apply
Posted by: petek | December 29, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
maybe the program wouldn’t be running out of money if they screened the people applying for coupons a little better. i know three people who have no financial difficulties whatsoever who felt they were “entitled” to a free box. also know several people who have cable/satellite who have gotten boxes anyway, just because they were free.
Posted by: e-wench | December 29, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
You don’t need a new antenna or new TV set to get digital TV, just a converter box. Everyone I’ve seen that has actually done it has been very pleased with the improvement — more channels off the air and better quality than they were before.
Posted by: Curtis | December 29, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
You only need a converter box if you are still using a rooftop antenna. If you have cable or satellite you do not need anything, and you DO NOT NEED an HD tv.
Posted by: Deb | December 29, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
This isn’t a welfare program. You don’t have to be poor to get the coupons. I’m not sure why you’d think that. Most people still get their T.V. over the air. That’s real people, not the rich people that appear to think that people always pay for T.V. if given the option. Basically T.V. is getting taken away. You need a much more powerful antenna to get the new signals, but most people don’t even own their own home to have this option.
Posted by: Stew_coil | December 29, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
“What happened to free TV”
“She’s never had cable and will be forced to get it”
the ignorance of this switch is just staggering. you dont have to “get cable”, you dont have to have an HDtv. your 20 year old tv is fine if you already have cable. if you dont have cable, you get the little box, and thats it. this is no big deal
Posted by: mark | December 29, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
I thought the manufacturers started converting to digital like 10 years ago. Why all this drama now?
Posted by: Sense | December 29, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Television will still be free after the transition, it just will be digital instead of analog. The only people making money off of this is the United States Government and the companies that saw the future coming, and decided to build convertor boxes.
I almost had one of my coupons expire too, I do think that is crazy!
But 10 years ago the government figured they were going to run out of bandwidth in the frequency spectrum, so they decided to force the change to digital. Had the companies manufacuting tv’s started right away putting in digital tuners, a lot of this could have been prevented. I mean most people replace their television every 10 years, but they kept dragging their feet, and didn’t include the extra cost of the digital tuner in their tv’s.
Noone should have to buy a new antenna unless they want to recieve channels from further away.
Currently a single television channel takes 6 MHz of space to broadcast. When the switch is made to digital, many more channels will be able to fit into a smaller space. This will open up available space for everyone, military, cell phones, wireless networks, ham radio operators, police dispatchers, you name it. The government will sell some of this space to companies, and they will make back all of this money for the convertor boxes, and probably more.
I too have noticed that the old signals sometimes are better. With analog transmissions, you may get a little snow on the screen, but if the signal degrades a little with digital, it will either break up into little boxes, or freeze, or go to a blue screen. Hopefully when the full power analog stations shut down, they may be able to transmit a little more power on the smaller frequency spread, and improve the reception a little.
As for emergency communications, most of these boxes will run off of battery power, you just need to wire something up. If nothing else, you could use a UPS from a computer. If your little tv is running on batteries, the battery backup from a computer should be able to keep the digital convertor box running for quite some time. I suspect much longer than the batteries in your television last.
Take Care, and remember, it is all in the name of progress.
Posted by: Patrick | December 29, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
“Most people still get their T.V. over the air”
false
less than 20% of homes only get over the air
Posted by: mark | December 29, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
For all the people complaining about having to pay extra to cable to get HD, you can get it FREE with an antenna. And the quality is better because there is no compression. I get all my local networks (50 miles away) 100% fine with a UHF yagi and amplifier in my attic.
Posted by: Bob | December 29, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
The new digital off-air is free and looks very good on HD, better than the same channel on cable since they compress it further. You do need a roof antenna and pretty much line-of-sight to the tower. Nobody talks about the ratio of converter boxes to analog tuners. VCRs and TiVos sometimes have two analog tuners. Most household have many TVs and VCRs so if you count them all you’d need say 7 converters if you have none of the newer electronics with ATSC digital tuners. For 3 years cable companies are required to carry local channels and will feed basic analog to old TVs but watch out after that. Personally, free off-air DTV is the best deal. Fill in gaps with on demand TV via Internet downloads to Apple TV, Boxee, TiVo or whatever. Cable may be easy but you will have a big bill with monthly rental fees.
Posted by: Duane | December 29, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
This changeover is far too early. What about rual customers and all those portable TV’s? Hook up a $60 box to each one??
All the more reason to stop watching tv, if I want to watch something, I download a pirated, commercial free torrent. Bye bye networks.
Posted by: Mark | December 29, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Niki
Thank your federal government.
Posted by: Quietman | December 29, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
We adopted Digital TV as soon as we got the coupon in June or July. The converter works with rabbit ear antennas. There is one MAJOR PROBLEM with digital signals. If the signal drops below a certain threshold no information is sent to the TV. WE HAD MAJOR PROBLEMS RECEIVING WEATHER RELATED WARNINGS DURING THE SUMMER MONTHS because sound and picture information gets lost. Analog TVs just pop and hiss with some distortion of the imagine and can give plenty of weather related information because if you cant see it well you can at least hear it. Not so with digital signals. Also in bad weather the signals are weaker. We noticed significant problems with high wind and rain. No amount of adjusting the antenna will relieve us from the blue screen produced by the converted box. We had to switch back to analog to find tornado track information. This summer there will be no analog signal to switch back to during tornado warnings. I am very worried that people will be killed by bad weather because they will no longer have access to life saving storm tracking information due to poor digital signal strength. We only live 4 miles from the TV transmission towers.
Posted by: Alan_S | December 29, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
davej…thats exactly what happened to me and I wrote them to send new ones with an explantion that my son had died and my life got kind of all mixed up. Their reply “to bad no refills” So how can they be running low on funds? I know I’m not the only person out there that did not get to the store quick enough. Running low on funds my ars, this is government Ripping us off once again
Posted by: Linda | December 29, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Mark I agree. I hardly watch TV any more.
Posted by: Linda | December 29, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
It’s just amazing how ignorant most of the people posting here are. Very few people don’t have any kind of cable at all (basic cable you can get for almost $10 a month in a lot of places), and for those that don’t have cable but are furious that they might have to pay $40 to continue to get FREE television… it’s not government subsidized, it’s a local service. You might as well complain that because you don’t have a TV, it isn’t fair that you don’t get to watch TV, get over it. If by 2009 you don’t have a TV that has a digital tuner, the rest of the population shouldn’t be penalized by a lack of progression because you still want to use an antiquated system. I don’t hear complaints from people who bought their computers in the 90s that they can’t run Vista, it’s part of progression, it’s what keeps our economy running, and there are some great things that are coming from it. I wonder how many of these people complaining are actually thinking it’s bad for the bigger picture, or they’re just angry that they have an old junker TV and are so self involved that they don’t really care if it’s good for the economy, the government, and the American people as a whole.
Posted by: David | December 29, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
I find it strange that in a “free market economy” such as yours, you get vouchers to affray the cost of switching over to a better system. We didn’t in Australia!
We have been in the process of switching to DVB for about 3 years now, with the switch off to happen in 2009. There have been few problems, mostly due to good planning from our government agencies. Most problems are related to stupid home-owners and their antiquated antenna systems. A simple and cheap upgrade sorts that one out.
Posted by: Chris from OZ | December 29, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
I think this is just another way for the cable companies, TV manufacturers and all those involved in this industry to make more money. If you live out in a rural area — as my parent do — most likely they are going to have to purchase what is call a Smart Antenna to either be installed on top of the house or an indoor antenna. A person who does work on their house got his converter box and had to install such an antennae. She purchased her current TV in 2005 and has a converter box out of the 3 local channels affiliates for ABC, NBC (which has always been a week signal even if you lived next door to the place) and CBS — she can only see 2. So for those living on a fixed income this is going to cost more money then what they have. We have toyed with getting them Direct TV but we’re going to wait and see what happens with this change over. Truly, it’s all about the BOTTOM LINE.
Posted by: NaDine | December 29, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
David, What planet are you from where you get basic cable for $10 a month. The additional fees and taxes are more than $10 a month alone.
Posted by: what | December 29, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
Somebody explain to me why my tax money goes to pay for those boxes anyway. Update people, join this century and pay your own way.
Sign me irritated and over taxed.
Posted by: Kat | December 29, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
The government is forcing people to change so they have to help sub someway. $50 a box is alot of money for some people.
Posted by: ohkat | December 29, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
David, You can still use your computer if you don’t have VISTA. Talk about ignorant. People can’t use their TV without the converter box. Man think before commenting.
Posted by: stupiddavid | December 29, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
I agree with others like Bob – We get HD over the air with an old roof antenna
that we have in the attic – we purchased a new tv when our old 1973 one finally bit the dust. If I had known what kind of great HD reception I could get I would have purchased one sooner.
Posted by: freehdtv | December 29, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
In response to the question if you can reapply: yes, you can reapply but no, they will not send you more coupons. Same thing happened to me; received coupons but they had expired. Reapplied but was denied; appealed and was again denied.
Posted by: kathyh | December 29, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Idiots. This is still free TV. The format in which it is being broadcast is changing. You don’t need to be plugged in all the time.
Do your research before posting something that will create a feedback loop of confusion.
Posted by: Mike | December 29, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
What about all of the televisions that will be getting thown in the garbage by people who just don’t want to deal with converters and don’t want to pay to get rid of the old sets? Did the government think of this? Why didn’t they have a program to handle disposed of tv’s? We are going to have an environmental mess with along with this scandalous debacle !
Posted by: electronsavy | December 29, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
The real problem is that when a atation goes digital it “reduces” its foot print (lower power broadcast). Those individuals living in “fringe” areas will be living in “dead” areas. I just happen to live in an area that is mid way between two broadcast areas. I was fortunate in that I could replace my antenna and raise it. Some may not be that fortunate.
Cable TV in this area is minimum of $60 (plus taxes per month). Considering the content that is a lot of money per year for for a very poor product.
Posted by: Lewtwofl | December 29, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Bandwith was just a guise to pass this legislation that was obviously bought by cable companies and electronics manufacturers. It is a ridiculous and expensive waste just at a time when people can least afford it!
Posted by: electronsavy | December 29, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
We get free digital high-def TV through our old roof top antenna, with more channels than before and the picture is crystal clear. We also have two older TVs that we connected to the converter boxes (the antenna connects to the box and the box to the TV). We’ve never had such great reception. The folks around here with DishNetwork and DirecTV will still be receiving an analog signal for the local stations, so we’re better off with the antenna in that regard.
Posted by: LovinIt | December 29, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Nobody is saying TV isn’t free. They’re complaining about buying converter boxes and if the signal is a little low you get no picture at all compared to analog which may be a little fuzzy but in an emergency you still can see and hear whats going on.
Posted by: idiotmike | December 29, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Mike,
This is not free tv. The cost of the converter box is not fully covered by the coupons and the coupons are subsidized with our tax dollars. The converter boxes consume electricity which you pay for as well.
Posted by: electronsavy | December 29, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
I applied for the coupons, but they never came in the mail. When I inquired, the Feds replied – “your problem, don’t bother asking again” (paraphrasing).
It seems possible that the Fed program cost more to run than the coupons were worth, which would be another reason that this program never should have been created.
Meanwhile, forget Free TV, I’m looking forward to *no* TV. Sincerely….
Posted by: JoeOvercoat | December 29, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
We got the coupons, went out and got the converter boxes (which cost us more than the coupon was worth) and when they ran a test in this area to see if your boxes or TV’s worked – guess what? Nothing! We then learned that this backward rural county we live in is not going to spend the money to update the towers. So everyone in this area who watches TV without sattelite (cable is not available in many places here) is going to lose TV. It would only cost $30,000 to update the towers here, but they are just going to let them go to scrap I guess. Thank you Lyon County Nevada – exactly why do I pay my taxes here? The least they could do is let those of us who can’t or don’t want to afford to buy TV continue to watch it for free. What’s next government? Going to make us pay for radio?
Posted by: Fedup | December 29, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
I do feel so sorry for those who are poor or elderly because $50 dollars is the difference between eating or not. I do understand the military needs the bandwidth though, I just wish there were free boxes for those who can’t possibly afford them. And yes, many televisions will be tossed.
Posted by: Paula J Countryman | December 29, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
I would like to take this opportunity to thank the folks who mandated the conversion of our TV signals to digital.
Great! Now I do not have to watch the crap. I get much more accomplished, and I feel like my IQ already raised ten points.
Posted by: Rick | December 29, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
It’s still “free TV” with digital. You had to buy a TV for analog, and you need to buy a TV (or converter box) for digital TV.
Digital TV is not HD TV. You can get digital stations that aren’t High Definition.
I went from 4 stations to 15 stations when I put my converter box in between my TV and rabbit ears. I am extremely happy with the digital conversion so far.
The only drawback is that a poor digital signal will not show a picture while a poor analog signal will still show a noisy, staticy picture.
Posted by: jimofoz | December 29, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
If you are in a fringe area like I am on the lower Eastern Shore of Maryland -even with an outside antenna you get virtually nothing!!!!!! A fuzzy picture was better than NOTHING! They need to boost signals.
Posted by: frankfletcher | December 29, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
I WON’T HAVE TV AFTER 2-16-09. I BOUGHT THE CONVERTER BOXES BUT THEY WON’T WORK IN THE APT. I CAN’T AFFORD ANOTHER BILL AS I LOST MY RETAIL JOB LAST AUGUST DUE TO BANKRUPTCY.
Posted by: bigmamma | December 29, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
All this may not be a big deal for most of you. However, I have tried to get a signal with my HDTV and a box. I have been receiving 9 channels with rabbit ears for years. Even with a box, I cannot receive any kind of a signal on either my HDTV or the older one that really needs a box. Guess what, I’m going to have to go back to radio because the government wants to control everything. I can’t afford cable, don’t use credit cards so I can’t get DirectTV either. Guess they forgot about us older citizens that they were exploiting for MORE MONEY.
Posted by: Elizabeth | December 29, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
These people are a bunch of ”COMMUNIST”FORCING PEOPLE INTO SOMETHING THEY DONT WANT OR NEED.
Posted by: JOHANN DOHMANN | December 29, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
I don’t understand why they didn’t mail every home / address a coupon. It would have cost a whole lot less. Also, why do they have to expire in the first place? My sister has to use the box and when the did the test in our area everything was fine for her, although she did say that she will loose two channels she gets now and like so many others she can’t afford a roof top antennae.
Posted by: Dave | December 29, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
When I first read about the coupons I contacted the website and requested mine. They came in the mail but there were no converter boxes in stock in my small town at the time. They got an order in (I was on a waiting list) a few weeks later and I pulled out my coupons and then read the fine print… they had already expired!!!
I tried to request new coupons but if I asked for more than one they wouldn’t let me have more because they had sent me those earlier that I could not use. I requested one… and it never came.
I wonder how many elderly and lower income people are just plain going to lose their tv with this. We do have one tv on a dish but have always used our upstairs tvs from an antenna. This seems to be coming at the worst possible time when many Americans have enough problems without all this.
Posted by: Annie | December 29, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Honestly, we’re not even going to get a new TV after the change. We’ve decide HDTV isn’t worth it for now. Maybe in the future we’ll get a new TV or get a convector but we get everything we need from the internet so we’re not even going to fuss with HD.
Posted by: Katie | December 29, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
I have an older TV and purchased a box. However, I usually tape shows when i am not at home or on vacation. But I heard yesterday that with the converter box, you can no longer tape programs on your VCR and the only programs you can tape are the ones you are watching. Why would I want to tape something I am already watching. Does anyone know how I would be able to tape a bunch of programs when am not at home when I am using a converter box?
Posted by: Kate | December 29, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Regarding using an antenna to pick up digital signal, Duane said: “You do need a roof antenna and pretty much line-of-sight to the tower.”
Not totally true, it really depends on how close to the broadcasting station you are. I’m close and using nothing but the loop part of an old cheapo rabbit ear antenna and picking up all digital stations great, many shows in perfect crystal clear HD too. I have a Panasonic flat panel HDTV.
The very strange thing about picking up digital signals is that too much antenna reception power to the TV will actually make picture worse, or no picture at all which is usually the case with digital. I get a better picture just using that cheap little loop antenna than with a special new antenna I got with amplifier on it which amplified the signal too much. By the way, the loop part picks up digital signals better than the telescopic part.
Posted by: Jim | December 29, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
I found it very annoying that the coupons expired so quickly. We ordered a couple of coupons but nobody mentioned to me that there was only 90 days till they expired. We’ve been busy and didn’t get around to buying the boxes yet. We tried to order more coupons, but the site won’t let us order more for the same address. Why didn’t they just make the expiration date for the coupons be some time that was well after the switchover, say in mid-2009? That would have ensured that most people who needed the boxes would get a chance to redeem their coupons.
Posted by: Mike | December 29, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
I dropped my satellite service 2 years ago because they had a price hike. I stuck my antennae back up and slapped a booster on it. Recently, I added the DTV converter and I really love it. I get more channels than I ever did with analog. And aside from paying for that booster years ago and 20 bucks for the converter, my service is FREE and always will be. You arent being forced to buy anything. Although, I would like to know the true reason for the switch.
Posted by: tendergroins | December 29, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
I have several analog tv’s (hooked up to analog cable). But when I splurged and bought an HDTV with a digital tuner, I was shocked at how many channels I could get with just a little antenna sitting next to my TV. (Oddly enough, I didn’t have a cable hookup to my HDTV, but still, it was wonderful)
I got 5 HD channels with great reception, and the secondary channels with SD.
No rooftop antenna at all.
I got a voucher for a converter, since I could easily run a small tv from a battery pack in case of emergency.
Posted by: Debbie | December 29, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
The RCA converter boxes (we got 2) are both pretty junky. Even though it is digital, you get pixelated squares and rectangles on the pictures a lot. We had to rig up the antennas and keep rescanning for channels to finally get PBS, and if you leave the converter boxes on constantly (like we do for our VCR and satellite) the converter box messes up, sometimes we have to unplug it and put it back for it to work right. It is a big pain, I hope eventually the converter boxes will work as good as they are supposed to and what people would expect.
Posted by: RCA cheap junk | December 29, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
A lot of whether you’re happy with DTV or not has to do with where you live. How close to the tower, whether you have any large hills or buildings blockiing the signal, etc. So one person’s experience with the switch may be a LOT different that somebody else’s. So all the “stop whining about DTV, I love it” posts here are sadly off the mark.
Also, for the people looking down their noses at people with old analog sets and telling us to stop complaining and just buy a new television, I live on a veteran’s disability pension of less than $1,000 per month. That has to pay my housing, utilities, food, car expenses (not just gas, but insurance, tires, maintenance, etc.) and a lot more. Do you think I can just $#*+ money for a new television?
Posted by: FemaleVeteran | December 29, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
The roof top will still work with a digital T.V. and you don’t need a box.The whole process still sucks
Posted by: james | December 29, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
I see alot of people here complaining that the coupons they received for converter boxes have expired. They were valid for 90 days. The expiration date is printed on them. Without an expiration date it remains a liability and the government cannot spend that money. They would have to hold that $40 for each unredeemed coupon forever.
HDTV isn’t going to be perfect, but it was necessary. People want more and more wireless devices, but the frequencies have to come from somewhere. The smart move is digital where more information can use less bandwidth. It isn’t perfect, but it is efficient.
Posted by: Sam J | December 29, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
I found the http://www.dtvanswers.com web site listed in the article to be extremely helpful – it answered all my questions. Now I’m just waiting for my coupon – though it sounds like the boxes might be in short supply.
Posted by: genlin | December 29, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
I was at the 2008 NAB convention and have been amazed at the amount of publicity that’s been put out concerning the switchover. Admittedly, I’m also amazed at just how many people STILL don’t get it even though they’ve been inundated at nearly every turn. But then we still have people that are shocked and surprised when their told that they have to evacuate due a hurricane of which they had no idea was approaching…
Posted by: David | December 29, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
P.S. The switchover is to [D]TV not [HD]TV there’s a BIG difference between the two.
DTV is digital (broadcast) television and deals with the METHOD of transmitting the signal.
HDTV is HIGH DEFINITION television and deals with the CONTENT of the signal.
The two are NOT interchangeable and should not be confused.
Posted by: david | December 29, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
“I see alot of people here complaining that the coupons they received for converter boxes have expired. They were valid for 90 days. The expiration date is printed on them. Without an expiration date it remains a liability and the government cannot spend that money. They would have to hold that $40 for each unredeemed coupon forever.”
Be that as it may, it was still a very poorly executed plan by the US goverment. They started issuing coupons long before the boxes started showing up in stores. So the people that ordered their coupons at the beginning of the program couldn’t have used them before they expired. A lot of people got their coupons only to find out that all of the local stores had sold out and didn’t have any in stock for quite some time. The government didn’t have to make them good “forever” but they damned sure could have made the expiration date the end of February 2009 or something. Not to mention coordinating with the manufacturers to make sure the boxes were actually in production before they started mailing out the coupons.
Posted by: FemaleVeteran | December 29, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
For those who are making a huge deal out of the cost of a converter box – I am not minimizing the fact that expenses are tight and that not everyone has lots of money to throw around, but come on! It’s 50 or 60 bucks – and only $10 or $20 if you have the coupon – a one-time cost. The cost of a relatively modest night out to dinner, or for those of you who smoke, a carton or two of cigarettes. How much money do you waste on other junk? We have two HDTV’s hooked up to antennna for locals and Dish for satellite, and another hooked up to antenna via a converter box. Once you see an HD picture you will not want to go back to analog, trust me – and even the DTV picture on an analog set is dramatically better than the old picture. You’ll be glad you made the switch. If you’re having problems, chances are you don’t have it hooked up right or your antenna setup isn’t appropriate for your station distance, elevation, etc.
Posted by: Steve | December 29, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
“For those who are making a huge deal out of the cost of a converter box – I am not minimizing the fact that expenses are tight and that not everyone has lots of money to throw around, but come on! It’s 50 or 60 bucks – and only $10 or $20 if you have the coupon – a one-time cost. The cost of a relatively modest night out to dinner, or for those of you who smoke, a carton or two of cigarettes.”
Who has money to eat in restaurants? Not everyone smokes. (In fact, it’s quite hazardous to your health to do so.)
So what you’re telling me, Steve, is that you can understand that I can’t $#*+ enough money for a whole new TV, but — if my coupon had expired — you figure I can $#*+ out at least enough for a converter box?
Posted by: FemaleVeteran | December 29, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
Female Veteran, this whole conversion has been heavily publicized for the past two or three years, maybe longer. I got my coupon and redeemed it. Boxes have been available at Best Buy and Circuit City for a long time. You can order boxes online via the internet, which you obviously have access to. Who cares whether one smokes or not – I don’t either for that matter – my point was that MOST people throw money away on frivolous stuff all the time that would have paid for a box. The fact that you sat on your coupon and let it expire and didn’t redeem it and are now bitter because of YOUR miss is not my fault. You are negative by the tone of your various posts and nothing anyone says will change your mind. Enjoy your internet!
Posted by: Steve | December 29, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
Steve, see my previous post about how coupons were available long before boxes even went into production, let alone were available in stores.
And who said I let my coupons expire? In fact, who said I even needed one?
What I am attempting to get into your mind is that not everyone can afford $60 that now needs to pay for their own box to receive a digital signal. And that not everyone who’s coupons expired had access to obtaining a box before the expiration date. Therefore, it was not their fault that they now have to pay the full price for a box, which they can’t afford, in order to make the switch.
The whole coupons-for-boxes, while a great idea in theory, was flawed in its execution.
Posted by: FemaleVeteran | December 29, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
there isn’t anything worth watching on tv anyway. Shut it off, go outside, or read a book. :)
Posted by: burnyourtv | December 29, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
since you seem to forget your own posts, which YOU wrote in the first person:
“Also, for the people looking down their noses at people with old analog sets and telling us to stop complaining and just buy a new television, I live on a veteran’s disability pension of less than $1,000 per month. That has to pay my housing, utilities, food, car expenses (not just gas, but insurance, tires, maintenance, etc.) and a lot more. Do you think I can just $#*+ money for a new television?”, and then:
“So what you’re telling me, Steve, is that you can understand that I can’t $#*+ enough money for a whole new TV, but — if my coupon had expired — you figure I can $#*+ out at least enough for a converter box?”
Now all of a sudden you’re talking in the third person about a generic “someone else”? I guess the “I”‘s and “me’s” had me confused.
If it doesn’t apply to you, why are you reacting so personally? When did I say my life was all peaches and roses? You drew that conclusion. My life is pretty good though, in the big picture! :-)
Don’t make it personal. As many others have pointed out here, there is no reason to have been caught off-guard or unaware. Millions of us did manage to get and use the coupons. Some people will find a reason to resist change and find a reason to b&^ch about it at every turn, with nothing to their liking. DTV & HDTV are not new concepts and no one should not have seen it coming.
Posted by: Steve | December 29, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
Concerning people that have expired coupons: Try to get a friend or relative who doesn’t need one to order coupons for you. You should be able to use these when they arrive. Also when you have poor reception you have 2 options: get a better antenna and/or get a booster. I got a 60 dollar digital stream from Radio Shack and it works very well. Still had to pay about $25 each.(tax is on the whole amount) It gets stations that my analog wouldn’t get before, and I lost some that I could get before. The picture immensely improved and please people, quit confusing hdtv and dtv.(high def. and digital)-both are digital. High def. requires an expensive high def. tv and high def. broadcast signal.
Also, if you only ordered one tuner, you can still order one more.
You can record using a vcr on one tv while you watch another channel on the other. (Works best if you have 2 vcr’s)
If you need severe weather info get a weather radio that runs on batteries.
There is supposed to be a separate fund for those who can’t get anything but free, over-the-air reception. So they may not be running out of money in both funds.
Posted by: Earl Toland | December 29, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
These converter boxes are ONLY for those who don’t have cable or satellite. If you use your TV and only get the 8 channels or less that come through over the airwaves through your Rabbit ears Antenna. I personally don’t know anyone who watches TV this way anymore where I live. YOU DON’T need a new TV, this has nothing to do with HD, and you don’t have to do anything but add a box to continue your 8 channels only if that is how you watch. If you have satellite and don’t get local channels, switch or complain because that rule was changed years ago.
Posted by: Tired of Morons | December 29, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
Oh grip, gripe, gripe. Not all the converter boxes out there allow analog pass through so if you already have yours connected that doesn’t allow it, no, it’s not going to work yet. This change isn’t something that was just sprung on us… there has been quite a bit of warning for someone to save $5 a month to put towards the balance after the coupon. It’s not fair to gripe about bad TV antennas out in the boonies… you have quite a few drawbacks when you want to live so far away from society. Septic tanks perhaps? I don’t feel sorry for the elderly about not understanding this change because they don’t teach TV in schools. If you have to buy an antenna, a smart antenna is like $100… which is still way cheaper than a monthly cable bill. If you’re dealing with emergency weather, you should probably be taking cover and listening to a radio than sitting on the couch watching the TV anyway. Better yet, ditch the TV and do something physical.
Posted by: Lauren | December 29, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
I have digital converter boxes. The digital signal often cuts out repeatedly so I have to switch back to analog in order to watch a program. After Feb. 17, I’m screwed.
I have some radios and walkmans that play TV audio. I use them all the time. After Feb. 17, those will no longer work.
I’m in favor of the public having some choice and some vote instead of having technological “improvements” forced on us, like this improvement which will improve picture quality for some and make television technically unwatchable for others.
Posted by: Rocky | December 29, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
I still have one 8 inch tv, that I have not done anything with. I will turn it on after “D TV Day”! Curious to see if it will still works, without any additional help, and for sure , will let me know if the American public has or has not, BEEN RIPPED OFF!!! once again.
Posted by: johnjohndoe | December 29, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
This is another giveaway to Bush’s corporate friends. What a scam. 1. Even if you only wanted one, they sent you TWO coupons — meaning the government was subsidizing two, even if the corporations only delivered one to a consumer! 2. Many coupons expired before the converter boxes were on store shelves. 3. Plus, no matter how many folks, units, apartments, households exist at any street address, that street address only was allowed two discount offers. So, this means, as indicated in 1. & 2., the manufacturers were paid for boxes they never sold at a discount AND ALSO, no offers were being made to people living in mutliple unit properties — that is, a great many tax-paying Americans who could use a discount. It appears the program was not created to help out American taxpayers, but rather to provide SEED MONEY UP-FRONT for the corporate manufacturers of the digital technology. Now that they are on their feet, the corporations will charge whatever they want of the public who funded their front-end costs. Disgusting. Yet another taxpayer rip-off. We have the Corporatists (Rep and Dem corporatists alike) to thank for this nightmare.
Posted by: nora | December 29, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
I sent for the coupons (actually cards similar to debit cards) and never got mine. I had to ask a friend who didn’t need them to request a couple for me, and one of the converters I got doesn’t work so I’ll have to exchange it when or if the store gets more of the same make and model in. On the plus side, the one functioning converter is working fairly well. The gummint really mucked up this program with their failure to include some mechanism that would track which cards go to whom, provide some means of issuing replacements if they got lost in the mail, and imposing a 90-day from data of issue (NOT receipt) “use it or lose it” limitation. At least bankcard companies have these kind of things under control.
Posted by: Publius | December 30, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
“If you use your TV and only get the 8 channels or less that come through over the airwaves through your Rabbit ears Antenna. I personally don’t know anyone who watches TV this way anymore…”
I do. And a lot of people I know do. I guess I must be a moron, huh?
Posted by: A Moron | December 30, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
We have seen the end of HD DVD, and now we look forward to the demise of awful broadcast NTSC. Progress! Throw out that old set and get HDTV. You will never regret it.
Posted by: A Hut | December 30, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
We’re going to wait until late next year to get a new set, maybe even later. They’ll be much, much cheaper and the bugs of DTV might be worked out by then. Until then, we’re going to go TV-less for the next year.
!
Posted by: Mike | December 30, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am
WHY?
Posted by: MsRotten | December 30, 2008, 3:28 am 3:28 am
This type of progression sucks. Current HDTV is not good and mature enough to be called as progressive before its signal reception is improved. I expect to see and hear a lot more complaints about it.
Posted by: Mike | December 30, 2008, 5:07 am 5:07 am
At this moment, I would like to say I love Analog TV better.
Posted by: Mike | December 30, 2008, 5:13 am 5:13 am
It’s all about the digital tracking system so H.S. can get into our homes and track us.
Posted by: clancy49 | December 30, 2008, 5:25 am 5:25 am
Quietman…if you are so worried about not getting the proper warnings through your TV, then get a NOAA weather radio. That will solve all of your problems.
Posted by: Karen | December 30, 2008, 5:30 am 5:30 am
i’m confused, is tax money paying for these converter boxes? i realize that not everyone can afford new tv’s, understandable, however if the converter box is $40-$70, and you had about two years warning, couldnt you save up $70 in two years? no, its easier to complain. by the way, dont tell me some people cant save because that 1.5 billion thats going to pay for your tv could be used for healthcare instead. i guess if you die from cancer being uninsured, at least youll have tv to watch.
Posted by: lisa | December 30, 2008, 5:53 am 5:53 am
Something must be done to make whole the owners of “tv sound” radios and handheld tv’s!
The poorest, most vulnerable members of our society depend on them as a lifeline to mainstream culture.
All you “I’m all right Jack” digi-lovers–Imagine how devestating it is to a partially sighted person, an old lady who lives in a crowded apartment, a bum who sleeps behind a dumpster– to be cut off from drama, comedy, Jay Leno, Oprah, even soap opera—the things ordinary people discuss, the knowlege that becomes part of their background.
Put yourself in the place of the security guard, the nurse, the assembly worker who must be on duty during prime time– they could listen–but not watch. Now they can do neither.
When this “economic stimulus package” for the electronics industry was passed, the livin’ was easy. Now we are in a deep recession, and the fifty bucks for the box is an issue for millions more people.
The incoming administration should TAX the manufacturers, distributors and importers of tv sets and digital broadcast equipment, and SPEND the money providing a bare-bones battery operated “tv sound” receiver to every owner of a “tv Sound” radio or handheld tv.
Posted by: bach | December 30, 2008, 5:55 am 5:55 am
It sure DOESN’T HELP when a GMA anchor said today that when the conversion takes place, “the old Zenith” won’t work anymore. The “old Zenith” will still work just fine as long as it’s hooked to cable or satellite. Why is there so much damn confusion? Because people like the guy on Good Morning America making stupid statements like this.
Posted by: tom | December 30, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am
What’s really unfortunate is all the irresponsible people out there who don’t know what the hell is going on and are getting the vouchers and don’t even need them and are cable or satellite subscribers. I know of one such person. That’s one less person that will get a voucher that really needs it.
Posted by: tom | December 30, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am
I got the converter box. Hooked it up and because I live in an area that is not close to major cities, I had to purchase an antenna. Went with indoor since it is extra TV-have Dish on main TV. I can only get NBC & PBS. No other stations. Converter coupons were a joke. They came out with expiration date. Supply was not there so I managed to only get one. They would not replace. Told me I was sol.
Posted by: Carol | December 30, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am
I was wondering how long it would take for someone to blame Bush for this.
Posted by: tom | December 30, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am
I have been trying to get this coupon since they started the program and as of this day I still do not have one. I have called, wrote etc. at this point I don’t care if I have a TV or not. this is crazy.
Posted by: chinue | December 30, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
RELIABILITY should be the forefront consideration with the transition to digital over the air (OTA) service and the elimination of analog OTA VHF service. In my technical opinion based on experimentation with typical user configurations, the experience on today’s service in the San Diego area is not acceptable. The frequent signal drop outs should not be tolerated. The highly sensitive signal is frequently interrupted by wind gusts, precipitation and air traffic as such digital OTA service reliable source for information distribution during weather related emergencies. The problem is that today’s digital TV processors require a certain signal strength to be able to read the signal data, rather than passing on a degraded signal such as a static distorted image for the user to discern they go to a blank screen or freeze on the last image received. Transmission and receiver performance will need to be improved in most areas to consider OTA digital TV an improved service over analog.
Posted by: Pete | December 30, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
I guess I’m one of the lucky ones. I bought a converter box BEFORE I ever got a coupon. It was a Sunday, Fox wasn’t coming in clear enough, I wanted to watch Nascar. I went to Radio Shack, spent my 60 bucks, came home, hooked up the box, and was enjoying the race before the checkered flag. Flash forward 8 months, I want to put a box on my other two tvs. I go to the DTV website, order my coupons, they say they will be there by Dec 12. Arrived Dec 11. They expire sometime in March. I haven’t had any trouble in finding a box from any of the stores I’ve gone to. I also haven’t had any problems with the first box I got. I even get more channels than before. Now my only problem is I have to learn Spanish to watch them (Telemundo)! LOL!
Posted by: Cassie | December 30, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
So why don’t you tell the really truth about the convert boxes??? I got my coupons, had a guy who knows all about how to hook them up come in to hook my up for me. Big problem if you don’t have an outside Antenna you wont get a signal!!! He even got me a new indoor antenna, I get the PBS stations and that is it!!! I live in an apartment complex’s that has an outdoor antenna that needs to be fix, but my landlord wont fix it. I even offered to pay to get it fix-no go on that. And in my lease it say “I can’t put up an outdoor Antenna” So when Feb 17th comes me and some of my neighbors will be without because someone decieded to go digital.. I live on a fix income and I am NOT PAYING FOR CABLE OR DISH NETWORK!!! So tell the people the truth that if you live in certain area’s you have to have a big outdoor antenna…..
Posted by: Sondra | December 30, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
Sondra,
Exactly what channels were you getting with an inside antenna before the box was connected ?
Posted by: Mike_C | December 30, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
We live 43 miles from from the TV towers, and we upgraded w/ the converter boxes and a bi-directional, amplified antennae in our attic. We love it. A multi-directional antenna would work even better (we do have an occasional brief loss of signal on a few channels). I would also like to try a SMART antenna, but I didn’t see anything online that I thought would work in our area. We have a NOAA weather radio for emergencies, though TV reception hasn’t been a problem during bad weather for us. What surprises me is that someone hasn’t capitalized on the need for people to set this stuff up for them. People are complaining about the cost of the converter boxes, but I’d bet a lot of people would throw money at the problem if someone would come over, tell them what antenna they need, and hook it up for them. There are plenty of places to buy an outdoor (or attic) antenna, but who can you hire to put it up for you? I would have gladly paid for an installation service.
Posted by: J | December 30, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Sadly I know of at least two people who are already having trouble with their converter boxes.
Posted by: WhatIsOnOurMinds | December 30, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
What a joke. We can’t cable where we live–not available, too many trees which interfere with the satellite signal we’re told. So we bought the converter boxes. They work terribly.
We looked into getting “digital” rabbit ears but were informed there’s no such thing. They’re just regular rabbit ears and are called digital ones for marketing purposes. At least the salesman was honest…
Posted by: A. Digitaltvnonfan | December 30, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
I read about the guy that says cable is offered for $10.00 a month. That must be what he pays his neighbor for stealing his. What a goofball!
Digital tv converter boxes just plain suck. I going to the internet for my shows!!!
Posted by: Donny Marie | December 30, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
Cable and satellite companies are private concerns and charge very different rates across the country. In rural areas they are generally cheaper than large urban areas for satellite service (cable service is a bit rare in rural areas). I pay less than half of what I paid in L.A. for cable service now in rural PA for satellite service. But I still pay over $50 per month (for the same services).
Posted by: Quietman | December 31, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
I have a new TV with a digital tuner built in it – I have used rabbit ears for years but got a new antenna that now allows me to watch (5) channels instead of just one :-)
I’ll just wait and see what happens when it switches over to digital — if it doesn’t work well, I’ll read a book and check the news on my computer.
Posted by: Elle | December 31, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
You know this article is only a few days old, but you could have updated it to state that there is no more vouchers…plus there has been so much information about this on TV, newspapers and the web that if you are cought in the dark; oh well. I hate to sound heartless, but people need to own up to their own responsobilities and get on the ball with this. I can see if they announced it during Christmas tv specials and changed in 2 months, but this has been out there for going on almost 2 years.
Posted by: Frank | January 6, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Note from Ned Potter–
Hello, Frank. Take a look at my posts of Jan. 5 and 8.
Posted by: Ned Potter | January 8, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
Doesn’t matter to me, i got rid of my outside antenna 6 years ago, I am a Directv customer, and i am glad they are getting rid of analog signals!! Because i am already 100% portable digital that is, Directv. Who cares for local crap!! I have everything i need on portable cable. So long analog television!! I have already got a Digital converter box, a Directv box that is just as big as a converter box and the other thing is just another piece of techno crap that i don’t need to hook up to my tv besides Directv
Posted by: michael | January 25, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
I Have an hd tv and tried to scan for the digital channels and it didn’t work yet.
Posted by: atv tires | January 30, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
For something that was forced on the public this should have done for free. unlike computer you are not forced to have one, but for the analog digital stuff you have to. this was done so wrong.the point is you are forced to change at your on expense. I have cable but people should not have to pay for changes they don’t agree with.
Posted by: bigg Willie | February 8, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
For all the selfish and wasteful people spouting off about how no one watches broadcast (as opposed to cablecast) TV any more and people should just go out and buy a new TV, I simply ask why?
My TV is at least ten years old and it’s still in great operating condition. For as little as I watch even the six or seven stations I have now, why should I spend hundreds of dollars a year for ten times as many stations I also won’t watch. And why should I discard a TV that works perfectly well. That doesn’t strike me as being environmentally sound.
I pray for all you shallow people who think the value of your life is tied into what you own rather than who you are.
Blessings….
Posted by: bob | February 17, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm