‘Green’ Bible Stirs Controversy Among Evangelicals
ABC News’ Ki Mae Heussner reports:
The Bible has gone green. But some in the evangelical community object to spreading the “good news” through an eco-friendly Good Book.
Released by HarperCollins Publishers this fall, the Green Bible emphasizes environmental messages laced throughout the pages (the book’s Web site says it includes 1,000 references to Earth in the Bible, compared to 490 to Heaven and 530 to love). In addition to highlighting Earth-related passages in light green, the book is printed on recycled paper with soy-based ink.
Supporters of the new book, including those in the creation care movement who believe that their biblical faith is crucial to solving ecological problems, hope it will encourage others to take environmental action.
“In every book of the Bible, there are references to the world and how we should take care of it,” Rusty Pritchard, editor of the eco-friendly evangelical publication Creation Care Magazine, told the Arizona Republic newspaper. “When you look at it through that lens, it really jumps out at you … that God is calling us to care for the world around us.”
But some evangelical Christians argue that the new Bible distorts and cheapens the meaning of the scripture.
“As an evangelical Christian, it’s my belief and the belief of many people like me that the central message of the Christian Bible is the redemption of fallen man through Jesus Christ, not the redemption of the polluted Earth through creation care advocates,” James M. Taylor, a founding elder and Sunday school teacher at Living Water Christian Fellowship in Palmetto, Fla., told ABCNews.com.
Taylor is also a senior fellow of environmental policy at the Heartland Institute, a conservative Chicago-based think tank, but he said he was speaking for himself and not his organization.
But it’s not just the Green Bible that some evangelicals contest. It’s the greater creation care movement that stakes positions on the environment – particularly global warming – that mainstream evangelicals say the Bible is largely silent on.
Some recent surveys and initiatives between evangelicals and the scientific community have suggested that more members of the community are retreating from their skeptical stance on global warming.
But mainstream evangelicals say that those members are in the minority, pointing to the National Association of Evangelicals’ assertion that it does not have a specific position on global warming.
“When we interject religion into environmental debates, we are taking the focus of the church away from God and, instead, placing it on a hotly disputed social values issue,” Taylor said.
Still, the Green Bible has received a significant amount of praise from those within and outside the evangelical community.
The new Bible includes a foreword by Archbishop Desmond Tutu and has been endorsed by the Sierra Club, the Humane Society and the Eco-Justice Program of the National Council of Churches USA.
More than 37,000 copies have been printed and the first 25,000 sold out within just a few weeks, according to the Arizona Republic.
Email
TechBytes (02.10.12)
Steve Jobs' FBI File: Bomb Threat? 




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Evangelicals, GOP, Just go away.
Posted by: Thinking | December 31, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
They can have Tennessee. The state has been well-cared for!
Posted by: Emily | December 31, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
It is still the Bible. Nothing has been changed from what I read in the srticle. The environmental passages are just highlighted. What is the big deal? God made the earth and we should take care of it and ourselves as well.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | December 31, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Mixed nuts
Posted by: surfobx31 | December 31, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
““When we interject religion into environmental debates, we are taking the focus of the church away from God and, instead, placing it on a hotly disputed social values issue,” Taylor said.”
But it’s is perfectly fine to use the bible to fight against gay marriage… why?
Posted by: Calis | December 31, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
““When we interject religion into environmental debates, we are taking the focus of the church away from God and, instead, placing it on a hotly disputed social values issue,” Horse hocky. God created the world and we as Gods children should be taking care of it. Theere are many who feel that the greatest cathedrials in the world cannot compare to natures cathedrial.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | December 31, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am
The earth belongs to God. We are just temporary tenants. Those that treat this planet like rock stars trashing a hotel room show their true Christian colors. Someday their security deposit will come due.
Posted by: Tracie | December 31, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
To the person who wrote: “Evangelicals, GOP, Just go away.” You are not confident enough to put a name with your opinion. They are just empty words.
Posted by: dugan442200 | December 31, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
I am so tired of this holy rolling sike job, It’s just a book , a book written by man for man nothing else get over yourselfs,there are plenty other books in the world just as valid, IT’S A BOOK, ONLY A BOOK. READ IT AND SHUT UP ABOUT IT ALREADY. IT’S A BOOK , ONLY A BOOK.
Posted by: KWOLF443 | December 31, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am
All of you evangelicals have you heard the hymn “Tthis is my Fathers World”? If you look at the words they sound pretty “green” to me.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | December 31, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
It is true God tells us is His word to take care of the earth He made for us. BUT excepting His Son who came to save us is what is most important. If we live by the commandments God gave us & except His Son then the rest should fall into place… Love the Lord & love what He has made for us. Do you respect the home of your parents? Respect the earth He made for us… saying that Global warming is bull. The earth has changed many times since it was created & it will continue. It is Gods will. Read His word He gives us plenty of warning.
Posted by: Cindy | December 31, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Here’s the first and most important lesson of the day: There is no God, never has been and never will be.
Posted by: magoo2u | December 31, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
‘Niche Bibles’ are nothing new among Evangelicals and other Christian groups. No Bible focusing on particular topics or targeting towards particular sub-groups can satisfy everyone’s taste. Even though I support the cause of Environmentalists I do admit that it would be difficult to get a 2000+ year old text to address the issues as they exist in the 21st century. The best one can do is to take statements from scripture and re-apply their general principle to our time.
Posted by: Robert | December 31, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
Wow, the Greenies have past the point of really creepy things.
This ‘Green Bible’ reminds me of another sci-fi book “Fallen Angels” a Prometheus Award-winning novel by science fiction authors Larry Niven, Jerry Pournelle, and Michael Flynn published by Jim Baen.
The story features a future in which the environmentalist movement, joined with the religious right, has gained control of the earth’s governments, imposing draconian luddite laws which, in an ironic effort to end global warming, bring about the greatest environmental catastrophe in recorded history – an ice age which may eventually escalate into a Snowball Earth.
It appears the Greenies are now the ‘fundamental religious’ only they worship fraud.
Posted by: syn | December 31, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Oh Cindy, as much as you want to believe you can cost through life in the belief that if you just do and think what your pastor tells you to, that’s fine, but don’t expect God to look kindly on it. The Earth is a gift created by God as is our own ability to think and act upon what we decide. By ignoring the ability to judge information yourself and leaving those decisions to other, you are effectively spitting in the face of God say “You may have given me the ability to decide for myself, but I’m to lazy to do so, I’ll left someone else make decisions for me.”
As for the “earth is constantly changing” argument, it is a very weak one when there is a heavy correlation between the beginning of the industrial revolution and the start of the current heating trend. If you decide to look into the issue, you will find that good, solid, science points much more heavily to global warming being an even caused by human activity rather than ‘a warming cycle.’
In short: Starting thinking for yourself and not just passively agreeing with what is convenient for you to believe in. The best way to strengthen your beliefs is to question them and why you believe in them, not to just repeat them louder and more often.
Posted by: Calis | December 31, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Hillarious………Two of my favorite fictional belief systems duking it out. Global warming is nonsense. And in fact, we are entering a cooling phase of the earth cycles.
Posted by: chattyway | December 31, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
“Tthis is my Fathers World”? If you look at the words they sound pretty “green” to me. ”
That’s interesting, so I am suppose to believe God said to worship Greenie’s scientific fraud?
For whatever it is worth, I believe Science as gone completely insane through its irrational emotionalism; the paranoid attempt to constantly prove fraudulent science is what is killing reason.
Posted by: syn | December 31, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
I love how people can have a “position” on global warming.
Maybe people should also have a “position” on gravity or have a “position” on whether microwave energy exists.
Posted by: Reason | December 31, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
“Hillarious………Two of my favorite fictional belief systems duking it out. Global warming is nonsense. And in fact, we are entering a cooling phase of the earth cycles.”
Please show your scientific credentials. You sound like an expert.
Posted by: Reason | December 31, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
“… ironic effort to end global warming, bring about the greatest environmental catastrophe in recorded history – an ice age which may eventually escalate into a Snowball Earth.”
Bush, is that you?
Posted by: Reason | December 31, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
“you will find that good, solid, science points much more heavily to global warming being an even caused by human activity rather than ‘a warming cycle.”
Here is a good, solid example of the paranoid attempt to constantly prove fraudulent science. I would add, all for the sake of convenience.
Posted by: syn | December 31, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Some people will complain just to complain and this what is going on. Anyways when god made the earth he said that is was good, and if you tarnish anything that god has made then that is a trespass against God its pretty simple.
Posted by: Nathan | December 31, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
Calis – If you knew the bible then you would know how strongly God feels about the earth that He made & loves & how He feels about mistreating it, which is to me this green thinking so many are concerned about….My pastor does not dictate to us on what to think. Never has he told us what to do. He strongly tells us to read the Word, investigate & test the Lord & pray.
I do thank you for the advise though & hope you have a blessed New Year.
Posted by: Cindy | December 31, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
How dare someone NOT think as the evangelicals tell them too.
Posted by: JR | December 31, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
Why would the bible even account for global warming. That is a science issue not a religious issue. I wonder how the bible would explain solar expansion and the future (yes a few billion years) destruction of the earth.
Posted by: chip | December 31, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
“I love how people can have a “position” on global warming.”
Al Gore profited 100s of millions and attracted a multitude of insane on just that position.
Do you love him?
Posted by: syn | December 31, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am
Syn – No God said to take care of the world he created for us. Obviously you are one of the scientific elite. Geeae. Have you ever been in an incrediably beautiful place. If you have been thank God , he made it for you and for me to enjoy and take care of.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | December 31, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
“But some evangelical Christians argue that the new Bible distorts and cheapens the meaning of the scripture.”
*****
The bible itself is a distortion, written and edited by man through the ages to fit the christian agenda of the moment. Who are these people kidding with this holier than thou crap? I agree with the earlier poster, Evangelicals just go away!
Posted by: Marlene | December 31, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
“No God said to take care of the world he created for us.”
I believe God said to be good stewards of the land not paranoid spastics who believe they can control the weather.
As I understand it, God would say that worshiping Gaia is worshiping a false God. Of course, God gave you free will to choose between worshiping God or worshiping the false God Gaia; that’s entirely up to you which God you choose to worship.
Posted by: syn | December 31, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Did I read right – Evangelicals are looking for something in the Bible about Global Warming – and not finding it. That’s possibly the most stupid thing I have ever heard. Tell me, does it talk about the earth having over 6B people with cars and factories polluting the air and the water? Just a hint – the Old Testament was written thousands of years ago during barbaric times and the New Testament we believe was written around 2000 years ago. I doubt very much if there is a “Thou shalt not Globally Warm” passage. Maybe you should just check with Nostradamas going forward. Evangelical beliefs grow more absurd and irrelevant with every day that passes.
Posted by: DaveM | December 31, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
Hey Christians, I think you could make good on this. Why not demand, that the greenie’s get greener. Tell them to save the planet by turning off their TV’s, require them to not fly at all. Take out their computers for their homes. and not be premitted to buy a laptop. They cannot own a yard blower, have to use a rake. And demand that they use a bicycle for travel. Not allowed to buy a DVD, or own an MP3 player. etc, etc. Ought to be fun.
Posted by: heavenislikethis | December 31, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
What insanity, yet it’s okay to pull two references from the Book to condemn homosexuality? You cannot have it both ways, the Bible is God’s word whether you heed it or not. Many will cite passages pertaining to an issue or point they feel strongly about.
“As an evangelical Christian, it’s my belief and the belief of many people like me that the central message of the Christian Bible is the redemption of fallen man through Jesus Christ, not the redemption of the polluted Earth through creation care advocates,” James M. Taylor, a founding elder and Sunday school teacher at Living Water Christian
Why do some Christians only read the New Testament? The Old Testament is historical and provides the basic laws, Ten Commandments. The New Testament is not just Jesus dying for our sins, it’s his teachings. He taught people how to live, forgive, be charitable etc. To sum it up as just a Book of redemption is very simplistic and ignorant.
Posted by: Hege! | December 31, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am
“Scientist don’t play politics, idiots play politics with science.”
Really? If Scientists aren’t playing politics why then are they so eager to have the Great and Awesome United Nations fund their fraudulent research?
And since ‘idiots play politics with science’ how come Al Gore received a Nobel Peace Prize and a Hollywood Oscar for his work in Global Warming oops.. it’s been changed to Climate Change fraud?
Listen, if you wish to dwell in irrational emotionalism and all the insanity it brings that’s not my problem. All I ask is that you do not force your tyrannical Luddite laws upon my freedom.
Posted by: syn | December 31, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
This is crazy. More loons to make our country great I suppose.
Posted by: c mar | December 31, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am
i hope you find freedom from religion and the peace that comes from being free of religious racism, tribalism, dogma, and terror. >>> if your god is omnipotent and omniscient why would it need the crude technology of a book to communicate? if you are made in the image of your god . . . well, you must have a pretty incompetent god – look at you – wasting time debating a fairy tale book when so many children and others are suffering around the world. oh, but the suffering of others is irrelevant as long as you profess your dogma and get your place in your imaginary heaven. you have the same priorities as every jihadist. if you believe really hard and sincerely, does it make leprechauns real? >>>imagine no religion. it’s easy if you try. >> please do not enable in the lies and propaganda of the high priest politicians and theocons: you can be free; the world will be a better, greener place.
Posted by: Don | December 31, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
Now there is something I can read! The book will inspire me to focus on Gods creation rather than his Only Begotten Son, then I can use the pages as a replacement for toilet paper to send down the sewer to pollute it when I’m done reading a page as I sit on the pot.
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
“When we interject religion into environmental debates, we are taking the focus of the church away from God and, instead, placing it on a hotly disputed social values issue,” Taylor said.”………….. O.K…..Um, haven’t they been REALLY into “social values” for the last several years? Abortion, gay bashing, etc. It seems to me the evangelicans should respect the fact God created the earth more and as a tribute to him they would wish to see that his creation isn’t harmed.
Posted by: Susan | December 31, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
“insulated yourself with your beliefs”
If being insulated by reason rather than irrational emotionalism is my belief then I shall take living in my world over an irrational world any day.
Indeed, thankfully we are free to disagree.
Posted by: syn | December 31, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
I wonder if they highlighted the part where God says this earth is parishing and there will be none to help.
“Global Warming” is an understatement compared to what is going to happen.
Posted by: Patricia N. | December 31, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
They forgot to mention and highlight Gods take on Global Warming. When he returns he will burn it the whole Earth.
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
“More loons to make our country great I suppose.”
Especially those who fly in their private jets so they can get to California to garner their Hollywood Oscar for making propaganda movies about how Global Warming is killing the Earth and all living things!
Praise all who worship at the alter of Goracle, he comes to save our souls by killing humanity!!!!!!
(This is way too much fun)
Posted by: syn | December 31, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
CHRISTIANS ARE CRAZY
Posted by: MARK WHITE | December 31, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Hey Herb, I hear there is a new threat to the environment Dihydrogenmonoxide. Look it up. Very serious stuff! More prevalent than Carbon Dioxide.
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Patricia N.— It’s sad that they don’t get it isn’t it.
Posted by: Cindy | December 31, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Ok, regardless on how you feel about the environment, is there something wrong with highlighting how God would feel about the earth, and about what some christians believe is their responsibility to keep it clean? Why would you at all put this down? This group doing this can only result in goodn and brings absolutely no harm. They aren’t forcing anyone to believe how they believe, nor are they disreputing any other belief system at all, christian or otherwise. Wow, all you all need to settle down and get some perspective.
Posted by: gradwrkout | December 31, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Common sense and a view of the bigger picture are needed here, a couple of things severly lacking in a lot of folks. It is foolish to think that the 6B+ people on this planet are not leaving a major footprint on our environment. The problem is that the footprint is a lot bigger and deeper than necessary. I’m no scientist, but when I see where ice is disappearing at historic rates all over the world, including the poles, I gotta wonder! And considering that the rainforests of South America produce the majority of this planet’s oxygen, I am concerned at the alarming rate they are being cleared. This planet is not so large to think that such things impact us all, including our children and their children. Are we so selfish and shortsighted that we are not concerned with the legacy we leave to our children?
Posted by: DaveM | December 31, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am
Most Christians are not crazy, just the right wing fundamentalists evangelicals!
Posted by: Herb Gray | December 31, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
“But it’s not just the Green Bible that some evangelicals contest. It’s the greater creation care movement that stakes positions on the environment – particularly global warming – that mainstream evangelicals say the Bible is largely silent on.”
Yeah, what the hell is wrong with THOSE people, caring about the environment and things like that. They should get back to their core beliefs of intolerance, bigotry, and lack of compassion…..
Posted by: SearamblerOne | December 31, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
God moves in a mysterious way
His wonders to perform;
He plants His footsteps in the sea
And rides upon the storm.
Deep in unfathomable mines
Of never failing skill
He treasures up His bright designs
And works His sovereign will.
Ye fearful saints, fresh courage take;
The clouds ye so much dread
Are big with mercy and shall break
In blessings on your head.
Judge not the Lord by feeble sense,
But trust Him for His grace;
Behind a frowning providence
He hides a smiling face.
His purposes will ripen fast,
Unfolding every hour;
The bud may have a bitter taste,
But sweet will be the flower.
Blind unbelief is sure to err
And scan His work in vain;
God is His own interpreter,
And He will make it plain.
Posted by: Grace | December 31, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Cindy, Very sad; But they fulfill God’s words with their ignorance.
“The message of the cross if foolishness only for those who are parishing…”
Posted by: Patricia N. | December 31, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
I’m Jewish but I’m gonna buy several of these new Bibles to P.O. the nutty Evangelists, including my favorite, Hog Hagee.
Posted by: Abe | December 31, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
the “Green Bible” sure beats the prosperity gospel.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 31, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
This all takes the focus out on the 2 great commandments that would save all of humanity from grief, sorrow and pain and give all people a renewed respect for all things.
1 – Love the Lord they God with all they heart (Translation: Keep my commandments [read the bible to find out what those are, especially after Jesus came])
2 – Love they neighbor as thyself (Translation: everyone respects and helps one another and improves their environment around them. In other words PEACE)
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
syn—i would hardly base an argument against environmentalism on a science fiction book.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 31, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
It’s about time the religious people got around to giving a **** about God’s green earth. It’s His creation, for Heaven’s sake! How does it make any sense that you’ve been fine with trashing it up til now???
Posted by: John A. | December 31, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
You know when I read an article like this I just laugh. That is an improvement because I used to let stupid stuff like this get me upset. To the Republicans, you created your own mess by pandering to the Evangelicals so you have to deal with them. To the Democrats, be glad they are not in your tent. To the educated, independent moderates, keep voting for the Democratic candidates. They at least try to deal with real issues that directly affect us all.
Posted by: Rod Dean | December 31, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
If God created this Earth and is all knowing and gave us this knowledge of things and invention. You would think that he known what man would do to this planet and prepared it to handle it.
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
I’m sure we add to the problem, but it is, never was and never will be in our hands.
Posted by: Patricia N. | December 31, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Dr. Reason, would you mind sharing your credetials as well?
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 31, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
LMAO…the right has always been associated with religion and big business… i.e. let the big dawgs pollute as they will. That’s why Republicans have traditionally voted against regulation of any kind when it comes to environment. Why is this article shocking to anyone?
Second point… If we destroy the environment then there won’t be any churches to go to in the long run. It will be the demise of human kind. Kind of a man made Armageddon. How ironic that the religious right believes in Armageddon yet not only denies climate change, but actually supports the acceleration of it.
THE END IS NEAR… LMAO
Posted by: Chuck S | December 31, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Wow, its funny that people have so little faith in their neighbor. Its like people believe that everyone else is running around like mad dogs hell bent on urinating and defecating on any tree they can find until their is no more. Like Farmer John is hell bent on destroying his lively hood and starving millions who depend on his job. The irony is, when I go in to the country side, farms and small towns are clean and yet they are conservative. When I go downtown to a major city, I see trash everywhere and they are liberal.
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Why is a “green bible” even an issue? There are many different versions of the bible available. Either a bible, of whatever origin, appeals to you or it doesn’t. If it doesn’t, don’t buy it, don’t read it.
And why do so many people who feel the need to post comments seem intent on interjecting such negativity to their comments? If you don’t believe in the bible, okay, fine. If you do, okay, fine. But why must you feel so compelled to attack one another?
And finally, if you are a Christian, can you not help redeem both your fellow man AND the planet at the same time? Doesn’t seem to me like they are mutually exclusive.
Posted by: Star Bustamonte | December 31, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Everyone has the right to believe what they want to, but please do NOT lump ALL Christians into the right-winged crazies. Just like not ALL “greenies” (i kinda like that term) are crazy and lying. There are extremes in every group from Democrats to Republicans, from Christians to Muslims. Why must this simply comment blog turn into a irrational, hateful pissing contest?
Do i personally believe in global warming? No, if you look at the history of the Earth, for most of its life it has been covered in ice.
Do I believe that mankind has caused damage to the enviroment. Yes, but the earth is amazing and can adapt and has before. Its always been changing.
And YES I do believe we should be as green as possible and try to lessen, if not completely, stop the damage we cause, but I do not believe the Bible is the place to do it.
Teach the people. Show them, not using scare tactics, what pollution can and will do. Force Big Business and Industry to make investments in clean technology AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, lets do this together. Christians, Muslims, Atheists, EVERYONE. Lets work together for change and a better, cleaner Earth.
Posted by: Nathan | December 31, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
As a Sunday School Teacher who walks to work everyday to help do my part and to use that travel income for bibles and supplies for activities with at-risk youth, I would like to know how many of the greenies posting comments here have sold their cars for more ‘green’ options. He’s right, just look at these posts- you would much rather be unkind to Christians than focus on how we can ALL work together for the good of all… Look to the true message of the Bible first…
Posted by: burnt popcorn | December 31, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
I don’t know how anyone who has read the bible or gone to church could dispute that God wants us to take care of the earth, thereby taking care of the defenseless around us. How is it “hotly contested” that we should not be so selfish as to pollute an environment that thousands of species have to live in. Jesus, protect me from your “followers.”
Posted by: nina | December 31, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
When I say “insulated in your beliefs” I do not limit that to any religious or spiritual belief, I open it to all things we believe to be true, regardless of the foundations.
(i.e. I believe the sky is blue, because, quite frankly it is and hard to dispute that fact, just look at on a clear day.)
A belief can very well be based on facts, arguments, or nothing at all. Beliefs based on facts are the hardest to debate because facts are facts. The hairy part is when beliefs are based on arguments but the arguments are taken as fact. If we remove that ability to question if a belief is right, then we remove the ability to advance. Scientist (good ones, anyways) always leave open the fact the they could be entirely wrong. However, they still proceed with their findings and their belief in those findings because the have strong arguments to back them up.
By acknowledging the fact that a belief can be wrong and being will to examine opposing views of the belief, we can better understand 1-why people would believe and 2- what the weaknesses in our own beliefs are and if they undermine the belief critically. The way to strength beliefs in not to just dig down further into them and ignore anything that questions it, instead to ask the questions ourselves and examine it closely.
To bring this back to global warming for a bit, I don’t think the answer to global warming is to got back to the dark ages, but to find ways to use the excess carbon we release into the atmosphere, rather than simply trying to stuff it somewhere else. Carbon is very useful stuff, so perhaps we should try and find a way to rapidly culture something say, food, in artificial CO2 rich environments. It doesn’t have to be costly, hell, it could be another way to make money. This is America, we make money selling WATER.
In short;
-Beliefs can be very rational, but still flawed
-Questioning and examining beliefs are important to becoming better
-Reducing carbon emissions doesn’t have to send us to the dark ages, we just need to be smarter about what we do with the emissions.
Posted by: Calis | December 31, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
LetYourKingdomCome: “The irony is, when I go in to the country side, farms and small towns are clean and yet they are conservative. When I go downtown to a major city, I see trash everywhere and they are liberal.”
I’ve never seen a more naive statement on this site. Where do you think the conservative corporations place their pollution plants? It’s not in the countryside. It’s common sense that the higher population density will create more trash…or so I thought it was common sense.
Posted by: Chuck S | December 31, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Global Warming fanatics remind me of people who are Obsessive Compulsive or had a phobia that they aren’t willing to recognize the truth and overcome their fear. Next it will come down to Farmer John lighting an oil lamp and he will be jailed for it. Only because he now cannot afford the electricity because either its too damn expensive after all the regulations to make it cleaner or, the government seized the plant and shut it down for good to save the planet.
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
I don’t know how anyone who has read the bible or gone to church could dispute that God wants us to take care of the earth, thereby taking care of the defenseless around us. How is it “hotly contested” that we should not be so selfish as to pollute an environment that thousands of species have to live in. Jesus, protect me from your “followers.”
Posted by: nina | December 31, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
religion is a belief not based in facts.
global warming is a fact based on facts.
facts are provable. religion is not.
there may be a God, or gods, Allah, Buddha, Osteen (ROFLMFAO).
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 31, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Everyone is entitled to believe in whatever religion they want…just keep it out of government and public policy! This is *not* a Christian nation!
Posted by: steve2112 | December 31, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
friedbrains – “When he returns he will burn it the whole Earth.” Care to site your biblical source on this one?
Posted by: ItsaBook | December 31, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Wow….the religious people sure get fired up when you have the temerity to disagree with them. Speaks well for them, don’t you think?
As far as I’m concerned, as long as you find God (a.k.a. believe in something bigger than you, and don’t hurt others in order to get there) then I don’t care what path you take.
But don’t tell the fundamentalists that, they want a one-lane toll road to their paradise.
Posted by: jester1976 | December 31, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Can someone define evangelical for me? They seem to be getting a lot of press in recent years. They sound somewhat like a group first called by another name at Antioch.
Posted by: A christian in AL | December 31, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
friedbrains: How can you deny global warming and also accept that man has damaged the environment? You are contradicting yourself.
Posted by: Chuck S | December 31, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Chuck, I did NOT write the statement you attributed to me.
Each quote is positioned ABOVE the person’s name, not below it. If you notice, it looks like a bubble in a cartoon strip.
Posted by: LetYourKingdomCome | December 31, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Wow, lots a facts and proof there Paul. God said to have faith, not facts. The facts I see now is that the Global Temperature now is back to 1980 levels and I’m freezing my A off here and have had seen the US get nailed with a huge snow storm that kept Christians from gathering to celebrate Christmas with their families during the Holiday travel. Wait, we had wonderful weather during that time and I’m in a heat spell here, I’ve got to turn on my carbon spewing AC!
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Even those with absolutely no Biblical knowledge knew to take care of the Earth! Those Bible toting Europeans that came to “America” simply took by force whatever they wanted to. They left huge holes and waste from their mines, dumped massive amounts of pollution into America’s rivers in the name of progress. Now, they want to highlight verses in the Bible!
Posted by: Gerald | December 31, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Chuck, I see Al Gore doing the same thing. Huge A house that took a large forest to cut to get wood, tons of rock blown out of a mountain side to get the ounces of copper for his wiring, etc.., etc… spewing tons of Carbon in to the the atmosphere during his many travels around the earth to preach his message and making Billions off the environmentalists buying his books that have 50% virgin paper that came from forests.
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
I also disagree with the statement that “Country people are cleaner.” I moved to a small town, after living in a big city all my life. I was appalled at the trash (especially beer cans) thrown out of cars, all along country roads.
People are people, and anywhere you go, there are many who have little concern for the environment, or their neighbors.
Good thing to know is…God will rectify matters soon. I’m not worried whether or not we “fix” global warming, pollution, or other global concerns like war or poverty. I know it is too big a problem for man to solve. But my God has a solution, and He is poised to act SOON.
Posted by: LetYourKingdomCome | December 31, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
“Can someone define evangelical for me? They seem to be getting a lot of press in recent years. They sound somewhat like a group first called by another name at Antioch”.
My grandpa use to call them “Holy Rollers” cause they would “Get Happy” pick up hot stoves, handle snakes, get burned, get bit, and die. When we were kids we would go to their “Brush Arbor Meetings” for entertainment. We thought they were nuts, but apparently they still have a cult following that call themselves Evangelist Christian.
Posted by: Billy Joe | December 31, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Here’s the difference between the environmentalists and the evangelics:
Environmentalists believe that 2+2=4. There is no disputing that and it is a constant.
Evangelists also believe that as of right now 2+2 = 4 but it could = 3 someday of God wills it.
FACTS PEOPLE… The air is worse now than 200 years ago. The water is worse now than 2000 years ago. We are over populated now yet the world religions want everyone to have big families.
Religion was created to explain the unexplainable. As science has been able to answer more and more of these unanswerable questions over time…religion has had to evolve to coincide with the facts. Ironic don’t you think? Religion has had to evolve yet denies evolution. If you disagree with me…ask yourself this. Do you believe that the if two men got in to a fight and the wife of one of the men tried to break it up, accidentally grazed the genitals of the man she is not married to, her hand needs to be amputated? If you do then great…there’s a few towns down south that I’m sure you’d fit right in. If you don’t believe that statement then you have to admit to the ever changing life cycle of religion. To deny it is only putting your heads in the sand.
Posted by: Chuck S | December 31, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Oh dang, I forgot to add that they spoke in unknown tongues while they were flopping on the ground or floor.
Posted by: Billy Joe | December 31, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Chuck S | Dec 31, 2008 12:43:12 PM – “Religion was created to explain the unexplainable, etc…” You nailed it! Well said.
Posted by: ItsaBook | December 31, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Chuck, can you explain in middeval Europe how they could not even drink water from any source because it was polluted by their livestock, open sewers and dumping chamber pots and food wastes in to the streets. How they had to drink anything with a small amount of Alcohol in it? Hence where Whiskey came from? It came from the same root word for Water.
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
oops… sorry LetYourKingdomCome
Posted by: Chuck S | December 31, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
friedbrains—this year’s weather has NOTHING to do with global warming. our environment is being destroyed by our activities. if you don’t believe in global warming go to the melting polar ice caps and look at algae that is growing there for the forst time in the earth’s history. christianity is convenient because when the going gets tough you just get teleported via the rapture/end of days to heaven. so you can afford to trash the earth. no need to take responsibility for the future.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 31, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
On the bright side, it’s the only Bible you can actually eat…
Posted by: Jon | December 31, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
To those who would say there is no God: It has been made undeniably clear, BY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, that the universe came from NOTHING. Even time did not exist before the instant that creation came to be. There are 122 points in creation- such as the distance between stars and between earth and the sun- that, if altered by a fraction in either direction would cease existance as we know it. It takes more faith to tiptoe around the existence of God with rediculous theories based on speculation than to admit the obvious- this complex creation has a complex and divine creator. Even AGNOSTIC scientist Robert Jastrow wrote that “For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries.” If you don’t believe, don’t pawn it off on a lack of evidence for the evidence is all around you. Cleary it’s volitional. You don’t want to believe because you don’t want to be accountable. It’s so much easier to live without fear of eternal repercussions for your actions. He is real and nothing else matters, not even these distracting little quarrels over a publisher cashing in on the green movement with an eco-Bible. He is in control. The question is whether you’ll realize the truth before it’s too late
Posted by: matthewkyleham | December 31, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
friedbrains—you would be a great teacher.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 31, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
These Religious Nut Jobs are quick to read Scripture from there BACKWOODED OUTDATED PRIMITIVE SUPRESTITIOUS MYTHOLOGY to bad they don’t live it.These SKY GODS of their’s only allow for limited thinking ,the rest they no clue for. Well your prays fall on deaf ears because there is no one to hear them, It is man who must clean up the earth not THE GREAT SUPREME INVISIBLE BEING THAT LIVES IN THE SKY.
Posted by: KWOLF443 | December 31, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Why thank you.
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Chuck…looks like mea culpas all around! (lol)
This board is confusing! Easy to make such mistakes!
Posted by: LetYourKingdomCome | December 31, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
I fail to see what the big deal is. The Bible is nothing more than a work of fiction; and a poorly written one at that. Each to his own, I guess.
Posted by: Pops | December 31, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
KWOLF443—”It is man who must clean up the earth”—it’s nice to see a responsible christian advocating environmentalism and saving the earth.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 31, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
matthew k: Good post!
Posted by: LetYourKingdomCome | December 31, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Why is it the religious all nut jobs? we need the environmental nuts too to help make this country a can of mixed nuts! Tastes better too.
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Wow, had huge snow fall in 83 from when Mt St Helens blew its top in 82. Had much greater affect than the 5 billion people on the globe at that time. Tell me then how Mars and Venus have 95% CO2 in their atmosphere, yet Mars isn’t hot? Under this GW model, it should be hot too!
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
FACTS PEOPLE… The air is worse now than 200 years ago. The water is worse now than 2000 years ago. We are over populated now yet the world religions want everyone to have big families.
Posted by: Chuck S | Dec 31, 2008 12:43:12 PM
_________________________________
I guess Chuck, in order to wright all the world’s wrongs, what we need to do is ban all religion, but that’s not quite enough.
As long zs there are religious people alive, there could still be a chance religion might be practiced. We MUST do more! We need to KILL all the religious people.
Then, there would be a “perfect world”. A world with no religion. Wait, isn’t that what religion says? That there would be a perfect world rid of infidels? Chuck! It seems, you, yourself perscribe to a religion. You are quite religious in your anti-religion.
Posted by: marco | December 31, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
So basically the non-green or whatever they are Evangelical Christians think that Global Warming is not a result of their or all of our actions and they should have no position on the matter, whether that means becoming more efficient or whatnot… and highlighting eco passages in green has obscured the true meaning of the bible.
Can’t Christians mult-task? Can’t they see both the main intent of the Bible AND more easily find the eco-specific passages, with neither being minimized… or are Christians so dumb that their minds can only focus on one thought process at a time?
I think Evangelicals should be upset with those who are upset about the green passages for portrayting them as less intelligent than I hope they are.
Posted by: darwin8fish | December 31, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
1500ppm of CO2 in the Carboniferous peroid yet it was the greenest period in Earths entire history.
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
I do have a religion of facts and evidence. I’m sorry if this insults your faith. We should not kill everyone who “believes”. We should merely educate because those who believe that snakes talk, a man can walk on water and a man can live in a big fish without dying for three days are a little suspicious to me.
Posted by: Chuck S | December 31, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
Wow, your facts keep changing over time. In my lifetime, I’ve seen theories change because of new evidence. Does your religion of facts teach you to love your neighbor too?
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Evangelicals, GOP, Just go away.
Posted by: Thinking | Dec 31, 2008 10:16:32 AM
****************************
I’m conservative and agnostic & voted Republican based on my fiscal beliefs. Your statement doesn’t really make sense.
Posted by: Rochelle | December 31, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Hahaha… This is getting funny. Its like everyone thinks the other is hell bent on either destroying on another by different means. One through religious zelousy and the other by trashing the entire planet.
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
not a controversy at all!!!! – just another article trying to make Christians look bad – we aren’t perfect you know and we don’t expect perfection from others – BUT how can you possibly call this an example of to “stir controversy” – answer , you can’t – it’s just two opinions – that’s all – nothing more – the hype is a media lie – the only stirring of controversy is the press overblowing this crap perpetually so as to bring out the haters and anti-Christian bigots – guess what? it worked – all you have to do is read the constant hate and bigotry – mostly from the left but not always – still it is a shame coming from people who are claiming to favor tolerance – they don’t – they only tolerate people they agree with (that is the definiton of intolerance and that is what the left has become)
Posted by: tojoley | December 31, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
If you believe that humans have a responsibility to look after and care for cats and animals, then you must by extension also believe that that responsibility extends to all of creation.
Posted by: david | December 31, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Wow, then Iguess the fact is that the bad state of the economy proves that our country is really doing great then.
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
friedbrains—i love my neighbor out of my own volition not because someone is going to punish me. you can have right and wrong, ethics and morals and not believe in God, spirits or the supernatural. do you not kill people because God says so? no, you don’t want to go to jail.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 31, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
I’m conservative and agnostic & voted Republican based on my fiscal beliefs. Your statement doesn’t really make sense.
Posted by: Rochelle | Dec 31, 2008 1:10:55 PM
Wow…so you thought the right was fiscally responsible? Please tell me how? Bigger deficit. Higher spending. Getting less of a return on the spending they did do. Good thing we had the Dems in there to say NO to putting SS in to the market like Bush wanted…but I guess that would have been a good thing huh?
Posted by: Chuck S | December 31, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Hey, look at the bright side like all those who seem to particularly hate Christian religions. Dont worry, since you think that all people of religions are insane, let them destroy one another in their over zealous efforts to convert one another and also burn up the planet in its so called wasteful behavior. So let that go on and then all the environmentalists can go back to surviving in the jungles of South America with those recent tribes that were recently discovered. For they are the true keepers of the Earth and living in harmony with it. Survival of the fittest!
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Well said Paul Wall… I live my life more as a Christian than most Christians do. I actully pull over and help change tires… I donate whenever I can and I always give my spare change to the guy on the corner.
And before anyone asks…yes I’ve served my country too. 10+ years in the Marine Corps…and faught in Iraq.
Posted by: Chuck S | December 31, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
The only ‘position’ that one can have on global warming is denial. Those evangelicals that are somehow trying to use religion as a ruse to cover their blatant disregard for fact are blasphemers. The fact is that global warming is happening so much faster than anyone expected, yet some of these people are impeding our actions to correct it. Shame.
Posted by: Joe | December 31, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Wow, what a novel concept. Wonder where morals came from. Did science come up with that?
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
KWOLF443—it’s good you want to live in a “cleaner greener.” that’s what will save the world, not like you so eloquently called “Hocus Pocus.”
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 31, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
“When we interject religion into environmental debates, we are taking the focus of the church away from God and, instead, placing it on a hotly disputed social values issue,”
HAHAHAAHA
Yeah, I can see how most evangelicals would have a problem sticking their noses into a disputed social values issue…. That is comedy gold.
Just goes to show that most evangelicals just use the bible as a shield to push their personal hate based views into the mainstream without catching flack.
Posted by: blakec | December 31, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
friedbrains—i don’t know where morals come from. the prisons are full of devout christians. i’m not sure your reasoning makes sense.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 31, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
What’s the point of conserving anything, and what’s gives someone else the right to tell me to conserve, until humanity’s population explosion is addressed? Each new person on Earth consumes what 10-20 people could ever conserve! Our illusion is that we can make the world cleaner, when in reality, it will probably never again be as clean as it is now. Imagine the impact of 6 billion more people on Earth in the next 20-30 years! I say eat all the lobster and sea bass you can now, because it’s going to be Soylent Green in the end!
Posted by: Poppers | December 31, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Chuck S—thanks for your comments. i admire your ethics and your committment to do good acts. most of all thank you for serving our country. your courage and service protects our rights so that people can disagree on blogs and not go to prison.
Happy New year.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 31, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
I’m sorry but the earth was made by the earth. The bible is a series of stories / teachings for people how to live not live through. The problem with religion is no one uses common sense theu let it rule them. Wow some group took pieces of the bible to focus on something good. Preach something about how we kill the very thing that makes live the earth. Now I know again why I don’t feel any need to go to church anymore. I learned all I needed when I did go.
Posted by: tucker | December 31, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Yep. Lets see, the Apostle John in the isle of Patmos, Daniel in the Lions den, Joseph as a slave in Egypt. I’m in good company.
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
Friedbrains… Morals came from society. Man quickly realized that he had a better chance of survival with the co-operation of others. Therefore I should not kill my fellow man for selfish reasons. This was the first of many steps in the evolution of man.
Once a society is strong enough to support itself without outside influence then you start to get wars among multiple societies. This happened long before the concept of religion.
This happened before the concept of speech. But because the Bible doesn’t acknowledge this part of world history, it’s been invalidated by people of faith.
The evidence is there just like the ballistics test on a gun. You’d support forensic evidence in a trial yet deny physical evidence of our own history because of a book that was written before that very evidence was discovered.
Posted by: Chuck S | December 31, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Poppers—you can address pollution and over-population at the same time. it does seem however that there is a lot of “white privilige” in the attitude “who is the world to tellme?!” when you talk about the growing population you mean Asia and Africa and Mexico. it’s all right to over-reproduce in America. we all know families who have six, seven kids. put your money where you mouth is and, if you are a male, consider vasectomy (actually there may be no charge at certain clinics). let’s start working on our population control problem here at home in Palin-esques families before we blame africa and asia in a self-righteous attitude.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 31, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
indeed Paul
Posted by: Chuck S | December 31, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Paul, when you are living in a mud hut in the middle of nowhere trying to survive off the planet like Homo Erectus, then I will follow you.
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
The only folks stupid enough to buy the book are the same ones who wrote it…. and those that think it a nice comic book. They should consider putting it on the shelf next to .. “The Far Side”
Posted by: terrie | December 31, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
we already do prescribe vasectomy to animals. i have two at home sleeping in a sun spot.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 31, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
The popular media often portrays the creation vs. evolution debate as religion vs. science, with creation being religious and evolution being scientific. Unfortunately, if you don’t agree with this label, you too are labeled. Regardless of whether you side with religion or with science, if you disagree with the stereotype, you’re condemned and “exposed” as a religious fanatic who is secretly trying to pass religion off as science or, even worse, trying to disprove science in order to redeem a unscientific, religious worldview. The fact is neither model of origins has been established beyond a reasonable doubt. Whether we like to admit it or not, those of us who subscribe to the theory of evolution (of science) do so by faith. And while the recognition of design in biology may have theological (religions) implications, it is not based upon religious premise – it’s based upon empirical observation and logic.
Posted by: CommenTarry | December 31, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
“Guess we should prescribe vasectomy to animals too as well”.
That’s nothing new, it been done for years.
Posted by: Billy Joe | December 31, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Taylor may claim to not speak for Heartland, but as one of the leading global-warming deniers, Heartland and anyone associated with it can be assumed to have an anti-science, anti-environment agenda. I would be sorry if some kind of misguided evangelical views were behind that position.
Posted by: jock59801 | December 31, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
As it is shown here in these comments, the human race cannot work together. No one can put away their differences when it comes to religious beliefs. In the end it will be the human race that kills the planet. The vast majority of people show a disregard for the world, and not a second thought about how rotten and no longer beautiful it will be to our children’s children. Maybe you all should take a couple hours out of your day and go watch Wall-E. Childrens movie or not it has a very deep, very obvious issue going on that we are facing now and can’t seem to get a hold on. It’s a sad fact but totally true
Posted by: Angela | December 31, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
It’s too bad that man believe’s that the earth can’t survive without him,but it can and it will . On an evolution scale we are just a tick on it , OH I am sorry I did not mean to offend the Religious Nut Jobs out there with the word EVOLUTION my fault.
Posted by: KWOLF443 | December 31, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
I don’t care what religion people are, just don’t try to force feed it to me and keep it outta my government. I believe in a Supreme Being, but don’t need to go to a church to pray or to be close to God. I can talk to God or pray just as well under a tree, or on a tractor. I don’t need no fancy clothes or try to impress my neighbors. IMO, God wants us to take care of our planet, the critters, and be good stewarts of the earth. Organize religion is about money, greed, and control IMO. Take care of Mother Nature and God will take better care of us all.
Posted by: Billy Joe | December 31, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Somehow, I don’t think God minds this Bible. I suspect he would approve of anything that encouraged people to take better care of any of His creations.
As for those who are upset by this, I think it is they who miss the point. Redemption is only a small part of Christianity – following the loving example set forth by Jesus is the main message.
Posted by: Big Picture | December 31, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
One last comment… One atheiest donating blood to save a life is a hell of a lot more effective than 1000 Christians praying for that person. Food for thought.
Posted by: Chuck S | December 31, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
I know that about the domesticated pets silly. I’m talking all of life on the whole entire planet.
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Environmentalism is just common sense, “Green” is a new religion looking for converts. The late Dr. Michael Crichton siad it well
in a speech at the Commonwealth Club, San Francisco, CA, September 15, 2003
How will we manage to get environmentalism out of the clutches of religion, and back to a scientific discipline? There’s a simple answer: we must institute far more stringent requirements for what constitutes knowledge in the environmental realm. I am thoroughly sick of politicized so-called facts that simply aren’t true. It isn’t that these “facts” are exaggerations of an underlying truth. Nor is it that certain organizations are spinning their case to present it in the strongest way. Not at all—what more and more groups are doing is putting out is lies, pure and simple. Falsehoods that they know to be false.
Posted by: Quietman | December 31, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Don – It is because of a belief in that “fairy tale,” as you call it, that hundreds of thousands of people dedicate their lives to alleviating the pain and suffering of others. You don’t have to believe, freedom and free will are wonderful in that way – but what do you gain by criticizing those who do believe? Does it somehow make you feel smarter or superior that you don’t need religion? Why does it bother you so much that others do believe?
Our new president is a believer in that “fairy tale.” Is he just another fool too?
Posted by: Oh Vey | December 31, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Waith I’m not done. Then man with his wisdom and science can go to to Mars by sending only the smartest people, teraform it to make it survivable and then in 1000 years reintroduce species to Earth and leave it as world nature preserve.
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
friedbrains: “1500ppm of CO2 in the Carboniferous peroid yet it was the greenest period in Earths entire history.”
So?
Your apparent belief that such a comment has any relevance to the AGW debate just shows how little you understand about it.
Posted by: jock59801 | December 31, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Because evolution screwed up by creating man.
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Unless the text is from the king james version crica 1611, then it is not the bible.
Posted by: Rebecca Lee Varady | December 31, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
jock, so when you say climate change and weather are 2 separate things, what do you mean by this? I see both happening at the same time. Is it one cause by man, and the other nature? What is it?
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Quietman
I find that quote from Michael Crichton to be extremely ironic.
Posted by: jock59801 | December 31, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Chuck S. — I think most Christians pray AND give blood – sometimes at the same time. They also volunteer in their communities and do lots of good works because they feel it is their moral obligation and, it feels good to help others and follow the example of Christ.
Posted by: Oh Vey | December 31, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
i am surprised any religous people would have anything to do with being good to the world or care for anybody or thing but them selves… most christains are hateful nasty burn the world and any non-believers, type of people. i wouldnt be a christain if you payed me billions to do so. they are the most evil group amd religion in the history of the earth.
Posted by: T | December 31, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Oh ye of little faith T. You really haven’t gotten out of the house lately and traveled and met people have you? Don’t believe half of what you see and hear on TV.
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Was syn listening in the fourth grade when the science teacher explained the process of the scientific method and the students had to heat the wood splints in the test tube and record all their observations? If he was, he wouldn’t be arguing that the work of hundreds of climatologists is all lies and emotionalism. And if he’d been reading some of the work on green technology, he wouldn’t be calling environmentalists Ludites. Folks, you can say whatever you want about global warming, but it is a fact that humans are having a negative impact on the planet that’s making our current actions unsustainable. The green movement isn’t about getting rid of your TV and never driving a car again. It’s about appreciating the effect we have on our environment, recognizing the limitations of our current technologies, and overcoming those limitations through innovation and new technology. It’s a process driven by science and consciousness. Right now, laboratories are experimenting with the use of easy-to-grow single-cell plant life in producing clean-burning fuel. A carpet manufacturer is producing durable, recyclable carpet backing from post-consumer plastic wastes. A textile manufacturer has developed a way to recycle 80% of its waste water. A village in Mauritania is meeting its electrical needs with solar panels built and maintained by local technicians. As for the green Bible, it seems to me that Jesus Christ taught us all to love and care for one another. This planet is your neighbor’s home as well as your own. You aren’t caring for your neighbor while you’re laying waste to his garden. We have the knowledge and ability to do better, and I welcome the support of that effort by the faitful.
Posted by: Hils | December 31, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
friedbrains—”don’t believe half of what you see and hear on TV”—o don’t watch tv and i get out every day. i live in a cosmopolitain city where there are a diversity of cultures and religions and non-believer. if someone doesn’t believe that’s their right and you actually find non-belivers among the kindest people, the most intelligent people. so we can do without your advise. our minds are already open.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 31, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
friedbrains
Excellent question. Weather is what is happening at a specific time in a specific area (e.g. temperature, wind, precipitation). Humans cannot control that, and nobody outside of science fiction has ever suggested we could.
Global climate is just that: GLOBAL (measured by such things as an AVERAGE temperature across the globe), and CLIMATE (conditions averaged over several decades, to smooth out the daily and yearly variations due to such things as air flows and ocean currents).
No one claims that humans are “in control” of the global climate, only that some things we do can affect it.
Posted by: jock59801 | December 31, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Wow, I’m so inspired. Sounds like you live in Zion Paul. How can I reach this Holy City?
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
well bush called himself a real christain look at the evil he spread. look at most republicans taht call themselves christains and how they vote for policies that hurt the common man and benefit the rich and huge corparations. how the christains wont let a couple guys that love each other get married but think its fine for a father to beat his kids and smack around his wife becaus ehe is the man.
Posted by: T | December 31, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Oh Vey—”Christians pray AND give blood” and “also volunteer in their communities.” i admire and respect the christians who do good works. but they are few and far between. i work everyday with people who save lives and it is done without religion. and i have never seen anyone donating blood praying. but you donate more than me so i defer to you.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 31, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Thanks Jock.
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
what i love is taht in my home town two of the 10 churches have closed the others have lost half there people… so glad to see christianity fading into nothingness like all ancient myths. wont thsi place be great once teh christains have taken there hate and racism and left teh world.
Posted by: T | December 31, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
friedbrains—”How can I reach this Holy City?” easy, friedbrains. close your bible, open your mind and go downtown and enjoy the new year with people of all cultures, faiths and backgrounds.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 31, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
To the Alchemist: I don’t know how to break this to you, but Jesus lived in the time of the ancient Romans, not the Nazis.
Posted by: JD Norvell | December 31, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
A century ago, Evangelicals were always at the forefront of social reform and environmental stewardship. They were the driving forces behind the abolition of slavery, the Progressive Era, and most other reforms. This is the “good” aspect of religious conviction.
Somewhere between then and now, something went terribly wrong.
Posted by: jock59801 | December 31, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Thanks Paul.
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Have a Happy New Year everyone!
Posted by: friedbrains | December 31, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
T
Religion did not invent hatred and racism. We will still have those, as long as we are human.
Posted by: jock59801 | December 31, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
friedbrains – “How can I reach this Holy City?”.
You, would take the 2:57 green “B-bus”. If you leave now, you should have just enough time to make it, too.
Posted by: Chianti | December 31, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
As long as Green Bible demonstrates crystal clear about the love of God, I support it. But if the focus is on saving the planet, not Jesus Christ, I reject it.
Posted by: Sung | December 31, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
jock—so true christains use to be on the right good side of issues—-now they are on teh wrong evil side….. so sad. i have met soem good christains but most say they want laws banning this or banning that. they want to censor this or sensor that. they hate this group or that group of people and wont let them be happy. yet at every turn they say they are the moral compass of this nation—-and they wonder why the world and 70% of true americans hate them. so sad
Posted by: T | December 31, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
We are keepers of the earth for God. As such I do not feel he would have any issue with a “green” bible.
Posted by: chez532531 | December 31, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
jock—also yes i know that racism isnt all christains but teh vast majority of racism and hate coem from shriatains
Posted by: T | December 31, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
God put mankind on the earth, and told us to take care of it. What have we done, Look around, open your eyes. This world is trashed. We have done nothing but make one great big mess. And we do have global warming. Mankind is recking this earth. If we only had listened and did what God said this world would not be the way it is.
Posted by: windyblue | December 31, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
T
Religion, like anything else, is only as good or bad as people make it. There are still religious people (of all faiths) who do exceptionally good works. Others use religion as an excuse to justify their inherently evil acts. Most are somewhere in between
I agree that there is something inherent in the idea of “faith” that can be easily abused by those who are hateful. But that does not mean that all religious people have to go down that path. People are people.
Posted by: jock59801 | December 31, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
So what, just another approach on the biggest fairy tale ever sold.
Posted by: Not buying it | December 31, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Lots of christians. Not enough lions.
Posted by: x | December 31, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
you liberals can just go away… mock the bible all you want.. cuz you all will get a big eye opener when you pass to the bye and bye.
Posted by: middle class | December 31, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
What is most disturbing about the responses to this article is that it shows that Fundamentalism is a mentality that can be applied to any ideology. (Religion, Atheism., Politics, Liberalism etc) More and more people today insist that they are absolutely right and that they are intimidated and angry when anyone asks them insightful or challenging questions. I have found that many of the responses to news articles on ABC show that the majority of the people react very defensibility and with adolescent style and that they really do not want to think. The ability to disagree with civility is just about gone….or maybe it never existed period. But then that is just one has to tolerate when you have a society that allows for free speech.
Posted by: Robert | December 31, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
all christianity is, is what the roman leader constantine made it for. to control a new cult that was giving the roman empire trouble,so he used there blind faith to control them and get them to give money to the church,which at that time was the roman empire. wake up christains you believe in a relgion that was started by the evil roman empire to control people. and today look at the huge costly churches and catherdrals these religions have. a minister of a church lives in a church bought home drives a church bought car and works oen or two days a week and make on average of 50,000 a year. why the majority of there followers make under 30,000 a year….such a great organazation thsi christain faith.
Posted by: T | December 31, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
Religion was created by man, but a relationship with The Creator of the Universe was designed by God. God created Adam and his job was to take care of the garden. Though Adam’s responsibility was the garden, his priority was his relationship with God.
God’s Plan: #1-Relationship with Him, #2-Relationship with others, #3-Responsibilities on Earth…in that order. How scripture is printed or distributed, who cares as long as it gets out and The Word is not altered.
Posted by: Eyez_Opened | December 31, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Ahhh evangelicals, such unbelievable hypocrites the world has never seen. I wish the rapture would actually happen so we could act like adults and forget these idiots.
Posted by: Bob Lees | December 31, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
The entire bible is and always has instructed that the Earth is a treasure bestowed upon us in stewardship and trust by our Creator. Indeed, the very fact that we even HAVE a “green” movement in the world today is a direct result of that teaching at work in western culture: the environmental movement did not germinate in some third-world polytheistic or animistic culture, but rather within the Judeo-Christian cultures of Europe and North America – and not as a reaction against the scripture but as a RESPONSE to it!
It is no accident that the apocalypse of John called Revelation contains this line declaring the impending judgment of our God:
“…and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great; and SHOULDEST DESTROY THEM WHICH DESTROY THE EARTH.” (Rev 11:18)
Pretty harsh, eh?
Posted by: Jordan | December 31, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
I am a Christian. I believe the Bible is God’s word to man. The Bible makes clear to man that he is to be a steward of the earth — not to trash it. As one makes his bed he has to sleep in it. If we trash the earth, we have to suffer for it. People, honor God’s creation. Be stewards.
Posted by: john raccoon | December 31, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
I am an Evangelical Lutheran and I really want to take the word evangelical back. There is no good new in “Accept Jesus or go to Hell.” Evangelical literally means “Good News” and Evangelicals are supposed to be Good News People. The Right Wing GOP “evangelicals” have been real bad news for too long. The Good News for me is that Almighty God came to Earth as a powerless human (like me) and showed the world that only by accepting complete powerlessness can one attain true wisdom and salvation. Living into complete powerlessness is the root of the path of discipleship.
Posted by: Samuel Brannon | December 31, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
wow, this thread was fun at first, then it got utterly ridiculous.
How about a live and let live attitude instead? If you like the green Bible,buy it, read it – if you don’t stick with the King James version!
If more people were just accepting and understood that MY WAY is not the ONLY WAY the world would be a much better place.
by the way we have freedom of religion here, everyone should be able to believe in what they want.
I personally think religion is the smile on my dog…
happy new year!
Posted by: karen | December 31, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
The media often portrays the creation vs. evolution debate as religion vs. science, with creation being religious and evolution being scientific. Unfortunately, if you don’t agree with this label, you too are labeled. Regardless of whether you side with religion or with science, if you disagree with the stereotype, you’re condemned and “exposed” as a religious fanatic who is secretly trying to pass religion off as science or, even worse, trying to disprove science in order to redeem a unscientific, religious worldview. The fact is neither model of origins has been established beyond a reasonable doubt. Whether we like to admit it or not, those of us who subscribe to the theory of evolution (of science) do so by faith. And while the recognition of design in biology may have theological (religions) implications, it is not based upon religious premise – it’s based upon empirical observation and logic.
Posted by: CommenTarry | December 31, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
karen—happy new year to you as well.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 31, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
The bible like any spiritual text is a good story with many valuable life lessons among its many contradictions and has been translated and re-interpreted by man over its history. To worry about highlighting earth conscious passages is just small minded…..again!
Posted by: hilodave | December 31, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Evangelicals have “no position” on global warming because they realize that in order to stop global warming they would have to stop making money from petroleum products – an industry that is stacked with evangelical Republicans. Do we really need an invisible man in the sky to tell us to take care of the planet? Come on people – let’s use some common sense here.
Posted by: Greg | December 31, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
“How scripture is printed or distributed, who cares as long as it gets out and The Word is not altered.”
It has been altered – the last big alteration was when it was translated into (17th century) English. It’s obvious that languages change over time, and the form used 400 years ago is almost a foreign language now. Every translation is a mistranslation. Someone wrote that only the King James Bible is the true Bible. If you want to read the true Bible, you should learn Hebrew and Greek (and maybe Aramaic and Latin.) You should also thoroughly understand the forms of those languages that were used at the times that each book was written, and then you would have to choose from the variations among the surviving manuscripts of each book (which are not originals, but copies of copies of…) All of that just to accurately learn to love God with all your heart and love your neighbor as yourself.
Posted by: Don | December 31, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Global warming is a sham. Just like “Global cooling” was
Posted by: Ryan | December 31, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Green, red, paper, digital…still fairy tales.
Posted by: Robby | December 31, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
How in the name of sanity can hundreds of millions of people still believe in someone they can not see – and have never seen, they can not feel – and have never felt, they can not speak with – and have never spoken with and all based on a book written hundreds and thousands of years ago and to which nothing has been added in at least fifteen hundred years ago! That is patently absurd!
To be fair to Christians, all other religions suffer from the same delusional and hallucinogenic ramblings of one or a few of their early “believers” as well. In that, Christians are not alone.
Nevertheless, I’ve always found it incredible that the religious quaintly prove their biblical assertions by referring back to the bible! Wow! In other words, Jesus is the Son of God…it says so in the New Testament! Are you nuts!?
Look, I could care less if you take any religious book and highlight the X’s and O’s and figure out if the authors were so damn enlightened that THEY actually came up with the “West Coast offense” and not Bill Walsh. Who cares? What relevancy does it have to the reality of the condition of our earth?
Posted by: usc.fiji | December 31, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
It’s important to note the difference between an “Evangelical” and “evangelism”.
An Evangelical is part of a movement begun in Great Britain in the 1700s that focuses on conversion (being born again), Biblical authority and evangelism (see below). It is a segment of Protestantism which itself is a segment of Christianity. The mainstream media has recently ascribed the label “Evangelical” to all Protestant Christians. The media further tends to stereotype most Protestants as Evangelicals and Republicans. As with any stereotype, this label is ridiculously simplistic as many Protestant Christians such as Episcopalians and Presbyterians are politically centrist or left leaning.
Evangelism is the Christian practice of sharing the Good News with others. All Christians are called to evangelize in accordance with the Great Commission (Matthew 28:16-20).
So you can be an evangelist without being an Evangelical just as you can be a proponent of democracy without being a Democrat.
So be wary of labels.
Donald Miller in the great book “Blue Like Jazz” tells the story of how, in radio interview, he was sternly asked by the host to defend Christianity. “I told him that I couldn’t do it, and moreover, that I didn’t want to defend the term. He asked me if I was a Christian, and I told him yes. “Then why don’t you want to defend Christianity?” he asked, confused. I told him I no longer knew what the term meant. Of the hundreds of thousands of people listening to his show that day, some of them had terrible experiences with Christianity; they may have been yelled at by a teacher in a Christian school, abused by a minister, or browbeaten by a Christian parent. To them, the term Christianity meant something that no Christian I know would defend. By fortifying the term, I am only making them more and more angry. I won’t do it. Stop ten people on the street and ask them what they think of when they hear the word Christianity, and they will give you ten different answers. How can I defend a term that means ten different things to ten different people? I told the radio show host that I would rather talk about Jesus and how I came to believe that Jesus exists and that he likes me. The host looked back at me with tears in his eyes. When we were done, he asked me if we could go get lunch together. He told me how much he didn’t like Christianity but how he had always wanted to believe Jesus was the Son of God.
Posted by: brad | December 31, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
It’s important to note the difference between an “Evangelical” and “evangelism”.
An Evangelical is part of a movement begun in Great Britain in the 1700s that focuses on conversion (being born again), Biblical authority and evangelism (see below). It is a segment of Protestantism which itself is a segment of Christianity. The mainstream media has recently ascribed the label “Evangelical” to all Protestant Christians. The media further tends to stereotype most Protestants as Evangelicals and Republicans. As with any stereotype, this label is ridiculously simplistic as many Protestant Christians such as Episcopalians and Presbyterians are politically centrist or left leaning.
Evangelism is the Christian practice of sharing the Good News with others. All Christians are called to evangelize in accordance with the Great Commission (Matthew 28:16-20).
So you can be an evangelist without being an Evangelical just as you can be a proponent of democracy without being a Democrat.
So be wary of labels.
Donald Miller in the great book “Blue Like Jazz” tells the story of how, in radio interview, he was sternly asked by the host to defend Christianity. “I told him that I couldn’t do it, and moreover, that I didn’t want to defend the term. He asked me if I was a Christian, and I told him yes. “Then why don’t you want to defend Christianity?” he asked, confused. I told him I no longer knew what the term meant. Of the hundreds of thousands of people listening to his show that day, some of them had terrible experiences with Christianity; they may have been yelled at by a teacher in a Christian school, abused by a minister, or browbeaten by a Christian parent. To them, the term Christianity meant something that no Christian I know would defend. By fortifying the term, I am only making them more and more angry. I won’t do it. Stop ten people on the street and ask them what they think of when they hear the word Christianity, and they will give you ten different answers. How can I defend a term that means ten different things to ten different people? I told the radio show host that I would rather talk about Jesus and how I came to believe that Jesus exists and that he likes me. The host looked back at me with tears in his eyes. When we were done, he asked me if we could go get lunch together. He told me how much he didn’t like Christianity but how he had always wanted to believe Jesus was the Son of God.
Posted by: brad | December 31, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
when a person goes to the doctor with a problem.. and the doctor treats him for that problem it doesnt mean the rest of the body is being left out. temporarily that part is being given more importance.earth is only a part of the of the great bible.but it is the stage where gods acts upon his creations are being unfold so if we dont take care of the earth . there willbe no stage for the drama. weather one believes in god or not . one has to belive in what you are standing on and what is feeding you 24/7 and 365 days. takeing care of the earth is takeing care of yourself.
Posted by: Mr Green | December 31, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
To the non-believers: what is so wrong with believing in a higher power? More than 90 percent of the world believes in some higher power – whether it be God, Allah, Buddah, Mother Earth, angels or some other entity. If it brings peace, serenity, love and a sense of purpose to one’s life, why should it bother you, as a non-believer? My advice to you – let it go and fight another battle. Leave those who believe alone.
Posted by: Believer and proud | December 31, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
If a greenie is someone who cares about our envirinment, is a person who hates greenies someone who wants to trash our planet by not caring? Or maybe you just call them a Republican.
Posted by: tom | December 31, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
“If a greenie is someone who cares about our envirinment, is a person who hates greenies someone who wants to trash our planet by not caring? Or maybe you just call them a Republican.”
You know, it’s so easy to insult and label. I’m a Republican and use solar power and recycle and the whole gamut of reusable technologies are being used at my ranch here in the Western U.S. – So please, don’t label. I will, however, say that the predisposition to legislate and force people to conform to Green thinking is rubbing people the wrong way. Let folks come to this on their own and there will be more support for these technologies. Besides, you fail to market to Republicans by making them appreciate the savings in going to renewable technologies – Ever think of that my dear Liberal friends? Something to consider before tossing us in the ash-heap and calling us all dead.
Posted by: Jon | January 1, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am
Jesus was a certified liberal! Fact!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: AJ | January 1, 2009, 12:43 am 12:43 am
I think everyone should be on Ritalin. Lets call Rush Limbaugh for his advice.
Posted by: tendergroins | January 1, 2009, 8:23 am 8:23 am
we are destyoying the earth day by day. we don’t need science or God to tell us that or show it to us. we are the destroyers of the world and if there is a god or gods or not, we are responsible and we will pay.
Posted by: Paul Wall | January 1, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
jesus was and would vote democrat because he was a carpenters son so he had work for a living so he couldnt be a republican.
Posted by: T | January 1, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
If someone takes the Holey Babble too seriously, his or her opinion isn’t worth much in the first place.
Posted by: Scorpredhead | January 1, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
Religion is the worst thing that ever happened to mankind. All the hatred and resentment between different religions not to mention the millions of people who died and continue to die as victims of religious fanaticism.
But what cannot and never will sink within me is how God can create mankind and then designate a belief which dictates for him stuff that is totally against all the humanly impulses afforded him by the same God.. And just for failing to believe, bundle up a majority of them and burn them up in hell. Go tell it to the birds, it doesn’t make any sense!
Posted by: MeSays | January 1, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Some evangelicals actually care about the environment? Who’d have thought…
Posted by: WDJ | January 2, 2009, 7:47 am 7:47 am
==Religion is the worst thing that ever happened to mankind.==
It’s true for religions like Islam.
However, Christianity is not a religion, rather a relationship.
== All the hatred and resentment between different religions not to mention the millions of people who died and continue to die as victims of religious fanaticism.==
Then, tell the Muslims to stop it.
==But what cannot and never will sink within me is how God can create mankind and then designate a belief which dictates for him stuff that is totally against all the humanly impulses afforded him by the same God.==
God didn’t create “all the humanly impulses” in Man.
==And just for failing to believe, bundle up a majority of them and burn them up in hell.==
Scoffers, as everybody can see here, never have understood what God does and what He doesn’t do.
God does not “send” people to Hell. He lets them go cuz they reject His offer of Reconciliation through Christ. How could YOU, a parent, do for a child who turns his back on YOU?
== Go tell it to the birds, it doesn’t make any sense!==
To scoffers, none of it does.
God didn’t make Covenant with the animals.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 2, 2009, 8:07 am 8:07 am
==If someone takes the Holey Babble too seriously, his or her opinion isn’t worth much in the first place.==
To YOU.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 2, 2009, 8:07 am 8:07 am
==Jesus was a certified liberal! Fact!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ==
A made-up “fact.”
In fact, though, He was intolerant, which makes Him anything but Lib.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 2, 2009, 8:09 am 8:09 am
==How in the name of sanity can hundreds of millions of people still believe in someone they can not see…==
YOu can’t see “love.” So, how can you believe in it.
You can’t see gravity, and, yet, you believe in it, trust it is there cuz-a some effect; but you cannot see it.
You cannot see “beauty,” and, still, you claim a flower is beautiful. Heh.
Fact is that things like this are not a matter of “seeing,” rather of perception based on life, having lived.
==I’ve always found it incredible that the religious quaintly prove their biblical assertions by referring back to the bible!==
Gee, Science does the same thing, referring back to itself! Wow!
==In other words, Jesus is the Son of God…it says so in the New Testament!==
No, God says so and that is reported in the Word of God.
== Are you nuts!?==
Yes, nuts for God through Christ!
==…I could care less…==
So, there’s room for your caring???
==What relevancy does it have to the reality of the condition of our earth?==
The condition of the Earth relies on the condition of its inhabitants. The Devil wants to destroy us and the Earth, and he’s happy that so many join him in jousting with God.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 2, 2009, 8:17 am 8:17 am
==The bible like any spiritual text is a good story with many valuable life lessons among its many contradictions…==
The contradictions are in your head.
==Evangelicals have “no position” on global warming because they realize that in order to stop global warming they would have to stop making money from petroleum products – an industry that is stacked with evangelical Republicans.==
Oh, you mean like all those evengelical Republicans in Saudi Arabia???
== Do we really need an invisible man in the sky to tell us to take care of the planet?==
Yes.
== Come on people – let’s use some common sense here.==
Translation: “Listen to me cuz I’m always right!”
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 2, 2009, 8:20 am 8:20 am
Jock
after spending ayear studying the alternate explanations I think Michael hit the nail on the head.
Posted by: Quietman | January 2, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
ps
we can’t post links here but if you fo to Skepticalscience.com and click on “arguments” you can see all of the relevant links I have come up with in the Volcanos thread.
Posted by: Quietman | January 2, 2009, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
Mr. Incredible,
==God didn’t create “all the humanly impulses” in Man.==
Then who did? You might tell me that God created a righteous being and then the devil implanted his evil in God’s beautiful creature.
Tell me then, who created the devil? And who created all that exists? Is it not God? Now that you claim that evil possessed the Angel Lucifer who then revolted against God together with a bunch of other rebel Angels, and was then sent off from heaven and has since been known as Satan – Would you care to explain the origin of that evil?
If the being called Man was constituted by God, why should we hear you to say that some of his humanly impulses were not created by God? Don’t you think you would be contradicting your Christian doctrine that God is the supreme creator?
==How could YOU, a parent, do for a child who turns his back on YOU?==
I fail to understand what kind of a person you are.. But if it was me, if my son turned my back on me, I would not “allow” him off to a fiery furnace. Matter of fact my fatherly love would compel me to destroy that fiery furnace so that my son doesn’t find himself there.
Posted by: MeSays | January 3, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
==/==God didn’t create “all the humanly impulses” in Man.==
Then who did?==
Man authorized the Devil.
== You might tell me that God created a righteous being…==
God was pleased with His Special Creation of Man.
==… and then the devil implanted his evil in God’s beautiful creature.==
The Devil didn’t “implant” anythng that Man didn’t authorize.
==Tell me then, who created the devil?==
God created Lucifer, one of His angels. Lucifer, taking authority upon himself to fight God, recreated himself in his own image.
==And who created all that exists? Is it not God?==
No. God didn’t create darkness. Thus, He didn’t create evil.
== Now that you claim that evil possessed the Angel Lucifer…==
Lucifer wasn’t possessed by evil. He created evil.
==… who then revolted against God together with a bunch of other rebel Angels, and was then sent off from heaven…==
He wasn’t “sent off.” He fell, or, rather, he jumped, just as Man did. It was no accident.
==… and has since been known as Satan – Would you care to explain the origin of that evil?==
Yes. It originated with Lucifer who jumped from Heaven in a fit of selfishness.
==If the being called Man was constituted by God, why should we hear you to say that some of his humanly impulses were not created by God?==
Because God created the Godly, not the ungodly. That’s cuz he didn’t ceate darkness, whence the ungodly.
== Don’t you think you would be contradicting your Christian doctrine that God is the supreme creator?==
Not at all.
==/==How could YOU, a parent, do for a child who turns his back on YOU?==
I fail to understand what kind of a person you are.==
No doubt.
==But if it was me, if my son turned my back on me, I would not “allow” him off to a fiery furnace.==
He turns his back on you and will not let you touch him, nor his life. Now what?
== Matter of fact my fatherly love would compel me to destroy that fiery furnace so that my son doesn’t find himself there.==
God makes such a way out for those who trust Him. It is by THEIR choice that they are not protected.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 3, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
==…who created the devil? And who created all that exists? Is it not God?==
God did not create darkness, nor the sin nature, and darkness/the sin nature is the home of the Devil.
God spoke LIGHT into the darkness, not the other way around. The darkness comprehended it not. It still doesn’t. That’s why YOU’re confused.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 3, 2009, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
==…who created the devil?==
Disobedience came by Man, not by God. Disobedience sustains evil. Through Man’s portal, evil came.
Grace and Truth came by Christ Who defeated the works of the Devil. Those who reject Christ and, through Him, God, the Father, are still subject to the works of the Devil.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 3, 2009, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
==I fail to understand what kind of a person you are.==
(1Co 2:14) But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 3, 2009, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
==Evangelicals, GOP, Just go away.==
No.
Now what?
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 4, 2009, 6:51 am 6:51 am
==”“When we interject religion into environmental debates, we are taking the focus of the church away from God and, instead, placing it on a hotly disputed social values issue,” Taylor said.”
But it’s is perfectly fine to use the bible to fight against gay marriage…==
It depends.
Nobody stops a man who claims to be homosexual from marrying a woman who also claims to be homosexual.
If you’re talking about so-called “same-sex ‘marriage,’” yes, it is. Perfectly fine.
== why?==
Cuz God condemns what we now call “homosexuality” as an “abomination.” As the General Manager of the universe He made, He oughta know what He’s talking about. We merely report that. Surely, we believe Him and in Him, and our trusting Him adds to the report.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 4, 2009, 6:57 am 6:57 am
==I fail to understand what kind of a person you are.==
The natural man, without God, is surely a failure.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 4, 2009, 6:59 am 6:59 am
==The earth belongs to God.==
He gave Man dominion over it, to subdue it.
== We are just temporary tenants.==
Not really. He gave it to us to control.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 4, 2009, 7:01 am 7:01 am
==I am so tired of this holy rolling sike job, It’s just a book , a book written by man for man nothing else get over yourselfs,there are plenty other books in the world just as valid, IT’S A BOOK, ONLY A BOOK. READ IT AND SHUT UP ABOUT IT ALREADY. IT’S A BOOK , ONLY A BOOK.==
Heh. The Devil says the same thing.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 4, 2009, 7:03 am 7:03 am
==”Global warming is nonsense. And in fact, we are entering a cooling phase of the earth cycles.”
Please show your scientific credentials. You sound like an expert.==
Nobody needs a “shingle” to understand teevee weather reports.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 4, 2009, 7:06 am 7:06 am
==How dare someone NOT think as the evangelicals tell them too [sic].==
How dare someone NOT think as the secularists tell them “too.”
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 4, 2009, 7:08 am 7:08 am
==Who are these people kidding with this holier than thou crap? ==
The Pharisees accosted Jesus with that.
The Devil accosts me with this every day. Y’know what I respond with? Romans 8:1, then James 4:7 cuz-a Matthew 4:1-11.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 4, 2009, 7:11 am 7:11 am
==the “Green Bible” sure beats the prosperity gospel.==
Really? The Word of God is NOT profitable and the Righteous shall NOT flourish??? Hmmm.
Then why
(Jos 1:8) This book of the law shall not depart out of thy mouth; but thou shalt meditate therein day and night, that thou mayest observe to do according to all that is written therein: for then thou shalt make thy way prosperous, and then thou shalt have good success.
(Jdg 18:5) And they said unto him, Ask counsel, we pray thee, of God, that we may know whether our way which we go shall be prosperous.
(Psa 1:3) And he shall be like a tree planted by the rivers of water, that bringeth forth his fruit in his season; his leaf also shall not wither; and whatsoever he doeth shall prosper.
(3Jn 1:2) Beloved, I wish above all things that thou mayest prosper and be in health, even as thy soul prospereth.
Just to name a few.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 4, 2009, 7:23 am 7:23 am
==God said to be good stewards of the land not paranoid spastics who believe they can control the weather.==
The phrasing, “good stewards,” appears once in the Word of God, and it has nothing to do with taking care of the planet.
He told those who are born again to be “stewards.” But, of what??? Letsee:
(1Co 4:1) Let a man so account of us, as of the ministers of Christ, and stewards of the mysteries of God.
(1Pe 4:10) As every man hath received the gift, even so minister the same one to another, as good stewards of the manifold grace of God.
(1Co 4:2) Moreover it is required in stewards, that a man be found faithful.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 4, 2009, 7:32 am 7:32 am
==I wonder if they highlighted the part where God says this earth is parishing and there will be none to help. ==
Where does He say this? I’ve searched the entire Word of God and cannot find it, except the parts where He is talking about Salvation, not Earth-saving “green” progams.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 4, 2009, 7:37 am 7:37 am
==Most Christians are not crazy, just the right wing fundamentalists evangelicals!==
Translation: “The Christians who agree with me are not crazy. ‘Right wind fundamentalist evangelicals’ don’t agree with me and I don’t agree with them, and, so, they must be crazy.”
By the way, a “Christian,” by definition, is fundamentalist and evangelical. If he is not fundamentalist and evangelical, he is not a Christian.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 4, 2009, 7:41 am 7:41 am
“right wind” —>>> right wing
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 4, 2009, 7:41 am 7:41 am
On this subject there are many Reference Bibles out there which are good. The only concern that one would have, is does this new kind of Bible add to or take away from the The Holy Bible? As the Bible States if one add to or takes away from it as is written will be written out of the Book of Life in Revelations 22.
Posted by: Interesting | January 5, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
==there are many Reference Bibles out there which are good.==
==…does this new kind of Bible add to or take away from the The Holy Bible? As the Bible States if one add to or takes away from it as is written will be written out of the Book of Life in Revelations 22.==
The questions, for me, are:
Did God say This? And,
If He said this in another language, is this the closest we can come to what He said?
If KJV is the Word of God, preserved in English, then all other translations and versions are ABOUT the Word of God. They can’t ALL be THE Word of God [there's ONLY One Way, not many] since, for instance, NASB leaves out half of Romans 8:1. If God said all of what KJV says He said, then THAT’s what He said, and anything that says He did not say it is in foul territory.
The reasoning, as I have been told, is that Romans 8:4 repeats what KJV says He said in :1. In other words, the insinuation is that God wouldn’t repeat Himself and that, therefore, men have to “correct” God.
“Oh,” I answered, “Why not? Maybe He wanted to make sure it got through. He had His reason, and any ‘reasoning’ that edits God is incorrect. We need to edit ourselves.” We’re not to ask, “Art thou he that should come, or do we look for another?” It’s understandable that they, in His time, didn’t know and had to ask. However, we’re supposed to know by now.
Now, I understand that we don’t use “thees and “thous.” I think that changing them to “you” is harmless cuz that doesn’t change the very Foundation of the Word cuz that change is direct translation, whereas other changes may be interpretations. Private interpretations. I think that we have to be careful of what is direct translation that preserves the Word and interpretation which changes Him [I, now, don't refer to the Word as "It."]. He doesn’t change, and men try to change Him.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 5, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
==there are many Reference Bibles out there which are good.==
“Good,” in what sense? Are people using them as a substitute for the Holy Spirit?
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 5, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
We’ve had all sorts of different versions of Bibles. Why not a “Green Bible”? It seems to me that more references to Mother Earth are sorely needed.
Posted by: Daymon Balser | January 9, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
==We’ve had all sorts of different versions of Bibles.==
The Devil gave the first one in the Garden, and he’s been handing out more ever since.
== Why not a “Green Bible”?==
Cuz it is not the Word of God. It is the word of men.
== It seems to me that more references to Mother Earth are sorely needed.==
Code translation: “We wanna impose our views on everybody else.”
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 10, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Karma is Jehovah’s recycling programme.
Posted by: Jenn | June 29, 2010, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
So why is it OK to get so deeply involved in other social issues and not this one? Sounds a bit hypcritical to me.
Posted by: MarkInPDX | June 29, 2010, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Does any informed person still believe in the global warming hoax?
Posted by: Truth | June 29, 2010, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
“Here’s the first and most important lesson of the day: There is no God, never has been and never will be.”
Truly sad that there are so many ignorant people in the world.
Posted by: Yikes | June 29, 2010, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
Question to everybody: If God made earth than who made God?
Posted by: Nihil sinedeo | June 30, 2010, 10:03 am 10:03 am