Dec 12, 2008 6:04pm

Quickly, Before We Leave….

Every administration, on its way out the door, leaves with a flurry of actions that it couldn’t do before, or wouldn’t do because of the likely backlash.  Remember Bill Clinton’s pardon of the financier Marc Rich?  Jimmy Carter’s White House famously got busy with new rules before handing off to Ronald Reagan. Depending on your point of view, a "midnight regulation" is not necessarily dastardly, just not something the incoming administration might like.  Emma Schwartz wrote a piece for us back in October on what the Bush Administration might have in mind; take a look HERE. Yesterday the Interior Department came forth on the Endangered Species Act.  "Interior Publishes Final Narrow Changes to Regulations," it said in its release.  "Bush Administration Undermines Endangered Species Protections," replied the Endangered Species Coalition. (The AP’s version of what happened is HERE; Dina Cappiello writes that the new rules are meant to "reduce the input of federal scientists and to block the law from being used to fight global warming.") There will presumably be more between now and Jan. 20.  Couldn’t help noticing this bulletin late today; the Sierra Club did: BC-APNewsAlert
   WASHINGTON (AP) — EPA exempts farms from reporting hazardous gas releases from manure in last-minute rulemaking. Here’s to a good weekend.

User Comments

Does this man not have a soul? I’ve stood up for President Bush for years against so-called Bush bashing. I know regret every single time that I have stood up for the man. It’s one thing to have a different point of view. In this case, he’s just being plain evil.

Posted by: Eric | December 12, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

now regret*

Posted by: Eric | December 12, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Eric, it is a pity that it took you so long to see the truth…

Posted by: Serena | December 12, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Just when you think he couldn’t sink any lower-

Posted by: GG | December 12, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

I can’t wait until Bush is out of the White House and Barack is in, so that he can repair all the damage done by Bush and the Republicans. America, are you better-off now than you were 8 years ago???

Posted by: Danny | December 12, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

He is still president. Let him enjoy his full term. He won fair and square regardless of how anyone feels about his policies. What’s a few more weeks anyway. His salute to his father was admirable and moving. He is indeed lucky to have a great family. Gob bless Mr. Bush. Wish you the best in the future. What is done is done and we all must look forward.

Posted by: zorra | December 12, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Funny. Lately I’ve read conservatives whine about corrupt Chicago politics. The Second City has nothing on Texas. I know, you think this is Bush bashing. Go back to LBJ and ballot box 13. Corruption has a long tradition in Texas. Republicans love to use Rove’s tactics to marginalize their critics. Once Bush had 80% approval. It’s 23% today. Most “Bush bashers” once liked Bush. Bush is like a cockapoo. You really want to like him. He always wets on the carpet, floor and you.

Posted by: Michael Johnson | December 12, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

He’s going to pay one day. It won’t be pretty….pay back is a #####!

Posted by: I hate STUPID People | December 12, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

This man is an oil man and all he cares about is money no matter who or what is in his way and that is a fact.
I can’t stand him and never could ever he is thief and a liar like all the rest. Texas hated him for what he did there. While he was there their taxes went out of sight. He bankrupted one of their savings and loans and so much more that is why I never voted for him and I mean both times.

Posted by: Carol | December 12, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Zorra, Why would God bless a man who is systematically permitting the annihilation of the planet. I just don’t think that would make him happy. And as for his speech today, did you also hear the cheers when he said this was the last year of his Presidency??? Looked a little shocked, didn’t he???

Posted by: GG | December 12, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Bush and Cheney have hated the country’s environmental protection policies all these years. Now they are wasting no time harming as much as possible for the benefit of a few rich and powerful that these changes will benefit. No, Bush has no shame. He has not been a president for the people of this country. He has been the president for corporate interests, lobbyists and the chosen few greedy corrupt people who will profit.

Posted by: Vicki | December 12, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Hi

Posted by: jon | December 12, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

Regarding his speech, I think it’s a bit scary how gushing (to the extreme) he is about his father on this and many other occasions. It does make one wonder about the theory that Sadaam’s removal was simply Dubyah’s revenge against his father’s assassination attempt. Who knows? Dubyah does seem like the kind of simple-minded dude that would do something like that.

Posted by: Danny | December 12, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Instead of HATING on Bush get your facts straight, and stop being crazy.

Posted by: jon | December 12, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

What facts aren’t straight, Jon? Bush made his own bed.

Posted by: GG | December 12, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

lets see… liberals were right about the environment, right about george bush being incompetent, right about religious fundamentalists, right about the demise of capitalism… hmmm… something to think about while george bush does his last minute dastardly bullying against humanity and the planet

Posted by: earthisnotflat | December 12, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Every single independent media count of the votes in Florida in the 2000 election, no matter which way they counted them, showed that Bush won the majority. I challenge “Dr. truth” to show a link to even one count of the vote by a non-partisan/non-biased organization that showed Bush lost the popular vote in Florida. He can’t and won’t.
But do not simply take my word for it, or the word of “Dr. Truth”…research it for yourself.

Posted by: Fair Play | December 12, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

To Don,
I work in the pulp/paper industry and I can say that only by practicing sustainable logging practices can we hope to achieve long term access to the resources we need.
I believe Species extinction is a natural part of evolution and I don’t care a bit about the plight of the spotted owl. But its endangerment is a symptom of the real disease— an Industrial Age approach to harvesting of natural resources predicated on the obsolescent belief that supply is unlimited.
The answer is that there must be careful coordination and regulation of industries dealing in natural resources, and unfortunately for those like myself who believe in minimal government intervention, this can only be ensured through legislation.
The practice of spending your resources faster than you can replenish them works no better in the context of natural resources than it does in managing your personal finances, or as the Bush administration has proven tragically, managing your government’s finances.

Posted by: ABL | December 12, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

Bush has no pride, no soul, no sense of stewardship. Not only that, he doesn’t care that his name will be smeared and his legacy tarnished. He is a truly appalling person and I wish this country had never had to endure his blundering. Even after eight years, he is still creating havoc. Bush is totally despicable.

Posted by: two-cats | December 13, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

All that we ask is that you give President Obama the same respect that we’ve given President Bush.

Posted by: notmyprez | December 13, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

I don’t want to get into emotional ad hominem arguments, including against President Bush, whom I voted for in 2000 then decided to sit out the 2004 election because of doubts that were creeping up for me. And I voted for Obama this election — but my vote was *for* him, not *against* McCain, whom I admired (and still do) in many ways. I just felt Obama was the better choice. All that said, despite the long, sometimes-checkered history of departing Presidents signing off on a flurry of matters, President Bush does seem intent on erasing whatever goodwill remains for him with some of his ill-conceived, as I see it, moves. I hope Obama will be able to reverse the most damaging ones ASAP, especially those regarding which he doesn’t have to go through Congress.

Posted by: Mekong Kurt | December 13, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

I told those about me in the year 2000, that this man would bring war and recession. I am so sorry to see that I was in fact correct. It seems more than apparent now that this man wants to completely destroy any good will that is left between the GOP and the American people. Let us never forget what they stand for in favoring emissions over clean air, Oil companies over the needs of average Americans, drug companies over elderly and those with health problems, and CEO pay raises over good old fashioned American jobs. Never has it been so clear of both a person and a political party that appear to resent and have ill intent towards the middle class of our country. Good riddance to them, may they never return.

Posted by: David Williams | December 13, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Oh Obama is so much better with his razor thin resume and no experience what so ever.

Posted by: Goon | December 13, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

I hate to say it but, as far as long range thinking, Bush isn’t the guy. I voted for his father in ’88. Definitely NOT like father, like son. So, yes, Obama IS better. Bush is a bandaid type of fixer. He is also too easily led by his nose. We need someone who is going to consider long and hard the consequences of rar-reaching decisions instead of Bush’s tossing darts at his choices on a board as a way of making a decision.

Posted by: tacticalguy | December 13, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

Far-reaching, even. It’s late, sorry.

Posted by: tacticalguy | December 13, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

do you really commend the act of allowing increased amounts of arnsic in the air we breath? What kind of human being, except for one totally caught up in greed and packing his bank account at the expense of others, could condon an act of this nature? This is deplorable! There is no excuse!

Posted by: David Williams | December 13, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

America may yet becoming a smoldering wasteland before Bush gets out of office. That on top of the wreckage of an economy, and god knows how many failed policies. There’s just no end to the mess he creates.

Posted by: Mike | December 13, 2008, 2:42 am 2:42 am

I have just one thing to say on this. Its all about money period. the envro’s dont ave as much money and the oil companies do so on his way out the door who you think hes going to side with? Hes already hated more than any president in history. Hes failed every test of sence and honor that has confronted him. So now that hes a lame duck on his way out hes trying to help the rich so they will line is pockets with cash after hes out of office.

Posted by: getsmart | December 13, 2008, 7:00 am 7:00 am

GOON –Obama may have a razor thin resume but he cant do a worse job than Bush PERIOD. A house cat could run the country better than Bush has.

Posted by: getsmart | December 13, 2008, 7:17 am 7:17 am

This is just another example of the evil in this mans soul. There is no rhyme or reason to do what he is doing. Please mr Bush, for the good of the Nation, sit back, shut up, and sign nothing. You have done more that enough. let the adults have the chair.

Posted by: Keith | December 13, 2008, 7:29 am 7:29 am

And why should we look for this mental midget to change his ways with just weeks left in his presidency. He continues to give historians reason to rate him as the WORST president in the history of the USA. He and the Gov of IL have something in common: both are ill and out of touch with reality-this is truly a sad time for us.

Posted by: ron hickey | December 13, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am

“EPA exempts farms from reporting hazardous gas releases from manure in last-minute rulemaking.” Are they kidding???? Bush finally did something that makes sense!! Global warming gone mad! That’s what’s happening in this country. Good for Bush. Hopefully he’ll make some more rules that help the people instead of these insane laws that the nuts are trying to pass!!

Posted by: M. Summer | December 13, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am

Lets hope president Obama will expedite us into a paperless and oil free economy-that’s a nice slice of revenge towards George Bush. Hit him in his pockets but he has enough money to diversify into alternative energies. However, it will hurt his inflated ego harshly if President Obama is able to free the United States from oil. And for Big 3, they better get onto the drawing board for hydrogen cars before the Japanese beat them to it.

Posted by: Phallon | December 13, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am

Do cow farts really hurt the environment? Absolutely not! WE have farming land all over the country that has no sulfur or other nutrients in the soil. You eat those vegetables, and get no healthy benefit from it. How do you get sulfur and other minerals in the soil? Cow manure, and forest fires, and smoke, and car exhausts, and factory smoke. The lack of sulfur in diet causes cancer. OOPS> you morons are killing yourselves. Bush really does love you. But you are too ignornant to know.

Posted by: heavenislikethis | December 13, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

heavenislikethis: Yes cow farts do hurt the environment. It’s called methane gas.

Posted by: Phallon | December 13, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

“Most of the evil done in the world is done by “good men”, John Adams

Posted by: olin tucker | December 13, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Eric,
If it took you this long to ascertain Bush does not have a soul, stick with the Republicians.

Posted by: Kenneth Pennington | December 13, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

OMG A trained monkey could do better than this jerk (W.) Of course it doesn’t surprise me. It’s time to pay the piper, I mean big oil, oops

Posted by: Ted | December 13, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

It’s about time so one shoved it to the environmental whack jobs, who’s real goal is to attack capitalism and not save the environment. Environmental laws hurt the economy and right now is no time to kick the economy any further while it’s down.

Posted by: JoJo the Dog Faced boy | December 13, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

I dont think the Reps are done undermining the important issues on the docket anyway they can before they have no control whatsoever in the executive branch. Their display so far appears just shy of childish pouting. I feel sorry for Obama. It will far worse for him than the alledged stolen ‘W’s from the White House keyboards.

Posted by: tendergroins | December 13, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

First off – I believe Global Warming is a very serious “Very Real- Man Induced” problem.
However, I do not believe the US is to blame. All we did was develop technologies that the rest of the world would have, if they could have. We were, and are, simply more technologically advanced[ [and the world is very jealous of this, and therefore all the criticism, not to mention that we are the worlds only Superpower, and the world is also jealous of that. Kyoto is as much an attempt to undermine our economy as an attempt to solve Global Warming. Much of the world is just using it as an Economic Tool against us – and many people in the US see this for exactly what it is, Hypocrisy,….. and much of the world knows we know. Probably the main reason even Clinton and Gore would not truly support Kyoto]].
Having a degree in Natural Resources I think the evidence (about global warming) is very Clear and Convincing ‘today’. However, I was not really sure until about 1995, even though I started seeing strong evidence around about 1985. At that point a noticeable warm up started (at least where I was living, & others said they noticed it also, in my area & elsewhere). In my opinion the evidence gradually got stronger till 95, when I thought the evidence was strong enough (and has only gotten stronger, today it is downright scary – the Arctic Ice Cap Meltdown – not funny). So, I really don’t think you can blame us till then (95), and many still don’t (or don’t want to) see it, & not just in the US. However, since 95 the US has made many moves (on many fronts) to combat the problem, and many other countries are dragging their feet, or have been given a free pass (the main Kyoto problem). One of the biggest examples here is China…..but there are others.
The world says it is our Industry that caused the problem (they don’t talk about Britain, and other Industrialized nations as much), but it is also probably mostly ‘Our Technology’ that is going to solve it……………….[I could also throw in many examples of other countries stealing our technology on the international market (weak international patent protections, and many anti-US countries want it that way), the vast majority of SE Asian Industries are built on Appropriated US Technology……. Etc., Etc…………………….…
Our Technology and Industry also saved the world in WWI, WWII, and the Cold War (not to mention other situations). If we had not spent all those years developing various Industries, and Aircraft, & Jeeps, & Tanks, & Ships the afore-mentioned wars would have been lost [[prior to Pearl Harbor the only modern Fighter Plane in SE Asia, other than a Japanese model, was the P-40 Curtis Hawk (Flying Tigers), not a great plane but it kept China from falling]]. We had to use Trains & Trucks to move parts from factory to factory. It took factories to build trains & trucks also, and they had to burn fuel (all this putting carbon in the atmosphere, etc). All those planes, & jeeps, & tanks, & ships etc also burned fuel etc., etc., etc. Not to mention when ours, or the other side’s material got destroyed & released carbon.
Our Industry saved the world on several occasions (also, we have established MANY Democracies around the world,….. how many has Russia or China established !!!). So when people talk about this situation as if we are the only beneficiaries, of such Industrialization, they should look at history again, more objectively. If not for us, much of the world could today be under Japanese Imperialism, or Nazism, or USSR domination………’Comprende’.
The rest of the world has ‘As Much a Responsibility’ to solve this problem as we do,
So, THEY SHOULD STOP BALKING, and cut the EXCUSES.

Posted by: Mr Reality | December 13, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Looks like you brought out all the loonies with this one Ned.

Posted by: Quietman | December 13, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

You got that right, Quietman. Algore would be impressed.

Posted by: Don | December 14, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Don
Re: “Algore would be impressed.”
Yes. Only if he knew how to read.

Posted by: Quietman | December 17, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

notmyprez
Re: “All that we ask is that you give President Obama the same respect that we’ve given President Bush.”
Just who was the last “respected” president? Eisenhauer?

Posted by: Quietman | December 17, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Bush would make a good Captain Planet villain

Posted by: WDJ | December 21, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Ned,
I don’t know how long you’ve been around but have you noticed that interest in spinning objects and anomalies measured re. gravity and magnetism dropped off pretty much in conjunction with the Republican Revolution?
Excerpt:
“Now new fuel has been added to the antigravity controversy by Hideo Hayasaka and colleagues at the Faculty of Engineering, Tohoku University, Japan, together with Matsushita, the Japanese multinational. The team has carried out a new set of experiments aimed at detecting anti-gravity generated by a small gyroscope.
The principle behind the experiment is very simple. After spinning up the gyroscope to 18,000 revolutions per minute, it is put inside an airtight container and allowed to fall between two laser beams. These record how long the gyroscope takes to fall nearly 6ft between the two beams. Any reduction in the strength of gravity reveals itself in a slight increase in the time it takes to fall the 6ft.
In a series of 10 runs, the team found that the gyroscope took about 1/25,000 of a second longer to fall when it was spinning than when it was stationary – equivalent to an anti-gravity effect of just one part in 7,000.
And in a curious twist, the anti-gravity only appeared when the gyroscope was spinning anticlockwise. The team members claim that both this, and the size of the effect, are in line with earlier findings published by them in 1989.
That link is of an article that long since vanished but here’s another source.
H. Hayasaka et al., ‘Possibility for the existence of anti-gravity: evidence from a free-fall experiment using a spinning gyro’, Speculations in Science and Technology, v. 20, 1997, pp. 173-18″
It’s clear that many UFO buffs took on the issue in order to validate investigation of the UFO phenomenon scientifically and as a result this attracted much more interest from the “new age” science crowd than those with more traditional backgrounds.
But if this is true, regardless of practicality in generating antigravity, it indicates a black hole in science that needs to be filled in.
Thanks.

Posted by: rainbowsally | December 23, 2008, 3:58 am 3:58 am

OOPS! It’s not clear where the excerpt above ended and my comment resumed.
My comment resumed at:
It’s clear that many UFO buffs took…

Posted by: rainbowsally | December 23, 2008, 4:00 am 4:00 am

Update:
Now some might say it makes no sense that a spinning object could rise and fall at different rates or that the direction of rotation shouldn’t have any effect but consider that a moving electron in a conductor DOES have a directional field (either clockwise or counter clockwise if you think of yourself as an electron moving forward or backward).
Any physics guys out there?
Forget the theories. Just look at the data.

Posted by: rainbowsally | December 23, 2008, 4:41 am 4:41 am

I Just really hope Obama can deliver the goods on the environment

Posted by: rc cars | February 3, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.