<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Galactic Battle … Against Salmonella</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2009/03/a-galactic-batt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2009/03/a-galactic-batt/</link>
	<description>The latest Technology news and blog posts from ABC News contributors and bloggers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:49:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Something</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2009/03/a-galactic-batt/#comment-1773</link>
		<dc:creator>Something</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2009/03/a-galactic-batt/#comment-1773</guid>
		<description>Lawrence,
Trickle down doesn&#039;t always work because of corporate greed. You assume that the business isn&#039;t always out to make the easiest buck, which they are.
Bottom-up economics can work because the consumers (and overspenders) spend more money on services they actually *want* to spend money. Resulting in the market adjusting to the demands on consumers rather than what businesses choose to offer.
I&#039;m not disagreeing that overtaxing to a severe degree will work, but I find your reasons for saying bottom-up economics don&#039;t work is flawed.
And we saw what happens when business takes risks with large sums of money ;), having lots of people with more money (some may overspend, etc, and remain low on money) but I&#039;d rather have that than 1 company or individual with a lot of money to lose.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawrence,<br />
Trickle down doesn&#8217;t always work because of corporate greed. You assume that the business isn&#8217;t always out to make the easiest buck, which they are.<br />
Bottom-up economics can work because the consumers (and overspenders) spend more money on services they actually *want* to spend money. Resulting in the market adjusting to the demands on consumers rather than what businesses choose to offer.<br />
I&#8217;m not disagreeing that overtaxing to a severe degree will work, but I find your reasons for saying bottom-up economics don&#8217;t work is flawed.<br />
And we saw what happens when business takes risks with large sums of money ;), having lots of people with more money (some may overspend, etc, and remain low on money) but I&#8217;d rather have that than 1 company or individual with a lot of money to lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2009/03/a-galactic-batt/#comment-1772</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2009/03/a-galactic-batt/#comment-1772</guid>
		<description>Phil, and the rest, trickle down does work.  My job and millions more are evidence of that.  Tax the rich less, they&#039;ll create jobs.  Tax them more, they&#039;ll stop creating jobs, and possibly start cutting jobs.  Tax them even more, they&#039;ll move overseas.  With that explaination, how does trickle up work?  Take from the rich and give to the poor?  The money will just end up back in the rich&#039;s acounts.  Why?  Poor people are generally poor because of a few things.  They don&#039;t manage money very well, would rather spend than save, and are not easy to take risks with money.  Trickle up won&#039;t work.
Now, as for the Galactic Battle.  Are lasers involved?  And is Darth Vader responsible?  Got any info on that Ned?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, and the rest, trickle down does work.  My job and millions more are evidence of that.  Tax the rich less, they&#8217;ll create jobs.  Tax them more, they&#8217;ll stop creating jobs, and possibly start cutting jobs.  Tax them even more, they&#8217;ll move overseas.  With that explaination, how does trickle up work?  Take from the rich and give to the poor?  The money will just end up back in the rich&#8217;s acounts.  Why?  Poor people are generally poor because of a few things.  They don&#8217;t manage money very well, would rather spend than save, and are not easy to take risks with money.  Trickle up won&#8217;t work.<br />
Now, as for the Galactic Battle.  Are lasers involved?  And is Darth Vader responsible?  Got any info on that Ned?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2009/03/a-galactic-batt/#comment-1771</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2009/03/a-galactic-batt/#comment-1771</guid>
		<description>almost forgot...at least here the &quot;trickle down effect&quot; seems to work..unlike we&#039;ve seen on economic matters...the technology developed for the space program does in fact trickle down...unlike tax cuts for the rich and famous...which were supposed to enrich my life...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>almost forgot&#8230;at least here the &#8220;trickle down effect&#8221; seems to work..unlike we&#8217;ve seen on economic matters&#8230;the technology developed for the space program does in fact trickle down&#8230;unlike tax cuts for the rich and famous&#8230;which were supposed to enrich my life&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2009/03/a-galactic-batt/#comment-1770</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2009/03/a-galactic-batt/#comment-1770</guid>
		<description>Jim Bob...
The computer you used to post your silly message is due in part to the investments made to the space program....so aside from an overall review of the contracting process (kinda like should have been done for the insane wars that we&#039;re fighting)...money spent on the space program in general is money well spent..better spent than the dough we lost thanks to the tax cuts given to the rich which allowed an ex-boss of mine to get a free Hummer...and since over the last 8 years, we also stopped regulating the food industry...any help these experiments could provide to reduce the chances of food chain issues would be welcome as well...that way....your next PB&amp;Jelly samiich might not kill you.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim Bob&#8230;<br />
The computer you used to post your silly message is due in part to the investments made to the space program&#8230;.so aside from an overall review of the contracting process (kinda like should have been done for the insane wars that we&#8217;re fighting)&#8230;money spent on the space program in general is money well spent..better spent than the dough we lost thanks to the tax cuts given to the rich which allowed an ex-boss of mine to get a free Hummer&#8230;and since over the last 8 years, we also stopped regulating the food industry&#8230;any help these experiments could provide to reduce the chances of food chain issues would be welcome as well&#8230;that way&#8230;.your next PB&amp;Jelly samiich might not kill you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2009/03/a-galactic-batt/#comment-1769</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2009/03/a-galactic-batt/#comment-1769</guid>
		<description>Mostly, NASA is just trying to tell us all that their research and all the expensive machinery and costs ultimately have some practical value to all of us. Given our current economic problems, one could easily imagine why NASA might be looking for any way to appear &quot;relevant&quot;.
The truth is that NASA is EXTREMELY relevant, and that money spent on launches and space station maintenance can have huge payback over time. Remember, for example, that the technology in your computer, your cell phone, Blackberry, iPod, HDTV, GPS, Satellite and HD radio, wristwatch, microwave oven and myriad other devices all stems from NASA-related research. Add to this C-T, MRI and PET scanners, much genetic-related technology, a number of drugs, and internal &quot;prostheses&quot; such as heart valves and artificial joints. All of these have either sprung directly from or benefited tremendously by NASA projects and research.
But NASA clearly fears that We the People will think all their work is unnecessary extra expense at this point, and they are looking for ways to remind us that what they are doing can have huge paybacks.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mostly, NASA is just trying to tell us all that their research and all the expensive machinery and costs ultimately have some practical value to all of us. Given our current economic problems, one could easily imagine why NASA might be looking for any way to appear &#8220;relevant&#8221;.<br />
The truth is that NASA is EXTREMELY relevant, and that money spent on launches and space station maintenance can have huge payback over time. Remember, for example, that the technology in your computer, your cell phone, Blackberry, iPod, HDTV, GPS, Satellite and HD radio, wristwatch, microwave oven and myriad other devices all stems from NASA-related research. Add to this C-T, MRI and PET scanners, much genetic-related technology, a number of drugs, and internal &#8220;prostheses&#8221; such as heart valves and artificial joints. All of these have either sprung directly from or benefited tremendously by NASA projects and research.<br />
But NASA clearly fears that We the People will think all their work is unnecessary extra expense at this point, and they are looking for ways to remind us that what they are doing can have huge paybacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Bob</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2009/03/a-galactic-batt/#comment-1768</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2009/03/a-galactic-batt/#comment-1768</guid>
		<description>We blew $500 million on this launch. I&#039;d like something tangible from these missions.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We blew $500 million on this launch. I&#8217;d like something tangible from these missions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmblweedtx</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2009/03/a-galactic-batt/#comment-1767</link>
		<dc:creator>tmblweedtx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2009/03/a-galactic-batt/#comment-1767</guid>
		<description>I thought that simple hand washing, equipment cleanliness, and simple common sense ended samonela outbreaks!  Do we really have to go into outerspace to learn how to clean and be clean?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that simple hand washing, equipment cleanliness, and simple common sense ended samonela outbreaks!  Do we really have to go into outerspace to learn how to clean and be clean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjalamelami</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2009/03/a-galactic-batt/#comment-1766</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjalamelami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2009/03/a-galactic-batt/#comment-1766</guid>
		<description>First!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2009/03/a-galactic-batt/#comment-1765</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2009/03/a-galactic-batt/#comment-1765</guid>
		<description>Wow, so incredibly enlightening.  Changes are triggered?  Better not let that crucial information out.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, so incredibly enlightening.  Changes are triggered?  Better not let that crucial information out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>