Oct 19, 2009 11:26am

Moon Crash Kicked Up Plume After All

It turns out, says NASA's Ames Research Center, that the LCROSS lunar impact mission, which it ran, did kick up a plume of debris after all.  It just wasn't bright enough to show in the live images streamed at the time of impact on Oct. 9.  Perhaps it wasn't large or dense enough to catch much sunlight over the edge of the permanently-shadowed Cabeus crater where the Centaur rocket crashed, with the LCROSS satellite watching as it followed.

But if you combine several overlapping images from parts of the visible spectrum, and crank up the contrast, you get the image below.  The red circle was added by NASA.

Click on the image to enlarge, or HERE for full resolution. NASA says that 15 seconds after impact, the debris had flown up to 3-4 km (2-3 miles) in every direction. Keep in mind that for lack of a lunar atmosphere, the flying particles did not form a debris "cloud" around the impact site; instead, each particle probably followed a roughly parabolic path from where the booster crashed.

"We are blown away by the data returned," said Anthony Colaprete, LCROSS principal investigator and project scientist, in a release you can find HERE. "The team is working hard on the analysis and the data appear to be of very high quality.”

"There is a clear indication of a plume of vapor and fine debris," said Colaprete. “Within the range of model predictions we made, the ejecta brightness appears to be at the low end of our predictions and this may be a clue to the properties of the material the Centaur impacted.”

As for what this means to the search for usable lunar ice, Colaprete and his team still cannot say.  The refining of an image does not change the spectrometer data, which will tell them the chemical composition of the lunar soil they hit. 

User Comments

The lack of oxygen, similar to what exists in Anita Dunn’s brain which is why she adores Mao Tse Tung and views him as hone of “Favorite Poliitcal Philosophers”. Barack Obama has picked some winners to work in OUR whitehouse!

Posted by: pauline | October 19, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

What does the moon landing have to do with Barack Obama? Jesus, you people are freakin crazy! lol

Posted by: WTF | October 19, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Again…where were the onboard cameras? A chance for an award winning shot lost.

Posted by: dfox2888 | October 19, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

The photo lacks context, but I guess that the darker regions are in shade?
It appears that the circled region is in a gully or canyon. If so, this would explain the lack of a big plume: The walls would have captured or concealed most of it.

Posted by: John Williams | October 19, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Read Dark Mission by Richard Hoagland, former NASA and CBS space consultant… There IS ice on the moon, and more…

Posted by: jafo | October 19, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

“‘There is a clear indication of a plume of vapor and fine debris,’ said Colaprete.” The resolution of Mr. Colaprete’s photo must be much better than the one posted here. There’s no way that I can tell that any of the debris plume is vapor. Or was the impact fast enough to guarantee vaporizing rock and other normally solid material?

Posted by: Publius | October 19, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Note from Ned Potter–
Hello. Let me add a couple of details, especially in light of good questions raised by John Williams and Publius.
John, you’re right — in the image you’re looking almost straight down at Cabeus crater, near the lunar south pole. It was chosen because it’s believed to be deep enough, and the sun angle is always shallow enough, that the floor of the crater is always in shadow. The image would make a lot more sense if the sunlit surface were not completely washed out so that they could show what’s in the darkness.
Publius, your skepticism is well-placed. After the impact Colaprete said the visual images would not be key to finding water, whether as ice or vapor. Instead, they’re looking at spectrometer readings, which, by nature, are noisy. He says they’re seeing vapor in them…just not much.

Posted by: Ned Potter | October 19, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

It does at first seem illogical to be trying to “see” an impact plume by purposely sending the probe into a dark hole. But that is where they thought the ice would most likely be, and the most important data was to be collected by the second probe, not by the cameras. That is why we don’t know how successful it was yet. These things take time to analyze.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 19, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

The thing is not a failure because it didn’t kick up a visible plume. It’s a failure if it doesn’t return data that can be used in determining the existance of water on the moon, or any other useful information.

Posted by: Robert Smith | October 19, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

DARK MISSON!

Posted by: Bill Matthews | October 20, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.