Mar 13, 2010 1:44pm

Is Technology Taking Its Toll on Our Relationships?

AUSTIN, Texas 

Is social media making us too social? Maybe so. 

During this year's South by Southwest Interactive conference, which is taking place this week in Austin, Texas (think geeks galore gushing about tech start-ups, social networking sites and the next Twitter), a panel of academics and social media experts took a look at what technology is doing to our personal relationships.

One of the points they raised is that we’re starting to reach a limit on how many “friendships” we can maintain. “We’re starting to max out the number of people that we can connect with,” said Matthew S. Weber, a senior researcher and doctoral candidate at the Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism at the University of Southern California. “Great that you have a 1,000 friends on Facebook, but you really can’t maintain those relationships and maintain those contacts.”

Highlighting research by Robin Dunbar, a professor of evolutionary anthropology at Oxford University, Weber said that according to “Dunbar’s Number” human brains can really only handle 150 friendships.

Dunbar initially came up with this number in the 1990s, but recently repeated the research to consider social networking sites. You may have 1,000s of friends, but according to that research, you can only have meaningful friendships with a much smaller group. (Incidentally, Facebook says that the average user has 130 friends.)

Corinne Weisgerber, another panelist and assistant professor of communication at St. Edward’s University in Austin, agreed that people are reaching a limit. “I think in the research we’ve seen there’s the question of time displacement,” she said, meaning the time you spend chatting, IM-ing, friending and tweeting with people online takes away from face-to-face conversations and activities.

The panelists also took a look a technology’s affect on romance. Ashley Brown, a marketing manager for an Austin-based higher education start-up called Classhive, said that she believes technology is “completely degrading” the way we communicate romance.

Given all the information that exists about each person online – from their Facebook profiles to Twitter updates – Brown said technology leapfrogs couples three months and has made the blind date practically obsolete.

But others thought that could be a good thing. “You kind of skip some of the crap early on,” said Jenn Deering Davis, co-founder and chief of community experience at Appozite, an Austin-based software start-up.

Weisberger added that online information complicates romance. It may be helpful to research potential dates and get the skinny on them before meeting them face to face, but it can also set up expectations.

As for how technology is changing work relationships, the panelists said that though people are working longer hours because of technology, workplace satisfaction surveys indicate that people are actually happier because they have more flexibility.

Weber cited recent research from the U.K.’s Nectar business, a business rewards program, which found that BlackBerrys add 10 extra work days each year.

– Ki Mae Heussner

User Comments

Yes, technology is taking a toll on our ability to communicate. The more we rely on technology to “reach out and touch someone,” the less we are able to engage one another in face-to-face communication.
More than 75% of pedestrians, diners in restaurants, even drivers, are oblivious to their surroundings, including companions because they’re engaged in talking on their cell phones, texting, or glued to their laptops.
As individuals, we need to take a breather away from all these devices, smell the flowers, enjoy a face-to-face conversation without tweeting, texting, IMing or talking on an electronic device.

Posted by: Arlene Nidel | March 13, 2010, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Wow, profound statement: there is a limit in how many friends one can have. 150 friends is the maximum. Really, if you have a family and kids you can maintain friendships with 150 people? Just do the math.. That would come out to a couple of hours total/year with each one of the 150 friends, if you are lucky. If that is the definition of “friendship”, then I’d say that you are really distorting the meaning of the word.

Posted by: David | March 13, 2010, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Arlene is right. These are NOT friendships we are talking about. Most of your 150 friends on FaceBook are opportunistic folks who link to you just in case you can be useful to them one day. It goes the other way around, of course. Facebook should come up with a new word. How about simply calling them “links”? I have 150 links. Not friends.

Posted by: David | March 13, 2010, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

In the speed of today’s just-in-time relationships, fueled by the frenetic social media rat race that lures into keeping up with the Jones online, I’ve tried to find ways to bring forward a piece of myself.
The era of informercial and let it all be about me pretending to be about others will wear thin. In its place are tremendous opportunities for us to share who and how we are. The shortest distance between two people is a story.
I am enamored by the ease with which we can synthesize media assets and create compelling video snippets. I’ve been playing with 2 minute videos that reflect me, allow me to build relationships with others, and model story-based communication techniques that I feel are critical for our future. Speed of conversation does not equal speed of real relationship. Imagination and time are still at the core. Stories open the door.
Here’s a link to my latest 2 minute video on Organizational Duels:
http://www.vimeo.com/10105428

Posted by: Terrence Gargiulo | March 14, 2010, 1:41 am 1:41 am

I think that in this day and age, we are getting a much greater quantity of communication, so much in fact that it is degrading the QUALITY of it. For anyone who studies Human Communication (my major in college), it’s easy to see why romantic realtionships are being sped up. You can get all the basic info on someone (lifestyle, likes/dislikes, religion, background stories, political views etc.) just by looking at a page online. Before, this took a lot of facetime. I have to wonder if this increase in the speed of relationships is healthy. My honest view is that modern technology, at least on some level, is harmful to the quality of human relationships. Yes, it allows us to send more messages back and forth, but (I believe) that those messages are of lower quality. Don’t want to sound like a Luddite, but I think we would be better off without a lot of this stuff…

Posted by: Chuck | March 14, 2010, 5:29 am 5:29 am

I couldn’t possibly keep up with anywhere close to 150 friends. I mean, not with any degree at all of sincerity.
Yes, there are some people that I don’t want to lose touch with, so I dash off an e-mail to them three or four times per year, but I don’t consider those *friends*.
I would say I actually have time to maintain maybe a dozen true *friends* in my life.

Posted by: JaylahPriest | March 14, 2010, 6:16 am 6:16 am

I HOPE THE ADVANTAGE AT COMMUNICATION TECNOLOGY WILL HELP FOR MORE QUALITY,NUMBER OF HUMANITY REALATIONSHIP.

Posted by: helmyelsaid | March 14, 2010, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Overall, yes, technology is replacing part of our lives.
But I think the slant of the article -that it gives us too many relationships- is less of a problem than the time removed from maintaining our closest relationships.
It does allow us to connect more. Someone requested me as a friend on Facebook, and when I checked out her friends, I recognized an old friend of mine among them. As a result, I’m going to a cookout at the horse farm he runs in a few weeks!

Posted by: The_Mick | March 14, 2010, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Exactly. I know people who add people as friends simply because they met them once. I may have met you but I don’t see why we should be able to spy on eachother the rest of our lives.

Posted by: Pete | March 14, 2010, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

If you have 150 Facebook “friends” (and let’s even assume you haven’t gotten into Twitter yet, or even all those incredibly time-wasted “games” on Facebook that your “friends” are always posting invitations to play on your wall) when do you have time to even have a life, let alone any face-to-face time with your *real* friends? All you have time for is to sit at your computer and check out what all of your “friends” are posting.
And I never will even log into Twitter, let alone sign up for an account there.
I’m not interested in knowing what anybody is doing every moment of the day, and I’m not going to bore anybody else with a blow-by-blow account of my day, either.

Posted by: JaylahPriest | March 15, 2010, 8:47 am 8:47 am

I agree with Chuck. I am 24 and because of my age a lot of people just assume that I have a facebook page and stuff but I don’t. I guess I am more traditional, ecspecially when it comes to dating and relationships. I think a lot of todays’ tech is getting out of hand and it’s only going to get worse. It is hard to really get to know a person anymore. It’s good to read posts like this and know I’m not the only one out there that feels this way. Everyone gets so wrapped up in the newest tech trends that they are consumed by it before they know it.

Posted by: Dave | November 10, 2010, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.