Gulf Oil Spill: Brace for Hurricane Season
As if people along the Gulf of Mexico didn't have enough to worry about, researchers at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory in Mississippi have crunched some numbers and warn that passing hurricanes — the season begins next week, and NOAA predicted today it will be “active to extremely active” — could snap undersea oil pipelines in ways never before estimated.
Most of us think of hurricanes as violent storms in the atmosphere. But Hemantha Wijesekera and her colleagues looked at data from Hurricane Ivan in 2004 — a category-4 storm, the tenth most intense on record — and found it was scouring the gulf floor as much as 90 meters (300 feet) beneath the surface.
This matters because of the network of pipes and cables that connect offshore rigs in the gulf to the mainland. There are 31,000 miles of pipelines snaking across the floor of the gulf, according the American Geophysical Union.
Wijeskera et al, writing in Geophysical Research Letters for publication on June 10, say the undersea force of the storm was considerable.
"During the passage of Ivan, the bottom stress was highly correlated with the wind with a maximum of about 40 percent of the wind stress," they say. "The bottom stress was dominated by the wave-induced stresses, and exceeded critical levels at depths as large as 90 m. Surprisingly, the bottom damaging stress persisted after the passage of Ivan for about a week, and was modulated by near-Inertial waves."
The paper was submitted for publication in March, well before the Deepwater Horizon crisis began on April 20, but it will become one more factor to consider in the debate over offshore drilling.
I traded e-mails a couple of weeks ago with Mark Bourassa, a meteorologist at Florida State University who studies the transfer of energy between the ocean and atmosphere, and he said a hurricane in the gulf could make a mess of cleanup efforts.
"It would generate lots of relatively large waves, which will make booms less effective even far away from the storm — how far depends on the strength of the storm," he wrote. "It will also spread the oil over a much larger area.
"However, rougher seas will also mix the oil, taking some of it off the surface and increasing the surface area of the oil," he said.
Would the presence of a large oil slick have an effect on a hurricane's strength or path? Not likely, said Bourassa, but it's a complicated issue. It is possible, he said, that a slick could trap heat — the fuel of a tropical cyclone — in the water beneath it.
"If the oil does trap a lot of heat, and if a very slow-moving storm enters the Gulf and generates lots of waves to mix up the oil, then we could have a very bad situation!"
(Satellite image of Hurricane Ivan in 2004. Courtesy NOAA.)
Email
Steve Jobs' FBI File: Bomb Threat?
Steve Jobs' FBI File Released 




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Looks like mother nature has a plan for cleaning up that oil.
Posted by: rightbehind | May 27, 2010, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
I can just see a hurricane sucking up the oily water and spraying it at 100 MPH onto land. A thin sheen of oil all over everything.
Posted by: KsDevil | May 27, 2010, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Looks like global warming is alive and well.
Posted by: Jim Bob | May 27, 2010, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
You know, alot of times they come out with these predictions and it doesn’t ever happen. Call me a skeptic but I find it hard to believe they can predict how many hurricanes we’re gonna have when the weathermen cant even accurately predict the weather a week out.
Posted by: houstonative | May 27, 2010, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
I am appalled by how little US media companies have said to call the attention of average Americans to their own complicity in creating the conditions for this catastrophic oil well blowout in the Mexican Gulf.
We consume more petroleum, per capita, than any nation on earth. And we are the most resistant to change in this vitally important habit.
Stop blaming BP. Look in the mirror — or better yet, look in your own garage. What do you see?
Posted by: Maria Ashot | May 27, 2010, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
How come the media is not coming down on Obama Admin in this crisis the way they came down on Bush for Katrina? At least Bush tried to get the Fed troops in early, only to be turned away by a mentally challenged governor who “didn’t want the Republicans to make them look bad”.
Posted by: Bill | May 27, 2010, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
you know i think its some crap that things are bing hadled the way they are with this iol spill. i think its the companies fault for not making sure they were up to date with safety. Alos i beleive the rig explosion was done purposly. but thats just my opinion.
Posted by: DF | May 27, 2010, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
another thing, the government is some crap too but they could be doing alot more to get this spill stopped and cleaned up. i mean really almost two months now and its still flowing like all h*&^. rediculous.
Posted by: DF | May 27, 2010, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
Prediction of weather/climate events is not a perfect science. If by that you mean we can say with certainty that “this will happen on this day at this time”. That being said computer models combined with current data and the expertise and common sense of specialists/scientists are quite good at making estimates of what we can expect in terms of weather/climate in specific areas and time periods. Witness Mark Fischetti’s prediction of the Katrina disaster (Scientific American, Oct 2001). We ignore those predictions at our own peril.
Posted by: Robert Brown | May 28, 2010, 9:01 am 9:01 am
During Bush administration do as you please originated by republican majority, oil companies knows best no regulation. Besides all the finger pointing we have a situation that can become very dangerous, a hurricane in the golf picking up water and oil as it churns, coating everything on land with an oil slick, if a fire breaks out oil fires are hard to handle water only spreads it around, do we have the chemicals to control a devastating fire? Second guess pipelines and cables all over the gulf under water a place that is hard to Fix if such as we have a now situation, worse case in point we could have coast line like no other in the World. The last say so as to the regulatory should been representatives keen responsibility, it all comes home to roost, what a tangled web they wove and have been found out, what lobby money bought us, and in it goes.
Posted by: joseph ryder | May 28, 2010, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Has anyone else put together two and two yet regarding spiraling tower of oil and water combined with lightning? Or for that matter, oil sprayed all over the path combined with lightning?
Potentially, a very exciting hurricane season to say the least. Ooh ooh, I call first on referring to it as a biblical plague if New Orleans gets hit by fire from the sky just a few years after the flood.
Posted by: Specs | May 28, 2010, 10:29 am 10:29 am
I can just see a hurricane sucking up the oily water and spraying it at 100 MPH onto land. A thin sheen of oil all over everything.
Posted by: uggboots canada | May 30, 2010, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
These last two comments echo something I’ve wondered about since the beginnings of this disaster. Since, as I understand them, hurricanes act like huge water pumps, running on warm Gulf water, is seems that a big storm could effectively siphon up crude-laden seawater and rain it down for hundreds of miles inland, poisoning water supplies and farmlands, not to mention possibly rendering cities uninhabitable by covering them in toxic crude.
Posted by: Mark | May 31, 2010, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm