Aug 17, 2010 3:40pm

Saving Energy in All the Wrong Places

Scientists, political leaders and environmentalists exhort people to save energy — and apparently, according to a survey from Columbia University's Center for Research on Environmental Decisions, have done a terrible job of telling people how best to do it.

Shahzeen Attari of Columbia's Earth Institute and three colleagues surveyed 505 Americans, and asked them how to protect the environment, reduce our need for foreign oil, save money and all that. The number one answer: "turn the lights off."

Wrong, says Attari, citing several lists of recommendations.  You don't have to sit in the dark, or turn off the air conditioner, she says. You can do the same things more efficiently and, in the long run, less expensively — but people haven't gotten the message.

In the survey, published in this week's Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 19.6 percent of those surveyed said "turn off lights," while only 3.6 percent said "use efficient light bulbs."  Likewise, 12.9 percent said "drive less," while 2.8 percent said "use efficient cars/hybrids."  The full paper is HERE.

"Relative to experts’ recommendations, participants were overly focused on curtailment rather than efficiency, possibly because efficiency improvements almost always involve research, effort, and out-of-pocket costs (e.g., buying a new energy-efficient appliance), whereas curtailment may be easier to imagine and incorporate into one’s daily behaviors without any upfront costs," the researchers write.

Americans have been misled into thinking that efficiency means sacrifice (remember Jimmy Carter's sweater?).  Sure, says Attari, every little bit helps — but over time, she says, a new refrigerator will save you a lot more than unplugging your cell-phone charger. 

User Comments

You’er not telling me much either.

Posted by: Crystal | August 18, 2010, 9:38 am 9:38 am

Of course energy is saved by both doing less AND being more efficient, but the point is that we can use a lot less energy without significant sacrifice. “Sacrifice” still helps, but people can help with without it as well.
One of the reasons for the misunderstanding is the propaganda campaign from free market idealogous, climate deniers, and other corporate interests. They want people to believe that energy reform means “making us all live in caves.” This is somehow supposed to discredit all calls for energy efficiency and conservation as well as alernative energy initiatives.

Posted by: Jock59801 | August 18, 2010, 11:27 am 11:27 am

It is obvious and must to save energy in whatever way we can, because we are suffering from Global Warming as we are seeing different weather every year that we were not facing previously. Energy, Water, Food etc things should be saved by each one wherever possible.

Posted by: ecommerce web design | August 19, 2010, 9:29 am 9:29 am

Changing old appliances does work! Changed to new washer and dryer and a new freezer at the end of last year, guess what? 135$ of saved electricity in less than 6 months! Can’t wait for the annual total saved!

Posted by: Moradin | August 23, 2010, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

I know the EV1 was not the panacea for electric vehicles. It was the Wright flyer of electric vehicles. But did the Wright Brothers burn up the Wright flyer because it only flew a few hundred feet? No they refined it until today we have commercial aircraft that fly close to the speed of sound. What did GM do with the EV1? They killed it and crushed any remaining vehicles. If GM ever does build another electric vehicle, I won’t buy one. I will buy a Japanese electric vehicle because they mean business. Theodore (Ted) Sumrall

Posted by: Theodore (Ted) Sumrall | August 24, 2010, 12:30 am 12:30 am

I think the third world war will break out one day because energy has become so scarce.

Posted by: Maverick Money Makers Review | August 28, 2010, 9:54 am 9:54 am

I bet that in the study the dolts that said “turn off the lights” proceeded to their second answer “not have children” and therefore won’t procreate so these kind of #1 answers will subside over time

Posted by: Birddog | September 8, 2010, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

This is somehow supposed to discredit all calls for energy efficiency and conservation as well as alernative energy initiatives.

Posted by: hermeselling | October 18, 2010, 7:34 am 7:34 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.