Comments on: The ‘God Particle’: ‘Tantalising Hints’ of Higgs Boson Seen by CERN Physicists http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2011/12/the-god-particle-search-for-higgs-boson-narrowed-by-cern-physicists/ The latest Technology news and blog posts from ABC News contributors and bloggers. Fri, 17 May 2013 23:48:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Dan http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2011/12/the-god-particle-search-for-higgs-boson-narrowed-by-cern-physicists/#comment-1498162 Dan Thu, 08 Mar 2012 03:17:20 +0000 http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/?p=34072#comment-1498162 ...and if it doesn't exist, how will they prove that? …and if it doesn’t exist, how will they prove that?

]]> By: Michael http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2011/12/the-god-particle-search-for-higgs-boson-narrowed-by-cern-physicists/#comment-1328622 Michael Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:47:57 +0000 http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/?p=34072#comment-1328622 Bob your exactly right. If the only answer you need are those given to you with no facts or evidence then What if i told you my skin was purple. You would just believe it because you had no proof against it . Also, I don't know how you could try to combine science and religion whoever wrote the Quran quotes. Bob your exactly right. If the only answer you need are those given to you with no facts or evidence then What if i told you my skin was purple. You would just believe it because you had no proof against it . Also, I don’t know how you could try to combine science and religion whoever wrote the Quran quotes.

]]> By: B-K KnightRider http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2011/12/the-god-particle-search-for-higgs-boson-narrowed-by-cern-physicists/#comment-884862 B-K KnightRider Sat, 31 Dec 2011 19:30:25 +0000 http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/?p=34072#comment-884862 Bob Roscoe: “So, I say continue in your pursuit of finding no new answers for the answer that has existed for thousands of years…” - - - Wow. So your god is a liar. If God created the universe only about six thousand years ago then that means God faked all of the evidence that indicates the universe is ancient, on the order of about 14.5B years ancient. If your god deceived us by faking all evidence of ancient age then means your god is a liar. Furthermore, if God could deceive us by faking all evidence of ancient age before six thousand years ago, then how do you know that God didn’t just create the universe last Thursday at 0700 GMT and then fake all evidence of everything/history prior to that time, including our memories and records of events prior to that time? Bob Roscoe: “So, I say continue in your pursuit of finding no new answers for the answer that has existed for thousands of years…” – - – Wow. So your god is a liar. If God created the universe only about six thousand years ago then that means God faked all of the evidence that indicates the universe is ancient, on the order of about 14.5B years ancient. If your god deceived us by faking all evidence of ancient age then means your god is a liar. Furthermore, if God could deceive us by faking all evidence of ancient age before six thousand years ago, then how do you know that God didn’t just create the universe last Thursday at 0700 GMT and then fake all evidence of everything/history prior to that time, including our memories and records of events prior to that time?

]]> By: B-K KnightRider http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2011/12/the-god-particle-search-for-higgs-boson-narrowed-by-cern-physicists/#comment-884792 B-K KnightRider Sat, 31 Dec 2011 19:21:31 +0000 http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/?p=34072#comment-884792 Bob Roscoe: “The answers to these questions lie in the fact that evolutionist rely heavily on assumptions. It is assumed that such and such has taken place at least once “because here we are”. There is no real “science” that backs these assumptions, only wide eyed speculators who deny the very existence of the One who knows the beginning from the end.” - - - ROFLMAO. This ludicrous statement clearly illustrates you don’t understand the first thing about science in general or evolution in particular. And your last sentence is patently false. Not everyone who believes in evolution is an atheist. Christians and the followers of other religions who ALSO believe in evolution don’t deny “the One,” they/we only deny childishly simplistic and mindlessly irrational literal interpretation of scripture. - - - Bob Roscoe: “’“Evolution is unproved and unprovable. We believe it only because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable.’ A Quote from Sir Arthur Keith (he wrote the forward to the 100th anniversary edition of Darwin’s book, Origin of Species in 1959).” - - - And that proves what exactly? That Sir Keith was an idiot? Okay, I am fine with that. Bob Roscoe: “The answers to these questions lie in the fact that evolutionist rely heavily on assumptions. It is assumed that such and such has taken place at least once “because here we are”. There is no real “science” that backs these assumptions, only wide eyed speculators who deny the very existence of the One who knows the beginning from the end.” – - – ROFLMAO. This ludicrous statement clearly illustrates you don’t understand the first thing about science in general or evolution in particular. And your last sentence is patently false. Not everyone who believes in evolution is an atheist. Christians and the followers of other religions who ALSO believe in evolution don’t deny “the One,” they/we only deny childishly simplistic and mindlessly irrational literal interpretation of scripture. – - – Bob Roscoe: “’“Evolution is unproved and unprovable. We believe it only because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable.’ A Quote from Sir Arthur Keith (he wrote the forward to the 100th anniversary edition of Darwin’s book, Origin of Species in 1959).” – - – And that proves what exactly? That Sir Keith was an idiot? Okay, I am fine with that.

]]> By: B-K KnightRider http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2011/12/the-god-particle-search-for-higgs-boson-narrowed-by-cern-physicists/#comment-884762 B-K KnightRider Sat, 31 Dec 2011 19:11:02 +0000 http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/?p=34072#comment-884762 Bob Roscoe: “This is a simple matter of grasping for particles. Nothing has been solved nor discovered that will shed any more light on the evolutionist’s fairytale.” - - - ROFLMAO. What on earth does subatomic particle physics have to do with evolution? One has nothing to do with the other. Talk about tossing out an irrelevant red herring. You do understand that biology and physics are two different natural sciences, right? - - - Bob Roscoe: “There had to be a first cause. “ - - - Why? Just because you say so? - - - Bob Roscoe: “This particle is comprised of non-life elements. How did life begin from non-life?” - - - We don’t know yet and we have not had millions of years to figure that out. Science is fine with admitting we don’t know something. That is the whole point of science - to figure out the answers to the things in nature we don’t know and don’t fully understand. Oh, that is also another pointless red herring because subatomic particle physics has nothing to do with abiogenesis. Again, physics and biology are two different scientific fields. - - - Bob Roscoe: “5) Where did the laws that govern the behavior patterns of these particles come from? There had to be a law giver.” - - - Why? Even if true, maybe the Big Bang was the law giver’s natural process for creating and developing the universe as we see it according to those natural laws, and maybe evolution is the law giver’s natural process for developing life according to those natural laws. Bob Roscoe: “This is a simple matter of grasping for particles. Nothing has been solved nor discovered that will shed any more light on the evolutionist’s fairytale.” – - – ROFLMAO. What on earth does subatomic particle physics have to do with evolution? One has nothing to do with the other. Talk about tossing out an irrelevant red herring. You do understand that biology and physics are two different natural sciences, right? – - – Bob Roscoe: “There had to be a first cause. “ – - – Why? Just because you say so? – - – Bob Roscoe: “This particle is comprised of non-life elements. How did life begin from non-life?” – - – We don’t know yet and we have not had millions of years to figure that out. Science is fine with admitting we don’t know something. That is the whole point of science – to figure out the answers to the things in nature we don’t know and don’t fully understand. Oh, that is also another pointless red herring because subatomic particle physics has nothing to do with abiogenesis. Again, physics and biology are two different scientific fields. – - – Bob Roscoe: “5) Where did the laws that govern the behavior patterns of these particles come from? There had to be a law giver.” – - – Why? Even if true, maybe the Big Bang was the law giver’s natural process for creating and developing the universe as we see it according to those natural laws, and maybe evolution is the law giver’s natural process for developing life according to those natural laws.

]]> By: madiha http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2011/12/the-god-particle-search-for-higgs-boson-narrowed-by-cern-physicists/#comment-829362 madiha Sun, 25 Dec 2011 13:38:55 +0000 http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/?p=34072#comment-829362 “Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, then We separated them, and made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe?” (Quran 21:30) “And the heaven We created with might, and indeed We are (its) expander.” (Quran 51:47) God teaches us in Islam about the big bang theory and expansion of the universe 14 centuries ago. “Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, then We separated them, and made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe?” (Quran 21:30)

“And the heaven We created with might, and indeed We are (its) expander.” (Quran 51:47)

God teaches us in Islam about the big bang theory and expansion of the universe 14 centuries ago.

]]> By: Bob Roscoe http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2011/12/the-god-particle-search-for-higgs-boson-narrowed-by-cern-physicists/#comment-724372 Bob Roscoe Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:32:44 +0000 http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/?p=34072#comment-724372 This is a simple matter of grasping for particles. Nothing has been solved nor discovered that will shed any more light on the evolutionist’s fairytale. The Higgs Boson theroy still does not even attempt to answer several very important questions (not in any particular order and there are many more): 1) Where did this particle come from? There had to be a first cause. 2) Where did the energy come from to put this particle in motion? Energy cannot be created or destroyed. 3) How did at least two of these particles come to be at the same time, at the same point in history, and on the same identical opposite paths racing towards each other at precisely the same trajectory? 4) This particle is comprised of non-life elements. How did life begin from non-life? 5) Where did the laws that govern the behavior patterns of these particles come from? There had to be a law giver. The answers to these questions lie in the fact that evolutionist rely heavily on assumptions. It is assumed that such and such has taken place at least once “because here we are”. There is no real “science” that backs these assumptions, only wide eyed speculators who deny the very existence of the One who knows the beginning from the end. “Evolution is unproved and unprovable. We believe it only because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable.” A Quote from Sir Arthur Keith (he wrote the forward to the 100th anniversary edition of Darwin’s book, Origin of Species in 1959). So, I say continue in your pursuit of finding no new answers for the answer that has existed for thousands of years, “By faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that the things which are seen were not made of things which are visible.” (Hebrews 11:3) This is a simple matter of grasping for particles. Nothing has been solved nor discovered that will shed any more light on the evolutionist’s fairytale. The Higgs Boson theroy still does not even attempt to answer several very important questions (not in any particular order and there are many more): 1) Where did this particle come from? There had to be a first cause. 2) Where did the energy come from to put this particle in motion? Energy cannot be created or destroyed. 3) How did at least two of these particles come to be at the same time, at the same point in history, and on the same identical opposite paths racing towards each other at precisely the same trajectory? 4) This particle is comprised of non-life elements. How did life begin from non-life? 5) Where did the laws that govern the behavior patterns of these particles come from? There had to be a law giver. The answers to these questions lie in the fact that evolutionist rely heavily on assumptions. It is assumed that such and such has taken place at least once “because here we are”. There is no real “science” that backs these assumptions, only wide eyed speculators who deny the very existence of the One who knows the beginning from the end.
“Evolution is unproved and unprovable. We believe it only because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable.” A Quote from Sir Arthur Keith (he wrote the forward to the 100th anniversary edition of Darwin’s book, Origin of Species in 1959).
So, I say continue in your pursuit of finding no new answers for the answer that has existed for thousands of years, “By faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that the things which are seen were not made of things which are visible.” (Hebrews 11:3)

]]> By: B-K KnightRider http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2011/12/the-god-particle-search-for-higgs-boson-narrowed-by-cern-physicists/#comment-723142 B-K KnightRider Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:41:30 +0000 http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/?p=34072#comment-723142 DAVE G: "God said in Genisis Let there be light, thus the Big Bang." - - - EXACTLY DAVE G: “God said in Genisis Let there be light, thus the Big Bang.” – - – EXACTLY

]]> By: Dave G. http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2011/12/the-god-particle-search-for-higgs-boson-narrowed-by-cern-physicists/#comment-719702 Dave G. Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:11:36 +0000 http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/?p=34072#comment-719702 God said in Genisis Let there be light, thus the Big Bang. God said in Genisis Let there be light, thus the Big Bang.

]]> By: B-K KnightRider http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2011/12/the-god-particle-search-for-higgs-boson-narrowed-by-cern-physicists/#comment-715892 B-K KnightRider Wed, 14 Dec 2011 01:32:46 +0000 http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/?p=34072#comment-715892 SIMON DANNIE: "The so called BigBang theory is STILL a theory." - - - Okay, so what? The theory of gravity is STILL just a theory. What alternative explanation to the Big Bang do you have for what we observe and what evidence or rational reasons do you have to support your alternative? SIMON DANNIE: “The so called BigBang theory is STILL a theory.” – - – Okay, so what? The theory of gravity is STILL just a theory. What alternative explanation to the Big Bang do you have for what we observe and what evidence or rational reasons do you have to support your alternative?

]]>