The votes have not yet been counted in Tuesday's special election, but five of the six measures intended to pull California out of its budget catastrophe are expected to go down in defeat today.
California's persistently large deficit -- which is currently estimated to be at least $15.4 billion -- and voter anger at Sacramento, has led more and more of the state's leaders to think that some kind of fundamental reform is needed of the state's budget process.
Among them is Bob Hertzberg, a former Democratic speaker of the California State Assembly who heads a reform group that calls itself California Forward. The group has laid out a series of steps it said would be a major government overhaul.
"We're not just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic," Hertzberg told ABC News. "Frustration is higher than it's ever been. California Forward is putting together a package of reforms. We're building support inside and outside of Sacramento. And our goal is to get it on the November 2010 ballot."
California politicos are weighing wholesale reform, according to Hertzberg, because Sacramento is facing a crisis of governance which extends beyond its current budget shortfall, a deficit which is expected to grow to $21.3 billion if Tuesday's ballot measures are rejected.
California Forward is seeking a series of reforms. Possibilities for the final package include:
Changing the state's vote requirement to pass a budget from two-thirds to 50 percent plus one.
Instituting multi-year budgeting while encouraging the legislature to engage in oversight during the off-year.
Reforming the state's tax system to make it more stable and business-friendly.
Implementing pay-as-you go rules.
Limiting the ability of Democrats to label higher taxes fees.
Tightening rules on lobbyists.
Increasing the size of the state's rainy day fund.
Easing the state's term limits so that legislators could serve a total of 12 years in either the Assembly or state Senate.
Making the state's governor and lieutenant governor run together on the same ticket rather than being elected independently as they are now.
"If you look at the ying and the yang, and the checks and the balances of this stuff, there is some architecture here that is the basis for a deal," Hertzberg told the Sacramento Press Club recently.
California is one of 14 states to require initiatives to focus on no more than one subject. To get around this "single-subject rule," Hertzberg is selling his package to the state's legislative leaders as a constitutional revision.
The downside of this approach is that it must first receive a two-thirds vote of the legislature.
The upside, in Hertzberg's view, is that a constitutional revision can go to the voters as one package rather than as a series of individual ballot measures as is the case in Tuesday's special election.