Immigration Reform: Where we Stand Today

PHOTO: Immigration reform rally

The loud kerfuffle over the heavy-handed IRS and post-Benghazi spin has had one positive effect: immigration reform is quietly moving ahead under the cable noise and political posturing of dysfunctional Washington.

Both houses of Congress are now expected to have bills ready to debate by the fall session. The bipartisan Senate "gang of 8" appears to be holding together and its broad outline of border security, pathway to citizenship, guest worker, employment verification and legal immigration future flow moves through committee largely intact.

The Senate Judiciary Committee has completed its third day of hearings of the sweeping immigration bill and so far the original architecture of the bill has held strong.

The four "gang of 8" members on the committee, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), have stuck together for the most part to maintain the integrity of their original bill.

Border security and E-verify amendments to the bill have been completed, as well as most of the amendments addressing non-immigrant visas.

There have been some changes, however. Sen. Chuck Grassley's (R-Iowa) amendment which calls for border security strategies to apply to all nine border sectors, not just the "high risk" ones identified in the original bill, passed.

Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.) also passed a bill on border security that restricts drones' ability to fly more than three miles from the border in San Diego and El Centro sectors, a smaller section compared to the 100 miles counted as "border" in the original bill.

"Their (drones) ability to see from great distances and for real time precision is extraordinary," she said. "My view is it is moving so quickly… don't want them looking in windows of people's homes or backyards."

The E-verify system, a program that makes all employers enforce immigration laws by confirming the employee status, stayed largely intact. An amendment by Grassley failed that would have enforced the system within 18 months of the bill's passage, instead of the four years outlined in originally.

"We all want E-Verify to work as quickly as possible. The problem is, it would be virtually impossible to have it work in 18 months," Schumer said. "The system is going to have to add in 5 million employers because, as we all know, it is not mandatory right now…Right now it can handle about 180,000 registrations a year, so you can imagine the burden of 5 million."

  • 1
  • |
  • 2
Join the Discussion
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like...