Judge rules against Stacey Abrams' voting rights lawsuit
In a blow to Democrat Stacey Abrams and her allies, less than 40 days until the 2022 midterm elections, a federal judge has upheld Georgia's election laws in "what is believed to have been the longest voting rights bench trial in the history of the Northern District of Georgia."
"Although Georgia's election system is not perfect, the challenged practices violate neither the constitution nor the Voting Rights Act," U.S. District Judge Steve Jones wrote in the ruling.
The case, filed by Fair Fight Action shortly after Abrams' 2018 loss, targeted Georgia's policies on absentee ballot cancellations, "exact match," and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger's management of voter rolls. "Exact match" policies suspended a person's voting status if there were inconsistencies between their voter registration form and identification. The plaintiffs argued this was racially discriminatory because most voters affected were Black.
"The court finds that the burden on voters is relatively low," Jones wrote about the "exact match" measure. "Here, plaintiffs have not provided direct evidence of a voter who was unable to vote, experienced longer wait times, was confused about voter registration status."
Abrams said the decision was "not the preferred outcome" but represented a "hard-won victory" for Black and brown voters.
"This case and the public engagement on these issues have had measurable results: the reinstatement of over 22,000 ballots, substantive changes to voting laws, and a platform for voters of color to demand greater equity in our state," her statement read.
Out on the campaign trail, Abrams continues to defend her refusal to concede in 2018, often saying that Brian Kemp, a Republican who was then serving as secretary of state, created barriers for people to vote when he was serving as Secretary of State, which is why she did not win the election.
Meanwhile, Gov. Kemp took a victory lap following Friday's decision.
"From day one, Abrams has used this lawsuit to line her pockets, sow distrust in our democratic institutions, and build her own celebrity. Judge Jones' ruling exposes this legal effort for what it really is: a tool wielded by a politician hoping to wrongfully weaponize the legal system to further her own political goals," Kemp said in a statement.
-- ABC News' Lalee Ibssa