Post office defends on claims that cuts threaten election

Officials from six states and the District of Columbia have asked a federal judge to halt what they say are slowdowns at the U.S. Postal Service that threaten the upcoming presidential election

The latest hearing on the issue took place in federal court in Philadelphia, where the attorneys general from six states and the District of Columbia have sued.

“There was a sharp dip in early July that hasn’t rebounded to where it was, even today,” Deputy Attorney General Aimee D. Thomson of Pennsylvania argued.

Judges in Washington state and New York have issued emergency orders this month in similar cases. The others states involved in Thursday's hearing are California, Delaware, Maine, Massachusetts and North Carolina.

Thomson said the evidence shows a slowdown order came from headquarters this summer after Postmaster General Louis DeJoy took over the service.

Lawyers for the Postal Service say headquarters never ordered a slowdown or overtime ban. However, upon questioning from the judge, they conceded that local postal managers may have misconstrued the guidance from Washington and thought the stated goal of reducing overtime was actually a mandate.

The state officials said that on-time delivery of first-class mail fell 10% from July to August, aggravating and even endangering customers who rely on mail delivery for food, medications and other essentials.

They said the cuts also threaten the integrity of the upcoming election, given the expected widespread use of mail-in ballots across the country.

U.S. District Judge Gerald A. McHugh Jr. did not immediately rule.

And last week, U.S. District Judge Stanley Bastian in Yakima, Washington, ordered an end to postal practices nationwide that slowed mail delivery since July, saying 14 states had made a “strong showing” that the Trump administration was using the Postal Service “as a tool in partisan politics.”

———

The headline on this story has been corrected to note that the post office defended itself against accusations that cuts threaten the presidential election; it did not say cuts threaten the election.