Key players in trial of Chicago cop who killed black teen

Key players in the murder trial of white Chicago police officer Jason Van Dyke include attorney known for defending officers, judge known as stern taskmaster

CHICAGO -- A look at some of the key players in the murder trial of Jason Van Dyke, the white Chicago police officer who was convicted of second-degree murder in October for fatally shooting black teenager Laquan McDonald.



Before the shooting, Jason Van Dyke never saw his name in the paper. Van Dyke, now 40, was just one of the 12,000 Chicago police officers who showed up to work, worked their shifts and went home to his wife, Tiffany, and their two school-age daughters. He also worked a part-time security job. He had been on the force for 13 years when the shooting happened and was automatically kicked off it once he was convicted. According to a database that includes reports from 2002 until 2008 and 2011 until 2015, he was the subject of at least 20 citizen complaints — eight of which alleged excessive force. Though he was never disciplined, a jury did once award $350,000 to a man who filed an excessive force lawsuit against him. In October, a jury found him guilty of second-degree murder in McDonald's death.


It makes perfect sense that Daniel Herbert should specialize in representing police officers in everything from civil rights lawsuits to divorce cases, and for arrests for crimes ranging from drunken driving to murder. A Chicago kid, Herbert got out of college and followed his father into the police department before he got his law degree and joined the Cook County state's attorney's office. When he set out on his own about eight years ago, he contracted with the police officer's union, which has led to a steady stream of cases defending officers.


Every day, Joseph McMahon comes to the courthouse on Chicago's South Side from his home in Kane County, where he is the county's state's attorney. Appointed special prosecutor when then-Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez recused herself and her office from the politically charged case, the career prosecutor strikes a far calmer, less flashy figure in court than Herbert, who routinely verbally spars with the judge. Though he often appears unflappable and his questioning of witnesses is typically a quiet march through the evidence he wants to cover, McMahon has also shown a dramatic side, as he did during his opening statement to jurors when he rapped his knuckles on the lectern once for every shot Van Dyke fired.


Make no mistake about Cook County Judge Vincent Gaughan: He is in charge of Van Dyke's trial. A judge since 1991, the 77-year-old Gaughan is a stern taskmaster, lecturing attorneys for failing to get to the point, spectators for not standing when he takes the bench, and even reporters whom he suspected of sticking chewed gum on the bottom of their seats. He was a decorated soldier in the Vietnam War and as a judge appears fearless, as he has presided over some of the county's biggest trials in recent years.