Russia-Ukraine updates: Putin says war was ‘unleashed’ on Russia

The Russian president delivered his annual Victory Day speech.

More than a year after Russian President Vladimir Putin launched a full-scale invasion of neighboring Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022, the countries are fighting for control of areas in eastern and southern Ukraine.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's forces are readying a spring counteroffensive, but Putin appears to be preparing for a long and bloody war.

For previous coverage, please click here.


0

Ukraine accuses Russia of conducting 'state sponsored kidnapping of children'

Ukraine accused Russia of conducting state-sponsored kidnapping of children, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba said in a statement to the United Nations Security Council on Friday.

"The magnitude of the humanitarian crisis brought on by Russia's aggression against Ukraine cannot be overstated. I would like to highlight here one of numerous horrendous facts - Russia is now implementing in Ukraine probably the largest instance of state sponsored kidnapping of children in history of our modern world," Kuleba said.

-ABC News' Ellie Kaufman


Zelenskyy hopes China will not supply Russia with weapons

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy told reporters he wants to believe China won’t supply Russia with weapons in the ongoing conflict.

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg and U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Thursday that the U.S. and NATO have intelligence that China is getting ready to possibly supply Russia with weapons. China has denied these claims.

Zelenskyy said it is "priority No. 1" for him to prevent China from providing Russia with weapons.

"This is very important. This is priority No. 1 for me and I am doing my best to prevent that from happening. It is important for us," he said.

He added, "I believe China is going to side with the idea of fair peace, peace and fairness which is our side."

-ABC News' Fidel Pavlenko


After a year, is the US strategy to help Ukraine win or force a stalemate?

One year ago, with Ukraine's borders surrounded by what seemed to be a superior military force, many U.S. officials and analysts predicted a swift Russian blitz to Kyiv.

But after Russian President Vladimir Putin sent his more than 150,000 arrayed troops across the border, it soon became clear that a dual reassessment was in order: The Russian invaders were less potent than advertised, and the Ukrainians were unexpectedly stubborn and wily in the defense.

Some of the Russian troops weren’t even aware they were on a combat mission until Ukrainian bullets came cracking past them, according to U.S. officials. Meanwhile, Ukrainian forces stalled a massive Russian supply convoy through direct attacks and by destroying a key bridge. Only one week into the invasion, Putin's men were plagued with food and fuel shortages, morale running similarly low.

Kyiv stood.

"Putin assumed that Ukraine was an easy target, Putin assumed that Kyiv would easily fall, and Putin assumed that the world would stand by," U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin said during a speech in Brussels last week. "But the Kremlin was wrong on every count."

Ukrainian forces were armed with more than grit.

They also had years of U.S. and NATO military training, plus American-made weapons, like anti-armor Javelins and anti-aircraft Stinger missiles. These made Russian vehicles vulnerable to ambush, and left Russian helicopter and jet pilots wary of flying over Ukrainian positions. Indeed, many airmen did not return from their sorties.

Despite astonishing losses of soldiers and vehicles, Putin has shown no inclination to end the conflict anytime soon. And despite its tenacity, Ukraine has also taken significant casualties, and is not able to produce enough of its own weapons and ammunition to keep up the fight.

Ukraine, after thwarting the advance on its capital, and later routing Russian forces from Kharkiv, now largely faces a battle of supply.

"When this war began, Russia had a larger population, a much bigger defense budget, a bigger military, bigger industrial base. So, this became an industrial war and a war of industrial bases," said Seth Jones, director of the International Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "This is why Western industrial support has been so critical."

A key question now is, despite massive military aid packages and a promise to send even more, could the U.S. strategy ultimately result, not in a Ukrainian victory, but a stalemate in a years-long war of attrition?

-ABC News' Matt Seyler


If Ukraine's partners keep their word on aid, Ukraine will 'definitely win,' Zelenskyy says

Asked if he believes in victory, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said his country "definitely" will if fellow nations keep their word about help and aid.

"Luckily, we’re not alone, so all of us should stay focused," Zelenskyy said.

Zelenskyy also said Ukraine has "put forward its peace plan, peace formula," which is "supported by many nations."

Rather than having bilateral peace negotiations, Zelenskyy suggested a "peace forum with participation of many countries from different continents."

"I’d like to see China, India, other countries approving post-war security guarantees," Zelenskyy said.

-ABC News' Fidel Pavlenko


Blinken warns China is 'contemplating lethal assistance' for Russia

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken warned Friday that China is "actively thinking about" providing lethal assistance to Russian forces in war-torn Ukraine.

"We're very concerned that they're thinking about it. Up until now, Chinese companies have provided non-lethal support," Blinken told ABC News' George Stephanopoulos during an interview on "Good Morning America."

"From Day One, President Biden warned President Xi not to provide material lethal assistance to Russia for use against Ukraine or to engage in the systematic evasion of sanctions. And the information we have suggests that they’re now actively thinking about it, which is why we've been public about warning them not to," he added. "It could make a material difference in Russia's capacity on the ground at a time when we want to bring this war to an end, not add fuel to the fire and have it continue."

The U.S. government has "shared a lot of information with other countries, with allies and partners," regarding the fact that China is now considering lethal assistance, according to Blinken.

"We always have to get the balance right between making sure that we're protecting the way we get our information and releasing it," he said. "But we thought it was really important to make clear that China's looking at this. And what they're hearing not just from us but from many other countries around the world is: Don't do it."

The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs released a position paper on Friday, calling for a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, the resumption of peace talks, an end to unilateral sanctions and the consideration of sovereignty, territorial integrity and security concerns of all countries. Blinken told ABC News that the U.S. government is "taking a look at it."

"No one wants peace more than the Ukrainians and any proposal that can advance peace is something that's worth looking at," he said. "But, you know, there are 12 points in the Chinese plan. If they were serious about the first one, sovereignty, then this war could end tomorrow."

"China's been trying to have it both ways," he added. "It's on the one hand trying to present itself publicly as neutral and seeking peace, while at the same time it is talking up Russia's false narrative about the war, it is, as I said, providing non-lethal assistance to its companies and now contemplating lethal assistance."