Allen Stanford's Former Security Chief Claims Vindication in Acquittal

The former head of the DEA's Miami office said he feels vindicated by his acquittal on federal charges of helping financier Allen Stanford hide evidence of an alleged $8 billion Ponzi scheme.

"I was an agent for over 30 years and I believed in the United States and I believed in the system and the system didn't fail me," Tom Raffanello told ABC News. "The system proved that what I said from day one was true."

In a rare move, Judge Richard Goldberg interrupted jury deliberations Friday to acquit Raffanello and codefendant Bruce Perraud, saying the evidence against the two former Stanford security employees was s "substantially lacking."

Raffanello, who worked as Stanford's security chief after leaving the DEA, said he never considered plea bargaining.

"I said from day one it wasn't true," said Raffanello. " I offered to correct the record, but no one would listen.

Janice Burton Sharpstein, one of Raffanello's defense attorneys, said the judge's ruling was very rare. "We witnessed a miracle," said Sharpstein, who said such rulings are usually made either before or after the jury deliberates, not during deliberations.

Asked for comment, a spokesperson for the Department of Justice in Washington said, "We're disappointed with the court's ruling."

Raffanello and Perraud were charged with four counts related to the shredding of documents, including obstruction of an SEC investigation and conspiracy, and could have faced up to 50 years in federal prison if convicted. Before going to work for Stanford as his security chief, Raffanello was a DEA agent for nearly 30 years, including a stint as head of the agency's Miami office.

Attorneys for the men had asked for a mistrial Friday after jurors, who began deliberating Thursday, sent a note to the judge saying they were confused about the law. Judge Richard Goldberg acquitted the defendants while the jury was still deliberating.

One of the defense attorneys had told ABC News Thursday he was confident the jury would return a verdict of not guilty. Ed Shohat, lawyer for computer technician Perraud, accused of shredding documents, cited a comment by Judge Goldberg during the trial about the quality of the government's case.

"He said the evidence was extremely thin," said Shohat. "The evidence was slight in this case that the defendants, Tom Raffanello and Bruce Perraud, had any intent to violate the law."

The two shredded documents at Stanford's Fort Lauderdale office in 2009 as the flamboyant financier's banking business was imploding. Stanford, currently awaiting trial in a Texas jail, is accused of ripping off investors in a pyramid scam.

The defense said that Raffanello and Perraud did not violate the law because the shredding was routine and the data was backed up on computers.

Prosecutors alleged that Raffanello had Perraud call in a shredding company even though he knew there was a federal investigation and he was not supposed to destroy documents.

The Miami Herald reported that in court on Wednesday, before the case went to the jury, Judge Richard Goldberg had called the prosecutors' evidence "slim."

A retired DEA agent who attended all but one day of the eight-day trial had echoed defense attorney Shohat's hope that the judge's comment might be reflected in the jury's verdict.

Jim Shedd said he thought the judge was going to throw out the case. "We were surprised when he didn't," said Shedd.

Page
  • 1
  • |
  • 2
Join the Discussion
You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please click here to upgrade your browser in order to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
You Might Also Like...