Insider Trading Case Involves Secrets Shared Among AA Members

PHOTO: Alcoholics Anonymous meeting

In what a government attorney calls the first case of its kind, the Philadelphia office of the SEC has charged five people with making more than $1.8 million illegally through insider trading of stocks. The SEC is claiming that the violation of trust and confidentiality required to prove insider trading occurred between members of Alcoholics Anonymous.

The SEC says Timothy McGee and Michael Zirinsky, both registered representatives of Ameriprise Financial Services, bought and sold stock in Philadelphia Consolidated Holding Corp. (PHLY), based on non-public information about an impending merger between PHLY and Tokio Marine Holdings.

McGee, the SEC claims, got that insider information from a PHLY executive who confided in him, based on the fact they both were members of A.A.

"What we're saying, here, is that the two shared a relationship of confidence and trust, beginning at the time they both started to attend A.A. in 2009," says Elaine Greenberg, associate director of the SEC's Philadelphia Regional office. The two men's relationship extended beyond A.A. For example, they occasionally trained together for triathlons, according to the SEC, and routinely shared confidences about their personal and professional lives. But, says Greenberg, their relationship of trust was heightened by A.A .

That contention matters, because the government, to establish insider trading, must show that a relationship of trust and confidentiality existed above and beyond that of ordinary friendship. The government has to prove, says Greenberg, that the person communicating the information and the one receiving it "have a history of sharing confidences, such that the recipient knows the giver expects him to maintain confidentiality."

Never before has the SEC tried to use as proof a shared membership in A.A..

Jennifer Arlen, professor of law at NYU and specialist in securities fraud, says the Supreme Court long ago established there's nothing illegal about someone trading on material, non-public information. "What's illegal," she clarifies, "is to trade on it in breach of a fiduciary duty to someone, or in breach of some similar relationship of trust and confidence." Might that include the especially trusting relationship encouraged between members of A.A?

One of the group's founding documents, "Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions," warns members against breaking trust or violating confidentiality. It makes no distinction between confidences shared in meetings, and others shared outside.

In this case, says the SEC, the insider information was illegally obtained just after the two men attended an A.A. meeting together in July 2008. The PHLY executive confided in McGee that he felt he was under terrible pressure to bring his company's confidential merger negotiations to a successful end—so much pressure that he feared he might resume drinking. McGee questioned him about the deal, then bought stock in PHLY. Later, when the merger was publicly announced, he made a $292,128 profit when shares shot up 64 percent.

  • 1
  • |
  • 2
Join the Discussion
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like...