Jazzercise Settlement Redefines Who's Fit

ByABC News via logo
May 9, 2002, 10:28 PM

May 10 -- After 15 years of aerobics classes, Jennifer Portnick felt she had the qualifications to become a Jazzercise instructor but she was rejected in a letter stating that applicants should "look leaner than the public."

Portnick, who weighs 240 pounds, said she was both devastated and inspired by the letter. She set out to change the rules and won. After filing a complaint, Jazzercise Inc. agreed it would no longer require instructors to look trim and fit.

For Portnick, 38, the decision was a victory against weight bias.

"One of my goals has been to bring fitness to people who might be intimidated by fitness classes or ashamed of [their] bodies," Portnick told ABCNEWS' Good Morning America. Although she supports weight loss in the classes, it isn't the focus.

"I want to tell larger people who might feel they aren't good enough to be seen in a leotard that they shouldn't have any shame," said Portnick, who works out six days a week.

Applying the 'Fat and Short' Law

Portnick did not file a lawsuit, but she did file a complaint against the company with San Francisco's Human Rights Commission, which mediated the settlement with Jazzercise.

Portnick filed the complaint last September, when Jazzercise sent her a rejection letter after receiving her instructor application. She argued its decision was based on her appearance, and that she was being discriminated under San Francisco's "fat and short" law, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of weight and height.

Jazzercise the world's largest dance-fitness company sent Portnick a letter saying that applicants must have a higher muscle-fat ratio, and look leaner than the public.

The company has since shifted its policy.

"Recent studies document that it may be possible for people of varying weights to be fit," Jazzercise said in statement released as part of the settlement announced Monday. "Jazzercise has determined that the value of 'fit appearance' as a standard is debatable."