Married Beauty Queens Challenge Rules

She won a regional beauty pageant and was all set to compete for the Miss Canada International title when she was unceremoniously stripped of her crown. Her offense: being a single mom.

Last summer, Kalista Zackhariyas, 24, was allowed to participate in the 2003 Miss Vaughan pageant despite being the divorced mother of a 3-year-old son.

But when she won the title and qualified for the Miss Canada International contest — which in turn sends winners on to the Miss World pageant — she was told to forget about any advancement in the pageant pecking order.

An acrimonious war of words between the deposed beauty queen and contest organizers then followed. But in the end, Zackhariyas was banned from the Miss Canada International contest and made to forfeit the Miss Vaughan title. Nearly a year later, the Toronto-based media consultant is still bitter.

"I thought I was going to be a role model for young women, I thought I was going to make a difference," she says. "I don't understand these rules. If I'm single, I'm single. What does it matter if I'm a mother, a sister or an aunt? It doesn't matter, it shouldn't matter."

But to the organizers of the more than 140 national pageants that lead up to the crowning of Miss World, it does indeed matter. For more than half a century, most of the pretty young hopefuls signing up for regional and national qualifying rounds have had to attest they have never been married or pregnant.

It's a requirement a number of participants in recent years have fought, fudged or fibbed about. But they don't always manage to pull it off. And invariably, tiaras are yanked, sashes stripped, and yesterday's pageant queen is declared persona non grata.

Mixed Message: Be Sexy But Still Pure

The latest pageant scandal emerged earlier this year when Laxmi Pandit, winner of the 2004 Miss India contest, handed back her crown after a controversy erupted over her marital status.

Pandit's abdication came a year after Miss Brazil 2003 Joseane Oliveira was stripped of her crown after pageant organizers discovered she was married.

At a news conference in Sao Paulo last year, a tearful Oliveira told reporters she concealed her marriage to enter the pageant because her father was sick and she needed the money.

While Oliveira admitted to lying about her marital status, the circumstances surrounding the Miss India scandal are murkier. Although she turned in her tiara, Pandit insisted she was still single. She said she pretended to be married in order to rent an apartment in Bombay with her boyfriend.

While the controversy rocked a country that still frowns on unwed couples living together, Pandit's predicament has put a spotlight on the housing difficulties many single working women face in Indian cities.

But for pageant organizers, any misrepresentation of contestants' marital statuses — past or present, necessary or opportunistic — is a serious violation.

A spokeswoman for the London-based Miss World Organization said it was unfortunate that Pandit had to misrepresent her status to secure housing. But, she maintained, as role models, applicants must be truthful in filling out their forms.

But for some critics, the assertion that beauty queens function as ideals of modern womanhood is particularly troubling.

Page
  • 1
  • |
  • 2
Join the Discussion
You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please click here to upgrade your browser in order to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
You Might Also Like...