While Social Security long has been seen as the deadly third rail of American politics, an ABC News/Washington Post poll finds that state budgets may in fact pose the greater hazard to ax-wielding lawmakers.
Beyond freezing pay and trimming pensions for new hires, state governments have little leeway in terms of public support for cost-cutting measures. Sizable majorities of Americans, six in 10 or more, reject 10 out of 12 state deficit-cutting approaches tested in this poll. The choices are so poor that raising or enacting taxes, while far from popular, are among the less unpopular options.
Nor does reducing union bargaining rights – the Wisconsin approach – look like a popular solution. Sixty-seven percent in this poll, produced for ABC News by Langer Research Associates, say workers employed by state governments should have a right to form unions to negotiate their working conditions, pay, benefits and pensions. (More, 81 percent, say all workers in general should have that right.)
Perhaps surprisingly, there may be a little more wiggle room for lawmakers in Washington eyeing Social Security. Despite the system's "touch it and die" reputation, one option gets narrow majority support – lifting the cap on the amount of income that's taxed to fund benefits. And two others, reducing early retirement benefits and slowing the rate of growth in benefits, approach a split decision.
One impetus could be the sense of risk: Eighty-one percent of Americans see a crisis ahead for Social Security if changes aren't made, up 10 points from six years ago. And more than half now favor "major" changes to keep the system secure. Given those shifts, support for proposed changes to Social Security has gained in several cases, even when it still falls short (sometimes well short) of a majority.
STATE CUTS – State-level budget battles, for their part, look highly hazardous. Fifty-five percent of Americans favor freezing wages for state employees; 51 percent back reducing pension benefits for new state workers. But a range of other state budget options are off the table in terms of public support, several emphatically so. The rundown:
- Opposition is broadest and deepest to laying off firefighters (89 percent opposed) teachers (86 percent) or police officers (again 86 percent). At least seven in 10 "strongly" oppose each of these.
- More than three-quarters reject reducing state aid to public schools (79 percent opposed, with 64 percent strongly opposed), cutting state funding for Medicaid (76 percent opposed) or closing or limiting access to state parks and recreation facilities (also 76 percent).
- Fewer but still significant majorities oppose increasing or enacting a state income tax (63 percent) or sales tax (61 percent), reducing spending on roads and infrastructure (61 percent) or laying off state employees in general (60 percent). Raising or enacting either a sales or income tax is "strongly" opposed by 45 percent.
While cutting police and firefighter positions are unpopular across the board, views on other proposals break down along customary partisan lines. Democrats, liberals and critics of the Tea Party political movement are all significantly more likely to oppose the remaining proposals that involve reductions in the public sector, and less critical of higher taxes.