All parents must wonder from time to time why their children, produced by the same gene pool, can be so different from each other. Often even siblings who look the same and are raised in essentially the same environment can be like night and day, opposites in so many ways.
How can that be? Why are we all unique?
Scientists at three institutions have pooled their resources and come up with a surprising clue. Even the collection of genes we inherit from our parents, while nearly identical for all members of the human family, are structured quite differently than we have been told over the last few decades.
"One of the interesting observations that has come out of the human genome project over the last five years or so is the broad sweeping statement that if you compare the DNA in any two genomes in the population they are 99.9 percent identical," says geneticist Stephen Scherer of The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, one of the lead authors of a major study published in the September issue of the journal Nature Genetics.
"So my genome and Bill Clinton's are 99.9 percent identical," Scherer says with a chuckle. DNA, which consists of two strands of chemical compounds, called nucleotides, linked together to form a ladder that has been twisted into the shape of a winding staircase, carries the individual blueprint for every creature on the planet. All humans share 99.9 percent of the same nucleotides, a remarkable number that makes it hard to figure out why we are all very distinct individuals.
"It means we all have a common heritage, and it sounds like we are nearly identical, but if you think about the size of the genome, you inherit 3 billion pairs of nucleotides, or chemical bases of genetic information, from your mom and your dad. So even 0.1 percent difference is still 3 million chemical base changes, so that's a lot."
And it is that 3 million different sources of genetic information that make us each different, scientists have argued.
"That's what we believed," Scherer says. "That's what I taught my students."
But that's probably going to change now. Scherer says he was "astonished" when early results of a research project at his hospital began coming in. He soon learned of similar results at other studies underway at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, and researchers at all three institutions decided to pool their resources.
What came out of all of that is research that could reshape our understanding of why each of us is different, and why some of us may be more prone to certain diseases than others. The difference, the researchers say, is not just in the number of small changes in the tiny points on both sides of that twisted ladder where genetic information is stored. The difference is in the numbers.
It's sort of like some ladders having more rungs, and others fewer.
DNA continually replicates, or copies, itself so that each descendent cell carries the same genetic information down the line, and it had been thought that the process of replication was essentially the same for all normal individuals. It is that assumption that the new research challenges.
"When we first made the observation we thought, wow, there's people walking around who are apparently healthy who are missing half a million nucleotides on one chromosome or in some cases gained half a million and it doesn't seem to affect them," Scherer says.
These changes, consisting of additions or omissions in the number of copies that the DNA makes of itself, were thought to exist in the form of "large-scale copy variations," but fairly rarely among normal individuals. That turns out to be wrong.
All together, the researchers studied 50 individuals and found that, on average, each person had 12 large-scale copy variations. That's a whopping number, especially if you try to imagine climbing a ladder with 12 rungs missing, and the researchers think those changes, which can extend over a considerable area of each genome, may help explain a lot about who we are.
More Rungs, More Disease?
It might even help scientists detect diseases much earlier. The most common variation involved amylase genes, which help the body break down starches, and Charles Lee of Harvard, co-principal investigator, finds that particularly intriguing.
"Our study shows that some people may have 10 copies of this gene while others may have as much as 24 copies of this same gene," Lee says. "It would be really exciting if we found that an increased copy number of these genes was associated with increased susceptibility to pancreatic diseases or cancer. This would allow us to use these (large-scale changes) as disease markers."
That could be a huge benefit in early detection of certain diseases.
But of course, all of this makes it sound like we're just a bunch of genetic robots, complying with blueprints that preordained that we would become just what we are. That's a common thought among geneticists and biologists, but Scherer, for one, disagrees. He still thinks our environment plays a major role in determining our uniqueness.
"It's the old nature vs. nurture debate," he says. That debate is being turned on its ear by research that wasn't possible just a few years ago.
"It's amazing how quickly things are happening in this field," Scherer says. "We're finding some traits that some of us, including myself, thought were entirely environmental, which in fact are almost entirely genetic. On the other hand, we're finding other things that we thought were genetic that are more influenced by the environment."
In the end, he says, if we ever really understand it, we will probably find that it is an equal measure of both that makes us what we are.
"A lot of the hardwiring is genetics," he says. "The reason you look like your parents is the genetics. But the environment really does tweak. You are programmed to develop to a certain height, but you may not achieve that because of nutrition changes, so environment clearly is going to be involved in tweaking some of the physical characteristics.
"But the behavioral? That's the real question mark. We don't know."
Do we act the way we do because of our blueprint? Or do mom and pop still make a huge difference?
It's probably both, Scherer says. "Everything seems to balance out in the end."
Lee Dye’s column appears weekly on ABCNEWS.com. A former science writer for the Los Angeles Times, he now lives in Juneau, Alaska.