Is Recycling Worth the Trouble, Cost?

The value of recycling aluminum, however, is generally agreed upon since it is a metal, and producing a can out of virgin ore instead of recycled aluminum uses up half the can's volume in gasoline.

In Taylor's view, recycling is largely a hoax. "Recycling has been sold as a civic act of spiritual atonement for the high standards of living that we engage in," Taylor said. "One way to atone for these terrible sins we inflict on the planet is to sort our plastic from our paper from our tin. It's an easy way for people to feel better and helps us assuage some of that guilt."

Use It or Lose It?

Advocates of recycling say these arguments miss the point. Yes, recycling can be costly for some cities, especially if it isn't done properly and efficiently. But we don't recycle to save money, they say, we do it to save the planet.

"In economic terms, it's very often a losing proposition but the thing is, human work does not have the same environmental consequences that exploiting virgin resources has. From a sustainability point of view, recycling has value," said John Tiemstra, a professor of economics at Calvin College in Grand Rapids, Mich.

Proponents of recycling probably oversold it by downplaying costs, says Chaz Miller, director of state programs for the National Solid Wastes Management Association. But Americans recycle anyway.

"People want to recycle because they believe they're saving resources," Miller said. "Clearly some materials can be used again. Clearly you're saving energy when you're reusing instead of using a virgin product."

"Whether for a good or a bad reason, Americans absolutely love recycling. That's OK as long as they understand it ain't free," Miller said.

Indeed, Americans have taken to being "green" — we recycle almost a third of the solid waste we produce. Recycling programs are more popular than ever, as 25 million Americans now have access to recycling programs.

But advocates worry that if recycling programs are dismantled due to budget problems, even temporarily, consumers will fall out of practice. Already, public education is a huge factor in making recycling work. When consumers don't sort and clean their recyclables, the costs of labor go up along with potential for contamination.

It's Only Natural

Some advocates also dispute the notion that recycling is economically unsound. The National Recycling Coalition recently released a study on recycling's economic benefits showing that 1.1 million Americans work in the recycling industry, comprising an annual payroll of $37 billion.

But experts are still looking for ways to make recycling more efficient and attractive.

Pay-as-you-throw programs, where consumers pay more to toss out more garbage, are believed to have a built-in economic incentive to recycle. Los Angeles, San Francisco and Seattle are among the cities that have already adopted such plans.

Another option, Tiemstra says, is to charge a tax at the time of purchase based on how much goods weigh. Consumers can get a rebate on the fee if they recycle the product.

Reducing the materials used in products and packaging through manufacture and design is another way to cut costs. Since 1977, the weight of 2-liter plastic soft drink bottles has been reduced from 68 grams each to 51 grams.

Costs aside, environmentalists still say recycling pays.

"Should people waste natural resources? That's what happens, you waste it when you throw it in the landfill," said Kate Krebs, interim executive director of the National Recycling Coalition. "That really gets to the fundamental makeup of a human being. It goes against nature."

Page
  • 1
  • |
  • 2
Join the Discussion
You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please click here to upgrade your browser in order to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
You Might Also Like...