Review: 'Assassin's Creed' Is the Worst Movie Michael Fassbender Has Done

Why the great actors in this film don't save the plot.

— -- Rated PG-13

One and a half out of five stars

“Assassin’s Creed,” based on the hit video game series of the same name, is the most stylized terrible film I’ve ever seen.

Fassbender is Cal Lynch, who as a young man may or may not have witnessed his father murder his mother. Fast-forward to adult Cal, who’s on death row and whom we watch as he’s executed via lethal injection. Then cut to ... some sort of medical facility or hospital room, where Sofia (Cotillard) greets Cal, telling him that he’s actually alive but the rest of the world thinks he’s dead.

In Cal’s case, the animus takes him to 1492 Spain, where, for all intents and purposes, he becomes his ancestor — an assassin named Aguilar. He and his fellow assassins are the guardians of the Apple of Eden, a thing that will unlock the secrets of free will — I think. I’m not really sure. All I know is Sofia and her dad (Jeremy Irons) need that apple, because it turns out they’re Templars, and the Templars are the sworn enemies of the Assassin’s Creed, dontcha know!

In the filmmakers’ defense, there’s decent fight choreography here and stunning CGI. What there isn’t is much of a story. That’s because character development is integral to a good story, and the character development here mostly involves lots of emoting and preening. It’s all fun to look at, but there’s nothing that will make you care about the characters or really make you want to see things through to the climax, which feels completely emotionally detached from the rest of the picture.

“Assassin’s Creed” is easily the worst movie Fassbender and Cotillard have ever participated in, and given that they’re both terrific actors, I can fault them only for choosing so poorly.

Top Stories

Top Stories

Top Stories

Top Stories

ABC News Live

ABC News Live

24/7 coverage of breaking news and live events